Tips from Other Journals
Diagnostic Proficiency and Use of Cardiac Auscultation
FREE PREVIEW Log in or buy this issue to read the full article. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles. Subscribe now.
FREE PREVIEW Subscribe or buy this issue. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles.
Am Fam Physician. 1998 Apr 1;57(7):1648-1653.
Because of the recent shift toward managed care and the accompanying pressures to contain costs of diagnosis, physical examination skills are under increased scrutiny. Mangione and Nieman conducted a cross-sectional assessment of internal medicine and family practice residents to determine their proficiency in using cardiac auscultation to identify various cardiac events.
Auscultatory skills were evaluated in 198 internal medicine and 255 family practice residents. Study participants listened to 12 different cardiac events (such as mitral regurgitation or S3 gallops) and then answered a multiple-choice questionnaire regarding the presence or absence of the sound and its characteristics. The resident's cumulative score reflected accuracy in recognizing six extra sounds, six murmurs and 12 auscultatory events. Participants also completed a one-page questionnaire assessing their motivation to learn cardiac auscultation and their level of confidence in their skills. A smaller group of third- and fourth-year medical students was also assessed for comparison.
The internal medicine residents were significantly more proficient than the family practice residents at identifying the 12 cardiac events and the six extra sounds. However, the residents' scores were never significantly better than those of the medical students. Overall, internal medicine and family practice residents correctly identified about 20 percent of the cardiac sounds. Family practice residents were never more accurate than the medical students and were significantly less accurate than the medical students in identifying some sounds (specifically, early systolic clicks and aortic stenosis murmurs). Although some residents had had more training and felt more confidence in their auscultatory skills, this confidence did not actually manifest itself as improved accuracy. Those who listened to teaching audiotapes and those who could play a musical instrument were more proficient at cardiac auscultation.
The authors conclude that training in cardiac auscultation is lacking and that there were no significant improvements as residents progressed to higher levels of training. They recommend that the boards of internal medicine and family practice consider adding the evaluation of cardiac auscultation skills to their certifying examinations.
Mangione S, Nieman LZ. Cardiac auscultatory skills of internal medicine and family practice trainees. A comparison of diagnostic proficiency. JAMA. 1997 September;278:717–22.
Copyright © 1998 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact email@example.com for copyright questions and/or permission requests.
Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions