Letters to the Editor
Bacterial Vaginosis: What's in a Name?
FREE PREVIEW Log in or buy this issue to read the full article. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles. Subscribe now.
FREE PREVIEW Subscribe or buy this issue. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles.
Am Fam Physician. 1998 Jun 1;57(11):2616.
to the editor: While I realize that there are more pressing issues in medicine than the one I am raising, I wish physicians could resolve to correct the anomalous terminology we use when discussing “a polymicrobial superficial vaginal infection involving a loss of the normal lactobacilli and an overgrowth of anaerobes.”1
The suffix -osis, most properly applied to Greek stems only, shouldn't be used with the Latin stem vagin- to begin with. If that were the only problem, I probably wouldn't lose any sleep over it. The deeper problem lies in the meaning of the suffix -osis, which is a “production or increase (of the stem) . . . an invasion and increase within the organism (of the stem).” Thus diverticulosis is excessive generation of diverticuli, and listeriosis is invasion by and multiplication of Listeria. However, I almost cannot stand the thought of bacteria sporting an excess number of vaginas, or worse yet, bacteria being invaded by proliferating vaginas, either of which could be suggested by the term, “bacterial vaginosis,” and neither of which characterizes the entity itself.
Now some will protest that this poor clinical entity has already suffered too many name changes as it is, from “nonspecific vaginitis” to “Gardnerella vaginitis” to “bacterial vaginosis,” and should be allowed to rest in peace. But I suggest that the entity could, in the interest of consistent nomenclature, and in the interest of shutting down the fantastic images conjured by the present terminology, tolerate one more change, to “vaginal bacteriosis,” which means “overgrowth of bacteria in the vagina,” and accurately describes the entity. Or, if we must retain the abbreviation “BV,” then we could change the term to “bacterial vaginopathy.”
1. Majeroni BA. Bacterial vaginosis: an update. Am Fam Physician. 1998;57:1285–9.
2. Stedman TL. Stedman's Medical Dictionary. 25th ed. New York: Macmillan, 1990:105.
Send letters to Kenneth W. Lin, MD, MPH, Associate Deputy Editor for AFP Online, e-mail: email@example.com, or 11400 Tomahawk Creek Pkwy., Leawood, KS 66211-2680.
Please include your complete address, e-mail address, and telephone number. Letters should be fewer than 400 words and limited to six references, one table or figure, and three authors.
Letters submitted for publication in AFP must not be submitted to any other publication. Possible conflicts of interest must be disclosed at time of submission. Submission of a letter will be construed as granting the American Academy of Family Physicians permission to publish the letter in any of its publications in any form. The editors may edit letters to meet style and space requirements.
Copyright © 1998 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact firstname.lastname@example.org for copyright questions and/or permission requests.
Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions