DOT Examinations: Practical Aspects and Regulatory Review
Am Fam Physician. 1998 Aug 1;58(2):415-426.
Most certification examinations of commercial drivers are simple, and relatively few drivers are disqualified. If these examinations are not done properly, however, the public can be exposed to potentially unqualified drivers. Should an accident occur, the physician who examined the driver may be found liable. In performing driver certification examinations, the physician's primary responsibility is to the public. The Federal Motor Carriers Safety Regulations and supporting documents provide guidelines for the conditions that may be disqualifying and the conditions that may allow only temporary certification until better medical control is achieved. Some medical diagnoses, such as insulin-requiring diabetes mellitus, are automatically disqualifying, no matter how well the disease is controlled. Other conditions may require documented clearance from a specialist before certification is granted.
More than 6 million drivers operate commercial vehicles in interstate commerce. Federal Motor Carriers Safety Regulations (FMCSRs) require most of these drivers to be certified by a medical examiner.1 The physical examination to comply with these federal regulations, commonly called the DOT (Department of Transportation) examination, is one of the most frequently performed ambulatory procedures. However, training in performing this examination is rarely offered, and concise guidelines are seldom available.
Incompetent performance of the DOT examination can result in physician liability. In one court case,2 a physician was found negligent for certifying a driver who was blind in one eye, had very poor vision in his other eye and had previously been rated 100 percent disabled due to multiple physical impairments. This driver was involved in a fatal accident that probably would not have occurred if his vision and reaction times had been normal.
While negligent DOT medical examinations have only rarely resulted in accidents and lawsuits, inattention to detail during these screening procedures may not be that unusual. The authors of this article have noticed that many drivers are surprised when they receive a more than cursory certification examination. This is indirect evidence that their previous medical examinations may not have been thorough.
In 1992, the FMCSRs were amended to allow physician assistants, advanced nurse practitioners and chiropractic physicians to perform DOT certification examinations, provided that their state license permits them to carry out examinations of this type. All examiners who perform these examinations should be familiar with the conditions that preclude driver certification, and they should be prepared to deal with common medical problems, such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and vision and hearing deficits. It should be emphasized, however, that any condition can be disqualifying if it is severe enough to affect the driver's ability to operate a motor vehicle safely.
The cases summarized in this article illustrate sections of the regulatory requirements and provide guidance for discussing potentially disqualifying conditions with drivers.
Guidance from the Federal Highway Administration
Most primary care physicians are familiar with the physical examination form published in the FMCSRs. This form, which contains brief instructions for performing the certification examination, is used almost universally, even though it was published only as an example. Physicians may devise their own examination form if it covers at least the same information as the published form.
The FMCSRs also list 13 conditions that can disallow driver certification. Four of these conditions always require denial of certification: insulin-treated diabetes mellitus, seizure disorders, significant vision deficits and significant hearing deficits. The 13 sections of the regulations are summarized in Table 1.1,3–8 Detailed regulatory criteria statements on each of these conditions are available from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA).
TABLE 1 Summary of Federal Motor Carriers Safety Regulations, Regulatory Criteria and Reports of Expert Panels
Summary of Federal Motor Carriers Safety Regulations, Regulatory Criteria and Reports of Expert Panels
Loss of foot, leg, hand or arm
The driver is medically disqualified unless a waiver has been obtained from the regional director of motor carriers. If the driver is otherwise medically qualified, the examining physician should check the statement “medically unqualified unless accompanied by a waiver” on the examination form and certificate.
Impairments of hand or lower extremity
Any significant limb defect that interferes with the ability to perform tasks associated with operating a motor vehicle is disqualifying or requires a waiver (e.g., fused or immobile knee or hip, partial paralysis, etc.).
A driver taking insulin cannot be certified for interstate driving. However, a driver who has diabetes that is controlled by oral medications and diet may be qualified if the disease is well controlled and the driver is under medical supervision. Documentation from the driver's physician should be obtained. If diabetes is untreated or uncontrolled, certification should not be given.
Current diagnosis of cardiovascular disease
Any condition known to be accompanied by sudden and unexpected syncope, collapse or congestive heart failure is disqualifying. Conditions such as myocardial infarction, angina and cardiac dysrhythmias should probably be evaluated rigorously by a cardiologist before certification is issued. Holter monitors and exercise stress tests may be needed when a driver has multiple risk factors and other questions need to be answered. Tachycardia or bradycardia should be investigated to rule out underlying cardiac disease. Asymptomatic dysrhythmia with no underlying disease process should not be disqualifying.
Established history or diagnosis of respiratory dysfunction
If a driver has clear symptoms of significant pulmonary disease, basic spirometry and lung volume tests are recommended. If the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) is less than 65 percent of predicted value, the forced vital capacity (FVC) is less than 60 percent of predicted or the ratio of FEV1 to FVC is less than 65 percent, pulse oximetry should be performed. If pulse oximetry on room air is less than 92 percent, an arterial blood gas measurement is recommended. If the partial pressure of arterial oxygen is less than 65 mm Hg or the partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide is more than 45 mm Hg, disqualification is recommended.
If the blood pressure is 160/90 mm Hg or lower, a full two-year certification is appropriate. If the blood pressure is higher than 160/90 mm Hg (either systolic or diastolic) but lower than 181/105 mm Hg, temporary certification may be granted for three months to allow time for the driver to be evaluated and treated. If the initial pressure is 181/105 mm Hg or higher, the driver should not be certified. Once treatment has brought a driver's blood pressure under control, certification should be issued for no more than one year at a time. Note that several readings should be taken over several days to rule out “white coat” hypertension. Significant target organ damage and additional risk factors increase the risk of sudden collapse and should be disqualifying.
Musculoskeletal, neurologic or vascular diseases
Depending on severity, any condition (physical, mental or functional) can be disqualifying if it can significantly impair a driver's ability to control a motor vehicle or to react to emergencies.
A driver with a clinical diagnosis of epilepsy and recurrent seizures of any etiology should never be certified. A driver who has had an isolated seizure or episode of syncope may be certified, but only if the driver is not taking medications and has been free of seizures for five years following an isolated idiopathic seizure and for 10 years following multiple seizures. Febrile seizures of childhood are not disqualifying. All questionable cases should be cleared by a neurologist.
Mental, nervous, organic or psychiatric disorders
Mental conditions that can affect judgment, perception of reality and reaction times may be disqualifying. When in doubt, the examining physician should have the driver obtain clearance from a psychiatrist or a neurologist. Medications required for mental conditions may be disqualifying if they can alter consciousness or reaction times.
Vision less than 20/40 in each eye
Vision must be at least 20/40 in each eye with or without correction. Certification can be given once vision has been corrected, but not until. The driver should be advised to have his or her eyes evaluated, obtain corrective lenses and then return for certification. Field of vision must be at least 70 degrees in each eye. Color vision must allow recognition of standard traffic signals (i.e., red, green and amber).
Hearing loss of more than an average of 40 dB in the best ear at 500, 1,000 and 2,000 Hz
The driver should pass a whispered voice test at five feet in at least one ear. A hearing aid may be worn for the test. If the test result is questionable, an audiogram is recommended. The better ear must not have an average hearing loss of more than 40 dB at 500, 1,000 and 2,000 Hz (to obtain an average, add the three decibel losses together and divide by 3).
Use of schedule I drugs and consciousness-altering drugs
Use of a schedule I drug or any other consciousness-altering substance, an amphetamine, a narcotic or any other habit-forming drug is cause for the driver to be found medically unqualified. Use of other prescription medications is not an automatic disqualifier; however, the condition being treated, the medications prescribed and the dosage level must be consistent with the safe performance of the driver's duties.
Current diagnosis of alcoholism
The term “current diagnosis” is meant to encompass those instances in which the physical and mental condition of the driver with alcoholism has not fully stabilized, regardless of the time element. If the severity or extent of the problem is uncertain, the examining physician may refer the driver to a substance abuse counselor for evaluation and clearance.
Reports from expert panels3–8 provide the most comprehensive advice on performing the DOT certification examination, the situations requiring additional tests and the conditions for which disqualification is required or recommended. These reports cover many cardiac, pulmonary, neurologic, psychiatric and diabetic disorders, as well as vision and hearing deficits. The cardiovascular report3 covers valvular heart disease, congenital heart disease and arrhythmias, as well as numerous other disorders. The report on neurologic disorders4 addresses cerebrovascular problems, headaches, vertigo and dementias. Compared with the FMCSRs, which provide general guidelines, the DOT expert panel reports recommend disqualification for a wide variety of specific disorders.
The text of the DOT monographs and other FHWA regulations can be obtained from the National Technical Information Service and through the Internet. If information about a specific problem is not available, physicians may contact the FHWA. Several resources for physicians are listed in Table 2.
Table 2 Sources for Information about DOT Examinations
Sources for Information about DOT Examinations
Agencies and information services
Federal Highway Administration
Office of Motor Carrier Research and Standards
400 7th St., S.W.
Washington, DC 20590
National Technical Information Service
5285 Port Royal Rd.
Springfield, VA 22161
Federal Highway Administration home page: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov
Regulations and regulatory criteria: http://www.acoem.com/dot/dotregs.html
Physicians' Approach to the DOT Examination
In performing the DOT medical certification examination, physicians and other examiners should remember that their primary responsibility is to the public—not, as in the usual office visit, to the patient. The intent of the DOT examination is to detect physical or mental defects of “such a character and extent as to affect the applicant's ability to operate a motor vehicle safely.”1 Therefore, the examiner should be prepared to decline, defer or limit the duration of certification if significant questions are raised about a driver's ability to operate a commercial vehicle safely.
One case series of 526 DOT certification examinations9,10 found that 22 (4 percent) commercial drivers had diabetes mellitus and 23 (4 percent) had blood pressures above 160/90 mm Hg. Furthermore, 44 (8 percent) of the drivers were receiving medication for hypertension, and 18 (3 percent) had a history of a major cardiac event, such as bypass surgery, angioplasty or arrhythmias.
Based on this case series and the experience of the authors of this article, approximately 5 to 10 percent of drivers may initially be denied certification pending the results of additional studies and/or verification of medical records. Although very few drivers are ultimately denied certification, examiners should remember that investigators will almost certainly review the records of the certification examination following any significant motor vehicle accident involving a commercial driver.
Declining, Deferring or Limiting Certification
Allowing a therapeutic trial of driving for a person with a serious medical condition is not an option. This point is a particularly important one for physicians or other examiners who may be asked to certify their own patients with known medical problems. In certain situations, it may be necessary to tactfully decline to perform a certification examination. Alternatively, examiners can defer certification until disqualifying conditions are corrected or brought under acceptable control.
Illustrative Case 1: Declining Certification for a Disallowed Medical Condition. The driver has insulin-treated diabetes mellitus. The examiner says,“I'm sorry, but you cannot take insulin and be certified for driving. The safety risk is just too great, and certification is against federal regulations.”
Illustrative Case 2: Deferring Certification for a Correctable Vision Problem. Wearing glasses, the driver has a distant visual acuity of 20/40 in one eye and 20/70 in the other eye. The examiner says, “You need 20/40 vision in each eye. I think you probably need new glasses. We can finish the rest of the examination and complete the paperwork if new glasses correct your vision.”
Occasionally, a driver's desire to remain certified can provide a strong incentive to comply with needed medical treatment. Medical examiners have the option of limiting certification to any length of time less than two years. If, for example, the physician has questions about the driver's compliance with needed treatment, limiting the duration of medical certification to one or two months at a time can be an extremely useful option. Hypertension, diabetes mellitus and pulmonary diseases are conditions for which certification might be limited.
Illustrative Case 3: Limiting Certification for a Chronic Condition. A driver has a blood pressure higher than 200/110 mm Hg. He has not been compliant with antihypertensive drug therapy in the past. After he has taken medication for a week, his blood pressure goes down to 158/86 mm Hg, and he requests DOT certification. The examiner says, “Your pressure is under control now, but it has been erratic. I will certify you for only two months at a time to be sure that your blood pressure stays under control. If your blood pressure remains under control, we may be able to get you certified for a longer time.”
Practical Aspects of the DOT Examination
Most disqualifying medical problems are identified during initial screening. A nurse or experienced office assistant should obtain a brief history, take vital signs and record any medications the driver is taking (Table 3). Only a few minutes are needed to inquire about the most common and important disqualifying conditions, which include problems with blood pressure, vision, hearing and cardiopulmonary fitness (Table 1).
TABLE 3 Suggested Protocol for DOT Examinations
Suggested Protocol for DOT Examinations
Screening by clinical staff
Measure the driver's height, weight, pulse (before exercise) and blood pressure.
If necessary, help the driver complete the medical history form.
Write notes regarding significant findings.
Ask all questions.
Check visual acuity and color vision.
Perform the whispered voice test. The following is a suggested script: “Please face the wall, and cover your right ear with your hand. Repeat the numbers that I whisper. Repeat these numbers: 26, 4 (driver repeats numbers); 17, 39 (driver repeats numbers); 7, 6, 3, 9 (driver repeats numbers).” The test is repeated with the left ear covered, using other number sequences.
Pulse after exercise
Have the driver jog in place for two minutes. Take pulse again and record.
Look for signs of dyspnea and/or angina.
Check the pulse for dysrhythmias, tachycardia and/or bradycardia. Dysrhythmias may suggest a need for electrocardiography.
Collect urine for drug screening first (if required).
Excess urine may be used for urinalysis (required).
Record the findings of the screening tests on the examination form.
Complete applicable sections of the examination form and the driver's certification card.
Inform the physician of significant findings or problems.
Physical examination by the physician
Review the driver's medical history and medication use.
Review any comments from clinical staff.
Briefly review symptoms and screening data for “red flags.”
Observe the driver's movements, range of motion and coordination.
If necessary, perform a more targeted examination.
Examine the major organ systems as noted on the medical form.
Review regulations and check references, if necessary.
Ask for, or obtain, additional tests, medical records or clearances, if needed.
Record objective information on the medical form.
Unrestricted certification should be for two years from the date of examination.
If a driver has a medical condition that requires periodic monitoring (e.g., hypertension or type 2 [noninsulin-dependent] diabetes), certification should probably be given for no more than one year.
Check appropriate “qualified only when ...” section on the form and the examination certificate.
Illustrative Case 4: Deteriorating Color Vision. A driver with type 2 (non–insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus previously did well on the color discrimination vision screening test. Now he has trouble with red-green discrimination. The examiner says, “Your color vision is not as good as it was last time. I think it's time to see an ophthalmologist and find out what is causing your vision to deteriorate. I also want you to return tomorrow for fasting blood sugar measurements.”
Illustrative Case 5: Hearing Problems. A driver fails the whispered voice test. When tested with a recently calibrated audiometer, he has a hearing loss of more than 40 dB in both ears. The examiner says, “First, we will recheck you in two weeks to give you some time to get over this cold. Then we will test your hearing again after you have had a quiet weekend. If your hearing is still this bad, you'll need to wear a hearing aid to be certified.”
Illustrative Case 6: Borderline Hypertension. On the day of the DOT examination, a driver's lowest blood pressure is 165/95 mm Hg. The examiner comments, “Your blood pressure is high. We need to recheck it over the next few days. If it is lower, you can be certified. If it remains elevated, we can give you a three-month certification while you get your blood pressure under control. Here is some information that will explain what you should do” (Figure 1).
Although the medical history is probably the most important component of the examination process, it is often neglected. Even if a driver reports no problems on the history section of the examination form, the physician should inquire about significant medical conditions. This is especially important when the physician is unfamiliar with the driver being examined. The physician may ask the following questions: “Do you have any medical problems? Are you taking any medications? Are you under a doctor's care for any reason? Have you ever had a seizure, passed out or lost consciousness?” If the responses to these questions raise any concerns, the physician should obtain a more thorough history and perform a more targeted examination.
Physicians who design their own examination form might include a comprehensive history section with a space for the driver's signature. If a driver is asked directly about specific health problems and is then required to attest to the accuracy of statements, he or she is likely to disclose information that otherwise might not be offered. This approach may also provide some protection for the examiner should legal challenges arise.
Illustrative Case 7: History of Myocardial Infarction. A driver recalls having had a myocardial infarction only after he is specifically asked about this heart problem. He states that he did not see a question about myocardial infarction in the history section of the examination form. He has, however, had no problems for over six months and has recently seen his cardiologist. The examiner responds, “I think you may be certified, but I need to review the results of the treadmill test you took last month and get a letter from your cardiologist stating that you are cleared to drive.”
With completely healthy, young drivers, the physician component of the examination may take less than seven minutes. The physician should review the history and screening test results while observing the driver as he or she sits, stands and moves around the examination room. If the physician notices that the driver has a gait or coordination problem, additional questions should be asked and a more targeted examination should be performed. Generally, however, the physician should be able to perform a basic physical examination according to the protocol presented in Table 3. In addition to a review of the history and screening tests, emphasis should be placed on auscultation of the heart and lungs, the findings of common neurologic tests and a determination of musculoskeletal system integrity. Less emphasis generally should be given to the genital, urinary and digestive systems, which are unlikely to cause safety-related problems. Of course, the physician should remember that any medical disorder or combination of disorders and risk factors can be grounds for the denial of certification if the overall condition of the driver is severe enough to affect the safe operation of a vehicle.
Need for Additional Objective Information
In deciding when additional testing is required, the physician should consider two factors: (1) the potential of the condition to cause sudden loss of consciousness or loss of control and (2) the presence of additional risk factors or target organ damage that can aggravate the condition.
In addition, the physician might double-check his or her own judgment by considering the following questions: “Is this driver with multiple risk factors and an irregular pulse at high risk for sudden loss of consciousness?” and “Would I want my children to ride in a bus this person is driving?” In short, if any condition or combination of risk factors causes concern, additional objective information and/or clearance from a specialist is appropriate.
Appropriateness of Tests
The role of the physician in the DOT examination process is not to “diagnose” but to determine if the driver can operate a vehicle safely. Thus, diagnostic tests generally should not be ordered if functional tests show that a driver has the capacity to operate a vehicle safely. For example, a radiograph probably does not need to be obtained for a driver with a painful shoulder if range of motion, reaction times and strength are normal.
Certain medical problems almost always warrant additional tests. For example, a fasting blood sugar or glycohemoglobin level should almost certainly be obtained in an obese driver with urine dipstick findings of 2+ glucose and 1+ protein. Pending evaluation, this driver should be certified only temporarily, if at all. Pulse oximetry, pulmonary function tests and arterial blood gases should be considered if a driver's pulmonary status is in question.
Obtaining Clearance from a Specialist
When a driver has a disorder that is outside the examining physician's area of expertise or zone of comfort, clearance from a specialist may be prudent. It is not appropriate to use specialists to “clear” drivers with disorders that the initial examiner already knows to be incompatible with safe driving. Rather, the role of the specialist is primarily to clarify questions involving borderline or complex cases.
Following most significant cardiac events, such as a myocardial infarction, an invasive cardiac procedure or a serious rhythm disturbance, a driver almost always should be cleared by a cardiologist.11,12 A driver with a disorder that has significant effects on the neurologic or musculoskeletal system may need to be cleared by a neurologist or a physiatrist.13,14
Illustrative Case 8: Abnormal Neurologic Findings. A driver known to the examining physician presents with a positive Romberg test, a slightly ataxic gait and nonreactive pupils that were not noted on previous examinations. The examiner says,“These tests show an abnormality that could affect not only your driving but also your health. I'll have my nurse make an appointment for you with a neurologist. These test findings need to be evaluated, and the problem must be corrected before you can be certified.”
Illustrative Case 9: Asthma or Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. A driver with steroid-dependent asthma has been seen in an emergency department for exacerbations of asthma twice in the past six months. He is wheezing, and his pulse oximetry shows 93 percent saturation. The examiner responds, “Your asthma needs to be better controlled before you can be certified. A pulmonary specialist may be able to set up a more effective treatment plan, so that your condition is not so fragile.”
In most instances, the physician who notices a potentially disqualifying condition in a driver should complete the remainder of the examination pending final disposition. Certification, however, should not be given until all questionable findings have been adequately addressed.
It is not uncommon for physicians to be caught in uncomfortable situations during the course of certification examinations. For example, an unemployed driver may lose a desperately needed job if he or she cannot be certified by the next day. The examination may suggest that the mental status of an older driver with years of safe vehicle operation may be deteriorating. In other instances, medical opinions may differ concerning what constitutes reasonable control or follow-up for hypertension or type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Unfortunately, the regulations and supporting literature do not provide firm guidance for every set of circumstances. In the final analysis, public safety is the most important consideration in a DOT certification examination, followed by the driver's health.
Illustrative Case 10: Responding to Objections. A driver had a thromboembolic stroke three years ago and has residual hemiparesis. After the stroke, he was certified by another physician, and he now demands recertification. The examiner responds, “I am sorry, but the Department of Transportation held a conference of experts to discuss conditions like yours. The experts concluded that such conditions are not compatible with safe driving. If you have an accident, both you and I would be held accountable.”
Dealing with a driver who has diabetes mellitus but does not use insulin is particularly difficult, because treatment guidelines clearly call for tight control of blood sugar levels15 (Table 4).16 However, tight control substantially increases the chance of hypoglycemic reactions (Table 5). Newer oral medications for diabetes may cause less hypoglycemia while still controlling blood sugar levels. Use of these medications should be considered in diabetic drivers who might not otherwise be allowed to operate a commercial vehicle due to hypoglycemic symptoms.
TABLE 4 Criteria for the Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus (1997)*
Criteria for the Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus (1997)*
Symptoms of diabetes mellitus (polyuria, polydipsia and unexplained weight loss) and random glucose levels at or above 200 mg per dL (11.1 mmol per L)
Fasting (eight hours) plasma glucose level at or above 126 mg per dL (7.0 mmol per L)†
Oral glucose tolerance test (75 g, anhydrous weight), two-hour plasma glucose level at or above 200 mg per dL (11.1 mmol per L)
*—Treatment goals are not changed, and the current treatment goals are for a fasting plasma glucose level of less than 120 mg per dL (6.7 mmol per L) and a hemoglobin A1c of 7 percent.
†—Reduced from the previous recommendation of 140 mg per dL (7.8 mmol per L).
Adapted with permission from Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care 1997;20: 1183–97.
TABLE 5 Risk Factors for Hypoglycemia
Risk Factors for Hypoglycemia
Congestive heart failure
Oral hypoglycemic agents, especially sulfonylureas such as Glimepiride (Amaryl), glyburide (DiaBeta, Glynase, Micronase), chlorpropamide (Diabinese) and glipizide (Glucotrol)†
Irregular medication regimens*
note: The risk factors listed in this table should be considered in determining the risk of hypoglycemia in drivers receiving treatment for diabetes mellitus.
*—Common condition in commercial drivers.
†—Other oral agents, such as metformin (Glucophage) and acarbose (Precose), are thought to be associated with little to no risk of hypoglycemia. The risk of hypoglycemia may be increased, however, when these agents are used in combination with a sulfonylurea, in the presence of calorie restriction or with exercise unaccompanied by increased calorie consumption.
The examining physician must carefully consider the severity of a diabetic driver's condition, the driver's compliance with treatment, the extent of target organ damage and the risk of hypoglycemic reactions (Tables 416 and 5). Public safety and treatment should take priority over the certification of a driver with poor glycemic control, multiple risk factors and target organ damage. Deferring or limiting certification might be considered for the diabetic driver with minimal risk factors who may benefit from incentives for getting appropriate treatment and achieving better glycemic control.
Waivers allow drivers to be certified for interstate driving when they have physical defects that ordinarily would be disqualifying conditions under the FMCSRs (e.g., amputation of a hand or foot). A driver must apply to the FHWA for the waiver.
Certifying a driver with a waiver requires special vigilance, because the regulations covering waivers are somewhat complex, and relatively few waivers are granted. The driver should provide the examining physician with complete and current documentation of the waiver and copies of the applicable regulations. A rarely used part of the examination form and the driver's certificate must be checked following the examination, provided that the waiver and all other aspects of the examination are in order.
Each state has its own rules and regulations for licensing and certifying drivers who operate vehicles intrastate (i.e., within a state and not across state lines). Most states provide waivers for certain medical conditions that would ordinarily disqualify drivers from operating vehicles under FMCSRs. For example, most states provide waivers for certain drivers who use insulin to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus, but the waivers are only for intrastate driving. The physician who performs DOT examinations should be careful not to certify a driver for interstate driving (across state lines) when the waiver is intended only for intrastate vehicle operation. Writing “intrastate” on the DOT card is not acceptable.
Fortunately, waivers for both interstate and intrastate driving are rarely encountered. With any driver who has a waiver, the examining physician should insist on complete and thorough documentation to be certain that all federal and state regulations are followed.
Future of DOT Certification Examinations
The present system for certifying and employing commercial drivers appears to do a reasonable job of protecting the public. Nonetheless, evidence exists that a significant number of examinations are performed incorrectly. The FHWA is considering a number of measures for improving the quality of the examination. Possible measures include the following:
A registry that would permit the DOT examination to be performed only by examiners who have received a copy of the standards and all supporting materials.
A mechanism to ensure that unqualified drivers are not able to find an examiner who will qualify them without additional review of the difference of opinions.
A revised form that will include the regulatory criteria, an enhanced medical history portion and more complete instructions on the medical standards. Proposed changes will be published in the Federal Register. Many competing interests will have to be taken into account before any new rules become final. It is uncertain which, if any, of the above changes may be implemented.
Before granting medical certification, the examining physician should be sure that the driver's history, physical condition and all other available information are consistent with the safe performance of his or her duties. If the physician has significant questions about a driver's condition, additional objective data must be obtained and, if necessary, certification should be denied, deferred or limited. As a practical matter, it is the driver's responsibility to provide test results (if tests were performed elsewhere), clearances from specialists and documentation for waivers. All supporting evidence and data should be filed with the DOT examination form and retained like any other medical record.
1. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations, 49 CFR, Part 391.41–49; Subpart E—Physical Qualifications and Examination. U.S. Department of Transportation, 1997.
2. Wharton Transport Corp. v. Bridges. Supreme Court of Tennessee. 606 S.W. 2d 521, 1980.
3. Conference on Cardiac Disorders and Commercial Drivers. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Office of Motor Carriers, 1987. Publication no. FHWA-MC-88-040.
4. Conference on Neurological Disorders and Commercial Drivers. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Office of Motor Carriers, 1988. Publication no. FHWA-MC-88-042.
5. Conference on Psychiatric Disorders and Commercial Drivers. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Office of Motor Carriers, 1991. Publication no. FHWA-MC-91-006.
6. Conference on Respiratory/Pulmonary Disorders and Commercial Drivers. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Office of Motor Carriers, 1991. Publication no. FHWA-MC-91-004.
7. Conference on Diabetic Disorders and Commercial Drivers. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Office of Motor Carriers, 1988. Publication no. FHWA-MC-88-041.
8. LaPorte RE. Insulin-using commercial motor vehicle drivers. Washington, D.C.: U. S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Office of Motor Carriers, 1992. Publication no. FHWA-MC 92-012.
9. Zondag T. DOT Medical certification process. Presented at the American Occupational Health Conference, San Antonio, May 1996.
10. Hartenbaum NP, ed. The DOT medical examination: a guide to commercial drivers' medical certification. Beverly Farms, Mass.: OEM Health Information, 1997.
11. Perry GF. Bus driving after non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. J Occup Med. 1994;36:117–8.
12. Larsen GC, Stupey MR, Walance CG, Griffith KK, Cutler JE, Kron J, et al. Recurrent cardiac events in survivors of ventricular fibrillation or tachycardia. Implications for driving restrictions. JAMA. 1994;271:1335–9.
13. Krumholz A, Fisher RS, Lesser RP, Hauser WA. Driving and epilepsy. A review and reappraisal. JAMA. 1991;265:622–6.
14. Pakola SJ, Dinges DF, Pack AI. Review of regulations and guidelines for commercial and noncommercial drivers with sleep apnea and narcolepsy. Sleep. 1995;18:787–96.
15. Reichard P, Nilsson BY, Rosenqvist U. The effect of long-term intensified insulin treatment on the development of microvascular complications of diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:304–9.
16. Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care. 1997;20:1183–97.
Copyright © 1998 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact email@example.com for copyright questions and/or permission requests.
Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions