Tips from Other Journals
Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Is Adding Flutamide Beneficial?
FREE PREVIEW Log in or buy this issue to read the full article. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles. Subscribe now.
FREE PREVIEW Subscribe or buy this issue. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles.
Am Fam Physician. 1999 Feb 15;59(4):1035-1036.
Prostate cancer is currently the most commonly diagnosed neoplasm in the United States. The median survival rate in men with metastatic disease ranges from 24 to 36 months. Because the growth of prostate cancer requires androgens, surgical castration is often performed in patients with advanced disease to suppress androgens and provide palliative effect. However, androgens are also produced by the adrenal glands. To counteract the effects of these androgens, agents such as leuprolide acetate and flutamide have been used. In an earlier study, Eisenberger and colleagues found that treatment with a combined androgen blockade of leuprolide acetate with flutamide improved patients' survival. In this double-blind, randomized study, the authors further evaluated the effects of this androgen blockade plus bilateral orchiectomy in the treatment of patients with metastatic prostate cancer.
Eligible patients had confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate with bone or distant soft-tissue metastases. All patients underwent early bilateral orchiectomy but received no previous or concomitant hormonal treatment, chemotherapy or biologic-response modifier therapy. Patients were still eligible for the study if they had received palliative radiation at sites of distant metastases. Baseline measurements of serum creatinine, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), liver enzymes, serum alkaline phosphatase, and serum testosterone levels were obtained. These measurements were repeated at one month and then every three months during the trial. Other diagnostic studies included a chest radiograph, a bone scan and a computed tomographic scan of the pelvis and abdomen at baseline and at six-month intervals for two years. Patients were randomized to either a treatment group, where they received two 125-mg capsules of flutamide three times a day until progression of the disease was noted, or a control group. The primary end point was death. Secondary end points included progression-free survival and PSA response.
During the five-year study period, 698 patients were randomly assigned to receive flutamide, and 687 were assigned to receive placebo. Patients had a mean age of 71 years. Twenty-two percent of the patients were black. The mean survival rate in the treatment group was 33.5 months compared with 29.9 months in the placebo group. This difference was not statistically significant. The median progression-free survival time was 20.4 months in the treatment group and 18.6 months in the placebo group. The percentage of PSA responses was higher in the treatment group (74 percent) than in the placebo group (61.5 percent). Despite this finding, patients in the flutamide group did not have better survival rates.
The authors conclude that flutamide offers no additional benefit to patients with metastatic prostate cancer following bilateral orchiectomy. This finding is in contrast to results of their previous study in which they found a 25 percent improvement in median survival in men with metastatic prostate cancer who were given flutamide with leuprolide acetate. In view of this, the authors recommend a reevaluation of medical and surgical options of castration, either alone or in combination with flutamide or other antiandrogen agents. The results cited in this study suggest that the benefits of combined androgen blockade in patients with metastatic prostate cancer are negligible.
Eisenberger MA, et al. Bilateral orchiectomy with or without flutamide for metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. October 8, 1998;339:1036–42.
Copyright © 1999 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact email@example.com for copyright questions and/or permission requests.
Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions