## Tips from Other Journals

# New Equation for Estimating Glomerular Filtration Rate

FREE PREVIEW. AAFP members and paid subscribers: Log in to get free access. All others: Purchase online access.

FREE PREVIEW. Purchase online access to read the full version of this article.

*Am Fam Physician.* 1999 Jun 1;59(11):3236.

The accuracy of estimating the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) on the basis of the serum creatinine concentration is limited because the serum creatinine concentration is affected by factors other than creatinine filtration. In an attempt to circumvent this limitation, formulas have been developed that include age, sex and body size in the calculation. The most widely used formula is the Cockcroft–Gault calculation of creatinine clearance. Levey and associates, as part of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study, developed an equation that may serve as an improvement in the method of predicting GFR on the basis of the serum creatinine concentration.

The authors used data from the MDRD study to devise a more accurate method of estimating GFR. Of the 1,785 patients who entered the study at baseline, 1,628 underwent measurement of GFR and other variables. The GFR was measured as the renal clearance of ^{125}I-iothalamate. Creatinine clearance was computed from a 24-hour urine collection and a single measurement of serum creatinine.

The accompanying table on page 3212 shows the seven equations evaluated as methods of estimating the GFR based on the serum creatinine concentration. The equations that were based on measured or estimated creatinine clearance were found to overestimate GFR. Inclusion of factors such as age, sex and ethnicity improved the accuracy of estimations. The MDRD study prediction equation—equation 7 in the table—predicted the GFR more accurately than the other formulas. This equation accounts for the variability in urea and creatinine filtration by the renal tubules and for the phenomenon of a reduction in GFR that occurs with lower protein intake.

The authors conclude that this new equation for estimating GFR could be implemented by clinical laboratories, provided demographic characteristics (age, sex and ethnicity) are available at the time serum measurements are taken.

#### Comparison of Equations to Predict GFR According to Measurement of the Serum Creatinine Level*

Equation 1: | serum creatinine |

GFR = 0.69 × [100/P | |

Equation 2: | Cockcroft-Gault formula |

GFR = 0.84 × [Cockcroft-Gault formula] | |

Equation 3: | creatinine clearance |

GFR = 0.81 × [C | |

Equation 4: | average of creatinine and urea clearance |

GFR = 1.11 × [(C | |

Equation 5: | creatinine clearance, urea clearance and demographic variables |

GFR = 1.04 × [C | |

Equation 6: | demographic, serum and urine variables |

GFR = 198 × [P | |

Equation 7: | demographic and serum variables only |

GFR = 170 × [P |

GFR = glomerular filtration rate; P_{cr} = serum creatinine concentration (mg per dL); C_{cr} = creatinine clearance (mL per minute per 1.73 m^{2}); C_{urea} = urea clearance (mL per minute per 1.73 m^{2}); SUN = serum urea nitrogen concentration (mg per dL); UUN = urine urea nitrogen concentration (g per day); alb = serum albumin concentration (g per dL).

*—Cockcroft-Gault formula and creatinine clearance are adjusted for body surface area. Age, sex and weight each had a P value >0.75; none of them entered equation 5.

Reprinted with permission from Levey AS, et al. A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Ann Intern Med 1999;130:461–70.

#### Comparison of Equations to Predict GFR According to Measurement of the Serum Creatinine Level*

Equation 1: | serum creatinine |

GFR = 0.69 × [100/P | |

Equation 2: | Cockcroft-Gault formula |

GFR = 0.84 × [Cockcroft-Gault formula] | |

Equation 3: | creatinine clearance |

GFR = 0.81 × [C | |

Equation 4: | average of creatinine and urea clearance |

GFR = 1.11 × [(C | |

Equation 5: | creatinine clearance, urea clearance and demographic variables |

GFR = 1.04 × [C | |

Equation 6: | demographic, serum and urine variables |

GFR = 198 × [P | |

Equation 7: | demographic and serum variables only |

GFR = 170 × [P |

GFR = glomerular filtration rate; P_{cr} = serum creatinine concentration (mg per dL); C_{cr} = creatinine clearance (mL per minute per 1.73 m^{2}); C_{urea} = urea clearance (mL per minute per 1.73 m^{2}); SUN = serum urea nitrogen concentration (mg per dL); UUN = urine urea nitrogen concentration (g per day); alb = serum albumin concentration (g per dL).

*—Cockcroft-Gault formula and creatinine clearance are adjusted for body surface area. Age, sex and weight each had a P value >0.75; none of them entered equation 5.

Reprinted with permission from Levey AS, et al. A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Ann Intern Med 1999;130:461–70.

Levey AS,
et al.
A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. *Ann Intern Med*.
March 16, 1999;130:461–70.

Copyright © 1999 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.

This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact
afpserv@aafp.org for copyright questions and/or permission requests.

Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions

#### Email Alerts

Don't miss a single issue. Sign up for the free *AFP* email table of contents.