Am Fam Physician. 1999 Jul 1;60(1):177-184.
See related patient information handout on infant hip problems, written by the authors of this article.
Screening programs relying primarily on physical examination techniques for the early detection and treatment of congenital hip abnormalities have not been as consistently successful as expected. Since the 1980s, increased attention has been given to ultrasound imaging of the hip in young infants (less than five months of age) as a possible tool for improving patient outcomes. Although ultrasound examination may not provide advantages over careful repeated physician examination for universal screening, a growing body of evidence indicates that ultrasound surveillance of mild abnormalities can reduce the need for bracing without worsening outcomes. Radiographic documentation of hip normality after the femoral nucleus of ossification has appeared (at three to five month of age) is still appropriate to rule out hip dysplasia.
The term “congenital dislocation of the hip” has traditionally been used to describe abnormal infant hips that may progress to dislocation. “Developmental dysplasia of the hip,” the currently preferred term, denotes the same range of hip problems but also includes hips that are never documented to be dislocated but are poorly developed, as well as hips that are determined to be abnormal after the newborn period.1–3 This new term has been adopted by the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America, but it is not yet universally employed.
Other terms may also require clarification. For example, “dysplasia” has two common usages in this disorder. In young infants, it is used both to signify an unstable hip and to refer to the radiographic or ultrasonographic features of poor acetabular development. In older children and adults, the term is used only to describe radiographic abnormalities of the femoral head or the acetabulum.
The term “late diagnosis,” which appears frequently in the literature on developmental dysplasia of the hip, implies a failure to screen or a failure to diagnose on early screening. The time frame referred to is generally not explicit. For some investigators, “late diagnosis” denotes any time beyond the newborn physical examination. The general consensus is that diagnosis after three months of age is late.
Finally, the term “teratologic dislocation” refers to the rare situation in which a hip is fixed in the dislocated position at birth. This dislocation is usually associated with other anomalies.
Epidemiology and Natural History
The incidence of hip dislocation in unscreened populations is estimated to be one to two cases per 1,000 children of European origin.4,5 The abnormality is rare in black Africans.6,7 It is more common in populations that practice swaddling or use infant cradle boards.8,9
The most significant risk factor for hip dysplasia is a positive family history. In a recent British study, more than 20 percent of children who required treatment for developmental dysplasia of the hip had a positive family history for the disorder; 5.5 percent of those children had an apparently normal physical examination at birth.10 Other risk factors for hip dysplasia include breech presentation, foot deformities, oligohydramnios, primiparity and female sex.11–13 Between 30 and 50 percent of infants with hip abnormality have risk factors other than sex.14,15
The natural history of developmental dysplasia of the hip is not completely understood. Typical treatment rates in European populations are 10 to 20 cases per 1,000 screened infants5 (about 10 times the rate of dislocation seen in unscreened populations). An early British study reported that more than 80 percent of hips found to be dislocatable at birth normalized by two months of age.16
A more recent British study employing universal ultrasound examination of the hips in 14,050 newborns found that 90 percent of ultrasonographic abnormalities normalized spontaneously without treatment and that no infants with ultrasonographically normal hips at birth presented later with dislocations.10 However, even with excellent screening and treatment programs, a small number of children (not more than one in 5,000) appear to have a poor outcome and require surgical correction of the abnormality.10
Screening by Physical Examination
Clinical screening for hip dysplasia was instituted in many countries after the publication of two landmark studies in 1962.16,17 The results of screening programs using physical examination alone have, however, been quite variable. Reports of nearly complete success with little need for late surgical intervention18–20 coexist with reports of no decrease in poor outcomes21,22 or, rarely, worse outcomes.23 Consequently, the accuracy of physical examination as a universal screening approach has been questioned.4,24,25
Controversy exists regarding the extent to which primary care physicians do not diagnose hip abnormalities during newborn examinations because of limited skills or inadequate training. Several reports demonstrate that clinicians who specialize in the detection of hip abnormalities in newborns have fewer late diagnoses.18,26–28 On the other hand, many investigators believe that some abnormal hips are not detectable clinically at the time of birth but may eventually progress to dislocation.29
ORTOLANI AND BARLOW MANEUVERS
The Ortolani and Barlow maneuvers have been the standard techniques for detecting hip instability in newborns9 (Figure 1). These maneuvers cannot be performed in a fussy, crying infant whose muscle activity may inhibit the movement of an unstable hip. For the examinations, the infant's hips are flexed to 90 degrees; the thumbs of the examiner are placed on the medial proximal thigh, and the long fingers are placed over the greater trochanter.
For the Ortolani maneuver, the contralateral hip is held still while the thigh of the hip being tested is abducted and gently pulled anteriorly. The sensation of instability in a positive Ortolani maneuver is the palpable and sometimes audible “clunk” of the femoral head moving over the posterior rim of the acetabulum and relocating in the cavity. The more poorly developed the acetabulum (and thus the more unstable the hip), the less pronounced the “clunk.” Consequently, the Ortolani maneuver must be performed very gently to avoid obscuring the sound of the femoral head passing over a poorly developed posterior acetabulum. Audible high-pitched “clicks” without a sensation of instability have no pathologic significance.14,30
The Barlow maneuver is performed by adducting the hip while pushing the thigh posteriorly. If the hip goes out of the socket, it is called “dislocatable” and the test is termed “positive.” The dislocation is confirmed by performing the Ortolani maneuver to reduce or relocate the hip.
Teratologic (e.g., irreducible) dislocation is suspected by limited abduction of one thigh, if unilateral. If both hips have fixed dislocations, the only clue will be less than normal abduction of both thighs.
If an unstable hip is not detected in the newborn period, a positive Ortolani's test becomes less common. Then limited abduction is the predominant physical sign as the hip becomes fixed in the dislocated position.4 Limitation of hip abduction is the best indicator of dislocation in the older infant.31 Other signs, such as an apparent shortening of the femur, asymmetric skin folds and telescoping of the affected hip, are also clues to dislocation.31,32
Screening by Ultrasonography
In 1978, ultrasound examination was introduced as a tool for detecting developmental dysplasia of the hip and evaluating infants with an abnormal physical examination.33 Graf, the pioneer in this field, introduced a method of classifying infant hips based on the depth and shape of the acetabulum as seen on coronal ultrasonograms34 (Figure 2).
In the Graf classification, a type I hip is considered normal, and developmental dysplasia is ruled out. The type II hip, which has a slightly shallow acetabular cup and a rounded rim with the femoral head in normal position, is considered to be developmentally immature in infants less than three months of age.34 In infants older than three months, a type II hip is considered abnormal and should be treated. A type III hip is subluxated, and a type IV hip is dislocated.34
Other investigators have popularized a dynamic approach, which consists of a multipositional evaluation using real-time ultrasonography to visualize the hips during physical examination35 (Figures 3 and 4).
Some concerns have been raised about the reliability of ultrasonographic imaging of the infant hip. Published studies of static imaging have found wide variations in the interpretation of the images.36–39 The authors of this article know of no study on the reliability of dynamic ultrasound examination. Compared with static imaging, dynamic ultrasound examination of the infant hip is more “operator dependent,” in that it relies on skill in interpreting the images and in performing the physical examination. At this time, ultrasound imaging of the infant hip cannot be considered a more reliable screening tool than physical examination alone.
Both universal and selective ultrasound screening programs for developmental dysplasia of the hip have been proposed. In a Norwegian study, the surgical treatment rate did not decrease significantly in newborns screened with ultrasonography compared with those screened by physical examination alone.40 However, the nonsurgical treatment rate was almost double in the ultrasound-screened group (34 versus 18 per 1,000 infants screened). The assumption is that many children in the ultrasound group who subsequently received treatment actually had false-positive ultrasound tests.
A possible role for ultrasonography in the surveillance of mildly abnormal hips is being increasingly recognized. In a number of studies, false-positive treatment rates have been reduced by at least 50 percent.41–43 Several studies have reported splinting rates of six or less per 1,000 infants screened by ultrasonography and excellent clinical outcomes.10,14,42,44
By the time an infant reaches three to five months of age, the femoral nucleus of ossification has appeared, and the bony architecture of the hip is sufficiently well developed that a dislocated hip can be reliably detected on radiographs. Thus, radiographs are indicated when developmental dysplasia of the hip is suspected in any child more than three months old. The age at which the diagnosis can be made by radiography is, however, near the upper limit of the age for successful treatment of hip dysplasia using the Pavlik harness.46,47
Clinical Screening Strategies
Serial physical examination remains the primary method for diagnosing developmental dysplasia of the hip in infants. In many U.S. institutions, ultrasound examination is used to evaluate newborns and young infants who have an abnormal hip on physical examination. However, additional research is needed to clarify the optimal use of ultrasonography in patients with possible hip dysplasia.
The neonate who has a dislocated hip at birth (positive Ortolani test or irreducible dislocation) should be referred to a pediatric orthopedist immediately for treatment. However, when a newborn has a dislocatable hip (positive Barlow maneuver), referral can be safely deferred for two weeks. It is highly possible that the hip will stabilize during that interval. With a dislocatable hip, use of an abduction pillow for the first two to four weeks of life is an appropriate option to referral at two weeks. The infant should then be reevaluated by physical examination with or without ultrasound assessment. Treatment or further surveillance may be initiated if the presence of an abnormality is confirmed.
A small number of hips that appear stable on physical examination at birth become dislocated later. Therefore, after the newborn period, regular well-child visits should include hip examinations until a child is walking.4,6,48,49
An infant can have a normal physical examination but a family history that is positive for hip dysplasia (i.e., the abnormality has occurred in an immediate family member such as a parent or sibling). In this instance, the physician should consider obtaining a radiograph of the pelvis when the child is three to five months old or performing an ultrasound examination when the child is four to six weeks of age.
In some situations (e.g., when any child has suspected hip abnormality in the newborn period), the absence of developmental dysplasia of the hip must be documented. Pelvic radiography after the appearance of the femoral nucleus of ossification is still the most well-accepted standard for judging the presence or absence of developmental dysplasia of the hip.6,49
An algorithm for the evaluation of infant hips is presented in Figure 5.
Treatment of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip
In the United States, developmental dysplasia of the hip in a newborn is generally treated by splinting with the Pavlik harness, a brace that places the hips in flexion and abduction. In Europe, excellent results have been reported for the use of abduction pillows as the initial mode of treatment.20,26,27
The primary complication associated with the Pavlik harness is avascular necrosis of the femoral head (reported incidence: 1 to 5 percent).5,50 However, no cases of avascular necrosis were reported in several recent studies on more than 200 children treated with this brace.26,27 Most cases of avascular necrosis are attributed to improper application of the harness, although this serious complication may be a result of the disease process itself.
The maximum age at which the Pavlik harness can be successfully used is five to six months.51 After this age, hip spica cast or fixed orthosis is required to maintain hip position. According to one report, successful conservative treatment can be followed by relapse.52
Surgical release of the hip adductor and iliopsoas muscles may be required in older infants and in children who are walking. Open surgical reduction of the hip is performed if a closed procedure does not result in complete reduction of the hip. In addition to open reduction, femoral and/or pelvic osteotomy may be necessary to reduce and stabilize dislocated hips in children older than two or three years.
Successful treatment of dysplasia in infancy does not guarantee long-term radiologic normality of the hips.53 Premature onset of symptomatic degenerative arthritis of the hip remains a possibility later in life.54
The value of ultrasonography in the early detection and treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip remains uncertain. Ultrasound screening programs have not yet been shown to achieve better long-term outcomes at a reasonable cost compared with programs that rely on physical examination of infants with or without the selective use of radiographs obtained at three to five months of age.55–57
At present, the case for universal ultrasound screening of newborn hips appears weak. This approach increases both cost and treatment rates without well-documented improvement in outcomes. A stronger case can be made for further clinical trials to assess the value of selective or universal ultrasound examinations in screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip in infants at four to six weeks of age. This screening approach may have the potential to decrease treatment rates while maintaining or improving outcomes.
REFERENCESshow all references
1. Klisic PJ. Congenital dislocation of the hip—a misleading term. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1989;71:136....
2. Bialik V, Fishman J, Katzir J, Zeltzer M. Clinical assessment of hip instability in the newborn by an orthopedic surgeon and a pediatrician. J Pediatr Orthop. 1986;6:703–5.
3. Ilfeld FW, Westin GW, Makin M. Missed or developmental dislocation of the hip. Clin Orthop. 1986;203:276–81.
4. Asher MA. Screening for congenital dislocation of the hip, scoliosis, and other abnormalities affecting the musculoskeletal system. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1986;33:1335–53.
5. Bennet GC. Screening for congenital dislocation of the hip [Editorial]. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1992;74:643–4.
6. Aronsson DD, Goldberg MJ, Kling TF Jr, Roy DR. Developmental dysplasia of the hip. Pediatrics. 1994;94(2 pt 1):201–8 [Published erratum in Pediatrics. 1994;94(4 pt 1):470].
7. Skirving AP, Scadden WJ. The African neonatal hip and its immunity from congenital dislocation. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1979;61-B:339–41.
8. Kutlu A, Memik R, Mutlu M, Kutlu R, Arslan A. Congenital dislocation of the hip and its relation to swaddling used in Turkey. J Pediatr Orthop. 1992;12:598–602.
9. Churgay CA, Caruthers BS. Diagnosis and treatment of congenital dislocation of the hip. Am Fam Physician. 1992;45:1217–28.
10. Marks DS, Clegg J, al-Chalabi AN. Routine ultrasound screening for neonatal hip instability. Can it abolish late-presenting congenital dislocation of the hip? J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1994;76:534–8.
11. Holen KJ, Terjesen T, Tegnander A, Bredland T, Saether OD, Eik-Nes S. Ultrasound screening for hip dysplasia in newborns. J Pediatr Orthop. 1994;14:667–73.
12. Clarke NM. Role of ultrasound in congenital hip dysplasia. Arch Dis Child. 1994;70:362–3.
13. Chan A, McCaul KA, Cundy PJ, Haan EA, Byron-Scott R. Perinatal risk factors for developmental dysplasia of the hip. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1997;76:F94–100.
14. Boeree N, Clarke NM. Ultrasound imaging and secondary screening for congenital dislocation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1994;76:525–33.
15. Walter RS, Donaldson JS, Davis CL, Shkolnik A, Binns HJ, Carroll NC, et al. Ultrasound screening of high-risk infants. A method to increase early detection of congenital dysplasia of the hip. Am J Dis Child. 1992;146:230–4.
16. Barlow TG. Early diagnosis and treatment of congenital dislocation of the hip joint in the newborn. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1962;44-B:292–301.
17. von Rosen S. Diagnosis and treatment of congenital dislocation of the hip in the newborn. J Bone Joint Surg. 1962;44-B:284–91.
18. Hadlow V. Neonatal screening for congenital dislocation of the hip. A prospective 21-year study. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1988;70:740–3.
19. Tredwell SJ. Neonatal screening for hip joint instability. Its clinical and economic relevance. Clin Orthop. 1992;281:63–8.
20. Darmonov AV, Zagora S. Clinical screening for congenital dislocation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1996;78:383–8.
21. Sanfridson J, Redlund-Johnell I, Uden A. Why is congenital dislocation of the hip still missed? Analysis of 96,891 infants screened in Malmo 1956–1987. Acta Orthop Scand. 1991;62:87–91.
22. Lennox IA, McLauchlan J, Murali R. Failures of screening and management of congenital dislocation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1993;75:72–5.
23. Moore FH. Examining infants' hips—can it do harm? J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1989;71:4–5.
24. Leck I. An epidemiological assessment of neonatal screening for dislocation of the hip. J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1986;20:56–62.
25. Jones DA. Principles of screening and congenital dislocation of the hip. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1994;76:245–50.
26. Poul J, Bajerova J, Sommernitz M, Straka M, Pokorny M, Wong FY. Early diagnosis of congenital dislocation of the hip, J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1992;74:695–700.
27. Krikler SJ, Dwyer NS. Comparison of results of two approaches to hip screening in infants. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1992;74:701–3.
28. Fiddian NJ, Gardiner JC. Screening for congenital dislocation of the hip by physiotherapists. Results of a ten-year study. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1994;76:458–9.
29. Donaldson JS, Feinstein KA. Imaging of developmental dysplasia of the hip. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1997;44:591–614.
30. Bond CD, Hennrikus WL, DellaMaggiore ED. Prospective evaluation of newborn soft-tissue hip “clicks” with ultrasound. J Pediatr Orthop. 1997;17:199–201.
31. Stoffelen D, Urlus M, Molenaers G, Fabry G. Ultrasound, radiographs, and clinical symptoms in developmental dislocation of the hip: a study of 170 patients. J Pediatr Orthop B. 1995;4:194–9.
32. Perkins G. Signs by which to diagnose congenital dislocation of the hip. 1928. Clin Orthop. 1992; Jan.(274):3–5.
33. Graf R. The diagnosis of congenital hip-joint dislocation by the ultrasonic Combound treatment. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1980;97:117–33.
34. Graf R. Classification of hip joint dysplasia by means of sonography. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1984;102:248–55.
35. Harcke HT, Grissom LE. Performing dynamic sonography of the infant hip. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990;155:837–44.
36. Rosendahl K, Markestad T, Lie RT. Congenital dislocation of the hip: a prospective study comparing ultrasound and clinical examination. Acta Paediatr. 1992;81:177–81.
37. Dias JJ, Thomas IH, Lamont AC, Mody BS, Thompson JR. The reliability of ultrasonographic assessment of neonatal hips. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1993;75:479–82.
38. Jomha NM, McIvor J, Sterling G. Ultrasonography in developmental hip dysplasia. J Pediatr Orthop. 1995;15:101–4.
39. Bar-On E, Meyer S, Porat S. Ultrasonography of the hip in developmental hip dysplasia. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1998;80:321–4.
40. Rosendahl K, Markestad T, Lie RT. Ultrasound screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip in the neonate: the effect on treatment rate and prevalence of late cases. Pediatrics. 1994;94:47–52.
41. Gardiner HM, Dunn PM. Controlled trial of immediate splinting versus ultrasonographic surveillance in congenitally dislocatable hips. Lancet. 1990;336:1553–6.
42. Sochart DH, Paton RW. Role of ultrasound assessment and harness treatment in the management of developmental dysplasia of the hip. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1996;78:505–8.
43. Graf R. Hip ultrasonography. Basic principles and current aspects [German]. Orthopade. 1997;26:14–24.
44. Bialik V, Bialik GM, Blazer S, Sujov P, Wiener F, Berant M. Developmental dysplasia of the hip: a new approach to incidence. Pediatrics. 1999;103:93–9.
45. Grill F, Müller D. Results of hip ultrasonographic screening in Austria [German]. Orthopade. 1997;26:25–32.
46. Viere RG, Birch JG, Herring JA, Roach JW, Johnston CE. Use of the Pavlik harness in congenital dislocation of the hip. An analysis of failures of treatment. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1990;72:238–44.
47. Garvey M, Donoghue VB, Gorman WA, O'Brien N, Murphy JF. Radiographic screening at four months of infants at risk for congenital hip dislocation. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1992;74:704–7.
48. McDermott V. Screening for congenital hip dysplasia [Letter]. Lancet. 1991;337:1421.
49. Catterall A. The early diagnosis of congenital dislocation of the hip [Editorial]. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1994;76:515–6.
50. Langkamer VG, Clarke NM, Witherow P. Complications of splintage in congenital dislocation of the hip. Arch Dis Child. 1991;66:1322–5.
51. Harris IE, Dickens R, Menelaus MB. Use of the Pavlik harness for hip displacements. When to abandon treatment. Clin Orthop. 1992; Aug(281):29–33.
52. Burger BJ, Burger JD, Bos CF, Obermann WR, Rozing PM, Vandenbroucke JP. Neonatal screening and staggered early treatment for congenital dislocation or dysplasia of the hip. Lancet. 1990;336:1549–53.
53. Tucci JJ, Kumar SJ, Guille JT, Rubbo ER. Late acetabular dysplasia following early successful Pavlik harness treatment of congenital dislocation of the hip. J Pediatr Orthop. 1991;11:502–5.
54. Weinstein SL, Morrissy RT, eds. Lovell and Winter's Pediatric orthopaedics. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1996:918–9.
55. Clarke NM, Clegg J, Al-Chalabi AN. Ultrasound screening of hips at risk for CDH. Failure to reduce the incidence of late cases. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1989;71:9–12.
56. Teanby TN, Patton RW. Ultrasound screening for congenital dislocation of the hip: a limited targeted programme. J Pediatr Orthop. 1997;17:202–4.
57. Hansson G, Jacobsen S. Ultrasonography screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip joint. Acta Paediatr. 1997;86:913–5.
Coordinators of this series are Thomas J. Barloon, M.D., associate professor of radiology, and George R. Bergus, M.D., associate professor of family practice, both at the University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City.
The editors of AFP welcome the submission of manuscripts for the Radiologic Decision-Making series. Send submissions to Jay Siwek, M.D., following the guidelines provided in “Information for Authors.”
Copyright © 1999 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact firstname.lastname@example.org for copyright questions and/or permission requests.
Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions