Evaluation of the Acutely Limping Child



FREE PREVIEW Log in or buy this issue to read the full article. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles. Subscribe now.


FREE PREVIEW Subscribe or buy this issue. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles.

Am Fam Physician. 2000 Feb 15;61(4):1011-1018.

A limp may be defined as any asymmetric deviation from a normal gait pattern. The differential diagnosis of a limp includes trauma, infection, neoplasia and inflammatory, congenital, neuromuscular or developmental disorders. Initially, a broad differential diagnosis should be considered to avoid overlooking less common conditions such as diskitis or psoas abscess. In any patient with a complaint of knee or thigh pain, an underlying hip condition should be considered. The patient's age can further narrow the differential diagnosis, because certain disease entities are age-specific. Vigilance is warranted in conditions requiring emergent treatment such as septic hip. The challenge to the family physician is to identify the cause of the limp and determine if further observation or immediate diagnostic work-up is indicated.

Normal gait follows a predictable pattern and uses energy efficiently. Gait can be divided into swing and stance phases: the swing phase forms 40 percent of the gait cycle, and the stance phase forms 60 percent. The most common form of limp, an antalgic gait, is caused by pain. To minimize weight bearing on an injured limb, the time in stance phase is shortened in the painful limb with a resultant increase in swing phase.

An acute limp implies an underlying pathology that causes disruption of the standard gait pattern; the challenge for the physician is to identify this pathology. The cause of a limp can range from something as serious as a life-threatening bone tumor to something as minor as a pebble in a shoe. The clinician must consider the spine, pelvis and lower extremities for a possible etiology. A useful approach is to consider the causes of limping from head to foot to avoid overlooking common underlying conditions such as diskitis, psoas abscess or septic hip, which are less obvious than conditions involving the lower extremities.

In considering the differential diagnosis of the acutely limping child, the clinician should first consider broader categories of etiologies, such as traumatic, infectious, neoplastic, inflammatory, congenital, neuromuscular or developmental causes (Table 1). Because certain diseases are more common in a given age group, the age of the patient provides critical information to narrow the diagnosis. For example, Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease is rare in toddlers and adolescents but more common in boys four to nine years of age. Table 2 categorizes many etiologies of limping by age.

TABLE 1.

Differential Diagnosis of the Acutely Limping Child

Trauma

Fracture

Stress fracture

Toddler's fracture (minimally displaced spiral fracture of the tibia)

Soft tissue contusion

Ankle sprain

Infection

Cellulitis

Osteomyelitis

Septic arthritis

Lyme disease

Tuberculosis of bone

Gonorrhea

Postinfectious reactive arthritis

Tumor

Spinal cord tumors

Tumors of bone

Benign: osteoid osteoma, osteoblastoma

Malignant: osteosarcoma, Ewing's sarcoma

Lymphoma

Leukemia

Inflammatory

Juvenile rheumatoid arthritis

Transient synovitis

Systemic lupus erythematosus

Congenital

Developmental dysplasia of the hip

Sickle cell

Congenitally short femur

Clubfoot

Developmental

Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis

Tarsal coalitions

Osteochondritis dissecans (knee, talus)

Neurologic

Cerebral palsy, especial mild hemiparesis

Hereditary sensory motor neuropathies

TABLE 1.   Differential Diagnosis of the Acutely Limping Child

View Table

TABLE 1.

Differential Diagnosis of the Acutely Limping Child

Trauma

Fracture

Stress fracture

Toddler's fracture (minimally displaced spiral fracture of the tibia)

Soft tissue contusion

Ankle sprain

Infection

Cellulitis

Osteomyelitis

Septic arthritis

Lyme disease

Tuberculosis of bone

Gonorrhea

Postinfectious reactive arthritis

Tumor

Spinal cord tumors

Tumors of bone

Benign: osteoid osteoma, osteoblastoma

Malignant: osteosarcoma, Ewing's sarcoma

Lymphoma

Leukemia

Inflammatory

Juvenile rheumatoid arthritis

Transient synovitis

Systemic lupus erythematosus

Congenital

Developmental dysplasia of the hip

Sickle cell

Congenitally short femur

Clubfoot

Developmental

Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis

Tarsal coalitions

Osteochondritis dissecans (knee, talus)

Neurologic

Cerebral palsy, especial mild hemiparesis

Hereditary sensory motor neuropathies

TABLE 2.

Differential Diagnosis of the Acutely Limping Child by Age

All ages

Septic arthritis

Osteomyelitis

Cellulitis

Stress fracture

Neoplasm (including leukemia)

Neuromuscular

Toddler (ages one to three)

Septic hip

Developmental dysplasia of the hip

Occult fractures

Leg-length discrepancy

Child (ages four to 10)

Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease

Transient synovitis

Juvenile rheumatoid arthritis

Adolescent (ages 11 to 16)

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis

Avascular necrosis of femoral head

Overuse syndromes

Tarsal coalitions

Gonococcal septic arthritis

TABLE 2.   Differential Diagnosis of the Acutely Limping Child by Age

View Table

TABLE 2.

Differential Diagnosis of the Acutely Limping Child by Age

All ages

Septic arthritis

Osteomyelitis

Cellulitis

Stress fracture

Neoplasm (including leukemia)

Neuromuscular

Toddler (ages one to three)

Septic hip

Developmental dysplasia of the hip

Occult fractures

Leg-length discrepancy

Child (ages four to 10)

Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease

Transient synovitis

Juvenile rheumatoid arthritis

Adolescent (ages 11 to 16)

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis

Avascular necrosis of femoral head

Overuse syndromes

Tarsal coalitions

Gonococcal septic arthritis

History

The child or caretaker should be questioned about the onset and duration of the limp and the association of the limp with pain. It is useful to ask if the limp is getting better, getting worse or staying the same. Usually a child whose limp shows signs of improvement may safely be observed as long as there are no constitutional symptoms. The older patient can localize a painful joint or focal area of pain, which is helpful in narrowing the differential diagnosis; however, referred pain patterns must also be considered (e.g., hip pathology causing knee pain). The very young child can rarely verbalize the location of the discomfort. In younger children, it is useful to ask the caretaker if the child prefers to crawl or walk on his or her knees; a positive response to this question makes foot pathology more likely.

A history of limp that appears worse in the morning suggests a rheumatologic process. Night pain, especially pain that wakes a child from sleep, is a worrisome indicator of a malignant process, and steps should be taken toward rapid diagnosis.

A diagnosis of “growing pains” must meet three criteria: (1) the leg pain is bilateral; (2) the pain occurs only at night; and (3) the patient has no limp, pain or symptoms during the day.1 To inaccurately diagnose a limping child with “growing pains” can be dangerous, as the physician risks missing the underlying pathology. However, if a child does fit the criteria for growing pains, the parents should be reassured that this is a benign, self-limited process that occurs for unknown reasons.

A review of systems should be completed to obtain a history of recent fever or other signs of infection. A recent upper respiratory infection could be the instigating event to a septic process or raise the possibility of poststreptococcal reactive arthritis.2,3 Fever suggests an infection or an inflammatory condition. A family history should also be obtained for rheumatalogic or neuromuscular diseases that may be inherited.

Physical Evaluation

In an antalgic gait, the gait is uneven because less time is spent in the stance phase of the affected leg. If the examiner is uncertain if a limp is present, listening to the sound of the feet hitting the floor may reveal an asymmetric cadence. A child who walks stiffly may be attempting to reduce pain in the spine, such as that occurring in diskitis. In a Trendelenburg gait, the torso shifts over the pathologic limb.4 This gait pattern is commonly seen in older adults with arthritis of the hip, although it also occurs in any condition causing hip inflammation or hip muscle weakness, including Perthes' disease and transient synovitis.

In a young child who clings to a parent and is hesitant to ambulate, the physician can separate the child from the parent and observe the child walking back to the parent. Having the patient run may bring out a gait disturbance not seen with walking.2

A focused neurologic examination should include observing the child walking on the toes, walking on the heels and hopping on one foot. Inspection of the feet may demonstrate clawing of the toes or cavus foot deformity, which are red flags for an underlying neurologic condition, especially if either condition is unilateral. The patient should be tested for deep tendon reflexes and clonus. The clinician should observe the patient bending forward to identify an asymmetric turning of the spine during flexion, another sign of spinal cord pathology. Limited spinal flexion accompanied by a stiff posture and local tenderness is suggestive of diskitis, which may sometimes be diagnosed with the use of plain radiographs (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1.

Lateral radiograph of the spine revealing decreased disc space (arrow) between L4 and L5. In a patient with a clinical picture of decreased spinal motion and elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate, a diagnosis of diskitis may be made.

View Large


FIGURE 1.

Lateral radiograph of the spine revealing decreased disc space (arrow) between L4 and L5. In a patient with a clinical picture of decreased spinal motion and elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate, a diagnosis of diskitis may be made.


FIGURE 1.

Lateral radiograph of the spine revealing decreased disc space (arrow) between L4 and L5. In a patient with a clinical picture of decreased spinal motion and elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate, a diagnosis of diskitis may be made.

In addition to testing spinal motion in flexion, the standing child should be asked to extend the spine by bending backward. Adolescents with spondylolysis or spondylolisthesis experience an exacerbation of lumbosacral pain with spinal extension. The sacroiliac joint may be involved in infectious or inflammatory conditions. On physical examination, the FABER test (consisting of hip flexion, abduction and external rotation) causes pain in the sacroiliac joint. This test is performed by placing the ipsilateral ankle on the contralateral knee in the supine patient and then providing gentle downward pressure on the knee (Figure 2).

FIGURE 2.

The FABER test is specific for sacroiliac joint pathology. A positive test causes pain at the sacroiliac joint when the patient lies supine with the ipsilateral ankle placed on the contralateral knee and mild downward pressure placed on the ipsilateral knee. (FABER = hip flexion, abduction and external r otation)

View Large


FIGURE 2.

The FABER test is specific for sacroiliac joint pathology. A positive test causes pain at the sacroiliac joint when the patient lies supine with the ipsilateral ankle placed on the contralateral knee and mild downward pressure placed on the ipsilateral knee. (FABER = hip flexion, abduction and external r otation)


FIGURE 2.

The FABER test is specific for sacroiliac joint pathology. A positive test causes pain at the sacroiliac joint when the patient lies supine with the ipsilateral ankle placed on the contralateral knee and mild downward pressure placed on the ipsilateral knee. (FABER = hip flexion, abduction and external r otation)

Examination of the hip may be the most important part of the physical examination in a child whose site of pathology is not unequivocally localized, because hip pathology often results in vague pain and many hip conditions require emergent treatment. While infection of the knee or ankle joint may be readily apparent from swelling, tenderness, warmth and erythema, the hip joint is not as easily visualized, and the clinician must rely on indirect assessment on physical examination through range of motion.

Nearly all hip joint pathology causes increased production of fluid within the joint capsule.4 In children with transient synovitis of the hip, the mean intracapsular pressure is only 18 mm Hg when the hip is in 45 degrees of flexion, but it increases to 178 mm Hg when the hip is in extension and internal rotation.5 Clinically, this explains why a child with a septic hip keeps the hip in a position of flexion, abduction and external rotation. Conversely, the position of prone internal rotation is provocative in a child with hip pathology. Every child lacking a clear explanation for a limp should be placed prone, with the knees flexed and the ankles falling away from the body (Figure 3) so the physician can look for a difference in internal rotation between the hips. It is important that the pelvis be kept flat on the table, or the difference in internal rotation between the two sides may not be appreciated.

FIGURE 3.

Prone internal rotation of the hip. This is the most sensitive test for intra-articular hip pathology. In this test, any inflammation of the hip manifests as decreased internal rotation of the hip.

View Large


FIGURE 3.

Prone internal rotation of the hip. This is the most sensitive test for intra-articular hip pathology. In this test, any inflammation of the hip manifests as decreased internal rotation of the hip.


FIGURE 3.

Prone internal rotation of the hip. This is the most sensitive test for intra-articular hip pathology. In this test, any inflammation of the hip manifests as decreased internal rotation of the hip.

Hip abduction may also be tested with the hips flexed and extended, again making certain the pelvis remains level. Asymmetry in hip abduction may be indicative of inflammatory conditions of the hip, as well as developmental dysplasia of the hip (Figure 4). The Galeazzi test is performed by putting the child in a supine position and bringing the ankles to the buttocks with the hips and knees flexed. The test is positive when the knees are at different heights, suggesting developmental dysplasia or a leg-length discrepancy (Figure 5). Measurement of thigh and calf circumference should reveal atrophy (more than 1 to 2 cm of difference between sides) in a patient with any hip or knee condition that has limited function for more than one to two months.

FIGURE 4.

Asymmetric abduction suggesting developmental dysplasia of the hip or any condition irritating the hip.

View Large


FIGURE 4.

Asymmetric abduction suggesting developmental dysplasia of the hip or any condition irritating the hip.


FIGURE 4.

Asymmetric abduction suggesting developmental dysplasia of the hip or any condition irritating the hip.

FIGURE 5.

A Galeazzi test suggesting developmental dysplasia of the hip or a leg-length discrepancy. The test is positive when the knees are at different heights as the patient lies supine with ankles to buttocks and hips and knees flexed.

View Large


FIGURE 5.

A Galeazzi test suggesting developmental dysplasia of the hip or a leg-length discrepancy. The test is positive when the knees are at different heights as the patient lies supine with ankles to buttocks and hips and knees flexed.


FIGURE 5.

A Galeazzi test suggesting developmental dysplasia of the hip or a leg-length discrepancy. The test is positive when the knees are at different heights as the patient lies supine with ankles to buttocks and hips and knees flexed.

To diagnose slipped capital femoral epiphysis, the examiner will observe obligate external rotation of the involved lower extremity when the hip is flexed (Figure 6). These rotational changes can occur when the radiographic findings are still quite minimal. Prompt referral for operative management is warranted.

FIGURE 6.

Diagnosing slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Obligate external rotation of the hip is noted while the hip is passively flexed.

View Large


FIGURE 6.

Diagnosing slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Obligate external rotation of the hip is noted while the hip is passively flexed.


FIGURE 6.

Diagnosing slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Obligate external rotation of the hip is noted while the hip is passively flexed.

Differentiating transient synovitis from septic arthritis is particularly challenging, because both conditions present with decreased motion of the hip. A modified log-roll test (Figure 7) may be helpful in differentiating the degree of hip irritation. While distracting the supine child by gently holding the big toe and pretending to examine the foot from different angles, significant hip rotation may be attempted. If an arc of 30 degrees or more of hip rotation is possible without complaints of pain, it has been our experience that a diagnosis of transient synovitis is more likely than one of sepsis.

FIGURE 7.

The modified log-roll test may help determine the severity of hip irritation and aid in distinguishing between transient synovitis of the hip and septic arthritis. The diagnosis of transient synovitis is more likely if an arc of 30 degrees or more of hip rotation is possible without pain.

View Large


FIGURE 7.

The modified log-roll test may help determine the severity of hip irritation and aid in distinguishing between transient synovitis of the hip and septic arthritis. The diagnosis of transient synovitis is more likely if an arc of 30 degrees or more of hip rotation is possible without pain.


FIGURE 7.

The modified log-roll test may help determine the severity of hip irritation and aid in distinguishing between transient synovitis of the hip and septic arthritis. The diagnosis of transient synovitis is more likely if an arc of 30 degrees or more of hip rotation is possible without pain.

All joints should be taken through their full range of motion passively and actively and be palpated for tenderness and warmth. Loss of range of motion will help localize the site of pathology. The knee examination should include ballotment of the patella to identify an effusion or hemarthrosis (blood in the joint). Pain at extremes of flexion or extension can signal meniscal pathology; however, in an acute injury, the amount of fluid and pain in the knee joint often makes motion limited, and the examination should be repeated once the fluid has resorbed.

Examination of the ankle should include careful palpation of the fibula physis; often an occult fracture through the growth plate occurs with the same mechanisms of injury that cause ligamentous injuries in the adult.

Laboratory Studies

If, after the history and physical examination, infection is being considered, a complete blood count with differential, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) level should be ordered. The platelet count may be low, or the white cell count elevated in the child with leukemia. The CRP becomes elevated earlier than the sedimentation rate and is considered more sensitive for an infectious process. In addition, having a baseline ESR and CRP helps monitor clinical improvement during antibiotic treatment. When examined together, the combination of an ESR greater than 20 and a temperature above 37.5°C (99.5°F) identified septic arthritis of the hip in 97 percent of patients presenting with a limp in one series.6

If the patient lives in an area that is endemic for Lyme disease, blood titers should be determined because acute Lyme disease can mimic a septic process.7

If a septic process is suspected, the first priority should be to aspirate joints with effusion and get a white cell count from the synovial fluid. Gram stain, anaerobic and aerobic cultures, protein and glucose analyses should also be obtained. While there is significant overlap of synovial white cell counts in infection and inflammatory conditions, a white blood cell count above 50,000 per mm3 (50 × 109 per L) should be presumed to be an infection.

A septic joint partially treated with antibiotics may have a lower-than-expected white cell count. A negative culture does not rule out a septic joint; in about 33 percent of cases, the joint aspirate does not recover an organism in a septic joint.8 If the joint in question is the knee in a sexually active patient, the fluid should be cultured for gonorrhea9; this requires a special media (Thayer-Martin) for growth.

Serum rheumatoid factor antinuclear antibody and HLA typing should not be considered initially, because inflammatory diseases in children tend to be seronegative, making blood work less critical than the clinical history and physical examination. Table 3 presents diagnostic criteria for various categories of limp.

TABLE 3.

Correlating History, Examination and Diagnostic Studies

Category History Physical examination may show Laboratory studies Radiology

Traumatic

Fall

Localized pain, swelling, loss of motion

None unless infection is possible

Plain films, bone scan

Infectious

Fever, chills, erythema, pain

Rigid guarding, warmth, erythema

CBC, ESR, CRP, joint aspirate

Plain films, MRI, bone scan

Neoplastic

Night pain, pain unrelated to activity

Mass

CBC, ESR, CRP, alkaline phosphatase, calcium, electrolytes, joint aspirate

Plain films, MRI/CT, bone scan, staging work-up

Congenital

Problem since birth

Deformity, leg-length discrepancy, loss of ROM

None

Plain films

Neurologic

Ataxia, loss of balance, disorganized gait

High/low muscle tone, increased/decreased deep tendon reflexes, cavus foot or claw toes

Creatine kinase (if DMD is in differential diagnosis)

Plain films

Inflammatory

Pain > 6 months, family history of rheumatoid arthritis

Warmth/erythema, one or more joints

CBC, ESR, CRP, joint aspiration

Plain films

Developmental

Painless limp (LCP disease) Knee pain (LCP disease, SCFE)

Loss of ROM in joints, asymmetric ROM, pain with ROM

None

Plain films


CBC = complete blood count; ESR = erythrocyte sedimentation rate; CRP = C-reactive protein; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; CT = computed tomography; ROM = range of motion; DMD = Duchenne's muscular dystrophy; LCP = Legg-Calvé-Perthes; SCFE = slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

TABLE 3.   Correlating History, Examination and Diagnostic Studies

View Table

TABLE 3.

Correlating History, Examination and Diagnostic Studies

Category History Physical examination may show Laboratory studies Radiology

Traumatic

Fall

Localized pain, swelling, loss of motion

None unless infection is possible

Plain films, bone scan

Infectious

Fever, chills, erythema, pain

Rigid guarding, warmth, erythema

CBC, ESR, CRP, joint aspirate

Plain films, MRI, bone scan

Neoplastic

Night pain, pain unrelated to activity

Mass

CBC, ESR, CRP, alkaline phosphatase, calcium, electrolytes, joint aspirate

Plain films, MRI/CT, bone scan, staging work-up

Congenital

Problem since birth

Deformity, leg-length discrepancy, loss of ROM

None

Plain films

Neurologic

Ataxia, loss of balance, disorganized gait

High/low muscle tone, increased/decreased deep tendon reflexes, cavus foot or claw toes

Creatine kinase (if DMD is in differential diagnosis)

Plain films

Inflammatory

Pain > 6 months, family history of rheumatoid arthritis

Warmth/erythema, one or more joints

CBC, ESR, CRP, joint aspiration

Plain films

Developmental

Painless limp (LCP disease) Knee pain (LCP disease, SCFE)

Loss of ROM in joints, asymmetric ROM, pain with ROM

None

Plain films


CBC = complete blood count; ESR = erythrocyte sedimentation rate; CRP = C-reactive protein; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; CT = computed tomography; ROM = range of motion; DMD = Duchenne's muscular dystrophy; LCP = Legg-Calvé-Perthes; SCFE = slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Radiographic Analysis

Plain films of the areas in question should be the first radiographic studies ordered.1012 If an area of pathology is localized by examination or history, anteroposterior and lateral views are indicated because a single view often misses pathology that is obvious in the second view (Figure 8). The pelvic films should be examined for bone fragmentation (Perthes'), joint space widening (sepsis, Perthes') and structural abnormalities (hip dysplasia). Especially in hip films, anteroposterior and frog-lateral views are necessary because the pathology is frequently best seen on lateral views (Figure 9).

FIGURE 8.

Anteroposterior (left) and lateral (right) views of a patient with spiral fracture (arrow) of the tibia. Note that the anteroposterior view alone would most likely have been considered normal.

View Large


FIGURE 8.

Anteroposterior (left) and lateral (right) views of a patient with spiral fracture (arrow) of the tibia. Note that the anteroposterior view alone would most likely have been considered normal.


FIGURE 8.

Anteroposterior (left) and lateral (right) views of a patient with spiral fracture (arrow) of the tibia. Note that the anteroposterior view alone would most likely have been considered normal.

FIGURE 9.

An anteroposterior view (left) of the pelvis in an adolescent with slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Note that the left hip has a slightly wider physis (large arrow), and slightly less femoral head is visible lateral to Kline's line (the line drawn along the lateral femoral neck). On the frog-leg view (right), the posterior slippage of the femoral head is more obvious (arrow).

View Large


FIGURE 9.

An anteroposterior view (left) of the pelvis in an adolescent with slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Note that the left hip has a slightly wider physis (large arrow), and slightly less femoral head is visible lateral to Kline's line (the line drawn along the lateral femoral neck). On the frog-leg view (right), the posterior slippage of the femoral head is more obvious (arrow).


FIGURE 9.

An anteroposterior view (left) of the pelvis in an adolescent with slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Note that the left hip has a slightly wider physis (large arrow), and slightly less femoral head is visible lateral to Kline's line (the line drawn along the lateral femoral neck). On the frog-leg view (right), the posterior slippage of the femoral head is more obvious (arrow).

In the nonverbal patient, a screening anteroposterior film from hips to feet identifies a fracture in one fifth of patients presenting with a limp.11 It is useful to remember that the growth plate is weaker than the ligamentous attachments to the bone; thus, a ligamentous injury is considerably less common than an occult fracture through the growth plate.

In patients with a history and physical examination consistent with infection of the hip, ultrasonography is useful in identifying fluid in the hip joint.13,14 Ultrasonography is much more sensitive than plain films, identifying an effusion in two thirds of a series of 500 children with normal plain films.14 Ultrasonography is noninvasive but highly dependent on the operator for an accurate result. It is also helpful in identifying fluid in the soft tissues consistent with a soft tissue abscess.13

When the cause of a child's limp cannot be localized by history or physical examination, a bone scan is an excellent way to help localize pathology15,16 (Figure 10). A negative bone scan makes an infection, a fracture or most tumors less likely so that observation may be more safely pursued. An area that is bright on bone scan can be further evaluated with plain films, computed tomographic (CT) scan with bone windows or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies. CT best delineates bone structure, whereas MRI best highlights areas of pathology in the soft tissues, as well as inflammation of bone.

FIGURE 10.

Bone scan in a three-year-old girl with a two-week history of limp and no localization by history or physical. The scan helped identify a stress fracture (arrow) of the cuboid. This child was treated successfully with a short leg walking cast for four weeks.

View Large


FIGURE 10.

Bone scan in a three-year-old girl with a two-week history of limp and no localization by history or physical. The scan helped identify a stress fracture (arrow) of the cuboid. This child was treated successfully with a short leg walking cast for four weeks.


FIGURE 10.

Bone scan in a three-year-old girl with a two-week history of limp and no localization by history or physical. The scan helped identify a stress fracture (arrow) of the cuboid. This child was treated successfully with a short leg walking cast for four weeks.

Need for Immediate Attention

A delay in diagnosis may be devastating in certain processes that cause a limp. For example, in a septic hip, the increased intra-articular pressure caused by purulence will compromise the blood supply to the femoral head, possibly resulting in catastrophic avascular necrosis unless surgical decompression is performed emergently. In any septic joint process, the body's attempt to eradicate pathogens results in damage to the cartilage surface.

Bone tumors and leukemia are rare but life-threatening, and should be ruled out as quickly as possible as the cause of a limp. Hip pathology is notorious for presenting as knee or thigh pain, and must always be considered in patients with these complaints.

If the child has multiple fractures or a fracture of a suspicious nature, child abuse should be considered.17 Missing this diagnosis and returning a child to an abusive situation can put the child at high risk of mortality.

A frequent dilemma is a limping child with no constitutional symptoms and no localized abnormalities by history or physical examination. We recommend using plain films to rule out a fracture, followed by observation and reevaluation in a few days, depending on the severity of the limp and the family situation. A bone scan should be performed after two to four weeks if symptoms do not resolve or localize.

The Authors

ARABELLA I. LEET, M.D., is in private practice in Long Beach, Calif., and is an instructor at Orthopedic Hospital, a teaching hospital affiliated with University of California-Los Angeles. She received her medical degree from Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons in New York City and served a residency in orthopedic surgery at the University of Minnesota. Dr. Leet also completed a fellowship in pediatric orthopedics at DuPont Children's Hospital in Wilmington, Delaware.

DAVID L. SKAGGS, M.D., is assistant professor of orthopedic surgery at the University of Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles. He received his medical degree from Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons and served a residency in orthopedic surgery at Presbyterian Hospital, both in New York City. He is an attending orthopedic surgeon at Childrens Hospital Los Angeles and Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, also in Los Angeles.

Address correspondence to David L. Skaggs, M.D., Department of Orthopedics, Childrens Hospital Los Angeles, 4650 Sunset Blvd., Mail Stop no. 69, Los Angeles, CA 90027. Reprints are not available from the authors.

REFERENCES

1. Nelson WE, Behrman RE, Kliegman R, Arvin AM. Nelson Textbook of pediatrics. 15th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1996.

2. MacEwen GD, Dehne R. The limping child. Pediatr Rev. 1991;12:268–74.

3. Birdi N, D'Astous J. Poststreptococcal reactive arthritis mimicking acute septic arthritis: a hospital-based study. J Pediatr Orthop. 1995;15:661–5.

4. Hensinger RN. Limp. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1986;33:1355–64.

5. Kesteris U, Wingstrand H, Forsberg L, Egund N. The effect of arthrocentesis in transient synovitis of the hip in the child: a longitudinal sonographic study. J Pediatr Orthop. 1996;16:24–9.

6. Del Beccaro MA, Champoux AN, Bockers T, Mendelman PM. Septic arthritis versus transient synovitis of the hip: the value of screening laboratory tests. Ann Emerg Med. 1992;21:1418–22.

7. Dabney KW, Lipton G. Evaluation of limp in children. Curr Opin Pediatr. 1995;7:88–94.

8. Herndon WA, Knauer S, Sullivan JA, Gross RH. Management of septic arthritis in children. J Pediatr Orthop. 1986;6:576–8.

9. Renshaw TS. The child who has a limp. Pediatr Rev. 1995;16:458–65.

10. Blatt SD, Rosenthal BM, Barnhart DC. Diagnostic utility of lower extremity radiographs of young children with gait disturbances. Pediatrics. 1991;87:138–40.

11. Oudjhane K, Newman B, Oh KS, Young LW, Girdany BR. Occult fractures in preschool children. J Trauma. 1998;28:858–60.

12. Phillips WA. The child with a limp. Orthop Clin North Am. 1987;18:489–501.

13. Alexandra JE, Seibert JJ, Glasier CM, Williamson SL, Aronson J, McCarthy RE, et al. High resolution hip ultrasound in the limping child. JCU J Clin Ultrasound. 1989;17:19–24.

14. Miralles M, Gonzalez G, Pulpeiro JR, Millan JM, Gordillo I, Serrano C, et al. Sonography of the painful hip in children: 500 consecutive cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1989;152:579–82.

15. Choban S, Killian JT. Evaluation of acute gait abnormalities in preschool children. J Pediatr Orthop. 1990;10:74–8.

16. Aronson J, Garvin K, Seibert J, Glasier C, Tursky EA. Efficiency of bone scan for occult limping toddlers. J Pediatr Orthop. 1992;12:38–44.

17. Leventhal JM, Thomas SA, Rosenfield NS, Markowitz RI. Fractures in young children. Distinguishing child abuse from unintentional injuries. Am J Dis Child. 1993;147:87–92.



Copyright © 2000 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact afpserv@aafp.org for copyright questions and/or permission requests.

Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions


Article Tools

  • Print page
  • Share this page
  • AFP CME Quiz

Information From Industry

More in Pubmed

Navigate this Article