Am Fam Physician. 2000 Jul 15;62(2):445.
The Committee on Practice Bulletins–Obstetrics of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) has issued new clinical management guidelines on the induction of labor. ACOG Technical Bulletin No. 10, which replaces Technical Bulletin No. 217 issued in December 1995, appears in the November 1999 issue of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
The report reviews the current methods of cervical ripening and induction of labor and summarizes the effectiveness of each method on the basis of outcomes research. It also contains a question-and-answer section that covers the following information: the indications for and contraindications to induction of labor; the relative effectiveness of pharmacologic agents for cervical ripening; administration of prostaglandin; the potential complications associated with each method of cervical ripening and labor induction; guidelines for fetal monitoring; the dosage of oxytocin and precautions to take when this agent is used; the management of complications from the use of oxytocin; the applicability of the various methods of labor induction in patients with intact or ruptured membranes; labor induction in cases of intrauterine fetal demise in the late second or third trimester; and the cost-effectiveness of misoprostol (synthetic prostaglandin E1 analog) and dinoprostone (prostaglandin E2[PGE2]).
Summary of Recommendations
The following excerpt represents the summary of recommendations at the end of the 10-page ACOG report:
Recommendations based on good and consistent scientific evidence (level A):
Prostaglandin E (PGE) analogs are effective in promoting cervical ripening and inducing labor.
Women in whom induction of labor is indicated may be appropriately managed with either a low- or high-dose oxytocin regimen.
Fetal heart rate and uterine activity should be continuously monitored from the time a PGE2 vaginal insert is placed until at least 15 minutes after it is removed.
High-dose PGE2 vaginal suppositories may be used in the management of intrauterine fetal demise in the second trimester of pregnancy.
Although the optimal dosage and timing interval of misoprostol are unknown, lower dosages (25 μg every three to six hours) are effective for cervical ripening and induction of labor.
With term premature rupture of membranes, labor may be induced with prostaglandins.
Recommendations based on evidence that may be limited or inconsistent (level B):
Use of misoprostol in women with previous cesarean delivery should be avoided because of the possibility of uterine rupture.
The use of higher dosages of misoprostol (50 μg every six hours) to induce labor may be appropriate in some situations, although increased risk of complications, including uterine hyperstimulation, has been reported.
Recommendations based primarily on consensus and expert opinion (level C):
For women with third-trimester intrauterine fetal demise, intravaginal misoprostol can be used to induce labor.
Fetal heart rate and uterine activity should be continuously monitored from 30 minutes to two hours after administration of PGE2 gel.
According to the ACOG committee, there is a significant cost difference between misoprostol and dinoprostone for induction of labor. The price of a 100-μg tablet of misoprostol may range from $0.36 to $1.20, compared with a dinoprostone gel kit that ranges from $65 to $75 and the dinoprostone vaginal insert that costs approximately $165. The ACOG committee notes that the cost would increase if oxytocin augmentation were needed. In addition, dinoprostone is an unstable compound that requires refrigeration to maintain its potency, whereas misoprostol is stable at room temperature.
Copyright © 2000 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact email@example.com for copyright questions and/or permission requests.
Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions
More in AFP
MOST RECENT ISSUE
Jul 15, 2016
Access the latest issue of American Family Physician