Letters to the Editor

Suggested Technique for the Clinical Breast Examination



FREE PREVIEW Log in or buy this issue to read the full article. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles. Subscribe now.


FREE PREVIEW Subscribe or buy this issue. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles.

Am Fam Physician. 2000 Sep 1;62(5):957.

to the editor: An article by Barton and colleagues,1 reviewed in “Tips from Other Journals,”2 discusses the clinical breast examination. The authors correctly encourage careful technique and thorough examination. However, I would like to suggest that, during the examination, the patient should be seated on the end of the examination table with her hands on the stirrups, while leaning forward at about a 45 degree angle to allow the breast tissue to fall away from the chest wall. This position allows the examiner to place the fingers behind the deep tissue so as not to confuse a breast mass with a rib. The room should be one that can be absolutely darkened so that adequate transilluminations can be done. Physicians might be amazed at what they can see under these conditions. Highly pigmented skin will not allow the breasts to be transilluminated well.

Axillae can be examined with one hand, but the breasts are best examined with a bimanual technique using digital pads. With one hand on each breast, using the digital pads with tissue between the finger and the thumb, the examiner can compare the texture and pick up differences that would otherwise be missed. All of the examiner's findings can be conveyed to the patient during the examination and, at the same time, the physician can encourage and educate the patient about breast self-examination and desexualize the process.

The most important part of the examination is the information assimilated in the examiner's mind. The examiner must create a picture of what the fingers feel (but cannot see) in the breast structures. This is best done with the eyes closed. The patient, too, should be reminded that she must learn to differentiate between what her fingers tell her and what her breasts tell her.

I do not have any statistics to support this technique; I am just a country doctor trying to catch cancer early, but this technique enables me to know what I am doing when performing a breast examination.

REFERENCES

1. Barton MD, Harris R, Fletcher SW. Does this patient have breast cancer? The screening clinical breast examination: should it be done? how?. JAMA. 1999;282:1270–80.

2. Should family physicians do screening breast exams? [Tips from Other Journals] Am Fam Physician. 2000;61:1469–72.

Send letters to Kenneth W. Lin, MD, MPH, Associate Deputy Editor for AFP Online, e-mail: afplet@aafp.org, or 11400 Tomahawk Creek Pkwy., Leawood, KS 66211-2680.

Please include your complete address, e-mail address, and telephone number. Letters should be fewer than 400 words and limited to six references, one table or figure, and three authors.

Letters submitted for publication in AFP must not be submitted to any other publication. Possible conflicts of interest must be disclosed at time of submission. Submission of a letter will be construed as granting the American Academy of Family Physicians permission to publish the letter in any of its publications in any form. The editors may edit letters to meet style and space requirements.


Copyright © 2000 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact afpserv@aafp.org for copyright questions and/or permission requests.

Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions


Article Tools

  • Print page
  • Share this page
  • AFP CME Quiz

Information From Industry

Navigate this Article