Spirituality and Medical Practice: Using the HOPE Questions as a Practical Tool for Spiritual Assessment
Am Fam Physician. 2001 Jan 1;63(1):81-89.
See patient information handout on spirituality and health, written by the authors of this article.
The relationship between spirituality and medicine has been the focus of considerable interest in recent years. Studies suggest that many patients believe spirituality plays an important role in their lives, that there is a positive correlation between a patient's spirituality or religious commitment and health outcomes, and that patients would like physicians to consider these factors in their medical care. A spiritual assessment as part of a medical encounter is a practical first step in incorporating consideration of a patient's spirituality into medical practice. The HOPE questions provide a formal tool that may be used in this process. The HOPE concepts for discussion are as follows: H—sources of hope, strength, comfort, meaning, peace, love and connection; O—the role of organized religion for the patient; P—personal spirituality and practices; E—effects on medical care and end-of-life decisions.
Family medicine emphasizes medical care of the whole person, which includes an understanding of a patient's family and environment, as well as the social, cultural and psychologic situation. Over the past several years, it has been suggested that spirituality is another important, yet often neglected, factor in the health of patients.1,2 Up to 77 percent of patients would like spiritual issues considered as part of their medical care,3 yet only 10 to 20 percent of physicians discuss these issues with their patients.3,4 Reports such as these have increased interest in the incorporation of spirituality into the practice of medicine. Nearly 50 medical schools currently offer courses in spirituality and medicine.5
Relationship Between Spirituality and Medicine
The evidence in the medical literature that suggests a strong relationship between spirituality and medicine is increasing (Table 13,4,6–24). Polls of the U.S. population6 have consistently shown that 95 percent of Americans believe in God. One study3 found that 94 percent of patients admitted to hospitals believe that spiritual health is as important as physical health, 77 percent believe that physicians should consider their patients' spiritual needs as part of their medical care, and 37 percent want their physician to discuss their religious beliefs more. However, 80 percent reported that physicians never or rarely discuss spiritual or religious issues with them.
TABLE 1 Studies of the Links Between Spirituality and Health
Studies of the Links Between Spirituality and Health
95 percent of Americans believe in God
91 percent believe in God; 74 percent feel close to God
77 percent believe physicians should consider their spiritual needs
73 percent believe they should share their religious beliefs with their physician
66 percent want physicians to inquire about religious or spiritual beliefs if gravely ill
37 to 40 percent believe that physicians should inquire about religious beliefs more
Only 10 to 20 percent report that their physician discusses religion or spirituality with them
64 to 95.5 percent believe in God; 43 to 77 percent feel close or somewhat close to God
77 percent believe that patients should share their religious beliefs with their physician
96 percent believe spiritual well-being is important in health
11 percent inquire at least frequently about spiritual issues (less than 20 percent discuss this issue in more than 10 percent of encounters)
Greatest barriers to discussion of spiritual issues are lack of time (71 percent), lack of training (59 percent) and difficulty in identifying patients who want such a discussion (56 percent)
80 percent of patients voluntarily chose a phrase with a religious focus
25 percent experienced increased spirituality (subjective)
Those who experienced increased spirituality had better medical outcomes.
75 percent of studies show a positive association, including:
Prevention of illness (including depression, substance abuse, physical illness, mortality)
Coping with illness
Recovery from illness*
Beneficial in 60 to 90 percent of diseases, including:
Prayer or mental effort from a distance can effect measurable outcomes
One review of 131 controlled trials found that 58 percent showed a statistically significant beneficial effect.
*—One review24 points out methodologic problems with these studies, including ethical issues in studying the effects of religious behavior on health outcomes. The investigators did not address patients' wishes for spiritual discussions with their physicians, studies on relaxation/meditation or patient's general spiritual concerns (beyond specific religious practices).
One study4 of physicians and patients in an outpatient setting found that 91 percent of patients believe in God, compared with 64 percent of physicians. In this study, 40 percent of patients felt that physicians should discuss pertinent religious issues; however, only 11 percent of physicians frequently or always did. Another study7 has reported similar findings. A recent national survey9 of family physicians reports that the percentage of physicians who have spiritual beliefs is closer to that of the general population.
The relationship between religious commitment and health outcomes has also been reviewed in detail.1,2,13,14 Although some disagree,24 most authors2,14–16 report that a positive relationship between religious commitment and mental and physical health was found in up to 84 percent of studies that included a measure of religious commitment as part of the study. Religious commitment was helpful in the prevention of illness (including depression, substance abuse and physical illness), in coping with illness and in recovery from illness.1,2
A recent study17 of elderly patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery showed that lack of strength and comfort from religion was independently related to the risk of death during the six-month period following surgery. A prospective cohort study18 of elderly poor forced to move from their homes showed that those who were more religiously committed were twice as likely to survive the two-year study period as persons without such religious commitment. The most influential study variable was strength and comfort derived from religion.
Some studies11,12 have evaluated the effects of the relaxation response and meditation on health outcomes. The relaxation response can be elicited by a simple two-step procedure: (1) repeating a word, phrase or muscular activity, and (2) passively disregarding any obtrusive thoughts that come to mind and returning to the repetition. When practiced regularly, this technique results in a reproducible set of physiologic effects and is effective therapy for several medical conditions (Table 211). Benson11 reports that 80 percent of patients, when given the choice between a religious or secular phrase, voluntarily chose a religious phrase to elicit the relaxation response. One quarter of the patients described a feeling of increased spirituality as a result of practicing the technique. These same patients were more likely to have better measurable medical outcomes than those who did not experience increased spirituality.11
TABLE 2 The Relaxation Response
The Relaxation Response
Technique to elicit relaxation response
1. Repeat a word, sound, phrase, prayer or muscular activity that has meaning for you (e.g., “one,” “peace,” “Om,” “Sh'ma Yisroel,” “The Lord is my shepherd,” “Insha'allah,” “Hail Mary, full of grace,” jogging, breathing techniques, knitting).
2. Passively disregard intrusive thoughts that come to mind and return to the repetitive focus.
Physiologic effects of the relaxation response
Decreased rate of breathing
Decreased blood pressure
Decreased muscle tension
Decreased heart rate
Increased slow brain waves
Effective in treatment of the following conditions
Mild to moderate depression
Migraine and cluster headaches
Symptoms of cancer and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)
Information from Benson H. Timeless healing: the power and biology of belief. New York: Scribner, 1996.
Definition of Terms
SPIRITUALITY VS. RELIGION
In order to have a meaningful discussion with patients regarding spirituality and medical care, a common understanding of terminology is essential. Many authors25–30 recommend clarifying the difference between the terms “spirituality” and “religion.” They advocate a universal, broad-based definition of spirituality that encompasses religious and nonreligious perspectives.
Spirituality is a complex and multidimensional part of the human experience. It has cognitive, experiential and behavior aspects. The cognitive or philosophic aspects include the search for meaning, purpose and truth in life5,10,25–29,31,32 and the beliefs and values by which an individual lives.26,31,33 The experiential and emotional aspects involve feelings of hope, love, connection, inner peace, comfort and support. These are reflected in the quality of an individual's inner resources,28,31,33 the ability to give and receive spiritual love,28 and the types of relationships and connections25,29–32 that exist with self, the community, the environment and nature,31 and the transcendent27,28,30,31 (e.g., power greater than self, a value system, God, cosmic consciousness). The behavior aspects of spirituality involve the way a person externally manifests individual spiritual beliefs and inner spiritual state.
Many people find spirituality through religion or through a personal relationship with the divine. However, others may find it through a connection to nature, through music and the arts, through a set of values and principles or through a quest for scientific truth.
Study of the world's religions34,35 reveals that each religion attempts to help answer mankind's spiritual questions and that each has developed a specific set of beliefs, teachings and practices.25,26,30 A person's experience with religious organizations may range from extremely positive to extremely negative.
Spiritual distress28,32 and spiritual crisis occur when individuals are unable to find sources of meaning, hope, love, peace, comfort, strength and connection in life or when conflict occurs between their beliefs and what is happening in their life. This distress can have a detrimental effect on physical and mental health. Medical illness and impending death can often trigger spiritual distress in patients and family members.
SPIRITUAL CARE AND SPIRITUAL ASSESSMENT
General spiritual care can be defined as recognizing and responding to the “multifaceted expressions of spirituality we encounter in our patients and their families.”30 It involves compassion, presence, listening and the encouragement of realistic hope,36 and might not involve any discussion of God or religion. General spiritual care may be provided by anyone. Specialized spiritual care often involves understanding and helping with specific theologic beliefs and conflicts. It is ideally performed by persons with special training in this area, such as those trained as Clinical Pastoral Education (CPE) chaplains.
Spiritual assessment is the process by which health care providers can identify a patient's spiritual needs pertaining to medical care.
Role of the Physician
Family physicians are concerned with any factors that affect their patients' health. It is important that physicians maintain a balanced, open-minded approach to medical care without sacrificing scientific integrity. Physicians can begin to incorporate spirituality into medical practice in three ways: (1) by scientific study of the subject; (2) by assessment of the patient's spirituality and diagnosis of spiritual distress; and (3) by therapeutic interventions.
Scientific study involves evaluating the current evidence for a link between spirituality and health and planning further study to clarify these effects. It is important to keep an open mind regarding new methods of study and to be aware that there are some things that may never be fully understood.
For assessment and diagnosis, the physician should evaluate whether spirituality is important to a particular patient and whether spiritual factors are helping or hindering the healing process.
Therapeutic interventions include consideration of a patient's spirituality in recommendations regarding prevention, medical treatment and adjuvant care. In addition, elements of general spiritual care should be incorporated into the routine medical encounter. Although not easily measurable, a physician's ability to offer connection, compassion and presence can be a powerful therapeutic intervention.
A spiritual assessment performed during a medical encounter is a practical way to begin incorporating spirituality into medical practice.
Several factors can increase the success of a discussion of spiritual issues with patients.
Spiritual Self-Understanding and Self-Care
A physician needs to understand his or her own spiritual beliefs, values and biases in order to remain patient-centered and non-judgmental when dealing with the spiritual concerns of patients. This is especially true when the beliefs of the patient differ from those of the physician.
One way to promote self-understanding is to perform a formal spiritual self-assessment using the tool described in this article. Spiritual self-care is integral to serving the multiple needs and demands of patients in the current health care system. Self-care can take the form of reconnecting with family and friends, time alone (for quiet contemplation, playing a sport, recreational reading, nature watching, etc.), community service, or religious practice.
Self-care and self-understanding can help physicians prepare for difficult questions, such as “Why is this happening to my child [or me]?” or questions regarding the physician's beliefs. It can also help physicians prepare for times when patients may make requests for prayer, or prepare for emotional responses from the patient or the physician.
Establishment of a Good Physician-Patient Relationship
The patient is more likely to discuss spiritual concerns within the context of a trusting and therapeutic physician-patient relationship.
Appropriate Timing of Discussions
Maslow's hierarchy of needs (i.e., physical, then mental and spiritual) is one way to help determine when timing is appropriate. Routine inquiry about spiritual resources can flow naturally following discussion of other support systems and may open the door for further discussion. Appropriate timing for more in-depth discussion requires skillful interpretation of verbal and nonverbal cues from patients and families and the willingness to explore further with gentle, open-ended interview techniques. The topic of spirituality may be introduced during discussion of advance directives, a new diagnosis of severe illness, terminal care planning, addiction, chronic pain, chronic illness, domestic violence or grieving.
INFORMAL SPIRITUAL ASSESSMENT
Informal spiritual assessment may be accomplished at any time during the medical encounter. Because most patients use symbolic and metaphoric language when expressing spiritual thoughts, spiritual assessment often involves listening carefully to the stories that patients tell regarding their lives and illness and then interpreting the spiritual issues involved.37 Themes such as the search for meaning, feelings of connection versus isolation, hope versus hopelessness, fear of the unknown, are clues that the patient may be struggling with spiritual issues. Perceiving these clues and following with open-ended as well as specific questions regarding the patient's spiritual beliefs may reveal more about a patient's spiritual needs than direct inquiry with a formal spiritual assessment. This is the approach most often employed by CPE chaplains. Many family physicians notice such clues instinctively and can easily continue to develop this perception skill once they know what to look for.
FORMAL SPIRITUAL ASSESSMENT
A formal spiritual assessment involves asking specific questions during a medical interview to determine whether spiritual factors may play a role in the patient's illness or recovery and whether these factors affect the medical treatment plan. There are many possible formats for conducting a formal spiritual assessment, and several have been reviewed elsewhere (www.gwu.edu/~cicd/toolkit/spiritual.htm).38,39 Most of these tools were developed for use in the hospice setting, for use by pastoral counselors or nurses, or as research instruments.28,33,38–41 Little has been written about approaches developed for use by practicing physicians in a routine medical encounter.42–44
The HOPE Questions
The HOPE questions, outlined below, were developed as a teaching tool to help medical students, residents and practicing physicians begin the process of incorporating a spiritual assessment into the medical interview. These questions have not been validated by research, but the strength of this particular approach is that it allows for an open-ended exploration of an individual's general spiritual resources and concerns and serves as a natural follow-up to discussion of other support systems. It does not immediately focus on the word “spirituality” or “religion.” This minimizes barriers to discussion based on use of language.
The HOPE questions cover the basic areas of inquiry for physicians to use in formal spiritual assessments (Table 3). The first part of the mnemonic, H, pertains to a patient's basic spiritual resources, such as sources of hope, without immediately focusing on religion or spirituality. This approach allows for meaningful conversation with a variety of patients, including those whose spirituality lies outside the boundaries of traditional religion or those who have been alienated in some way from their religion. It also allows those for whom religion, God or prayer is important to volunteer this information. There are many ways of asking these questions (Table 4).
TABLE 3 The HOPE Questions for a Formal Spiritual Assessment in a Medical Interview
The HOPE Questions for a Formal Spiritual Assessment in a Medical Interview
Sources of hope, meaning, comfort, strength, peace, love and connection
Personal spirituality and practices
Effects on medical care and end-of-life issues
TABLE 4 Examples of Questions for the HOPE Approach to Spiritual Assessment
Examples of Questions for the HOPE Approach to Spiritual Assessment
Sources of hope, meaning, comfort, strength, peace, love and connection
We have been discussing your support systems. I was wondering, what is there in your life that gives you internal support?
What are your sources of hope, strength, comfort and peace?
What do you hold on to during difficult times?
What sustains you and keeps you going?
For some people, their religious or spiritual beliefs act as a source of comfort and strength in dealing with life's ups and downs; is this true for you?
If the answer is “Yes,” go on to O and P questions.
If the answer is “No,” consider asking: Was it ever? If the answer is “Yes,” ask: What changed?
Do you consider yourself part of an organized religion?
How important is this to you?
What aspects of your religion are helpful and not so helpful to you?
Are you part of a religious or spiritual community? Does it help you? How?
Personal spirituality/ practices
Do you have personal spiritual beliefs that are independent of organized religion? What are they?
Do you believe in God? What kind of relationship do you have with God?
What aspects of your spirituality or spiritual practices do you find most helpful to you personally? (e.g., prayer, meditation, reading scripture, attending religious services, listening to music, hiking, communing with nature)
Effects on medical care and end-of-life issues
Has being sick (or your current situation) affected your ability to do the things that usually help you spiritually? (Or affected your relationship with God?)
As a doctor, is there anything that I can do to help you access the resources that usually help you?
Are you worried about any conflicts between your beliefs and your medical situation/care/decisions?
Would it be helpful for you to speak to a clinical chaplain/community spiritual leader?
Are there any specific practices or restrictions I should know about in providing your medical care? (e.g., dietary restrictions, use of blood products)
If the patient is dying: How do your beliefs affect the kind of medical care you would like me to provide over the next few days/weeks/months?
The second and third letters, O and P, refer to areas of inquiry about the importance of organized religion in patients' lives and the specific aspects of their personal spirituality and practices that are most helpful. A useful way to introduce these questions is a normalizing statement such as: “For some people, their religious or spiritual beliefs act as a source of comfort and strength in dealing with life's ups and downs. Is this true for you?”
If the answer to this question is “Yes,” inquiry can proceed with specific questions regarding religion and personal spirituality (Table 4). If the answer to the question is “No,” the physician can end this line of questioning or, if the patient appears to be at ease, ask follow-up questions such as: “Was it ever important to you?” If the answer is “Yes,” then the question “What changed?” opens the door for patients to discuss important spiritual concerns that may have an impact on their medical care.
The final letter of the mnemonic, E, pertains to the effects of a patient's spirituality and beliefs on medical care and end-of-life issues. These questions can help focus the discussion back onto clinical management. Table 4 suggests several areas of inquiry, including barriers to the access of usual spiritual resources; fears, concerns or conflicts regarding the patient's belief system and the current medical situation; and the effects of specific beliefs or rituals on medical management. Understanding spiritual issues in the care of the dying has been addressed in detail elsewhere.30,36,39 Major themes include fear of disconnection or isolation and the ability to make peace with the death that is approaching as well as with the life that is ending.
Effects of Spiritual Assessment on Medical Management
Many possible steps may follow the spiritual assessment.
Take no further action. Spiritual concerns and questions often have no clear answers or solutions, yet they can significantly affect the quality of a patient's suffering. Experienced physicians know that in many cases there is little they can offer to their patients in the way of medical solutions and cure. At these times, the best therapeutic intervention is to offer their presence, understanding, acceptance and compassion.
Incorporate spirituality into preventive health care. Patients can be helped to identify and mobilize their own internal spiritual resources as a preventive health care measure. These resources may include prayer, meditation, yoga, t'ai chi, walks in the country or listening to soothing music.
Include spirituality in adjuvant care. The physician can help patients identify spiritually based measures that can be useful to them in conjunction with standard medical treatment. For example, a patient may choose to say the rosary while taking medication or may need to listen to music or read scripture before surgery.
Modify the treatment plan. Modifications can be made based on better understanding of the patient's spiritual needs as related to medical care. This can include such measures as stopping or continuing chemotherapy in a patient with metastatic cancer; referring a patient in spiritual distress or crisis to a clinical chaplain; using community cultural or religious resources; and teaching the relaxation response or other meditation techniques to patients with chronic pain or insomnia.
Spirituality is an important, multidimensional aspect of the human experience that is difficult to fully understand or measure using the scientific method, yet convincing evidence in the medical literature supports its beneficial role in the practice of medicine. It will take many more years of study to understand exactly which aspects of spirituality hold the most benefit for health and well-being. The world's great wisdom traditions suggest that some of the most important aspects of spirituality lie in the sense of connection and inner strength, comfort, love and peace that individuals derive from their relationship with self, others, nature and the transcendent.
As family physicians begin the process of integrating spirituality into medical practice, it is important to keep in mind the advice to “do no harm” and to maintain the utmost respect for the patient's rights to autonomy and freedom of thought and belief. If done responsibly, the practice of medicine may be the best arena for integrating science and spirituality. The future exploration of this field offers physicians the opportunity to improve care and gain a clearer understanding of some of life's and medicine's greatest mysteries.
1. Levin JS, Larson DB, Puchalski CM. Religion and spirituality in medicine: research and education. JAMA. 1997;278:792–3.
2. Matthews DA, McCullough ME, Larson DB, Koenig HG, Swyers JP, Milano MG. Religious commitment and health status. Arch Fam Med. 1998;7:118–24.
3. King DE, Bushwick B. Beliefs and attitudes of hospital inpatients about faith healing and prayer. J Fam Pract. 1994;39:349–52.
4. Maugans TA, Wadland WC. Religion and family medicine: a survey of physicians and patients. J Fam Pract. 1991;32:210–3.
5. Puchalski CM, Larson DB. Developing curricula in spirituality and medicine. Acad Med. 1998;73:970–4[Published erratum appears in Acad Med 1998;73: 1038]
6. Gallup G. Religion in America 1990. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton Religious Research Center, 1990.
7. Oyama O, Koenig HG. Religious beliefs and practices in family medicine. Arch Fam Med. 1998;7:431–5.
8. Ehman JW, Ott BB, Short TH, Ciampa RC, Hansen-Flaschen J. Do patients want physicians to inquire about their spiritual or religious beliefs if they become gravely ill?. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:1803–6.
9. Daaleman TP, Frey B. Spiritual and religious beliefs and practices of family physicians: a national survey. J Fam Pract. 1999;48:98–104.
10. Ellis MR, Vinson DC, Ewigman B. Addressing spiritual concerns of patients. J Fam Pract. 1999;48:105–9.
11. Benson H. Timeless healing: the power and biology of belief. New York: Scribner, 1996.
12. NIH Technology Assessment Panel on Integration of Behavioral and Relaxation Approaches into the Treatment of Chronic Pain and Insomnia. JAMA. 1996;276:313–8.
13. Matthews DA, Larson DB, Barry CP. The faith factor: an annotated bibliography of clinical research on spiritual subjects: Vol I. Rockville, Md.: National Institute for Healthcare Research, 1993.
14. Matthews DA, Larson DB. The faith factor: an annotated bibliography of clinical research on spiritual subjects: Vol III. Enhancing life satisfaction. Institute for Healthcare Research, 1995.
15. Craigie FC, Larson DB, Liu IY. References to religion in The Journal of Family Practice. Fam Pract. 1990;30:477–8,480.
16. Larson DB, Sherrill KA, Lyons JS, Craigie FC, Thielman SB, Greenwold MA, et al. Associations between dimensions of religious commitment and mental health reported in the American Journal of Psychiatry and Archives of General Psychiatry: 1978–1989. Am J Psychiatry. 1992;149:557–9.
17. Oxman TE, Freeman DH, Manheimer ED. Lack of social participation or religious strength and comfort as risk factors for death after cardiac surgery in the elderly. Psychosom Med. 1995;57:5–15.
18. Zuckerman DM, Kasl SV, Ostfeld AM. Psychosocial predictors of mortality among the elderly poor. Am J Epidemiol. 1984;119:410–23.
19. Benson H, Friedman R. Harnessing the power of the placebo effect and renaming it “remembered wellness.” Ann Rev Med. 1996;47:193–9.
20. Brody H. Placebo response, sustained partnership, and emotional resilience in practice. J Am Board Fam Pract. 1997;10:72–4.
21. Dossey L. Healing words. New York: HarperPaperbacks, 1993.
22. Byrd RC. Positive therapeutic effects of intercessory prayer in a coronary care unit population. South Med J. 1988;81:826–9.
23. Harris WS, Gowda M, Kolb JW, Strychacz CP, Vacek JL, Jones PG, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of the effects of remote, intercessory prayer on outcomes in patients admitted to the coronary care unit. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:2273–78.
24. Sloan RP, Bagiella E, Powell T. Religion, spirituality, and medicine. Lancet. 1999;353:664–7.
25. Sulmasy DP. Is medicine a spiritual practice? Acad Med. 1999;74:1002–5.
26. McKee DD, Chappel JN. Spirituality and medical practice. J Fam Pract 1992;35:201,205–8.
27. Thomason CL, Brody H. Inclusive spirituality. J Fam Pract. 1999;48:96–7.
28. Hay MW. Principles in building spiritual assessment tools. Am J Hosp Care. 1989;6:25–31.
29. Craigie FC, Hobbs RF 3d. Spiritual perspectives and practices of family physicians with an expressed interest in spirituality. Fam Med. 1999;31:578–85.
30. Derrickson BS. The spiritual work of the dying. Hosp J. 1996;11:11–30.
31. Ross L. The spiritual dimension. Int J Nurs Stud. 1995;32:457–68.
32. Smucker C. A phenomenological description of the experience of spiritual distress. Nurs Diagn. 1996;7:81–91 [Published erratum appears in Nurs Diagn 1996;7:115]
33. Stoll RI. Guidelines for spiritual assessment. Am J Nurs. 1979;79:1574–7.
34. Smith H. The world's religions: our great wisdom traditions. San Francisco: HarperSanFrancisco, 1991.
35. Sharma A, ed. Our religions. San Francisco: HarperSanFrancisco, 1993.
36. O'Connor PM. Spiritual elements of hospice care. Hosp J. 1986;2:99–108.
37. Remen RN. Kitchen table wisdom: stories that heal. New York: Riverhead, 1996.
38. Fitchett G. Spiritual assessment in pastoral care: a guide to selected resources. Monograph no. 4. Decatur, Ga.: Journal of Pastoral Care Publications, 1993.
39. Millison MB. A review of the research on spiritual care and hospice. Hosp J. 1995;10:3–18.
40. Farran CJ, Fitchett G, Quiring-Emblen JD, Burck JR. Development of a model for spiritual assessment and intervention. J Relig Health. 1989;283):185–93.
41. Hatch RL, Burg MA, Naberhaus DS, Hellmich LK. The Spiritual Involvement and Beliefs Scale. J Fam Pract. 1998;46:476–86.
42. Culver MD, Kell MJ. Working with chronic pain patients. Am J Pain Management. 1995;5:55–61.
43. Maugans TA. The SPIRITual history. Arch Fam Med. 1996;5:11–6.
44. Puchalski C, Romer AL. Taking a spiritual history allows clinicians to understand patients more fully. J Palliative Med. 2000;3:129–37.
Copyright © 2001 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact email@example.com for copyright questions and/or permission requests.
Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions