Valvular Heart Disease: Review and Update

Am Fam Physician. 2001 Jun 1;63(11):2201-2209.

People with valvular heart disease are living longer, with less morbidity, than ever before. Advances in surgical techniques and a better understanding of timing for surgical intervention account for increased rates of survival. Echocardiography remains the gold standard for diagnosis and periodic assessment of patients with valvular heart disease. Generally, patients with stenotic valvular lesions can be monitored clinically until symptoms appear. In contrast, patients with regurgitant valvular lesions require careful echocardiographic monitoring for left ventricular function and may require surgery even if no symptoms are present. Aside from antibiotic prophylaxis, very little medical therapy is available for patients with valvular heart disease; surgery is the treatment for most symptomatic lesions or for lesions causing left ventricular dysfunction even in the absence of symptoms.

Family physicians routinely encounter patients with valvular heart disease. Although major advances in our understanding of this disease have been made in the past two decades, only recently has there been evidence-based literature from which to draw conclusions about its diagnosis and management. The American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) Task Force recently published comprehensive practice guidelines to help clinicians manage this challenging disorder.1,2 Improved surgical techniques, noninvasive techniques for surveillance of left ventricular function and guidelines for the timing of surgery have likely combined to contribute to improved survival and decreased morbidity in patients with chronic valvular heart disease.1,3

Aortic Stenosis

Aortic stenosis is usually idiopathic and results in calcification and degeneration of the aortic leaflets. Persons born with a bicuspid aortic valve are predisposed to develop aortic stenosis. The classic symptoms of angina, exertional syncope and dyspnea generally follow an extended latent period during which the patient is asymptomatic. The survival of patients with aortic stenosis is nearly normal until the onset of symptoms, when survival rates decrease sharply. After the onset of symptoms, average survival is only two to three years.1,3,4 Although the rate of progression of aortic stenosis is variable and difficult to predict,4 approximately 75 percent of patients with aortic stenosis will be dead three years after the onset of symptoms if the aortic valve is not replaced. Some patients with severe aortic stenosis remain asymptomatic, while others with moderate stenosis have symptoms attributable to the condition.

The normal aortic valve area averages 2.5 cm2, and there should normally be no gradient. A valve area of less than 0.8 cm2 or a gradient of more than 50 mm Hg represents critical stenosis capable of causing symptoms or death.1,3

PHYSICAL EXAMINATION

The most common physical sign of aortic stenosis is a systolic ejection murmur that radiates to the neck. In mild aortic stenosis, the murmur peaks early in systole, but as the severity of stenosis increases, the murmur peaks progressively later in systole and may become softer as cardiac output decreases (Table 1). As the stenosis worsens, the aortic component of the second heart sound may become diminished. The timing and amplitude of the carotid pulse correlate with the severity of aortic stenosis.5(p118) Later in the disease, the carotid upstrokes become diminished and delayed1,2,5 (parvus et tardus; Figure 1).

TABLE 1

Physical Examination of Patients with Valvular Heart Disease

Findings Murmur S1 S2 Other findings Maneuvers

Aortic stenosis

Mid to late systolic; may be soft or absent if severe

Normal

Single or paradoxically split

Carotid upstrokes diminished and delayed; S3or S4 may be present

Murmur softer with Valsalva maneuver

Mitral stenosis

Diastolic rumble

Loud

Normal

Opening snap may be present

Murmur increased with brief exercise

Aortic regurgitation

Blowing diastolic

Soft

Normal

Wide pulse pressure, systolic hypertension, hyperdynamic circulation

Murmur increased with handgrip or squatting

Mitral regurgitation

Holosystolic

Soft

Normal or split

S3 may be present; carotid upstrokesbrisk

Murmur louder with Valsalva maneuver

Mitral valve prolapse

Mid to late systolic

Normal

Normal

Mid-systolic click

Murmur increased with standing


Information from references 1, 3 and 5.

TABLE 1   Physical Examination of Patients with Valvular Heart Disease

View Table

TABLE 1

Physical Examination of Patients with Valvular Heart Disease

Findings Murmur S1 S2 Other findings Maneuvers

Aortic stenosis

Mid to late systolic; may be soft or absent if severe

Normal

Single or paradoxically split

Carotid upstrokes diminished and delayed; S3or S4 may be present

Murmur softer with Valsalva maneuver

Mitral stenosis

Diastolic rumble

Loud

Normal

Opening snap may be present

Murmur increased with brief exercise

Aortic regurgitation

Blowing diastolic

Soft

Normal

Wide pulse pressure, systolic hypertension, hyperdynamic circulation

Murmur increased with handgrip or squatting

Mitral regurgitation

Holosystolic

Soft

Normal or split

S3 may be present; carotid upstrokesbrisk

Murmur louder with Valsalva maneuver

Mitral valve prolapse

Mid to late systolic

Normal

Normal

Mid-systolic click

Murmur increased with standing


Information from references 1, 3 and 5.

FIGURE 1.

Five-chamber view (including the aorta) showing moderate aortic regurgitation. The transducer is positioned at the top of the image. Regurgitant blood moving toward the transducer appears red on Doppler imaging or as a mosaic pattern, indicating turbulence. (RV = right ventricle, LV = left ventricle, RA = right atrium, LA = left atrium)

View Large


FIGURE 1.

Five-chamber view (including the aorta) showing moderate aortic regurgitation. The transducer is positioned at the top of the image. Regurgitant blood moving toward the transducer appears red on Doppler imaging or as a mosaic pattern, indicating turbulence. (RV = right ventricle, LV = left ventricle, RA = right atrium, LA = left atrium)


FIGURE 1.

Five-chamber view (including the aorta) showing moderate aortic regurgitation. The transducer is positioned at the top of the image. Regurgitant blood moving toward the transducer appears red on Doppler imaging or as a mosaic pattern, indicating turbulence. (RV = right ventricle, LV = left ventricle, RA = right atrium, LA = left atrium)

ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY

Echocardiography with Doppler provides an accurate assessment of aortic valve area and transvalvular gradient and also can be used to estimate left ventricular hypertrophy and ejection fraction.1,2 Patients with severe aortic stenosis should undergo echocardiography annually. This frequent monitoring is more for evaluation of left ventricular function than for estimation of valve area. In patients with mild to moderate aortic stenosis, performance of echocardiography every two to five years is appropriate for monitoring.1

MANAGEMENT

Patients with signs of aortic stenosis on physical examination should undergo testing, including chest x-ray, electrocardiograph (ECG) and echocardiograph.1 There is presently no medical therapy for aortic stenosis. Aortic valve replacement is the only effective treatment that will relieve this mechanical obstruction.3 The decision for surgery is based on the presence of at least moderately severe aortic stenosis with symptoms or signs of left ventricular dysfunction. The prognosis with surgery is excellent, even for elderly patients (in the absence of comorbid conditions). In fact, the age-adjusted survival rate in postoperative patients is similar to that of the general population.3 Cardiac catheterization with angiography is warranted in the appropriate age and risk groups before aortic valve replacement is undertaken.1

Exercise stress testing is not recommended in patients with aortic stenosis, especially those who are symptomatic. Asymptomatic patients may undergo exercise stress testing only under the careful supervision of an experienced physician and with close monitoring of blood pressure levels and ECGs.1 Patients with severe aortic stenosis should limit vigorous physical activity. Patients with aortic stenosis are at moderate risk for development of endocarditis and should receive endocarditis prophylaxis before selected procedures.6

Mitral Stenosis

The decline in rheumatic fever has reduced the incidence of mitral stenosis, a sequelae of rheumatic heart disease primarily affecting women.3 Mitral stenosis has a progressive, lifelong course that is slow and stable in the early years, with rapid acceleration later in life. There is generally a latent period of 20 to 40 years between the occurrence of rheumatic fever and the onset of symptoms.1

Increased left atrial pressure and decreased cardiac output produce the symptoms of mitral stenosis. Elevated left atrial pressure eventually causes pulmonary vasoconstriction, pulmonary hypertension and compromise of right ventricular function. Many patients remain asymptomatic until atrial fibrillation develops or until pregnancy occurs, when there is increased demand on the heart. Symptoms are generally those of left-sided heart failure: dyspnea on exertion, orthopnea and paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea. Patients may also present with hemoptysis and signs of right-sided heart failure.

PHYSICAL EXAMINATION

An apical rumbling, diastolic murmur is characteristic and will immediately follow an opening snap, if present. The rumble is loudest in early diastole but, in patients with mild mitral stenosis or mitral stenosis with low cardiac output, the murmur may be difficult to hear (Table 1).1,3,5(p271) It can be accentuated by placing the patient in the left lateral decubitus position and using the bell of the stethoscope. Brief exercise (such as walking in the hallway) may also accentuate the murmur. A loud first heart sound is common. A right ventricular lift, elevated neck veins, ascites and edema are later signs of right ventricular overload with pulmonary hypertension.

ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY

Echocardiography is the study of choice for diagnosing and assessing the severity of mitral stenosis. It is also useful for obtaining an accurate valve area, assessing right ventricular function and determining suitability for balloon mitral valvotomy.

MANAGEMENT

In patients who are asymptomatic, an annual history and physical examination, as well as a chest x-ray and ECG, are recommended. Apart from endocarditis prophylaxis, no medical therapy is indicated.3,6 When mild symptoms develop, diuretics may be helpful in reducing left atrial pressure and decreasing symptoms. If atrial fibrillation develops, rate control is critical since tachycardia will further decrease left ventricular filling, reduce cardiac output and increase left atrial pressure, leading to more symptoms.1,3

The timing of surgery correlates with the clinical outcome. If symptoms are more than mild or if there is evidence of pulmonary hypertension, mechanical intervention is warranted and delaying intervention worsens prognosis.3

Unlike valvotomy for aortic stenosis, balloon valvotomy for mitral stenosis provides excellent mechanical relief with long-term benefit.3 Mitral balloon valvotomy is recommended for patients who have New York Heart Association class II, III or IV, moderate or severe mitral stenosis and favorable valve morphology. The valves must be pliable, noncalcified and free of subvalvular distortion.1,3 Candidates for valvotomy must have no significant mitral regurgitation.1

Open commissurotomy mitral valve reconstruction and mitral valve replacement improve survival and reduce symptoms.1,3 Mitral valve replacement is indicated in patients with severe mitral stenosis who are not candidates for valvotomy or commissurotomy.

Aortic Regurgitation

Aortic regurgitation results from disease affecting the aortic root or aortic leaflets, preventing their normal closure. Common causes of aortic regurgitation include endocarditis, rheumatic fever, collagen vascular disease, aortic dissection and syphilis.3 Bicuspid aortic valves are also prone to regurgitation. In chronic aortic regurgitation, the stroke volume is increased, which in turn causes systolic hypertension, high pulse pressure and increased afterload. The afterload in aortic regurgitation may be as high as that occurring in aortic stenosis.1

Patients may be asymptomatic until severe left ventricular dysfunction has developed. The initial signs of aortic regurgitation are subtle and may include decreased functional capacity or fatigue. As the disease progresses, the typical presentation is that of left-sided heart failure: orthopnea, dyspnea and fatigue.

Systolic dysfunction is initially reversible, with full recovery of left ventricular size and function after aortic valve replacement. Over time, however, progressive chamber enlargement with decreased contractility make recovery of left ventricular function and improved survival impossible, even with surgery.1

PHYSICAL EXAMINATION

A diastolic blowing murmur heard along the left sternal border is characteristic of aortic regurgitation. A diastolic rumble may also be heard over the apex. The peripheral signs of hyperdynamic circulation indicate severe disease (Table 1).1,3,5(p271) Some of these include Quincke's pulse (alternating blanching and erythema of the nailbed with gentle pressure applied) and Musset's sign (head bobbing).3

ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY

Echocardiography with Doppler ultrasonography provides information about aortic valve morphology and aortic root size, and a semiquantitative estimate of the severity of aortic regurgitation (Figure 2). It provides valuable information about left ventricular size and function. Asymptomatic patients with severe aortic regurgitation should undergo annual echocardiographic examination. Patients with milder forms of aortic regurgitation should have echocardiography if any change in symptoms occurs.2

FIGURE 2.

Echocardiogram of a 73-year-old man with new-onset atrial fibrillation. Moderate mitral regurgitation is seen on this apical view. The color on Doppler imaging indicates movement of blood away from the transducer, located at the top of the image. (RV = right ventricle, LV = left ventricle, RA = right atrium, LA = left atrium)

View Large


FIGURE 2.

Echocardiogram of a 73-year-old man with new-onset atrial fibrillation. Moderate mitral regurgitation is seen on this apical view. The color on Doppler imaging indicates movement of blood away from the transducer, located at the top of the image. (RV = right ventricle, LV = left ventricle, RA = right atrium, LA = left atrium)


FIGURE 2.

Echocardiogram of a 73-year-old man with new-onset atrial fibrillation. Moderate mitral regurgitation is seen on this apical view. The color on Doppler imaging indicates movement of blood away from the transducer, located at the top of the image. (RV = right ventricle, LV = left ventricle, RA = right atrium, LA = left atrium)

MANAGEMENT

Aortic regurgitation should be corrected if the symptoms are more than mild. Compelling evidence supports surgical correction before the onset of permanent left ventricular damage, even in asymptomatic patients.1,3 As in patients with mitral valve regurgitation, timing of surgical intervention correlates with a good outcome. In patients with chronic aortic regurgitation, surgery should be performed before the ejection fraction falls below 55 percent or the end-systolic dimension exceeds 55 mm.1,3 The end-systolic dimension is another gauge of left ventricular function that helps determine contractility and is less dependent on preload than ejection fraction.

Afterload reduction with vasodilators has been shown to improve left ventricular performance and reduce aortic regurgitation. Therapy with nifedipine (Procardia) in particular has been shown to delay the need for surgery by two to three years in patients with severe aortic regurgitation and normal left ventricular function.3

Although the mainstay of surgical treatment has been replacement of the aortic valve with a tissue or mechanical prosthesis, interest in autograft procedures and aortic valve reconstruction is increasing.3 All patients with aortic regurgitation should receive appropriate endocarditis prophylaxis for selected procedures.6

Mitral Regurgitation

Causes of chronic mitral regurgitation include infective endocarditis, degenerative valvular disease (mitral valve prolapse) and rheumatic fever.3 Chronic mitral regurgitation is a state of volume overload leading to the development of left ventricular hypertrophy. The left atrium also enlarges to accommodate the regurgitant volume. This compensated phase of mitral regurgitation varies in duration but may last many years.1 The prolonged state of volume overload may eventually lead to decompensated mitral regurgitation. This phase is characterized by impaired left ventricular function, decreased ejection fraction and pulmonary congestion.

PHYSICAL EXAMINATION

A holosystolic murmur that may radiate to the axilla, the upper sternal borders or the subscapular region is apparent on physical examination. There may be displacement of the left ventricular impulse. A soft first heart sound and a widely split second heart sound may be present. An S3 indicates severe disease but does not necessarily indicate heart failure (Table 1).1,3,5(p271)

ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY

Echocardiography can be used to determine the etiology and morphology of mitral regurgitation, which are important in determining suitability for mitral valve repair (Figure 3). Although a variety of methods are used to quantify mitral regurgitation, echocardiography provides only a semiquantitative estimate of its severity.3 In patients with severe mitral regurgitation, annual or semiannual estimation of left ventricular function (ejection fraction and end-systolic dimension) is indicated, even in the absence of symptoms.

FIGURE 3.

Indications for echocardiography in the evaluation of murmurs.

Information from references 1,2 and 5.

View Large


FIGURE 3.

Indications for echocardiography in the evaluation of murmurs.

Information from references 1,2 and 5.


FIGURE 3.

Indications for echocardiography in the evaluation of murmurs.

Information from references 1,2 and 5.

MANAGEMENT

In patients with chronic mitral regurgitation, left ventricular damage can occur while the patient remains asymptomatic. Therefore, surgery is indicated if left ventricular dysfunction has begun to develop, even in the absence of symptoms.1,3 Generally, the ejection fraction of patients with mitral regurgitation should be above normal. If the ejection fraction falls to below 60 percent, the prognosis worsens. End-systolic dimension is another helpful gauge in determining the need for surgery. An end-systolic dimension over 45 mm is also consistent with a poor prognosis.

In summary, patients should be referred for surgery if symptoms are moderate to severe, if the ejection fraction is less than 60 percent or if the end-systolic dimension approaches 45 mm, even in the absence of symptoms1,3(Figure 3). Properly timed surgery gives patients with mitral regurgitation a postoperative survival rate similar to that of the general population. No studies have demonstrated successful use of medical therapy, other than as prophylaxis against endocarditis, in the treatment of chronic mitral regurgitation.1,3

Because mitral valve repair has a lower rate of mortality associated with surgery and a better late outcome than mitral valve replacement, repair should be performed whenever possible.1 The better outcome of repair is thought to be associated with the geometric preservation of the left ventricular and mitral valve apparatus. Mitral valve repair also eliminates the need for anticoagulation therapy in patients who are in sinus rhythm and prevents the chance of prosthetic valve failure. Mitral valve repair, however, is more technically demanding than mitral valve replacement, making the surgeon's skill and experience in performing the repair a predictor of success.1 The success of mitral valve repair surgery also depends on the location and type of mitral valve disease that caused the mitral regurgitation.

Mitral Valve Prolapse

Mitral valve prolapse occurs when varying portions of one or both leaflets of the mitral valve extend or protrude abnormally above the mitral annulus into the left atrium.

Although the prevalence of mitral valve prolapse was once thought to be as high as 15 percent in the general population, more recent studies using new echocardiographic criteria for diagnosis have suggested a prevalence of approximately 2.4 percent.7

Many symptoms have been attributed to mitral valve prolapse, including chest pain, dyspnea, anxiety and palpitations. Previous studies have linked mitral valve prolapse to serious long-term complications such as atrial fibrillation, syncope, stroke and sudden death. More recent research, however, reveals no increased risk of these complications when patients with mitral valve prolapse are compared with those who have no prolapse.7,8 In addition, the age-adjusted survival rate in patients with mitral valve prolapse is similar to that in patients without mitral valve prolapse.1

PHYSICAL EXAMINATION

The mid-systolic click, often accompanied by a late systolic murmur, is the auscultatory hallmark of mitral valve prolapse (Table 1). The click results from a sudden tensing of the mitral valve apparatus as the leaflets prolapse into the left atrium. When end-diastolic volume is decreased (as with standing), the clickmurmur complex occurs shortly after the first heart sound. Maneuvers that increase enddiastolic volume (such as squatting) cause the click-murmur complex to move toward the second heart sound.

ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY

New echocardiographic criteria for the diagnosis of mitral valve prolapse are based on the three-dimensional shape of the valve with clinical correlation. The new criteria have improved sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of mitral valve prolapse.7 All patients with signs or symptoms of mitral valve prolapse should have an initial echocardiograph. Serial echocardiography is usually not necessary unless mitral regurgitation is present.1

MANAGEMENT

Reassurance is a major component of the management of patients with mitral valve prolapse. Patients should be reminded of the low incidence of serious complications associated with mitral valve prolapse, and physicians should attempt to allay fears of serious underlying heart disease. Patients with mitral valve prolapse and symptoms such as chest pain, palpitations or anxiety often respond to treatment with beta-blocking medications. In many cases, cessation of alcohol, tobacco and caffeine use may be sufficient to control symptoms.1

Use of prophylaxis against endocarditis has been controversial in patients with mitral valve prolapse. Currently, antibiotic prophylaxis is not recommended for use in patients with mitral valve prolapse in the absence of mitral regurgitation. Only patients with prolapsing and regurgitant valves, evidenced by audible clicks and murmurs or by mitral regurgitation demonstrated on Doppler imaging, should receive antibiotics.6

Final Comment

Great progress has been made in improving rates of morbidity and mortality in patients with valvular heart disease. Successful management of patients with valvular heart disease requires an evidence-based approach to echocardiography and to surgical intervention. Echocardiography should assess not only the valvular lesion but also the compensatory changes of the heart in response to the lesion. Timing of surgical intervention often correlates with outcome. Most patients with acquired valvular heart disease are at risk for developing endocarditis and should receive prophylactic antibiotics.

The Authors

BENJAMIN SHIPTON, D.O., is in private practice in Mercer, Pa. A graduate of the Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Philadelphia, he completed a family medicine residency at Mercy Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa.

HANEY WAHBA, M.D., is faculty member at the Mercy Hospital family practice residency program and a clinical assistant professor in the department of family medicine at Jefferson Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia. Dr. Wahba received his medical degree from the Cairo University Faculty of Medicine, Cairo, Egypt, and completed a residency in family practice at Latrobe Area Hospital in Latrobe, Pa.

Address correspondence to Haney Wahba, M.D., MFHC-East 3424 William Penn Hwy., Penn Center Building No. 2, Pittsburgh, PA 15235 (e-mail: hwahba@mercy.pmhs.org). Reprints are not available from the authors.

REFERENCES

1. Bonow RO, Carabello B, de Leon AC, Edmunds LH, Fedderly BJ, Freed MD, et al. Guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Patients with Valvular Heart Disease). Circulation. 1998;98:1949–84.

2. Cheitlin MD, Alpert JS, Armstrong WF, Aurigemma GP, Beller GA, Bierman FZ, et al. ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Clinical Application of Echocardiography. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Clinical Application of Echocardiography). Circulation. 1997;95:1686–744.

3. Carabello BA, Crawford FA. Valvular heart disease. N Engl J Med. 1997;337(1):32–41 [published erratum appears in N Engl J Med 1997;337:507].

4. Lester SJ, Heilbron B, Gin K, Dodek A, Jue J. The natural history and rate of progression of aortic stenosis. Chest. 1998;113:1109–14.

5. Otto CM. Valvular heart disease. Philadelphia: Saunders,. 1999:118,271.

6. Dajani AS, Taubert KA, Wilson W, Bolger AF, Bayer A, Ferrieri P, et al. Prevention of bacterial endocarditis. Recommendations by the American Heart Association. JAMA. 1997;227:1794–801.

7. Freed LA, Levy D, Levine RA, Larson MG, Evans JC, Fuller DL, et al. Prevalence and clinical outcome of mitral-valve prolapse. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(1):1–7.

8. Gilon D, Buonanno FS, Joffe MM, Leavitt M, Mar shall JE, Kistler JP, et al. Lack of evidence of an association between mitral-valve prolapse and stroke in young patients. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(1):8–13.

This article is one in a series developed in collaboration with the American Heart Association. Guest editor of the series is Sidney C. Smith, Jr., M.D., Chief Science Officer, American Heart Association, Dallas.


Copyright © 2001 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact afpserv@aafp.org for copyright questions and/or permission requests.

Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions


Article Tools

  • Download PDF
  • Print page
  • Share this page
  • AFP CME Quiz

Information From Industry

More in AFP

More in Pubmed

Navigate this Article