Letters to the Editor

Management Guidelines for Sport-Related Concussions



FREE PREVIEW Log in or buy this issue to read the full article. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles. Subscribe now.


FREE PREVIEW Subscribe or buy this issue. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles.

Am Fam Physician. 2002 Jun 15;65(12):2435-2436.

to the editor: I enjoyed reading Dr. Kushner's comprehensive review of sports-related concussions in American Family Physician.1 As mentioned in the article, the risks of cumulative neurologic injury and fatal cerebral edema following repeated concussions have led to the promulgation of at least 14 management guidelines since 1973 to reduce these risks.2 Several points regarding the validity and utility of the current guidelines deserve mention.

The published guidelines rely heavily on expert opinion and anecdotal case reports. Therefore, the guidelines differ in the criteria used to define mild, moderate, and severe degrees (or grades) of concussion. For example, as illustrated in Tables 1 and 2 of the article,1 the guidelines of the Colorado Medical Society and the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) emphasize loss of consciousness more than any other sign or symptom of concussion in determining the severity of injury. These two guidelines assume that loss of consciousness (even for a period of seconds) portends a worse prognosis than a prolonged period of posttraumatic amnesia. In contrast, the guidelines presented in those tables1 by Dr. Cantu3 consider prolonged post-traumatic amnesia (more than 30 minutes) as significant as brief loss of consciousness (less than five minutes) in determining the severity of a concussion. Currently, no compelling clinical data favor any single symptom or sign as a better predictor of severity of injury.4

All concussion guidelines agree that an athlete should not return to play if still symptomatic from a previous concussion. Returning an athlete prematurely to sport presumably exposes the athlete to the threat of second-impact syndrome and cumulative brain injury. However, the guidelines differ in their recommendations for returning players to competition once they are asymptomatic. For example, under the Colorado guidelines, an athlete who is completely asymptomatic following several seconds of loss of consciousness would immediately be transported to the hospital and kept from play until asymptomatic for two weeks (grade 3 concussion). Under the AAN guidelines, this same athlete may return to play after being asymptomatic for one week (grade 3, brief loss of consciousness). The Cantu3 guidelines return this athlete to play after two weeks, if asymptomatic for one week (grade 2 concussion).

Questions remain regarding the universal applicability of the current concussion management guidelines. In the published cases of the second-impact syndrome, all victims have been adolescents.5 This implies some age-related differences in vulnerability and response to brain injury. Nor do the return-to-play guidelines consider the different inherent risks of further head trauma among sports.

Concussion management guidelines have undoubtedly increased awareness of the signs, symptoms, and potential sequelae of concussion; however, more definitive, evidence-based information is needed to validate current recommendations. Newer diagnostic tools, such as neuropsychologic testing, may offer more sensitive means of determining the presence and severity of cerebral concussion.6 Ideally, optimum management of the head-injured athlete will occur through a synthesis of scientifically based guidelines and the physician's clinical judgment.

REFERENCES

1. Kushner DS. Concussion in sports: minimizing the risk for complications. Am Fam Physician. 2001;64:1007–14.

2. Collins MW, Lovell MR, Mckeag DB. Current issues in managing sports-related concussion. JAMA. 1999;282:2283–5.

3. Cantu RC. Guidelines for return to contact sports after a cerebral concussion. Physician Sports Med. 1986;14:75–6,79,83.

4. McCrory P, Johnston KM, Mohtadi NG, Meeuwisse W. Evidence-based review of sport-related concussion: basic science. Clin J Sport Med. 2001;11:160–5.

5. Cantu RC. Second-impact syndrome. Clin Sports Med. 1998;17:37–44.

6. Grindel SH, Lovell MR, Collins MW. The assessment of sport-related concussion: the evidence behind neuropsychological testing and management. Clin J Sport Med. 2001;11:134–43.

Send letters to Kenneth W. Lin, MD, MPH, Associate Deputy Editor for AFP Online, e-mail: afplet@aafp.org, or 11400 Tomahawk Creek Pkwy., Leawood, KS 66211-2680.

Please include your complete address, e-mail address, and telephone number. Letters should be fewer than 400 words and limited to six references, one table or figure, and three authors.

Letters submitted for publication in AFP must not be submitted to any other publication. Possible conflicts of interest must be disclosed at time of submission. Submission of a letter will be construed as granting the American Academy of Family Physicians permission to publish the letter in any of its publications in any form. The editors may edit letters to meet style and space requirements.



Copyright © 2002 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact afpserv@aafp.org for copyright questions and/or permission requests.

Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions


Article Tools

  • Print page
  • Share this page
  • AFP CME Quiz

Information From Industry

Navigate this Article