Foot Fractures Frequently Misdiagnosed as Ankle Sprains



FREE PREVIEW Log in or buy this issue to read the full article. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles. Subscribe now.


FREE PREVIEW Subscribe or buy this issue. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles.

Most ankle injuries are straightforward ligamentous injuries. However, the clinical presentation of subtle fractures can be similar to that of ankle sprains, and these fractures are frequently missed on initial examination. Fractures of the talar dome may be medial or lateral, and they are usually the result of inversion injuries, although medial injuries may be atraumatic. Lateral talar process fractures are characterized by point tenderness over the lateral process. Posterior talar process fractures are often associated with tenderness to deep palpation anterior to the Achilles tendon over the posterolateral talus, and plantar flexion may exacerbate the pain. These fractures can often be managed nonsurgically with nonweight-bearing status and a short leg cast worn for approximately four weeks. Delays in treatment can result in long-term disability and surgery. Computed tomographic scans or magnetic resonance imaging may be required because these fractures are difficult to detect on plain films.

Ankle injuries are commonly evaluated by primary care and emergency physicians. Most of these injuries do not pose a diagnostic dilemma and can be managed nonsurgically without a prolonged or costly work-up. However, the clinical presentation of some subtle fractures can be similar to that of routine ankle sprains, and they are commonly misdiagnosed as such. Many of these injuries, if left without a definitive diagnosis, result in long-term disability (Table 1).

TABLE 1

Summary and Comparison of Presented Fractures

Fracture type Mechanism of injury Important physical examination findings* Best plain radiograph Treatment

Talar dome (lateral)

Inversion with dorsiflexion

Tenderness anterior to the lateral malleolus, along the anterior border of the talus

Mortise view: shallow, wafer-shaped lesion

Stage I or II (see Table 3): NWBSLC for six weeks Stage III or IV (see Table 3), or persistent symptoms: surgical Treatment

Talar dome (medial)

Inversion with plantar flexion or atraumatic

Tenderness posterior to the medial malleolus, along the posterior border of the talus

AP view: deep, cup-shaped lesion; initial radiograph can be normal because changes in subchondral bone may not develop for weeks.

Stage I, II, or III (see Table 3): NWBSLC for six weeks Stage IV (see Table 3): surgical treatment

Lateral talar process

Rapid inversion with dorsiflexion

Point tenderness over the lateral process (anterior and inferior to the lateral malleolus)

Mortise view; lateral view may show subtalar effusion

Small fragment with <2 mm Displacement: NWBSLC for four to six weeks Large or displaced fragments: operative treatment

Posterior talar Process (lateral tubercle)

Hyperplantar flexion or forced inversion

Tenderness to deep palpation anterior to the Achilles tendon over posterolateral talus Plantar flexion may reproduce pain.

Lateral radiograph (an accessory ossicle, the os trigonum, may be present)

Minimally displaced fracture: NWBSLC for four to six weeks Large or displaced fragments or persistent symptoms: operative treatment

Posterior talar process (medial tubercle)

Dorsiflexion with pronation

Tenderness to deep palpation between the medial malleolus and the Achilles tendon

Difficult with standard views; an oblique ankle radiograph taken with the foot placed in 40 degrees of external rotation has been successful.

Similar to lateral tubercle Fractures

Anterior process of the calcaneus

Inversion with plantar flexion can lead to an avulsion fracture. Forced dorsiflexion compression fracture.

Point tenderness over the calcanealcuboid joint (approximately 1 cm inferior and 3 to 4 cm anterior to the lateral malleolus)

Lateral radiograph (an accessory ossicle, the calcaneus secondarium, may be present)

Small nondisplaced fracture: nonweight-bearing with compressive dressing or NWBSLC for four to six weeks Large or displaced fractures may require operative treatment.


AP = anteroposterior; NWBSLC = nonweight-bearing, short leg cast.

*—Acutely, most fractures will have symptoms very similar to those of ankle sprains: swelling, ecchymosis, ligamentous laxity, tenderness, and decreased range of motion. f—All of these fractures can have subtle findings on plain radiograph, and computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging may be required to accurately confirm or characterize a fracture.

TABLE 1   Summary and Comparison of Presented Fractures

View Table

TABLE 1

Summary and Comparison of Presented Fractures

Fracture type Mechanism of injury Important physical examination findings* Best plain radiograph Treatment

Talar dome (lateral)

Inversion with dorsiflexion

Tenderness anterior to the lateral malleolus, along the anterior border of the talus

Mortise view: shallow, wafer-shaped lesion

Stage I or II (see Table 3): NWBSLC for six weeks Stage III or IV (see Table 3), or persistent symptoms: surgical Treatment

Talar dome (medial)

Inversion with plantar flexion or atraumatic

Tenderness posterior to the medial malleolus, along the posterior border of the talus

AP view: deep, cup-shaped lesion; initial radiograph can be normal because changes in subchondral bone may not develop for weeks.

Stage I, II, or III (see Table 3): NWBSLC for six weeks Stage IV (see Table 3): surgical treatment

Lateral talar process

Rapid inversion with dorsiflexion

Point tenderness over the lateral process (anterior and inferior to the lateral malleolus)

Mortise view; lateral view may show subtalar effusion

Small fragment with <2 mm Displacement: NWBSLC for four to six weeks Large or displaced fragments: operative treatment

Posterior talar Process (lateral tubercle)

Hyperplantar flexion or forced inversion

Tenderness to deep palpation anterior to the Achilles tendon over posterolateral talus Plantar flexion may reproduce pain.

Lateral radiograph (an accessory ossicle, the os trigonum, may be present)

Minimally displaced fracture: NWBSLC for four to six weeks Large or displaced fragments or persistent symptoms: operative treatment

Posterior talar process (medial tubercle)

Dorsiflexion with pronation

Tenderness to deep palpation between the medial malleolus and the Achilles tendon

Difficult with standard views; an oblique ankle radiograph taken with the foot placed in 40 degrees of external rotation has been successful.

Similar to lateral tubercle Fractures

Anterior process of the calcaneus

Inversion with plantar flexion can lead to an avulsion fracture. Forced dorsiflexion compression fracture.

Point tenderness over the calcanealcuboid joint (approximately 1 cm inferior and 3 to 4 cm anterior to the lateral malleolus)

Lateral radiograph (an accessory ossicle, the calcaneus secondarium, may be present)

Small nondisplaced fracture: nonweight-bearing with compressive dressing or NWBSLC for four to six weeks Large or displaced fractures may require operative treatment.


AP = anteroposterior; NWBSLC = nonweight-bearing, short leg cast.

*—Acutely, most fractures will have symptoms very similar to those of ankle sprains: swelling, ecchymosis, ligamentous laxity, tenderness, and decreased range of motion. f—All of these fractures can have subtle findings on plain radiograph, and computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging may be required to accurately confirm or characterize a fracture.

This article features subtle fractures to facilitate timely diagnosis and treatment of these less-common injuries. These fractures should be considered in the differential diagnosis of any acute ankle sprain, as well as any suspected sprain that does not improve with routine treatment (Table 2).

TABLE 2

Common Management of Ankle Sprains

Acute care

Joint rest, ice, compression, and elevation (RICE)

Simple analgesics for 24 to 72 hours

Follow-up care

Progressive range-of-motion and proprioceptive exercises

Protection from further ankle injury with a wrap or brace

Gradual return to normal activity level

TABLE 2   Common Management of Ankle Sprains

View Table

TABLE 2

Common Management of Ankle Sprains

Acute care

Joint rest, ice, compression, and elevation (RICE)

Simple analgesics for 24 to 72 hours

Follow-up care

Progressive range-of-motion and proprioceptive exercises

Protection from further ankle injury with a wrap or brace

Gradual return to normal activity level

Overall, optimal results are achieved with early diagnosis and treatment of these fractures. When treatment is delayed, patients tend to have a more complex clinical course.

Talar Dome Injuries

The dome of the talus articulates with the tibia and fibula, and has a key role in ankle motion and in supporting the axial load during weight bearing14(Figures 1 and 2). Fractures of the talar dome are generally the result of inversion injuries of the ankle. They are located medially or laterally with equal frequency and occasionally through both.35 Lateral talar dome fractures are almost always associated with trauma, while medial talar dome lesions can be traumatic or atraumatic in origin.

FIGURE 1.

Bones of the foot, dorsal view.

View Large


FIGURE 1.

Bones of the foot, dorsal view.


FIGURE 1.

Bones of the foot, dorsal view.

FIGURE 2.

Bones of the foot and ankle, lateral view.

View Large


FIGURE 2.

Bones of the foot and ankle, lateral view.


FIGURE 2.

Bones of the foot and ankle, lateral view.

Although the etiology in atraumatic lesions is unclear, osteochondral fragments can separate from the surrounding cartilage surface and dissect into the joint space. As these osteochondral fragments (often referred to as osteochondritis dissecans lesions) become loose in the joint, they can cause pain, locking, crepitance, and swelling.1,4,5

DIAGNOSIS

Clinical diagnosis of talar dome fractures can be highly challenging because there are no pathognomonic signs or symptoms.5 The patient may have sustained a fall or a twisting injury to the ankle and may generally ambulate with an antalgic gait. In the acute setting, the symptoms of a talar dome fracture are similar to and often occur with an ankle sprain.3,5

In lateral talar dome lesions, tenderness is generally found anterior to the lateral malle-oli, along the anterior lateral border of the talus.3,6 In medial talar dome lesions, tenderness is usually located posterior to the medial malleolus, along the posterior medial border of the talar dome.3,6 Chronic talar dome lesions—traumatic and atraumatic osteo-chondritis dissecans lesions—may have a clinical presentation similar to that of arthritis. Typical findings include crepitance, stiffness, and recurrent swelling with activity.5

Diagnosis of talar dome lesions can often be made with standard anteroposterior (AP), lateral, and mortise ankle radiographs. However, repeated radiographs may be necessary because initial films may appear normal. Secondary changes in the subchondral bone (visible on plain radiographs) caused by a compression fracture of the articular osteochondral surface may take weeks to appear.2,4 In addition, small chondral fragments are radiolucent and not evident on standard radiographs.

Generally, the AP ankle view is best for visualizing deep, cup-shaped medial lesions,1,4 although the lesions are often appreciated on the mortise view as well (Figure 3). Lateral lesions are best visualized on a mortise view and are generally thin and wafer-shaped.1,4(Figure 4). If suggested by the clinical scenario, fractures not visualized with plain radiographs may require magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT).6  The fracture classification developed by Berndt and Harty is widely used to stage talar dome lesions (Table 3).5

FIGURE 3.

Mortise view of the ankle showing an atraumatic osteochondral lesion (arrow) of the medial talar dome.

View Large


FIGURE 3.

Mortise view of the ankle showing an atraumatic osteochondral lesion (arrow) of the medial talar dome.


FIGURE 3.

Mortise view of the ankle showing an atraumatic osteochondral lesion (arrow) of the medial talar dome.

FIGURE 4.

Mortise view (left) and anteroposterior view (right) of the ankle showing a traumatic lateral talar dome fracture (arrows).

View Large


FIGURE 4.

Mortise view (left) and anteroposterior view (right) of the ankle showing a traumatic lateral talar dome fracture (arrows).


FIGURE 4.

Mortise view (left) and anteroposterior view (right) of the ankle showing a traumatic lateral talar dome fracture (arrows).

TABLE 3

Berndt and Harty Classification of Osteochondral Lesions of the Talar Dome

Stage I

Compression fracture of subchondral bone

Stage II

Partial osteochondral fragment fracture

Stage III

Completely detached fragment without displacement

Stage IV

Completely detached fragment with displacement


Adapted with permission from Berndt AL, Harty M. Transchondral fractures (osteochondritis dissecans) of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1959;41:988–1020.

TABLE 3   Berndt and Harty Classification of Osteochondral Lesions of the Talar Dome

View Table

TABLE 3

Berndt and Harty Classification of Osteochondral Lesions of the Talar Dome

Stage I

Compression fracture of subchondral bone

Stage II

Partial osteochondral fragment fracture

Stage III

Completely detached fragment without displacement

Stage IV

Completely detached fragment with displacement


Adapted with permission from Berndt AL, Harty M. Transchondral fractures (osteochondritis dissecans) of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1959;41:988–1020.

TREATMENT

An orthopedic surgeon should be consulted for treatment of talar dome lesions because of the high functional demands of for the talar dome and the potential for complications. Stage I, II, and III medial lesions can usually be treated nonsurgically with six weeks in a nonweight-bearing cast.1,3,5 Adequate reduction and immobilization are crucial for fracture healing and to avoid avascular necrosis of the fracture fragment.5

Patients with stage III lateral lesions, stage IV lesions, and persistent symptoms are generally treated surgically. Treatment options fragment excision range from arthroscopy with or without subchondral bone drilling to open reduction internal fixation.4,5

Lateral Process Fractures

The lateral talar process is an osseous protuberance that articulates superolaterally with the fibula, helping to stabilize the ankle mortise, and inferomedially with the calcaneus, forming the lateral portion of the subtalar joint7(Figures 1 and 2). Lateral process fractures are the second most common talar fractures. From 33 to 41 percent of these fractures are missed on initial presentation.811 Traditionally, the causative injuries are falls, motor vehicle crashes, or direct trauma. Some recent reports79,12 implicate snowboarding accidents in these fractures.

DIAGNOSIS

The patient usually has a history of a rapid inversion and dorsiflexion injury.79 Fractures of the lateral process range from avulsion fractures of the capsular ligaments to intra-articular injuries involving the ankle and subtalar joints.9

Physical examination findings are similar to those in lateral ankle ligamentous injuries. Pain with plantar flexion, dorsiflexion, and subtalar joint movement is generally present.7 Although the normal anatomy of the ankle may be obscured by soft tissue swelling, a helpful diagnostic indicator is point tenderness over the lateral process. The lateral process can be palpated anteriorly and inferiorly to the tip of the lateral malleolus.8,11

Fractures can usually be visualized on a standard ankle series9(Figure 5). A posterior subtalar effusion seen on the lateral view is highly suggestive of an occult lateral process fracture.13 A CT scan can clearly show this injury and may be required to confirm a suspected fracture.11

FIGURE 5.

Anteroposterior view of the ankle showing a fracture (arrow) of the lateral process of the talus.

View Large


FIGURE 5.

Anteroposterior view of the ankle showing a fracture (arrow) of the lateral process of the talus.


FIGURE 5.

Anteroposterior view of the ankle showing a fracture (arrow) of the lateral process of the talus.

TREATMENT

A nonweight-bearing, short leg cast can be used if anatomic position with less than 2 mm displacement can be maintained.7,11 A nonweight-bearing cast should be maintained for four to six weeks, followed by two weeks in a walking cast and initiation of rehabilitation exercises.7 For large and displaced fragments, the treatment of choice is usually surgical reduction and fixation.7,8

Posterior Process Fractures

The posterior process of the talus is composed of two tubercles, the lateral and medial (Figures 1 and 2). The lateral tubercle is the larger of the two and serves as the attachment of the posterior talocalcaneal and posterior talofibular ligaments.9,14,15 The medial tubercle serves as the attachment for the posterior third of the deltoid ligament.9,14,15 The under-surface of both tubercles forms the posterior fourth of the subtalar joint.9,14

An accessory bone known as the ostrigonum is relatively common, posterior to the lateral tubercle.6,15 The os trigonum can be a source of pathology, and a normal os trigonum may be confused with a fracture of the lateral tubercle.2,9,14

Again, these fractures have been commonly misdiagnosed as ankle sprains.2,9,15,16 In one case series,15 17 of 20 patients with fractures were misdiagnosed with ankle sprains. Posterior process fractures can occur at either or both tubercles.1418 Lateral and medial tubercle fractures are discussed separately.

FRACTURES OF THE POSTERIOR PROCESS: LATERAL TUBERCLE

Fractures of the lateral tubercle can be caused by hyperplantar flexion or inversion.1,2,15 Hyperplantar flexion injuries tend to cause compression fractures, while inversion injuries tend to produce avulsion fractures.1,2,15 Both of these injuries have been described after falls and have been associated with football and rugby kicking injuries, which place the ankle in a forced plantar flexed position.19 If present, an os trigonum can be injured by the same mechanisms described above.2,19

Diagnosis

Clinically, patients with a fracture of the lateral tubercle present with pain and swelling in the posterolateral area of the ankle. The pain is often exacerbated by activities requiring plantar flexion.15 Physical examination findings in lateral tubercle fractures of the posterior process are highly consistent for tenderness to deep palpation anterior to the Achilles tendon over the posterior talus. The pain is often reproduced with plantar flexion and occasionally accentuated with dorsiflexion of the great toe. This is caused by compression of the fracture fragment as the flexor hallucis longus tendon passes between the medial and lateral tubercle.15

Careful physical examination and correlation with radiographic findings may be necessary to differentiate a fracture of the lateral tubercle, a fracture of a fused os trigonum, a tear in the fibrous attachment of the ostrigonum to the lateral tubercle, or a normal os trigonum.2,6,19

A lateral radiograph of the foot usually best visualizes the lateral tubercle and, if present, the os trigonum.6,9 When evaluating the fracture line, a rough, irregular cortical surface suggests the presence of an acute fracture (Figure 6). In acute injuries, this rough irregular surface may help distinguish a fracture from a normal os trigonum, which generally has a smooth, rounded cortical surface.15 In chronic cases, these differences may be less distinct, making the distinction between a fracture and a normal os trigonum difficult. When the diagnosis is unclear and clinical suspicion is present, an MRI or CT will clearly demonstrate this fracture.16

FIGURE 6.

Lateral view of the ankle showing a fracture of the lateral tubercle of the posterior process of the talus. The faint vertical lucency (arrow) is the fracture line.

View Large


FIGURE 6.

Lateral view of the ankle showing a fracture of the lateral tubercle of the posterior process of the talus. The faint vertical lucency (arrow) is the fracture line.


FIGURE 6.

Lateral view of the ankle showing a fracture of the lateral tubercle of the posterior process of the talus. The faint vertical lucency (arrow) is the fracture line.

Treatment

Nondisplaced or minimally displaced fractures can be treated with a non-weight-bearing, short leg cast for four to six weeks.9,15 After this period of immobilization, weight bearing is allowed as tolerated. If symptoms persist, an additional four to six weeks of immobilization would be recommended.6 If the fracture site continues to be symptomatic after six months, fragment excision is usually curative.6,9 Larger and more displaced fractures may require open reduction internal fixation.6,16

FRACTURES OF THE POSTERIOR PROCESS: MEDIAL TUBERCLE

Medial tubercle fractures are relatively rare.17,18 They were first described by Cedell,18 who presented four cases of medial tubercle fractures that had originally been treated as ankle sprains.

Diagnosis

Generally, medial tubercle fractures are secondary to dorsiflexion, pronationtype injuries, because the medial tubercle is avulsed by the deltoid ligament.17,18

On clinical assessment, there may be only slight pain with ambulation and range-of-motion testing.6,18 Patients with medial tubercle fractures typically have swelling and pain posterior to the medial malleolus and anterior to the Achilles tendon.17,18,20

Visualization of the medial tubercle fracture on plain radiograph may be challenging, but the fracture can generally be seen on an oblique projection with the foot and ankle externally rotated 40 degrees and the beam centered 1 cm posterior and inferior to the medial malleolus16,17(Figure 7). However, CT (Figure 8) or MRI may be necessary if the diagnosis is unclear.16,17

FIGURE 7.

Special oblique view of the ankle showing a medial tubercle fracture (arrow) of the posterior process of the talus.

View Large


FIGURE 7.

Special oblique view of the ankle showing a medial tubercle fracture (arrow) of the posterior process of the talus.


FIGURE 7.

Special oblique view of the ankle showing a medial tubercle fracture (arrow) of the posterior process of the talus.

FIGURE 8.

Computed tomographic scan demonstrating a medial tubercle fracture (arrow) of the posterior process of the talus.

View Large


FIGURE 8.

Computed tomographic scan demonstrating a medial tubercle fracture (arrow) of the posterior process of the talus.


FIGURE 8.

Computed tomographic scan demonstrating a medial tubercle fracture (arrow) of the posterior process of the talus.

Treatment

Medial tubercle fractures are treated in a manner similar to that for lateral tubercle fractures.17,18,20

Fracture of the Anterior Process of the Calcaneus

The anterior process of the calcaneus is a saddle-shaped bony protuberance that articulates with the cuboid. It is attached to the cuboid by an interosseous ligament and to the cuboid and navicular bones by the strong bifurcate ligament21,22(Figures 1 and 2). Fractures of the anterior process account for approximately 15 percent of all calcaneal fractures and are commonly misdiagnosed as ankle sprains.6,21,23,24

Anterior process fractures result from avulsion or compression. Inversion plantar flexion can cause avulsion fractures of the anterior process. This injury tends to be extra-articular and accounts for most of the anterior process fractures that are initially diagnosed as ankle sprains.2123

Anterior process fractures secondary to compression generally occur when the foot is forcefully dorsiflexed and the anterior process is pressed against the cuboid.22 Because of the energy involved with this mechanism, anterior process fractures secondary to compression are often intra-articular and are commonly associated with other fractures.7,23

DIAGNOSIS

Patients with anterior process fractures generally have a history of a previous inversion injury or involvement in a motor vehicle crash.21 Clinically, patients generally show signs and symptoms similar to those of a lateral ankle sprain.21,23 The pain may be minimal with standing but increases substantially with ambulation.21,23 An important diagnostic feature is point tenderness over the calca-neocuboid joint that is localized approximately 1 cm inferior and 3 to 4 cm anterior to the lateral malleolus, just distal to the anterior talofibular ligament insertion.21,22,23 Careful assessment of the point of maximal tenderness may help differentiate this fracture from a lateral ligament sprain.21,23

Although this fracture can be difficult to assess on routine radiographs of the foot and ankle, a careful inspection of the lateral view of the calcaneus often reveals this subtle fracture21,24(Figure 9). As the clinical scenario dictates, a CT scan or MRI may be necessary.9,21,23 In addition, an accessory ossicle (calcaneus secondarium) maybe located near the anterior process and could be misinterpreted as a fracture.21,24

FIGURE 9.

Lateral view of the foot and ankle showing a fracture (arrow) of the anterior process of the calcaneus.

View Large


FIGURE 9.

Lateral view of the foot and ankle showing a fracture (arrow) of the anterior process of the calcaneus.


FIGURE 9.

Lateral view of the foot and ankle showing a fracture (arrow) of the anterior process of the calcaneus.

TREATMENT

For small, nondisplaced fractures, early immobilization in a nonweight-bearing, short leg cast or compressive dressing for four to six weeks followed by range-of-motion exercises and a gradual return to weight bearing has been successful.21,23

Although fracture healing may appear radiographically to be complete, approximately 25 percent of patients require more than a year before becoming asymptomatic.21 Following nonsurgical management, most patients report satisfactory results and a return to preinjury activity levels.21,23,24 Symptomatic nonunions or large, displaced fractures may require surgical intervention.21,24

Final Comment

The fractures discussed here can be serious injuries and cause prolonged disability. In general, extra-articular fractures of the talus and calcaneus can be managed with nonsurgical treatment. However, intra-articular fractures require special attention to ensure that the articular surface is restored to anatomic congruity and that the correct mechanical alignment is maintained. This step optimizes the chance for a full recovery and decreases the incidence of post-traumatic arthritis and associated morbidities.

Appropriate radiographs are essential to the diagnosis of these fractures but, in the work-up of an ankle injury, radiographs are not always required. The Ottawa ankle rules (Figure 1025) offer the physician clinical guidance as to which injuries require radiographs. Prospective studies have validated the effectiveness of these guidelines and shown the rules to be 100 percent sensitive for clinically significant fractures.25,26

FIGURE 10.

Adaptation of the Ottawa ankle rules used to determine when to obtain radiographs of the foot or ankle in patients with acute ankle injury. An ankle radiographic series is only required if there is pain in the malleolar zone and any of the following findings are present: bone tenderness at point A or B, or inability to bear weight immediately following the injury and during examination. A foot radiographic series is only required if there is pain in the midfoot zone and any of the following findings are present: bone tenderness at point C or D, or inability to bear weight immediately following the injury and during examination.

Adapted with permission from Rubin A, Sallis R. Evaluation and diagnosis of ankle injuries. Am Fam Physician 1996;54:1609–18.

View Large


FIGURE 10.

Adaptation of the Ottawa ankle rules used to determine when to obtain radiographs of the foot or ankle in patients with acute ankle injury. An ankle radiographic series is only required if there is pain in the malleolar zone and any of the following findings are present: bone tenderness at point A or B, or inability to bear weight immediately following the injury and during examination. A foot radiographic series is only required if there is pain in the midfoot zone and any of the following findings are present: bone tenderness at point C or D, or inability to bear weight immediately following the injury and during examination.

Adapted with permission from Rubin A, Sallis R. Evaluation and diagnosis of ankle injuries. Am Fam Physician 1996;54:1609–18.


FIGURE 10.

Adaptation of the Ottawa ankle rules used to determine when to obtain radiographs of the foot or ankle in patients with acute ankle injury. An ankle radiographic series is only required if there is pain in the malleolar zone and any of the following findings are present: bone tenderness at point A or B, or inability to bear weight immediately following the injury and during examination. A foot radiographic series is only required if there is pain in the midfoot zone and any of the following findings are present: bone tenderness at point C or D, or inability to bear weight immediately following the injury and during examination.

Adapted with permission from Rubin A, Sallis R. Evaluation and diagnosis of ankle injuries. Am Fam Physician 1996;54:1609–18.

Although fractures of the talus were vary rarely encountered in the Ottawa ankle trials, the fractures discussed in this article would likely be identified using the Ottawa ankle rules, because of the inability of the patient to bear weight after the injury and during the examination.

Nevertheless, some patients with these fractures are able to ambulate and, because patients with these fractures generally do not present with tenderness along the posterior border of the lateral or medial malleolus, radiographic evaluation may not be indicated under the Ottawa guidelines. However, as with all guidelines, clinical judgment and experience may be grounds for radiographic analysis in unique cases. Furthermore, in the case of a suspected ankle sprain that does not improve as expected or is accompanied by tenderness over a potential fracture site, radiographic analysis at a follow-up evaluation may be indicated. The fracture may then be diagnosed and treated soon enough after the injury to avoid an adverse prognosis.

The Authors

DANIEL B. JUDD, M.D., is currently an orthopedic resident at Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, Hawaii. Dr. Judd earned his medical degree from New York Medical College, Valhalla, N.Y., and completed an internship in orthopedics at Tripler Army Medical Center. He formerly served as flight physician at Katterbach Health Clinic, Ansbach, Germany.

DAVID H. KIM, M.D., is an attending orthopedic surgeon at Tripler Army Medical Center. He earned his medical degree from the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences F. Edward Hébert School of Medicine in Bethesda, Md. Dr. Kim completed an orthopedic residency at the University of Colorado School of Medicine in Denver and a foot and ankle fellowship at the Scripps Clinic in La Jolla, Calif.

Address correspondence to Daniel B. Judd, M.D., 1 Jarrett White Rd., Tripler AMC, HI 96859 (e-mail: Daniel.Judd@haw.tamc.amedd.army.mil). Reprints are not available from the authors.

The authors indicate that they do not have any conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: none reported.

REFERENCES

1. Higgins TF, Baumgaertner MR. Diagnosis and treatment of fractures of the talus: a comprehensive review of the literature. Foot Ankle Int. 1999;20:595–605.

2. Keene JS, Lange RH. Diagnostic dilemmas in foot and ankle injuries. JAMA. 1986;256:247–51.

3. Nash WC, Baker CL Jr. Transchondral talar dome fractures: not just a sprained ankle. South Med J. 1984;77:560–4.

4. Canale ST, Belding RH. Osteochondral lesions of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1980;62:97–102.

5. Berndt AL, Harty M. Transchondral fractures(osteochondritis dissecans) of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1959;41:988–1020.

6. DeLee JC. Fractures and dislocations of the foot. In: Mann RA, Coughlin MJ, eds. Surgery of the foot and ankle. 6th ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 1993:1465–1703.

7. Hawkins LG. Fracture of the lateral process of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg. 1965;47:1170–5.

8. Mukherjee SK, Pringle RM, Baxter AD. Fracture of the lateral process of the talus. A report of thirteen cases. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1974;56:263–73.

9. Heckman JD. Fractures and dislocations of the foot. In: Rockwood CA, Green DP. Rockwood and Green's Fractures in adults. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1996:2313–16.

10. Heckman JD, McLean MR. Fractures of the lateral process of the talus. Clin Orthop. 1985;199:108–13.

11. Tucker DJ, Feder JM, Boylan JP. Fractures of the lateral process of the talus: two case reports and a comprehensive literature review. Foot Ankle Int. 1988;19:641–6.

12. Kirkpatrick DP, Hunter RE, Janes PC, Mastrangelo J, Nicholas RA. The snowboarder's foot and ankle. Am J Sports Med. 1998;26:271–7.

13. Cimmino CV. Fracture of the lateral process of the talus. Am J Roentgenol. 1963;90:1277–80.

14. Nasser S, Manoli A 2d. Fracture of the entire posterior process of the talus: a case report. Foot Ankle. 1990;10:235–8.

15. Paulos LE, Johnson CL, Noyes FR. Posterior compartment fractures of the ankle. A commonly missed athletic injury. Am J Sports Med. 1983;11:439–43.

16. Kim DH, Hrutkay JM, Samson MM. Fracture of the medial tubercle of the posterior process of the talus: a case report and literature review. Foot Ankle Int. 1996;17:186–8.

17. Nadim Y, Tosic A, Ebraheim N. Open reduction and internal fixation of fracture of the posterior process of the talus: a case report and review of the literature. Foot Ankle Int. 1999;20:50–2.

18. Cedell CA. Rupture of the posterior talotibial ligament with the avulsion of a bone fragment from the talus. Acta Orthop Scand. 1974;45:454–61.

19. McDougall A. The os trigonum. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1955;37:257–65.

20. Stefko RM, Lauerman WC, Heckman JD. Tarsaltunnel syndrome caused by an unrecognized fracture of the posterior process of the talus (Cedell fracture). A case report. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1994;76:116–8.

21. Degan TJ, Morrey BF, Braun DP. Surgical excision for anterior-process fractures of the calcaneus. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1982;64:519–24.

22. Jahss MH, Kay BS. An anatomic study of the anterior superior process of the os calcis and its clinical application. Foot Ankle. 1983;3:268–81.

23. Bradford CH, Larsen I. Sprain-fractures of the anterior lip of the os calcis. N Engl J Med. 1951;244:970–2.

24. Hodge JC. Anterior process fracture or calcaneus secundarius: a case report. J Emerg Med. 1999;17:305–9.

25. Rubin A, Sallis R. Evaluation and diagnosis of ankle injuries. Am Fam Physician. 1996;54:1609–18.

26. Stiell IG, Greenberg GH, McKnight RD, Nair RC, McDowell I, Reardon M, et al. Decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Refinement and prospective validation. JAMA. 1993;269:1127–32.


Copyright © 2002 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact afpserv@aafp.org for copyright questions and/or permission requests.

Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions


Article Tools

  • Download PDF
  • Print page
  • Share this page
  • AFP CME Quiz

Information From Industry

More in Pubmed

Navigate this Article