Tips

From Other Journals

Rates of Adult Immunization and Cancer Screening



FREE PREVIEW Log in or buy this issue to read the full article. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles. Subscribe now.


FREE PREVIEW Subscribe or buy this issue. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles.

Am Fam Physician. 2002 Sep 15;66(6):1089.

Although the value of adult immunizations, such as influenza and pneumococcal pneumonia, and screening for breast, cervical, and colon cancer has been clearly established, the rate at which these services are provided is unacceptably low. Many interventions aimed at increasing these services have been explored, but the outcomes have been unclear. Stone and associates reviewed prevention literature using meta-analysis techniques to evaluate specific interventions intended to increase the rates of prevention activities among clinicians.

Seven intervention activities (see the accompanying table) were evaluated, as were multiple key features of each specific intervention. Multiple databases were reviewed through February 1999 for suitable studies. Adequate studies were obtained to develop models for immunizations (combining studies of influenza and pneumococcal pneumonia), screening mammography, cervical cytology screening, and fecal occult blood testing. Articles looking at other techniques of colon cancer screening were inadequate. Of the 108 studies accepted for inclusion in the analysis, 95 were randomized clinical trials, and 13 were controlled clinical trials.

Efficacy of Specific Intervention Activities in Increasing Preventive Care Services

Intervention Efficacy

Reminders to physicians and/or patients

Reminders to patients were shown to be moderately effective.

Physician feedback to stimulate improvement

Ineffective

Education for physicians and patients

Patient education was moderately effective.

Financial incentives to patients or physicians

Financial incentives to patients were consistently effective; physician incentives could not be evaluated

Regulatory or legislative action to change the context in which medicine is practiced

Could not be evaluated

Organizational changes within the medical care organization to improve performance

Most effective

Mass media campaigns to educate the public

Could not be evaluated

Efficacy of Specific Intervention Activities in Increasing Preventive Care Services

View Table

Efficacy of Specific Intervention Activities in Increasing Preventive Care Services

Intervention Efficacy

Reminders to physicians and/or patients

Reminders to patients were shown to be moderately effective.

Physician feedback to stimulate improvement

Ineffective

Education for physicians and patients

Patient education was moderately effective.

Financial incentives to patients or physicians

Financial incentives to patients were consistently effective; physician incentives could not be evaluated

Regulatory or legislative action to change the context in which medicine is practiced

Could not be evaluated

Organizational changes within the medical care organization to improve performance

Most effective

Mass media campaigns to educate the public

Could not be evaluated

Organizational change was one of the intervention s most effective at increasing the rate of preventive services. Some of the most successful organizational changes included (1) establishing a separate clinic for screening and preventive services, (2) using a planned visit for preventive care, (3) using techniques modeled on continuous quality improvement, and (4) having specific nonphysician staff dedicated to performing preventive care services. Patient financial incentives also increased preventive care services. Patient reminders were effective, although less so than the previously mentioned activities. Personalized reminders seemed to be more effective than generic reminders. Patient education demonstrated moderate effectiveness in increasing these services, while provider feedback showed little improvement.

The authors conclude that organizational change is clearly the most effective way to increase preventive care services, especially when used with teamwork and collaboration. Combining more than one effective action can lead to even greater services.

In an editorial in the same issue, Laine discusses the importance of the annual physical examination in the minds of many patients and its value in providing preventive services. Benefits of the annual physical examination include regular screening, establishing a relationship with a physician, and discussions of health promotion. Regular examinations centered around prevention should be evaluated more objectively before they are eliminated.

Stone EG, et al. Interventions that increase use of adult immunization and cancer screening services: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. May 7, 2002;136:641–51, and Laine C. The annual physical examination: needless ritual or necessary routine? [Editorial] Ann Intern Med May 7,2002;136:701–3.



Copyright © 2002 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact afpserv@aafp.org for copyright questions and/or permission requests.

Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions


Article Tools

  • Print page
  • Share this page
  • AFP CME Quiz

Information From Industry

Navigate this Article