Letters to the Editor

Alternatives to Rehydration During Hypodermoclysis

EDITOR'S NOTE: I was glad to read "Hypodermoclysis: An Alternative Infusion Technique."¹ In palliative care settings, often rehydration is not necessary for comfort and may worsen the situation with unwanted pulmonary edema, skin edema, or ascites. In addition to fluids, the physician can also provide the patient with parenteral medications during hypodermoclysis. At the Rainey Hospice House, this technique has helped us to medicate patients who cannot swallow or whose vomiting precludes using their gastrointestinal tract, without resorting to intravenous or central lines. We find hypodermoclysis especially useful for three classes of patients.

First, we use hypodermoclysis to give parenteral opioids when patients in pain cannot get adequate relief by oral or transdermal medicines. We find that hydromorphone works best for this indication because its potency requires a very small amount of infusate to deliver high doses of analgesic. Morphine can also be administered this way, using a patient-controlled pump.

Second, in patients with severe nausea syndromes, hypodermoclysis can be used to deliver medicines such as metoclopramide (Reglan), lorazepam (Ativan), diphenhydramine (Benadryl), dexamethasone (Decadron), or promethazine (Phenergan). Some of these medicines can be combined to hit multiple brain and gut receptors that mediate nausea syndromes, but physicians must be careful of parenteral drug incompatibilities. Although little data are available on this topic, we often use a combination drip of dexamethasone, lorazepam and diphenhydramine with good nausea control in these patients. Many of these patients additionally require metoclopramide, which must be administered in a separate drip or transdermally because of incompatibility issues.

Finally, hypodermoclysis can be used for patients who require palliative sedation for uncontrolled delirium near the end of life. One can use a pump to control a drip of lorazepam, midazolam, or others to achieve the proper level of sedation to control the patient's symptoms. In severely agitated patients, one can put the infusion in the skin between the shoulder blades so that the patient cannot pull it out during their confusion.

HUNTER E. WOODALL, M.D.
Anderson Family Practice Center
600 N. Fant St.
Anderson, SC 29621

REFERENCE

1. 1. Sasson M, Shvartzman P. Hypodermoclysis: an alternative infusion technique. Am Fam Physician 2001;64:1575-8.

IN REPLY: We would like to thank Dr. Woodall for his comments. We agree that there is controversy regarding hydration in the palliative care setting. In most cases, the worst case scenario is that it does not help. In our experience, some families find it too hard to deal with the patient not eating and drinking, and hydration through hypodermoclysis symbolically seems to answer this cultural need. Hypodermoclysis can be used in the palliative setting as well as in the geriatric population, and other adult populations in home care or in nursing settings of home care.

We also administer drugs via hypodermoclysis without the use of a pump, and our clinical impression is that it works. A literature search that we conducted found no documentation of this method; we are currently examining this issue. There is wide literature on administering drugs in a subcutaneous infusion by a pump. The following medications are included in this category: atropine (Urised), dexamethasone (Decadron), haloperidol (Haldol), hydromorphone (Dilaudid-Hp), hydroxyzine (Atarax), methadone, methotrimeprazine (Levoprome), metoclopramide (Reglan), midazolam (Versed), morphine (Duramorph), octreotide (Sandostatin), phenobarbital, promethazine (Phenergan), scopolamine (Transderm Scop).

The following medications are incompatible: ranitidine and haloperidol, midazolam and dexamethasone, haloperidol and dexamethasone, ranitidine and metoclopramide, and ranitidine and midazolam. Check with your hospital pharmacist before combining any medicines administered via infusion.

MENAHEM SASSON, M.D.
PESACH SHVARTSMAN, M.D.
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
P.O. Box 653
Be'er Sheva, 84105, Israel

Corrections

The article "Practical Use of the Pessary" (May 1, 2000, page 2719) contained an error in the cost of pessaries. On page 2723, in the second sentence of the first paragraph under the heading "Management," the cost of pessaries from Milex, the largest manufacturer, should have been cited as ranging from $31.00 to $51.50 per pessary, not per dozen.

The article "Peritonsillar Abscess: Diagnosis and Treatment" (January 1, 2002, page 93) contained two misleading illustrations. Figure 2, on page 94, and Figure 3, on page 95, did not accurately portray peritonsillar abscess and needle aspiration of the abscess, respectively. These illustrations should not be relied on as models for aspiration.

A photograph in the article "Venomous Snakebites in the United States: Management Review and Update" (April 1, 2002, page 1367), was incorrect. Figure 4 (page 1368) shows a light-phase timber rattlesnake rather than an eastern diamondback rattlesnake, which was the intended photograph.

Send letters to Jay Siwek, M.D., Editor, American Family Physician, 11400 Tomahawk Creek Pkwy., Leawood, KS 66211-2672; fax: 913-906-6080; e-mail: afplet@aafp.org. Please include your complete address, telephone number, and fax number. Letters should be submitted on disk, double-spaced, fewer than 500 words, and limited to one table or figure and six references. Please submit a word count. Letters submitted for publication in AFP must not be submitted to any other publication. Possible conflicts of interest must be disclosed at time of submission. Submission of a letter will be construed as granting the AAFP permission to publish the letter in any of its publications in any form. The editors may edit letters to meet style and space requirements.