Am Fam Physician. 2003 Feb 1;67(3):473.
to the editor: An editorial1 on chronic pain management in American Family Physician illustrates many of the reasons that the current management of this heterogeneous disorder is so unsatisfactory. Reflecting the common tendency to think of chronic pain as a single entity requiring a single approach to treatment, the editorial's text begins with an estimate from the National Center for Health Statistics that “32.8 percent of the U.S. general population has persistent or chronic pain symptoms.”1
Such survey data do not provide a precise indication of how many of those persons have trivial discomfort that most people would ignore, how many have moderate pain that can be self-treated adequately with over-the-counter analgesics, how many have pain that can be managed effectively under a physician's care, and how many have truly disabling pain. Surveys of this type do not discriminate adequately between patients with life-threatening diseases (e.g., disseminated cancer), those with benign but painful disorders amenable to objective diagnosis (e.g., postherpetic neuralgia), and those with less tangible conditions such as fibromyalgia. It is difficult to imagine truly effective pain care that ignores this differentiation.
Consistent with established trends in the treatment of pain in the United States, the management section of the Marcus editorial1 focuses primarily on opioid treatment and indications for referral. Psychosocial factors are briefly mentioned but deserve more attention. There is incomplete but increasingly persuasive evidence that renewed attention to human thought and behavior is a key feature in effective management of chronic pain. Almost every issue of Pain features at least one paper supporting the hypothesis that psychosocial factors are important in the genesis and persistence of pain behavior.2,3 Family physicians are trained in the biopsychosocial model of medicine and are a natural choice to lead research in this area.
The current research also sheds light on another urgently needed area of clinical inquiry: the etiology of chronic pain behavior. The poor prognosis for functional improvement once the disorder is firmly established indicates that there needs to be more longitudinal research on ways to prevent chronic pain as well as detect and treat it at earlier stages. Here again, family medicine should be taking the lead.
1. Marcus DA. Managing chronic pain in the primary care setting [Editorial]. Am Fam Physician. 2002;66:36,38,41.
2. Gillette RD. Comment on Thompson E.N; PAIN 82 (1999):109-110. Pain. 2000;85:523–4.
3. Walsh DA, Radcliffe JC. Pain beliefs and perceived physical disability of patients with chronic low back pain. Pain. 2002;97:23–31.
Send letters to firstname.lastname@example.org, or 11400 Tomahawk Creek Pkwy., Leawood, KS 66211-2680. Include your complete address, e-mail address, and telephone number. Letters should be fewer than 400 words and limited to six references, one table or figure, and three authors.
Letters submitted for publication in AFP must not be submitted to any other publication. Possible conflicts of interest must be disclosed at time of submission. Submission of a letter will be construed as granting the AAFP permission to publish the letter in any of its publications in any form. The editors may edit letters to meet style and space requirements.
This series is coordinated by Kenny Lin, MD, MPH, Associate Deputy Editor for AFP Online.
Copyright © 2003 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact email@example.com for copyright questions and/or permission requests.
Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions