Letters to the Editor
FPs Should Reconsider the Use of Hospitalists for Patients
FREE PREVIEW Log in or buy this issue to read the full article. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles. Subscribe now.
FREE PREVIEW Subscribe or buy this issue. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles.
Am Fam Physician. 2003 Mar 1;67(5) Online.
to the editor: The practice of primary care physicians assigning their patients who need hospital care to hospitalists is gaining momentum. Some are solely hospitalists and some also maintain their private medical practices. It is much more economical for a busy family physician to assign their in-hospital patients to the care of a hospitalist. Although the family physician typically has only a few of these patients, they are usually at several hospital locations. Assigning these patients to a hospitalist allows the family physician to treat more patients in the office where they can be examined and treated more efficiently and more cost-effectively.
As a retired private practice family physician, I submit that this practice of assigning hospitalists will negatively impact the care of these patients, because it results in fragmentation of their care; it also belittles the work of family physicians by making them assistants in the medical care of these patients.
I graduated from the University of Pennsylvania in 1940. My generation of family practice physicians worked long and hard over many years to secure privileges in most of our hospital clinical departments. I am saddened to see that today many family physicians rush to divest themselves of the privileges and responsibilities of the hospital care of their patients. In the long run, this will demean their practices and family practice in general. Even at this early stage of the hospitalist movement, the effect is showing up in lowered interest among medical students to enter family practice residencies.
I urge that family physicians rethink the collective wisdom of giving up the responsibility of the hospital care of their patients. Continuing such care will be for the benefit of the patient, and for the benefit of the doctor to keep him or her whole. Presently, the use of hospitalists by family physicians is purely voluntary; however, it may work so well that the practice will become mandatory.
Send letters to Kenneth W. Lin, MD, MPH, Associate Deputy Editor for AFP Online, e-mail: email@example.com, or 11400 Tomahawk Creek Pkwy., Leawood, KS 66211-2680.
Please include your complete address, e-mail address, and telephone number. Letters should be fewer than 400 words and limited to six references, one table or figure, and three authors.
Letters submitted for publication in AFP must not be submitted to any other publication. Possible conflicts of interest must be disclosed at time of submission. Submission of a letter will be construed as granting the American Academy of Family Physicians permission to publish the letter in any of its publications in any form. The editors may edit letters to meet style and space requirements.
Copyright © 2003 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact firstname.lastname@example.org for copyright questions and/or permission requests.
Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions