Letters to the Editor
FREE PREVIEW Log in or buy this issue to read the full article. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles. Subscribe now.
FREE PREVIEW Subscribe or buy this issue. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles.
Am Fam Physician. 2003 Apr 15;67(8):1684.
The Importance of Taking an Occupational History
to the editor: I read with great interest the case report1 in American Family Physician presented by Dr. Mycyk and Ms. Hettmansberger regarding a patient with “occult” lead poisoning. It was interesting to note that even after an extensive three-day work-up as an inpatient, the patient finally revealed at discharge that he was a welder who was exposed to lead fumes.
Because the most common exposure to lead among adults is occupational, this case illustrates that a thorough occupational history is essential in any patient who presents with a constellation of unexplained symptoms. An occupational history would most likely have revealed important diagnostic clues regarding the nature of this patient's illness and may have prevented a lengthy diagnostic work-up and delay in treatment. Furthermore, an exposure history should be elicited with a particular focus on personal hygiene, such as eating or smoking on the job, and the habits and general health of his coworkers who also may experience similar exposures.
Ideally, a work-site evaluation should include a walk-through of the patient's work space, with particular attention paid to engineering and administrative controls. An inspection of the patient's personal protective equipment would ensure that it is functioning properly and is appropriate for the type of work that is being performed. Because most physicians are not trained in workplace evaluations, the inspection should be performed in conjunction with a certified industrial hygienist or a health and safety officer who is familiar with health and safety protocols, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's regulations, and appropriate fit testing of personal protective equipment.
Finally, it is important to establish whether the patient might be unknowingly placing others at risk by wearing work clothes home and exposing family members to lead dust or other contaminants.
1. Hettmansberger TL, Mycyk MB. Lead poisoning presents a difficult diagnosis (letter). Am Fam Physician. 2002;66:1839–40.
Send letters to Kenneth W. Lin, MD, MPH, Associate Deputy Editor for AFP Online, e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org, or 11400 Tomahawk Creek Pkwy., Leawood, KS 66211-2680.
Please include your complete address, e-mail address, and telephone number. Letters should be fewer than 400 words and limited to six references, one table or figure, and three authors.
Letters submitted for publication in AFP must not be submitted to any other publication. Possible conflicts of interest must be disclosed at time of submission. Submission of a letter will be construed as granting the American Academy of Family Physicians permission to publish the letter in any of its publications in any form. The editors may edit letters to meet style and space requirements.
Copyright © 2003 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact email@example.com for copyright questions and/or permission requests.
Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions