Diagnosis and Management of Acute Interstitial Nephritis
Am Fam Physician. 2003 Jun 15;67(12):2527-2534.
Acute interstitial nephritis is an important cause of acute renal failure resulting from immune-mediated tubulointerstitial injury, initiated by medications, infection, and other causes. Acute interstitial nephritis may be implicated in up to 15 percent of patients hospitalized for acute renal failure. Clinical features are essentially those of acute renal failure from any cause, and apart from a history of new illness or medication exposure, there are no specific history, physical examination, or laboratory findings that distinguish acute interstitial nephritis from other causes of acute renal failure. Classic findings of fever, rash, and arthralgias may be absent in up to two thirds of patients. Diagnostic studies such as urine eosinophils and renal gallium 67 scanning provide suggestive evidence, but they are unable to reliably confirm or exclude the diagnosis of acute interstitial nephritis. Renal biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosis, but it may not be required in mild cases or when clinical improvement is rapid after removal of an offending agent or medication. The time until removal of such agents, and renal biopsy findings, provide the best prognostic information for return to baseline renal function. Corticosteroids appear to provide some benefit in terms of clinical improvement and return of renal function, but no controlled clinical trials have been conducted to confirm this.
Acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) defines a pattern of renal injury usually associated with an abrupt deterioration in renal function characterized histopathologically by inflammation and edema of the renal interstitium. The term was first used by Councilman1 in 1898 when he noted the histopathologic changes in autopsy specimens of patients with diphtheria and scarlet fever. Although the term acute interstitial nephritis is more commonly used, acute tubulointerstitial nephritis more accurately describes this disease entity, because the renal tubules, as well as the interstitium, are involved. AIN has become an important cause of acute renal failure caused by drug hypersensitivity reactions as a result of the increasing use of antibiotics and other medications that may induce an allergic response in the interstitium. AIN has been reported to occur in approximately 1 percent of renal biopsies during the evaluation of hematuria or proteinuria. In some studies of patients with acute renal failure, approximately 5 to 15 percent had AIN.2
TABLE 1 Disease Processes Associated with AIN
Disease Processes Associated with AIN
|Disease category||Specific examples|
Corynebacterium diphtheriae, legionella3, staphylococci, streptococci, yersinia
Cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, hantaviruses, hepatitis C, herpes simplex virus, human immunodeficiency virus, mumps4, polyoma virus
Leptospira, mycobacterium, mycoplasma, rickettsia, syphilis, toxoplasmosis
Immune and neoplastic disorders
Acute rejection of a renal transplant, glomerulonephritis, lymphoproliferative disorders, necrotizing vasculitis, plasma cell dyscrasias, systemic lupus erythematosus
The most frequent causes of AIN can be found in one of three general categories: drug-induced, infection-associated, and cases associated with immune or neoplastic disorders (Table 12–4). Other causes of tubulointerstitial nephropathy also are addressed.
The list of drugs implicated in causing AIN continues to expand (Table 22,5–16 ). Drugs are more frequently recognized as etiologic factors in AIN because of the increased frequency with which drugs are used, the increased use of renal biopsy, and the characteristic clinical presentation. Some classes of medication often are associated with certain clinical features of AIN, as summarized in Table 3. Development of drug-induced AIN is not dose-related. AIN may become clinically evident an average of two weeks or longer after starting a medication.17
AIN is associated with primary renal infections such as acute bacterial pyelonephritis, renal tuberculosis, and fungal nephritis. Systemic infections can cause direct injury because of pathologic processes in the kidney or can be associated with indirect injury caused by medications used in the treatment of infections. For example, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) can be responsible for AIN caused by opportunistic infections or using drugs such as indinavir (Crixivan), sulfonamide antibiotics, and others. Sometimes depressed cell-mediated immunity may have the impact of protecting the patient from developing AIN.
TABLE 2 Medications Associated with AIN
Medications Associated with AIN
|Medication class||Specific examples|
Almost all agents2
Furosemide (Lasix), thiazides, triamterene (Dyrenium)
Acyclovir (Zovirax), allopurinol* (Zyloprim), amlodipine8 (Norvasc), azathioprine (Imuran), captopril (Capoten), carbamazepine (Tegretol), clofibrate (Atromid-S), cocaine, creatine9, diltiazem10 (Cardizem), famotidine (Pepcid), indinavir11 (Crixivan), mesalazine12 (Asacol), omeprazole13 (Prilosec), phenteramine14 (Zantryl), phenytoin (Dilantin), pranlukast (Ultair)15, propylthioruacil16 (Propacil), quinine (Quinamm), ranitidine (Zantac)
AIN may be caused by local or systemic autoimmune processes. Several types of glomerulonephritis result in interstitial inflammation, possibly associated with anti-tubular basement membrane (anti-TBM) autoantibodies. Sjögren's syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus, and Wegener's granulomatosis also may cause immune complex-mediated disease.
Patients with AIN typically present with nonspecific symptoms of acute renal failure, including oliguria, malaise, anorexia, or nausea and vomiting, with acute or subacute onset.5 The clinical presentation can range from asymptomatic elevation in creatinine or blood urea nitrogen (BUN) or abnormal urinary sediment, to generalized hypersensitivity syndrome with fever, rash, eosinophilia, and oliguric renal failure. A relatively rapid decrease in renal function, as measured by elevated creatinine and BUN, is typical. Other nonspecific laboratory findings, with expected ranges for AIN, are listed in Table 4.
The classic triad of low-grade fever, skin rash, and arthralgias was primarily described with methicillin (Staphcillin)-induced AIN, but it was present only about one third of the time. This triad is present in only 5 percent of cases of AIN overall. Each component of the triad is present in 70 to 100 percent, 30 to 50 percent, and 15 to 20 percent of AIN cases, respectively.17 Other associated symptoms may include flank pain, gross hematuria, or other clinical findings associated with an underlying disease process.
The hallmark of AIN is the infiltration of inflammatory cells within the renal interstitium, with associated edema, sparing the glomeruli and blood vessels.2,18 Interstitial fibrosis is initially sparse, but develops later in the course of the illness. Fibrotic lesions may be diffuse or patchy, beginning deep in the renal cortex, most prominently at the medullocortical junction. The inflammatory infiltrate is typically composed of mononuclear cells and T lymphocytes, with a variable number of plasma cells and eosinophils. Eosinophils may be totally absent from the infiltrate or may concentrate in small foci, forming eosinophilic microabscesses.
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly associated with glomerular involvement producing a nil lesion (minimal change disease). Peritubular infiltration and occasional invasion of lymphocytes beneath the TBM may occur with mild to extensive tubular damage, which may be difficult to distinguish from acute tubular necrosis (ATN). In chronic interstitial nephritis, the cellular infiltrate is largely replaced by interstitial fibrosis.
TABLE 3 Clinical Features of AIN Associated with Specific Medication Classes
Clinical Features of AIN Associated with Specific Medication Classes
|Medication classes||Special features|
Beta lactams and cephalosporins (prototype: methicillin [Staphcillin])
Allergic and hypersensitivity reactions seen histologically
Classic triad of symptoms (fever, rash, arthralgias) more common
No correlation between drug dosage and duration with development of AIN
AIN can occur in people sensitized to penicillin while on cephalosporins and vice versa
Sulfonamides and diuretics
Vasculitis seen histologically
Cross reaction between the sulfonamide antimicrobials and the diuretics—use nonsulfonamide diuretics such as ethacrynic acid if requested
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
Most frequent and clinically important
AIN can occur with over-the-counter agents such as ibuprofen
Development of AIN is more common in older populations
Nephrotic range proteinuria is more common
Hematuria is rare
Histologically pure lesion with/without papillary necrosis with absence of glomerular disease
Mixed variety with minimal change glomerulonephritis also is seen histologically
Antituberculous drugs (prototype: rifampin [Rifadin])
Associated with intermittent or discontinuous dosing
AIN = acute interstitial nephritis.
A third pathologic category is granuloma formation with epithelioid giant cells usually found in AIN secondary to tuberculosis, sarcoidosis, or Wegener's granulomatosis.
There is strong evidence that AIN is immunologically mediated. The precise disease mechanism is unclear, but antigen-driven immunopathology is the key mechanism. The presence of helper-inducer and suppressor-cytotoxic T lymphocytes in the inflammatory infiltrate suggests that T-cell mediated hypersensitivity reactions and cytotoxic T-cell injury are involved in pathogenesis of AIN.19 In some cases, humoral mechanisms are involved with complement proteins, immunoglobulins, and anti-TBM antibodies found in the interstitium.
The diagnostic approach to renal failure in general has been described elsewhere.20 Renal biopsy is the only definitive method of establishing the diagnosis of AIN; this step usually is undertaken when the diagnosis is unclear and there are no contraindications for the procedure, or when the patient does not improve clinically following discontinuation of the medication suspected as the cause of AIN and renal failure. Other laboratory features (Table 4) are used to provide suggestive evidence of AIN, to guide conservative management, or to permit empiric treatment with steroids. Unfortunately, none of these tests have sufficient predictive value to be diagnostically reliable. A number of other diagnostic studies have been proposed to help confirm or exclude AIN.
Urine eosinophils are frequently tested to provide confirmatory evidence of AIN, though the typical constellation of fever, rash, arthralgias, eosinophiluria, and renal insufficiency rarely presents completely. Early studies21,22 found that Hansel's stain for eosinophils was more sensitive than Wright's stain but did not conclusively demonstrate that urine eosinophils were diagnostically useful in confirming or excluding AIN. A more recent study23 found a positive predictive value of 38 percent (95 percent confidence interval [CI], 15 to 65 percent) and a negative predictive value of 74 percent (95 percent CI, 57 to 88 percent) among 51 patients for whom urine eosinophils were ordered to help diagnose an acute renal condition; 15 of these were suspected to have AIN, though biopsy was not performed in all patients. Other conditions such as cystitis, prostatitis, and pyelonephritis also can be associated with eosinophiluria. Other studies have found similar results; thus, the diagnostic value of urine eosinophils remains unclear.
TABLE 4 Laboratory Features Associated with AIN
Laboratory Features Associated with AIN
|Laboratory study||Typical findings||Expected range, diagnostic use, or value|
Present to variable degrees, usually < 1 g per 24 hours except in AIN associated with NSAIDs
Leukocytes or leukocyte casts
Red cell casts are rare in AIN
Renal tubular epithelial cells or casts
Elevated urine major basic protein
Lacks adequate predictive value to confirm or exclude diagnosis
Positive predictive value 38 percent (95 percent CI, 15 to 65 percent)
Serum chemistry profile
Elevated BUN and creatinine
Variable degree of renal injury
Hyperkalemia or hypokalemia
Variable based on severity of renal failure and associated electrolyte or fluid changes
Hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis
Suggests tubulointerstitial injury
Fractional excretion of sodium
Usually greater than 1 percent
Complete blood count
More often associated with beta-lactam antibiotic-induced AIN
Liver function tests
Elevated serum transaminase levels
In patients with associated drug-induced liver injury
Elevated serum IgE levels
AIN = acute interstitial nephritis; NSAIDs = nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; CI = confidence interval; BUN = blood urea nitrogen; IgE = immune globulin E.
Renal ultrasonography may demonstrate kidneys that are normal to enlarged in size, with increased cortical echogenicity, but there are no ultrasonographic findings that will reliably confirm or exclude AIN versus other causes of acute renal failure.
Gallium 67 scanning has been proposed24,25 as a useful test to diagnose AIN. In one small series,26 nine patients with AIN had positive gallium 67 scans, while six patients with ATN had negative scans. In other studies,27 other renal disorders such as minimal-change glomerulonephritis, cortical necrosis, and ATN have resulted in positive gallium 67 scans. Nonrenal disorders such as iron overload or severe liver disease also can result in positive gallium 67 scans.
Likewise, patients with biopsy-proven acute tubulointerstitial disease have had negative gallium 67 scans, therefore the predictive value of this test is limited. In general, patients with ATN have negative scans, and in patients who are poor candidates for renal biopsy, gallium 67 scanning may be useful in distinguishing ATN from AIN.
Renal biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosis of AIN, with the typical histopathologic findings of plasma cell and lymphocytic infiltrates in the peritubular areas of the interstitium, usually with interstitial edema.
Renal biopsy is not needed in all patients. In patients for whom the diagnosis seems likely, for whom a probable precipitating drug can be easily withdrawn, or who improve readily after withdrawal of a potentially offending drug, supportive management can proceed safely without renal biopsy. Patients who do not improve following withdrawal of likely precipitating medications, who have no contraindications to renal biopsy and do not refuse the procedure, and who are being considered for steroid therapy, are good candidates for renal biopsy (Figure 15). Indications and contraindications for renal biopsy are listed in Table 5.28
Most patients with AIN in whom offending medications are withdrawn early can be expected to recover normal or near-normal renal function within a few weeks. Patients who discontinue offending medications within two weeks of the onset of AIN (measured by increased creatinine) are more likely to recover nearly baseline renal function than those who remain on the precipitating medication for three or more weeks.
A number of investigators have tried to identify other clinical and renal biopsy features that will provide prognostic information in terms of recovery of renal function. One study29 noted two phases to recovery in AIN: an initial rapid phase of improvement lasting six to eight weeks, followed by a phase of slower improvement to the previous or new baseline renal function lasting approximately one year.
Adverse prognostic factors in AIN recovery include diffuse (versus patchy) inflammation on biopsy; excess number of neutrophils (1 to 6 percent); and extent or severity of interstitial fibrosis, which was noted to correlate most closely with the final glomerular filtration rate.29
TABLE 5 Indications and Contraindications for Renal Biopsy in Suspected AIN
Indications and Contraindications for Renal Biopsy in Suspected AIN
Acute renal failure from AIN suspected clinically
Exposure to potential offending medications
Typical symptoms of rash, fever, arthralgias
Suggestive evidence on laboratory data
No improvement after withdrawal of medication
Patient agrees to procedure
Patient unable to cooperate with percutaneous procedure
End-stage renal disease with small kidneys
Severe uncontrolled hypertension
Sepsis or renal parenchymal infection
AIN = acute interstitial nephritis.
*—May be controlled or may indicate open biopsy if required diagnostically.
Information from Tisher CC, Croker BP. Indications for and interpretation of the renal biopsy: evaluation by light, electron, and immunofluorescence microscopy. In: Scrier RW, Gottschalk CW, eds. Diseases of the kidney. 6th ed. Boston: Little, Brown, 1997:435–41.
Withdrawal of medications that are likely to cause AIN is the most significant step in early management of suspected or biopsy-proven AIN.30 If multiple potentially precipitating medications are being used by the patient, it is reasonable to substitute other medications for as many of these as possible and to withdraw the most likely etiologic agent among medications that cannot be substituted. The majority of patients with AIN improve spontaneously following the withdrawal of medications that resulted in renal failure, and such patients should be listed as having had an adverse reaction to these medications.
TABLE 6 Supportive Care Measures
Supportive Care Measures
Fluid and electrolyte management
Maintain adequate hydration
Avoid volume depletion or overload
Identify and correct electrolyte abnormalities
Symptomatic relief for fever and systemic symptoms
Symptomatic relief for rash
Avoid use of nephrotoxic drugs
Avoid use of drugs that impair renal blood flow
Adjust drug dosages for existing level of renal function
Other supportive care interventions are listed in Table 6. Indications for renal dialysis in the management of acute renal failure have been described elsewhere,31 and these include uncontrolled hyperkalemia, azotemia with mental status changes, and other symptomatic fluid or electrolyte derangements.
There are no randomized trials to support the use of corticosteroids in treatment of AIN. Small case reports and studies32 have demonstrated rapid diuresis, clinical improvement, and return of normal renal function within 72 hours after starting steroid treatment, although some case reports indicate lack of efficacy, especially in cases of NSAID-induced AIN. The decision to use steroids should be guided by the clinical course following withdrawal of offending medications.
If steroid therapy is started, a reasonable dosage is prednisone, 1 mg per kg per day orally (or equivalent intravenous dose) for two to three weeks,30,33 followed by a gradually tapering dose over three to four weeks. In patients who do not respond to corticosteroids within two to three weeks, treatment with cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan) can be considered.
Other Clinical Syndromes
Drug-induced AIN accounts for the majority of interstitial nephropathies; however, a number of other tubulointerstitial nephropathy syndromes deserve mention because they may be identified clinically and may have different treatable or correctable causes.18 Table 7 summarizes the typical features of some of these disorders.
TABLE 7 Other Clinical Syndromes Manifesting as Interstitial Nephritis
Other Clinical Syndromes Manifesting as Interstitial Nephritis
History of chronic pain or aspirin use; associated with epigastric symptoms, anemia, sterile pyuria
Toxin-induced AIN (lead)
Progressive renal failure associated with lead exposure, hypertension, gout, and proteinuria
Sarcoidosis and AIN
Granulomatous interstitial nephritis associated with hypercalcemia and pulmonary involvement
Chronic interstitial nephritis
Heavy metal exposure or other causes; mild proteinuria, glucosuria with normal serum glucose
Tubulointerstitial nephritisuveitis syndrome
Diffuse eosinophilic nephritis with bone marrow and lymphoid granulomas seen in pubertal females with constitutional symptoms and uveitis
HIV-associated renal disease
AIDS nephropathy, drug-induced AIN, proteinuria, other renal disorders
AIN = acute interstitial nephritis; HIV = human immunodeficiency virus; AIDS = acquired immunodeficiency syndrome.
1. Councilman WT . Acute interstitial nephritis. J Exp Med. 1898;3:393–420.
2. Michel DM, Kelly CJ . Acute interstitial nephritis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1998;9:506–15.
3. Nishitarumizu K, Tokuda Y, Uehara H, Taira M, Taira K . Tubulointerstitial nephritis associated with Legionnaires’ disease. Intern Med. 2000;39:150–3.
4. Kabakus N, Aydinoglu H, Bakkaloglu SA, Yekeler H . Mumps interstitial nephritis: a case report. Pediatr Nephrol. 1999;13:930–1.
5. Cruz DN, Perazella MA. Drug-induced acute tubulointerstitial nephritis: the clinical spectrum. Hosp Pract 1998;33:151–52,157–8,161–4.
6. Andrews PA, Robinson GT . Intravascular haemolysis and interstitial nephritis in association with ciprofloxacin. Nephron. 1999;83:359–60.
7. Wai AO, Lo AM, Abdo A, Marra F . Vancomycin-induced acute interstitial nephritis. Ann Pharmacother. 1998;32:1160–4.
8. Ejaz AA, Fitzpatrick PM, Haley WE, Wasiluk A, Durkin AJ, Zachariah PK . Amlodipine besylate induced acute interstitial nephritis. Nephron. 2000;85:354–6.
9. Koshy KM, Griswold E, Schneeberger EE . Interstitial nephritis in a patient taking creatine. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:814–5.
10. Abadin JA, Duran JA, Perez de Leon JA . Probable diltiazem-induced acute interstitial nephritis. Ann Pharmacother. 1998;32:656–8.
11. Jaradat M, Phillips C, Yum MN, Cushing H, Moe S . Acute tubulointerstitial nephritis attributable to indinavir therapy. Am J Kidney Dis. 2000;35:E16.
12. Corrigan G, Stevens PE . Review article: interstitial nephritis associated with the use of mesalazine in inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2000;14:1–6.
13. Post AT, Voorhorst G, Zanen AL . Reversible renal failure after treatment with omeprazole. Neth J Med. 2000;57:58–61.
14. Markowitz GS, Tartini A, D’Agati VD . Acute interstitial nephritis following treatment with anorectic agents phentermine and phendimetrazine. Clin Nephrol. 1998;50:252–4.
15. Schurman SJ, Alderman JM, Massanari M, Lacson AG, Perlman SA . Tubulointerstitial nephritis induced by the leukotriene receptor antagonist pran-lukast. Chest. 1998;114:1220–3.
16. Fang JT, Huang CC . Propylthiouracil-induced acute interstitial nephritis with acute renal failure requiring haemodialysis: successful therapy with steroids. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1998;13:757–8.
17. Eknoyan G. Acute tubulointerstitial nephritis. In: Schrier RW, Gottschalk CW, eds. Diseases of the kidney. 6th ed. Boston: Little, Brown, 1997:1249–72.
18. Rastegar A, Kashgarian M . The clinical spectrum of tubulointerstitial nephritis. Kidney Int. 1998;54:313–27.
19. Toto RD . Acute tubulointerstitial nephritis. Am J Med Sci. 1990;299:392–410.
20. Agrawal M, Swartz R . Acute renal failure. Am Fam Physician. 2000; 61:2077–88.
21. Corwin HL, Bray RA, Haber MH . The detection and interpretation of urinary eosinophils. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1989;113:1256–8.
22. Nolan CR 3d, Kelleher SP. Eosinophiluria. Clin Lab Med 1988; 8:555–65.
23. Ruffing KA, Hoppes P, Blend D, Cugino A, Jarjoura D, Whittier FC . Eosinophils in urine revisited. Clin Nephrol. 1994;41:163–6.
24. Linton AL, Richmond JM, Clark WF, Lindsay RM, Driedger AA, Lamki LM . Gallium67 scintigraphy in the diagnosis of acute renal disease. Clin Nephrol. 1985;24:84–7.
25. Shibasaki T, Ishimoto F, Sakai O, Joh K, Aizawa S . Clinical characterization of drug-induced allergic nephritis. Am J Nephrol. 1991;11:174–80.
26. Linton AL, Clark WF, Driedger AA, Turnbull DI, Lindsay RM . Acute interstitial nephritis due to drugs: review of the literature with a report of nine cases. Ann Intern Med. 1980;93:735–41.
27. Graham GD, Lundy MM, Moreno AJ . Failure of Gallium-67 scintigraphy to identify reliably noninfectious interstitial nephritis: concise communication. J Nucl Med. 1983;24:568–70.
28. Tisher CC, Croker BP. Indications for and interpretation of the renal biopsy: evaluation by light, electron, and immunofluorescence microscopy. In: Schrier RW, Gottschalk CW, eds. Diseases of the kidney. 6th ed. Boston: Little, Brown, 1997:435–41.
29. Kida H, Abe T, Tomosugi N, Koshino Y, Yokoyama H, Hattori N . Prediction of the long-term outcome in acute interstitial nephritis. Clin Nephrol. 1984;22:55–60.
30. Eknjoyan G. Acute hypersensitivity interstitial nephritis. In: Glassock RJ, ed. Current therapy in nephrology and hypertension. 4th ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 1998:99–101.
31. Albright RC Jr. Acute renal failure: a practical update. Mayo Clin Proc. 2001;76:67–74.
32. Pusey CD, Saltissi D, Bloodworth L, Rainford DJ, Christie JL . Drug associated acute interstitial nephritis: clinical and pathological features and the response to high dose steroid therapy. Q J Med. 1983;52:194–211.
33. Aradhye S, Neilson EG. Treatment of acute interstitial nephritis. In: Brady HR, Wilcox CS, eds. Therapy in nephrology and hypertension. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1999:232–5.
Copyright © 2003 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact email@example.com for copyright questions and/or permission requests.
Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions