Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease



FREE PREVIEW Log in or buy this issue to read the full article. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles. Subscribe now.


FREE PREVIEW Subscribe or buy this issue. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles.

Am Fam Physician. 2003 Oct 1;68(7):1311-1319.

  Patient Information Handout

  Related Editorial

The primary treatment goals in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease are relief of symptoms, prevention of symptom relapse, healing of erosive esophagitis, and prevention of complications of esophagitis. In patients with reflux esophagitis, treatment is directed at acid suppression through the use of lifestyle modifications (e.g., elevating the head of the bed, modifying the size and composition of meals) and pharmacologic agents (a histamine H2-receptor antagonist [H2RA] taken on demand or a proton pump inhibitor [PPI] taken 30 to 60 minutes before the first meal of the day). The preferred empiric approach is step-up therapy (treat initially with an H2RA for eight weeks; if symptoms do not improve, change to a PPI) or step-down therapy (treat initially with a PPI; then titrate to the lowest effective medication type and dosage). In patients with erosive esophagitis identified on endoscopy, a PPI is the initial treatment of choice. Diagnostic testing should be reserved for patients who exhibit warning signs (i.e., weight loss, dysphagia, gastrointestinal bleeding) and patients who are at risk for complications of esophagitis (i.e., esophageal stricture formation, Barrett's esophagus, adenocarcinoma). Antireflux surgery, including open and laparoscopic versions of Nissen fundoplication, is an alternative treatment in patients who have chronic reflux with recalcitrant symptoms. Newer endoscopic modalities, including the Stretta and endocinch procedures, are less invasive and have fewer complications than antireflux surgery, but response rates are lower.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common chronic, relapsing condition that is associated with a risk of significant morbidity and the possibility of mortality from complications. An estimated 44 percent of the U.S. adult population (61 million Americans) have heartburn, the hallmark of acid regurgitation, at least once a month.1 Approximately 14 percent of Americans have gastroesophageal symptoms weekly, and 7 percent have symptoms daily.1,2

Many patients self-diagnose and self-treat, and do not seek medical attention for their symptoms, while others have more severe disease, including erosive esophagitis.3 Patients who have GERD generally report decreased quality of life, reduced productivity, and decreased well-being. In many of these patients, reported quality of life is lower than in patients who have untreated angina pectoris or chronic heart failure.4 This article summarizes an evidence-based approach to the cost-effective management of patients with GERD.5

Diagnosis

A careful history is essential to establish the diagnosis of GERD. If a patient has classic symptoms of heartburn and acid regurgitation, the diagnosis can be made with high specificity, yet the sensitivity remains low.6,7 GERD can be missed in patients with heartburn, and some patients with Barrett's esophagus or adenocarcinoma of the esophagus do not complain of heartburn. Only 2 to 3 percent of acid reflux events reach the conscious level and are perceived by patients with GERD.8 Furthermore, many patients with GERD present with atypical symptoms6,7 (Table 1),9 although the presence of such symptoms is not required for clinical diagnosis.

TABLE 1

Atypical Signs and Symptoms of GERD

Asthma

Chest pain

Chronic cough

Dental enamel loss

Globus sensation

Initial onset of heartburn and regurgitation after 45 years of age

Recurrent laryngitis

Recurrent sore throat

Subglottic stenosis


GERD = gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Information from reference9.

TABLE 1   Atypical Signs and Symptoms of GERD

View Table

TABLE 1

Atypical Signs and Symptoms of GERD

Asthma

Chest pain

Chronic cough

Dental enamel loss

Globus sensation

Initial onset of heartburn and regurgitation after 45 years of age

Recurrent laryngitis

Recurrent sore throat

Subglottic stenosis


GERD = gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Information from reference9.

There is no gold standard for diagnosing GERD, although 24-hour pH monitoring (pH probe) is the accepted standard for establishing or excluding its presence. In patients with nonerosive reflux disease or symptomatic reflux esophagitis, 24-hour pH monitoring has a sensitivity and specificity of 70 to 96 percent, but false-positive or false-negative results are possible.10 While endoscopy lacks sensitivity for identifying pathologic reflux, it is the gold standard for assessing esophageal complications of GERD.11 Barium radiology is seldom useful for diagnosing GERD.12

In practice, the initial diagnosis of GERD is based on the history. Empiric acid suppression therapy for four to eight weeks should be tried in patients who have typical GERD symptoms without atypical manifestations and without warning signs or symptoms suggestive of complicated disease13,14 (Table 2).14 [Reference 13—evidence level A, meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs)]

TABLE 2

Warning Signs and Symptoms Suggesting Complicated GERD

Dysphagia

Early satiety

Gastrointestinal bleeding

Iron deficiency anemia

Odynophagia

Vomiting

Weight loss


GERD = gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Adapted with permission from DeVault KR, Castell DO. Updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. The Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94:1435.

TABLE 2   Warning Signs and Symptoms Suggesting Complicated GERD

View Table

TABLE 2

Warning Signs and Symptoms Suggesting Complicated GERD

Dysphagia

Early satiety

Gastrointestinal bleeding

Iron deficiency anemia

Odynophagia

Vomiting

Weight loss


GERD = gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Adapted with permission from DeVault KR, Castell DO. Updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. The Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94:1435.

For the empiric trial, treatment may be initiated with a standard dosage of a histamine H2-receptor antagonist (H2RA) taken twice daily on demand or a standard dosage of a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) taken 30 to 60 minutes before the first meal of the day. The preferred empiric approach is step-up or step-down therapy. Step-up therapy begins with an eight-week trial of an H2RA and progresses to use of a PPI if symptoms of heartburn and regurgitation are not relieved. Step-down therapy starts with a PPI for eight weeks; treatment is then “downgraded” to the lowest effective dosage and type of medication that provide symptom relief.15

Drug selection should be based on the frequency or severity of symptoms at presentation, with a treatment goal of complete, cost-effective symptom relief13,14 (Figure 114  and Table 35). Diagnostic testing should be reserved for patients who present with warning signs and symptoms, have not responded to PPI therapy, or have disease duration of five to 10 years.

Diagnosis and Treatment of GERD

FIGURE 1.

Diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in patients with no warning signs or symptoms that suggest complicated disease (see Table 2). (H2RA = histamine H2-receptor antagonist; PPI = proton pump inhibitor)

Information from reference14.

View Large

Diagnosis and Treatment of GERD


FIGURE 1.

Diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in patients with no warning signs or symptoms that suggest complicated disease (see Table 2). (H2RA = histamine H2-receptor antagonist; PPI = proton pump inhibitor)

Information from reference14.

Diagnosis and Treatment of GERD


FIGURE 1.

Diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in patients with no warning signs or symptoms that suggest complicated disease (see Table 2). (H2RA = histamine H2-receptor antagonist; PPI = proton pump inhibitor)

Information from reference14.

TABLE 3

Acute and Maintenance Therapy for GERD

Agent Equivalent dosages Dosage Cost (generic)*

Histamine H2-receptor antagonists

Cimetidine (Tagamet)

400 mg twice daily

400 to 800 mg twice daily

$109 (88)

Famotidine (Pepcid)

20 mg twice daily

20 to 40 mg twice daily

121 (77 to 104)

Nizatidine (Axid)

150 mg twice daily

150 mg twice daily

183 (165)

Ranitidine (Zantac)

150 mg twice daily

150 mg twice daily

118 (91 to 95)

Proton pump inhibitors

Esomeprazole (Nexium)

40 mg per day

20 to 40 mg per day

132

Lansoprazole (Prevacid)

30 mg per day

15 to 30 mg per day

131

Omeprazole (Prilosec)

20 mg per day

20 mg per day

138 (112)

Pantoprazole (Protonix)

40 mg per day

40 mg per day

104

Rabeprazole (Aciphex)

20 mg per day

20 mg per day

128


GERD = gastroesophageal reflux disease.

*—Estimated cost to the pharmacist for 30 days of treatment at the lowest given dosage, based on average wholesale prices (rounded to the nearest dollar) in Red book. Montvale, N.J.: Medical Economics Data, 2003. Cost to the patient will be higher, depending on prescription filling fee.

Adapted with permission from University of Michigan Health System. Guidelines for clinical care. Management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Retrieved May 28, 2003, from www.cme.med.umich.edu/pdf/guideline/gerd.pdf.

TABLE 3   Acute and Maintenance Therapy for GERD

View Table

TABLE 3

Acute and Maintenance Therapy for GERD

Agent Equivalent dosages Dosage Cost (generic)*

Histamine H2-receptor antagonists

Cimetidine (Tagamet)

400 mg twice daily

400 to 800 mg twice daily

$109 (88)

Famotidine (Pepcid)

20 mg twice daily

20 to 40 mg twice daily

121 (77 to 104)

Nizatidine (Axid)

150 mg twice daily

150 mg twice daily

183 (165)

Ranitidine (Zantac)

150 mg twice daily

150 mg twice daily

118 (91 to 95)

Proton pump inhibitors

Esomeprazole (Nexium)

40 mg per day

20 to 40 mg per day

132

Lansoprazole (Prevacid)

30 mg per day

15 to 30 mg per day

131

Omeprazole (Prilosec)

20 mg per day

20 mg per day

138 (112)

Pantoprazole (Protonix)

40 mg per day

40 mg per day

104

Rabeprazole (Aciphex)

20 mg per day

20 mg per day

128


GERD = gastroesophageal reflux disease.

*—Estimated cost to the pharmacist for 30 days of treatment at the lowest given dosage, based on average wholesale prices (rounded to the nearest dollar) in Red book. Montvale, N.J.: Medical Economics Data, 2003. Cost to the patient will be higher, depending on prescription filling fee.

Adapted with permission from University of Michigan Health System. Guidelines for clinical care. Management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Retrieved May 28, 2003, from www.cme.med.umich.edu/pdf/guideline/gerd.pdf.

Treatment

LIFESTYLE MODIFICATIONS

Based on expert opinion, lifestyle modifications should be initiated and continued throughout the course of therapy in patients with a history that is typical of uncomplicated GERD (Table 4).14 Although there is little supporting evidence, it is considered reasonable to educate patients about various factors that may precipitate reflux.16

TABLE 4

Suggested Lifestyle Modifications for Patients with GERD

Avoid large meals.

Avoid acidic foods (citrus- and tomato-based products), alcohol, caffeinated beverages, chocolate, onions, garlic, and peppermint.

Decrease dietary fat intake.

Avoid lying down within three to four hours after a meal.

Avoid medications that may potentiate GERD symptoms, including calcium channel blockers, beta agonists, alpha-adrenergic agonists, theophylline, nitrates, and some sedatives.

Elevate the head of the bed 10 to 20 cm (4 to 8 inches).

Avoid wearing clothing that is tight around the waist.

Lose weight.

Stop smoking.


GERD = gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Information from reference14.

TABLE 4   Suggested Lifestyle Modifications for Patients with GERD

View Table

TABLE 4

Suggested Lifestyle Modifications for Patients with GERD

Avoid large meals.

Avoid acidic foods (citrus- and tomato-based products), alcohol, caffeinated beverages, chocolate, onions, garlic, and peppermint.

Decrease dietary fat intake.

Avoid lying down within three to four hours after a meal.

Avoid medications that may potentiate GERD symptoms, including calcium channel blockers, beta agonists, alpha-adrenergic agonists, theophylline, nitrates, and some sedatives.

Elevate the head of the bed 10 to 20 cm (4 to 8 inches).

Avoid wearing clothing that is tight around the waist.

Lose weight.

Stop smoking.


GERD = gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Information from reference14.

ANTACIDS

Over-the-counter acid suppressants and antacids are considered appropriate initial therapy for GERD. Almost one third of patients with heartburn-related symptoms use one of these agents at least twice weekly, for an annual expenditure of more than $1 billion.17,18 Antacids (e.g., Tums, Rolaids, Maalox) and combined antacid–alginic acid preparations have been shown to be more effective than placebo in relieving GERD symptoms, based on measures such as lower global symptom scores, less acid regurgitation, and fewer days and nights with heartburn.19,20

Sucralfate (Carafate), a prescription drug, increases the barrier to acid penetration in the esophagus. However, clinical studies have shown limited or no clinical efficacy for this agent in patients with GERD.14

HISTAMINE H2-RECEPTOR ANTAGONISTS

A number of RCTs have shown that H2RAs, given in standard dosages, are more effective than placebo for relieving heartburn in patients with GERD; within a few weeks of initiating treatment, up to 70 percent of patients reported symptomatic relief.13,14 No RCTs or systematic reviews have compared recurrence rates of esophagitis symptoms in patients treated with H2RAs or placebo.

A systematic review of 43 RCTs found faster healing rates in patients with erosive esophagitis who were treated with H2RAs compared with placebo.21 [Evidence level A, meta-analysis of RCTs] Higher dosages and more frequent dosing appear to increase the effectiveness of these agents in treating reflux symptoms and healing esophagitis.22 Disadvantages of using maximal dosages of H2RAs may include cost (possibly equal to or higher than the cost of PPI therapy) and poor compliance with the medication regimen.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved the use of cimetidine (Tagamet), famotidine (Pepcid), nizatidine (Axid), and ranitidine (Zantac) as over-the-counter preparations, with the dosage for each medication uniformly one half of the standard lowest prescription dosage. The four agents have similar clinical efficacy.

Some patients with GERD may be able to predict when they will have reflux symptoms. These patients may benefit from premedication with an over-the-counter H2RA. Alternatively, patients may elect to take the medication when symptoms occur (on-demand therapy). The over-the-counter H2RAs are believed to be more effective than antacids, alginic acid, and placebo.14

The efficacy of promotility agents is similar to that of H2RAs when given in standard dosages. Promotility agents can be used to augment therapy; however, they are seldom used because of their association with rare fatal cardiac arrhythmias.14

The course of incompletely treated GERD has not been examined in randomized trials. Little information is available on the degree of gastric acid suppression that is necessary to ensure adequate esophageal healing. Patients may develop tolerance to H2RAs, with some decrease in efficacy occurring after 30 days of therapy.

Dosages of H2RAs may need to be decreased in the elderly and in patients with renal insufficiency. In some case reports, these agents have been associated with rare cytopenias, gynecomastia, liver function test abnormalities, and hypersensitivity reactions. No RCTs have examined the safety of long-term H2RA therapy.

PROTON PUMP INHIBITORS

If a patient who was initially started on twice-daily H2RA therapy does not respond after two weeks, appropriate step-up therapy is to switch to once-daily PPI therapy (Figure 1).14 Evidence from several RCTs found that better control of reflux disease symptoms was achieved over a four-to eight-week period in patients treated with PPIs (83 percent) than in those given H2RAs (60 percent) or placebo (27 percent).14 Evidence also indicates that step-up therapy and step-down therapy are cost-effective and should be used.15,23 Furthermore, one study showed that a significantly greater number of patients treated with PPIs were in symptomatic remission at 12 months, compared with patients who were given H2RAs or placebo.24 [Evidence level B, uncontrolled trial]

In the treatment of erosive esophagitis, faster healing rates were achieved in patients who received PPI therapy for four to eight weeks (78 percent) than in patients who were given H2RAs (50 percent) or placebo (24 percent) for the same period.14 At one year, patients treated daily with a PPI were significantly less likely to relapse than those who received an H2RA.25

PPIs include lansoprazole (Prevacid), omeprazole (Prilosec), pantoprazole (Protonix), and rabeprazole (Aciphex). For these agents, no significant differences have been demonstrated in the symptomatic treatment of GERD or the healing of erosive esophagitis. Omeprazole recently became available in generic form, at only a slight reduction in cost compared with Prilosec. In the near future, an over-the-counter form of omeprazole should become available.

Esomeprazole (Nexium) is the S-isomer of omeprazole. Compared with omeprazole, esomeprazole is associated with higher rates of healing and symptom resolution in patients with GERD and reflux esophagitis.26 [Evidence level B, uncontrolled trial]

In patients with chronic or complicated GERD, the potential benefit of long-term PPI therapy generally outweighs the risk of adverse events. The most common side effects include headache and diarrhea. Rarely, cobalamin absorption is decreased, but a clinically significant decrease in serum vitamin B12 levels is unusual. The profound decrease in gastric acid secretion induced by PPIs leads to increased gastrin production from antral G cells. PPIs have not been linked to gastric cancer or carcinoid since their release more than 16 years ago.27

ANTIREFLUX SURGERY

Consideration of antireflux surgery must be individualized. Indications for surgery include failed medical management, patient preference for surgery despite successful medical management, complications of GERD, medical complications attributable to a large hiatal hernia, or atypical symptoms with reflux documented on 24-hour pH monitoring.

Potential surgical candidates should have reflux esophagitis documented by esophagogastroduodendoscopy and normal esophageal motility as evaluated by manometry. Patients being considered for surgery should have a defective antireflux barrier in the absence of poor gastric emptying. Potential candidates also should have at least a partial response to a previous trial of acid suppression therapy. The surgical referral should be made by a GERD subspecialist.

The basic tenets of surgery are the reduction of hiatal hernia, repair of diaphragmatic hiatus, strengthening of the gastroesophageal junction–posterior diaphragm attachment, and strengthening of the antireflux barrier through placement of a gastric wrap around the gastroesophageal junction (fundoplication). Surgery appears to be most effective for alleviating heartburn and regurgitation (beneficial in 75 to 90 percent of patients) and less effective for alleviating extraesophageal symptoms of cough, asthma, and laryngitis (beneficial in 50 to 75 percent of patients).28

While postsurgical complications are common, they are manageable in most patients. Approximately 10 percent of patients have solid food dysphagia; between 2 and 3 percent of these patients have permanent symptoms. From 7 to 10 percent of surgically treated patients have gas bloating; diarrhea, nausea, and early satiety occur more rarely. Although as many as 20 percent of patients have postsurgical complications, patient satisfaction is high when the symptoms of GERD are well controlled.29

Comparisons of antireflux surgery and antacid therapy in patients with erosive esophagitis have demonstrated marginal superiority for surgery as measured by heartburn relief, esophagitis healing, and improved quality of life. However, long-term follow-up studies have found that within three to five years of surgery, 52 percent of patients are taking antireflux medications again.30

NEWER ENDOSCOPIC TREATMENTS

The goals of radiofrequency heating of the gastroesophageal junction (Stretta procedure) and endoscopic gastroplasty (endocinch procedure) are to reduce medication use, improve quality of life, and decrease reflux symptoms in patients who have GERD, without the costs and risks associated with conventional antireflux surgery. Initial results for these treatments have been encouraging, with acid suppressant use decreased or eliminated in 50 to 75 percent of treated patients.31

To date, fewer than 10,000 patients have received any form of endoscopic antireflux treatment. Studies comparing postprocedure outcomes are currently in progress.

Follow-up

Further diagnostic testing should be performed in patients who have not responded to continuous therapy or who require such treatment, exhibit warning symptoms, or have risk factors for Barrett's esophagus.14 Although chronic reflux plays a major role in the development of Barrett's esophagus, it is not known if outcomes can be improved through surveillance coupled with surgical or medical treatment. In observational studies, progression to severe esophagitis has not occurred in patients with an initial normal endoscopy whose symptoms have remained unchanged during 10-year follow-up, thus arguing against repeat endoscopy during that time period.32

The Authors

JOEL J. HEIDELBAUGH, M.D., is clinical assistant professor in the Department of Family Medicine at the University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, and medical director of the Ypsilanti (Mich.) Health Center.

TIMOTHY T. NOSTRANT, M.D., is professor of internal medicine and physician director of the faculty diagnostic unit in the gastroenterology division at the University of Michigan Medical School.

CLARA KIM, M.D., is clinical instructor in the Department of Internal Medicine at the University of Michigan Medical School.

R. VAN HARRISON, PH.D., is associate professor in the Department of Medical Education and director of the Office of Continuing Medical Education at the University of Michigan Medical School.

Address correspondence to Joel J. Heidelbaugh, M.D., Ypsilanti Health Center, 200 Arnet, Suite 200, Ypsilanti, MI 48198 (email: jheidel@umich.edu). Reprints are not available from the authors.

The authors indicate that they do not have any conflict of interest. Sources of funding: Dr. Nostrant is a consultant and member of the speaker's bureau for AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen Pharmaceutica Products, L.P., Merck & Co., Inc., TAP Pharmaceuticals Inc., and Wyeth Pharmaceuticals.

The authors thank all who assisted in the development and modification of the University of Michigan Health System (UMHS) guideline for the management of GERD, specifically those on the UMHS Guidelines Oversight Team.

REFERENCES

1. Sontag SJ. The medical management of reflux esophagitis. Role of antacids and acid inhibition. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 1990;19:683–712.

2. Hinder RA, Libbey JS, Gorecki P, Bammer T. Antireflux surgery. Indications, preoperative evaluation, and outcome. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 1999;28:987–1005,viii.

3. Brunton S. Treatment strategies for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Fam Pract Recertif. 2002;24:51–64.

4. Dimenas E, Glise H, Hallerback B, Hernqvist H, Svedlund J, Wiklund I. Quality of life in patients with upper gastrointestinal symptoms. An improved evaluation of treatment regimens?. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1993;28:681–7.

5. University of Michigan Health System. Guidelines for clinical care. Management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Retrieved May 28, 2003, from www.cme.med.umich.edu/pdf/guideline/gerd.pdf.

6. Klauser AG, Schindlbeck NE, Muller-Lissner SA. Symptoms in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Lancet. 1990;335(8683):205–8.

7. Locke GR 3d, Talley NJ, Fett SL, Zinsmeister AR, Melton LJ 3d. Prevalence and clinical spectrum of gastroesophageal reflux: a population-based study in Olmstead County, Minnesota. Gastroenterology. 1997;112:1448–56.

8. Richter JE, Bradley LC. Psychophysiological interactions in esophageal diseases. Semin Gastrointest Dis. 1995;7:169–84.

9. Da Costa LR. Value of a therapeutic trial to diagnose gastroesophageal reflux disease: step up versus step down therapy. Can J Gastroenterol. 1997;11(suppl B):78B–81B.

10. Wiener GJ, Morgan TM, Copper JB, Wu WC, Castell DO, Sinclair JW, et al. Ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring. Reproducibility and variability of pH parameters. Dig Dis Sci. 1998;33:1127–33.

11. Voutilainen M, Sipponen P, Mecklin JP, Juhola M, Farkkila M. Gastroesophageal reflux disease: prevalence, clinical, endoscopic and histopathological findings in 1,128 consecutive patients referred for endoscopy due to dyspeptic and reflux symptoms. Digestion. 2000;61:6–13.

12. Johnston BT, Troshinsky MB, Castell JA, Castell DO. Comparison of barium radiology with esophageal pH monitoring in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 1996;91:1181–5.

13. Van Pinxteren B, Numans ME, Bonis PA, Lau J. Short-term treatment with proton pump inhibitors, H2-receptor antagonists and prokinetics for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease–like symptoms and endoscopy negative reflux disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;(4):CD002095.

14. DeVault KR, Castell DO. Updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. The Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:1434–42.

15. Gerson LB, Robbins AS, Garber A, Hornberger J, Triadafilopoulos G. A cost-effectiveness analysis of prescribing strategies in the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95:395–407.

16. Meining A, Classen M. The role of diet and lifestyle measures in the pathogenesis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95:2692–7.

17. Jones MP. Treating acid-related diseases: the current approach. Fam Pract Recertif. 2000;22:71–84.

18. DeVault KR. Overview of medical therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 1999;28:831–45.

19. Weberg R, Berstad A. Symptomatic effect of a low-dose antacid regimen in reflux oesophagitis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1989;24:401–6.

20. Chatfield S. A comparison of the efficacy of the alginate preparation, Gaviscon Advance, with placebo in the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Curr Med Res Opin. 1999;15:152–9.

21. Chiba N, De Gara CJ, Wilkinson JM, Hunt RH. Speed of healing and symptom relief in grade II to IV gastroesophageal reflux disease: a meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 1997;112:1798–810.

22. Simon TJ, Berlin RG, Tipping R, Glide L. Efficacy of twice daily doses of 40 or 20 milligrams famotidine or 150 milligrams ranitidine for treatment of patients with moderate to severe erosive esophagitis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1993;28:375–80.

23. Sridhar S, Huang J, O'Brien BJ, Hunt RH. Clinical economics review: cost-effectiveness of treatment alternatives for gastro-oesophageal reflux. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1996;10:865–73.

24. Festen HP, Schenk E, Tan G, Snel P, Nelis F. Omeprazole versus high-dose ranitidine in mild gastroesophageal reflux disease: short-and long-term treatment. The Dutch Reflux Study Group. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:931–6.

25. Dent J, Yeomans ND, Mackinnon M, Reed W, Narielvala FM, Hetzel DJ, et al. Omeprazole v ranitidine for prevention of relapse in reflux oesophagitis. A controlled double blind trial of their efficacy and safety. Gut. 1994;35:590–8.

26. Kahrilas PJ, Falk GW, Johnson DA, Schmitt C, Collins DW, Whipple J, et al. Esomeprazole improves healing and symptom resolution as compared with omeprazole in reflux oesophagitis patients: a randomized controlled trial. The Esomeprazole Study Investigators. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2000;14:1249–58.

27. Klinkenberg-Knol EC, Nelis F, Dent J, Snel P, Mitchell B, Prichard P, et al. Long-term omeprazole treatment in resistant gastroesophageal reflux disease: efficacy, safety, and influence on gastric mucosa. Gastroenterology. 2000;118:661–9.

28. So JB, Zeitels SM, Rattner DW. Outcomes of atypical symptoms attributed to gastroe-sophageal reflux treated by laparoscopic fundoplication. Surgery. 1998;124:28–32.

29. Spechler SJ, Lee E, Ahnen D, Goyal RK, Hirano I, Ramirez F, et al. Long-term outcome of medical and surgical therapies for gastroesophageal reflux disease: follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2001;285:2331–8.

30. Lundell L, Miettinen P, Myrvold HE, Pedersen SA, Liedman B, Hatlebakk JG, et al. Continued (5-year) followup of a randomized clinical study comparing antireflux surgery and omeprazole in gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Am Coll Surg. 2001;192:172–9.

31. Lehman GA. Endoscopic and endoluminal techniques for the control of gastroesophageal reflux: are they ready for widespread application?. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;52:808–11.

32. Schnell TG, Sontag SJ, Chejfec G, Aranha G, Metz A, O'Connell S, et al. Long-term nonsurgical management of Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia. Gastroenterology. 2001;120:1607–19.



Copyright © 2003 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact afpserv@aafp.org for copyright questions and/or permission requests.

Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions


Article Tools

  • Download PDF
  • Print page
  • Share this page
  • AFP CME Quiz

Information From Industry

More in Pubmed

Navigate this Article