Graham Center One-Pager
The Ecology of Medical Care for Children in the United States: A New Application of an Old Model Reveals Inequities That Can Be Corrected
FREE PREVIEW Log in or buy this issue to read the full article. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles. Subscribe now.
FREE PREVIEW Subscribe or buy this issue. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles.
Am Fam Physician. 2003 Dec 15;68(12):2310.
If equal and adequate access to health care for children in the United States is a goal, we are failing. That failing is most prominent in the setting where most children receive care and preventive services—the doctor's office.
Data from the Department of Health and Human Services reveal the number of children (younger than 18 years) in the United States who received care in a typical month and where that care was received.1 Similar estimates have been made for adults and the total U.S. population, but never for children alone. The number of children per 1,000 who received care in each of six settings can be displayed as a series of boxes (see accompanying figure)1 to contrast with adults. Compared with adults in 1996, a smaller proportion of children received health care in all but two settings, the emergency department and the dentist's office. This is not surprising, given the generally good health of children.
There were disturbing differences, however, in the likelihood of children being seen in some settings, specifically physicians' offices. A significantly smaller proportion of children were seen in physicians' offices if they were the same in all regards except: they were black (odds ratio [OR] = 0.57 [0.51, 0.64]—43 percent less), Hispanic (OR = 0.81 [0.71, 0.92]—19 percent less), uninsured (OR = 0.61 [0.52, 0.70]—39 percent less), or living in families where the head of household had not graduated from high school (OR = 0.73 [0.63, 0.83]—27 percent less), and if they did not have a usual source of care (OR = 0.40 [0.33, 0.48]—60 percent less). Interestingly, living in a rural area was not independently associated with differences in receiving care in any of the studied settings.
Providing health insurance and access to a usual source of care for all children are feasible strategies that could be achieved in the United States to help ensure that all children receive appropriate health care. The United States, the wealthiest country in the world spending the most on health care, can afford both for its children.
note: The information and opinions contained in research from the Graham Center do not necessarily reflect the views or the policy of the AAFP.
1. Dovey SM, Weitzman M, Fryer GE, Green LA, Yawn B, Lanier D, et al. The ecology of medical care for children in the United States. Pediatrics. 2003;111:1024–9.
Adapted from Graham Center One-Pager #25. Dovey SM, Green LA, Phillips RL, Fryer GE. The ecology of medical care for children in the United States: a new application of an old model reveals inequities that can be corrected. December 2003. Available at: http://www.graham-center.org/x497.xml. From the Robert Graham Center: Policy Studies in Family Practice and Primary Care, 1350 Connecticut Ave., NW, Suite 950, Washington, DC 20036 (telephone: 202-986-5708; fax: 202-986-7034; e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org).
Copyright © 2003 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact email@example.com for copyright questions and/or permission requests.
Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions