|
COCHRANE FOR
CLINICIANS: PUTTING EVIDENCE INTO PRACTICE |
Which Nonsurgical Treatments for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Are Beneficial?
JANET H. PIEHL, M.D., Monash Institute of Health Services Research, Melbourne, Australia
The Cochrane Abstract below is a summary of a review from the Cochrane Library. It is accompanied by an interpretation to help clinicians put evidence into practice. Janet H. Piehl, M.D., presents a clinical scenario and question based on the Cochrane Abstract, along with an evidence-based answer and a full critique of the abstract.
This
clinical content conforms to AAFP criteria for evidence-based continuing
medical education (EB CME). EB CME is clinical content presented with practice
recommendations supported by evidence that has been systematically reviewed by
an AAFP-approved source. The practice recommendations in this activity are
available at www.update-software.com/abstracts/ab003219.htm.
Clinical Scenario
A 38-year-old female machinist complains of intermittent right wrist pain of several weeks' duration. Her job requires her to press a single button on a drill press once per second.
Clinical Question
Which nonsurgical treatments for carpal tunnel syndrome are beneficial?
Evidence-Based Answer
A 10- to 14-day course of oral corticosteroids, wrist splints, ultrasonography, yoga, and carpal bone mobilization provide short-term benefit. Ergonomic keyboards, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, diuretics, pyridoxine (vitamin B6), exercise, neurodynamic mobilization, magnet therapy, chiropractic treatment, and laser acupuncture provide no benefit. A related Cochrane review1 found steroid injection to be superior to oral corticosteroids.
|
|||||||||||||||
Cochrane Critique
Did the authors address a focused clinical question? Yes.
Were the criteria used to select articles for inclusion appropriate? Yes.
Is it likely that important relevant articles were missed? No.
Was the validity of the individual articles appraised? Yes.
Were the assessments of studies reproducible? Yes.
Were the results similar from study to study? Yes, when more than one study addressed the particular intervention.
How precise were the results? The precision of the included studies was quite variable; oral steroid treatment was the most precise.
Can the results be applied to patient care? Yes.
Do the conclusions make biologic and clinical sense? Yes.
Are the benefits worth the harms and costs? Yes.
|
Practice Pointers
This Cochrane review addresses the most common nonsurgical treatments for carpal tunnel syndrome. Unfortunately, most studies provided limited follow-up after the intervention, with only three of 21 trials following patients for up to three months. Although nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are used commonly to treat carpal tunnel syndrome, this review identified only one randomized controlled trial comparing this treatment with placebo, and it found no significant benefit.
Three related Cochrane reviews provide additional insight into treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome, but poor data confuse the results. Compared with placebo, local corticosteroid injection for carpal tunnel syndrome provides symptomatic relief for up to one month and clinical improvement for up to three months.1 A Cochrane review3 on biopsychosocial rehabilitation for upper limb repetitive strain injuries reveals a lack of reliable data and a need for high-quality trials in this area. An additional Cochrane review4 compares surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome; unfortunately, it uncovered only one small, poor-quality study performed 40 years ago.
Based on this review, a 10- to 14-day course of oral corticosteroids, use of wrist splints at night, workplace modification, and enrollment in a yoga class could be first-line therapy for the patient described in the clinical scenario. Although this review does not address this combination of therapies, they are unlikely to cause additional harm. The dosage of prednisolone used in the studies ranged from 25 mg for 10 days to 20 mg for one to two weeks followed by 10 mg for one to two weeks.
If the patient had contraindications or objections to therapy with oral corticosteroids, physical therapy with ultrasonography, carpal bone mobilization, and wrist splints would be first-line therapy. If these treatments were unsuccessful, steroid injection could be considered because of its longer duration of effect, as long as the workplace environment also was being adapted.
Janet H. Piehl, M.D., is currently in clinical practice in Seattle, Wash. She formerly was a research fellow at the Australasian Cochrane Centre in Melbourne, Australia. Dr. Piehl received her medical degree from the University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, and completed a family practice residency at Valley Medical Center, Renton, Wash.
Address correspondence to Janet H. Piehl, M.D. (e-mail: Janet_ Piehl@alum.wellesley.edu). Reprints are not available from the author.
REFERENCES
- Marshall S, Tardif G, Ashworth N. Local corticosteroid injection for carpal tunnel syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2003: CD001554.
- O'Connor D, Marshall S, Massy-Westropp N. Non-surgical treatment (other than steroid injection) for carpal tunnel syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2003:CD003219.
- Karjalainen K, Malmivaara A, van Tulder M, Roine R, Jauhiainen M, Hurri H, et al. Biopsychosocial rehabilitation for upper limb repetitive strain injuries in working age adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003:CD002269.
- Verdugo RJ, Salinas RS, Castillo J, Cea JG. Surgical versus non-surgical treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003:CD001552.
Copyright © 2003 by the American Academy of
Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it
online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for
his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise
be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any
medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by
the AAFP. Contact afpserv@aafp.org for
copyright questions and/or permission requests.
MEDLINE:
• Citation
More in AFP:
• Cochrane for Clinicians: Putting Evidence into Practice (93)
• Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (6)










These summaries have been derived from Cochrane
reviews published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews in The
Cochrane Library. Their content has, as far as possible, been checked with the
authors of the original reviews, but the summaries should not be regarded as an
official product of the Cochrane Collaboration; minor editing changes have been
made to the text (