Pharyngitis



FREE PREVIEW Log in or buy this issue to read the full article. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles. Subscribe now.


FREE PREVIEW Subscribe or buy this issue. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles.

Am Fam Physician. 2004 Mar 15;69(6):1465-1470.

Sore throat is one of the most common reasons for visits to family physicians. While most patients with sore throat have an infectious cause (pharyngitis), fewer than 20 percent have a clear indication for antibiotic therapy (i.e., group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal infection). Useful, well-validated clinical decision rules are available to help family physicians care for patients who present with pharyngitis. Because of recent improvements in rapid streptococcal antigen tests, throat culture can be reserved for patients whose symptoms do not improve over time or who do not respond to antibiotics.

Pharyngitis is one of the most common conditions encountered by the family physician.15 The optimal approach for differentiating among various causes of pharyngitis requires a problem-focused history, a physical examination, and appropriate laboratory testing. Identifying the cause of pharyngitis, especially group A beta-hemolytic streptococcus (GABHS), is important to prevent potential life-threatening complications.6

Epidemiology and Pathogenesis

The 2000 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey found that acute pharyngitis accounts for 1.1 percent of visits in the primary care setting and is ranked in the top 20 reported primary diagnoses resulting in office visits.3 Peak seasons for sore throat include late winter and early spring.4 Transmission of typical viral and GABHS pharyngitis occurs mostly by hand contact with nasal discharge, rather than by oral contact.7,8 Symptoms develop after a short incubation period of 24 to 72 hours.

Differential Diagnosis

Sore throat most often is caused by direct infection of the pharynx (pharyngitis), primarily by viruses or bacteria.4 GABHS pharyngitis accounts for 15 to 30 percent of cases in children and 5 to 15 percent of cases in adults.5,6,9,10 Sore throat also may be caused by other conditions, such as gastroesophageal reflux, postnasal drip secondary to rhinitis, persistent cough, thyroiditis, allergies, a foreign body, and smoking.1,2,11

This article focuses on infectious causes of sore throat (pharyngitis). If patients do not have any other signs of infection or do not respond as expected to treatment of pharyngitis, physicians should investigate noninfectious causes.

VIRUSES

Viral pharyngitis, the most common cause of sore throat, has a wide differential. Furthermore, different viruses are more prevalent during certain seasons.4 Coryza, conjunctivitis, malaise or fatigue, hoarseness, and low-grade fever suggest the presence of viral pharyngitis.12 Children with viral pharyngitis also can present with atypical symptoms, such as mouth-breathing, vomiting, abdominal pain, and diarrhea.8,12

INFECTIOUS MONONUCLEOSIS

Infectious mononucleosis is most common in patients 15 to 30 years of age.13 Patients typically present with fever, sore throat, and malaise. On examination, there is pharyngeal injection with exudates. Posterior cervical lymphadenopathy is common in patients with infectious mononucleosis, and its absence makes the diagnosis much less likely. Hepatosplenomegaly also may be present.1012 If these patients are treated with amoxicillin or ampicillin, 90 percent will develop a classic maculopapular rash.14,15

BACTERIA

Patients with bacterial pharyngitis generally do not have rhinorrhea, cough, or conjunctivitis. The incidence of bacterial pharyngitis is increased in temperate climates during winter and early spring.16 There is often a history of streptococcal throat infection (strep throat) within the past year. GABHS is the most common bacterial cause of pharyngitis.1618

GABHS Infection

Symptoms of strep throat may include pharyngeal erythema and swelling, tonsillar exudate, edematous uvula, palatine petechiae, and anterior cervical lymphadenopathy. Untreated, GABHS infection lasts seven to 10 days.4,13,19 Patients with untreated streptococcal pharyngitis are infectious during the acute phase of the illness and for one additional week.1 Effective antibiotic therapy shortens the infectious period to 24 hours, reduces the duration of symptoms by about one day, and prevents most complications.

Complications of GABHS Infection

The incidence of complications with GABHS infection, such as rheumatic fever and peritonsillar abscess, is much lower than generally perceived.17 Peritonsillar abscess occurs in fewer than 1 percent of patients treated with antibiotics.1 Patients with peritonsillar abscess typically have a toxic appearance and may present with a “hot potato voice,” fluctuant peritonsillar mass, and asymmetric deviation of the uvula. However, clinical impression is only moderately accurate in diagnosing peritonsillar abscess (78 percent sensitivity and 50 percent specificity in one series of 14 patients).20 Intraoral ultrasound examination is an accurate diagnostic test if abscess is suspected.

Rheumatic fever is exceedingly rare in the United States and other developed countries (annual incidence less than one case per 100,000).21 This illness should be suspected in any patient with joint swelling and pain, subcutaneous nodules, erythema marginatum or heart murmur, and a confirmed streptococcal infection during the preceding month. Patients will have an elevated antistreptolysin-O titer and erthrocyte sedimentation rate.

Poststreptococcal glomerulonephritis is another rare complication of GABHS pharyngitis, although treatment with antibiotics does not prevent it. Patients present with hematuria and, frequently, edema in the setting of a recent streptococcal infection with an elevated antistreptolysin-O titer.

Scarlet fever is associated with GABHS pharyngitis and usually presents as a punctate, erythematous, blanchable, sandpaper-like exanthem. The rash is found in the neck, groin, and axillae, and is accentuated in body folds and creases (Pastia’s lines).1,4,19 The pharynx and tonsils are erythematous and covered with exudates. The tongue may be bright red with a white coating (strawberry tongue).4

Other Bacterial Causes of Pharyngitis

Gonococcal pharyngitis occurs in sexually active patients18 and presents with fever, severe sore throat, dysuria, and a characteristic greenish exudate.

The role of Chlamydia pneumoniae and Mycoplasma pneumoniae as causes of acute pharyngitis, particularly in the absence of lower respiratory tract disease, remains somewhat uncertain.18 There is no evidence that testing for atypical bacteria or treatment in the primary care setting improves clinical outcomes in patients with pharyngitis.18

Diphtheria is an acute upper respiratory tract illness that is characterized by sore throat, low-grade fever, and an adherent grayish membrane with surrounding inflammation of the tonsils, pharynx, or nasal passages.16,22 In diphtheria, the throat is moderately sore, with tender cervical adenopathy. Case fatality rates for noncutaneous diphtheria (5 to 10 percent) have remained constant for the past five decades.23 Diphtheria pharyngitis has recently (March 2001) been reported in Delaware County, Pa.24

If examination reveals a serosanguineous nasal discharge and a grayish-white pharyngeal membrane (exudative and extending to the uvula and soft palate) in association with pharyngitis, tonsillitis, and cervical lymphadenopathy, the presumptive diagnosis is diphtheria. The incubation period for Corynebacterium diphtheriae infection is two to four weeks. A confirmatory diagnosis is made by microbacteriologic analysis.

KAWASAKI DISEASE

Kawasaki disease is probably an infectious disease caused by an unknown agent. The disease most often affects children younger than five years and presents with a constellation of symptoms, including sore throat. Characteristic signs and symptoms include fever, bilateral nonpurulent conjunctivitis, anterior cervical node enlargement, erythematous oral mucosa, and an inflamed pharynx with a strawberry tongue. Dermatologic features of the disease become apparent within three days of the onset of fever14,18 and include cracked red lips, a generalized polymorphous erythematous rash with edema and erythema of the hands and feet, and periungual desquamation followed by peeling of the palms. Dermatologic manifestations in concert with characteristic signs and symptoms serve as diagnostic criteria.13

Diagnosis

GENERAL APPROACH

When a patient presents with sore throat, the family physician must consider a wide range of illnesses. Infectious causes range from generally benign viruses to GABHS. Inflammatory presentations may be the result of allergy, reflux disease or, rarely, neoplasm or Kawasaki disease.

In determining the underlying cause and thereby deciding if, when, and how to treat the patient with pharyngitis, the physician must integrate information from the history and physical examination. Environmental and epidemiologic factors also may need to be assessed.

GABHS

Important historical elements include the onset, duration, progression, and severity of the associated symptoms (e.g., fever, cough, respiratory difficulty, swollen lymph nodes); exposure to infections; and presence of comorbid conditions (e.g., diabetes). The pharynx should be examined for erythema, hypertrophy, foreign body, exudates, masses, petechiae, and adenopathy. It also is important to assess the patient for fever, rash, cervical adenopathy, and coryza. When streptococcal pharyngitis is suspected, the physician should listen for the presence of a heart murmur and evaluate the patient for hepatosplenomegaly. Laboratory testing serves as an adjunct to the history and physical examination (Table 1).1,2,4,6,7,11,17,2327

TABLE 1

Selected Laboratory Tests for Identifying the Cause of Pharyngitis

Name of test Type of test Sensitivity and specificity

Throat culture

Specimen obtained by throat swab of posterior tonsillopharyngeal area and inoculated onto 5 percent sheep-blood agar plate to which a bacitracin disk is applied; results in 24 to 48 hours

Sensitivity: 97 percent; specificity: 99 percent; results dependent on the technique, medium, and incubation

Rapid antigen detection test or rapid streptococcal antigen test

Detects presence of group A streptococcal carbohydrate on a throat swab (change in color indicates a positive result); results available within minutes; in-office test

Specificity: > 95 percent; sensitivity: 80 to 97 percent, depending on the test

Monospot test

Rapid slide agglutination test for mononucleosis

Overall sensitivity: 86 percent; overall specificity: 99 percent

First week sensitivity: 69 percent; specificity: 88 percent

Second week: sensitivity: 81 percent; specificity: 88 percent


Information from references 1,2,4,6,7,11,17, and 23 through 27.

TABLE 1   Selected Laboratory Tests for Identifying the Cause of Pharyngitis

View Table

TABLE 1

Selected Laboratory Tests for Identifying the Cause of Pharyngitis

Name of test Type of test Sensitivity and specificity

Throat culture

Specimen obtained by throat swab of posterior tonsillopharyngeal area and inoculated onto 5 percent sheep-blood agar plate to which a bacitracin disk is applied; results in 24 to 48 hours

Sensitivity: 97 percent; specificity: 99 percent; results dependent on the technique, medium, and incubation

Rapid antigen detection test or rapid streptococcal antigen test

Detects presence of group A streptococcal carbohydrate on a throat swab (change in color indicates a positive result); results available within minutes; in-office test

Specificity: > 95 percent; sensitivity: 80 to 97 percent, depending on the test

Monospot test

Rapid slide agglutination test for mononucleosis

Overall sensitivity: 86 percent; overall specificity: 99 percent

First week sensitivity: 69 percent; specificity: 88 percent

Second week: sensitivity: 81 percent; specificity: 88 percent


Information from references 1,2,4,6,7,11,17, and 23 through 27.

A systematic review of the clinical diagnosis of pharyngitis1 identified large, blinded, prospective studies using throat cultures as a reference standard. The presence of tonsillar or pharyngeal exudate and a history of exposure to streptococcus in the previous two weeks were the most useful clinical features in predicting current GABHS infection. The absence of tender anterior cervical adenopathy, tonsillar enlargement, and tonsillar or pharyngeal exudate was most useful in ruling out GABHS. However, no single element in the history or physical examination is sensitive or specific enough to exclude or diagnose strep throat.1,4 This dilemma has inspired investigators to develop scoring systems to facilitate the diagnostic process.4,18,24

In one study, investigators identified four findings from the history and physical examination that independently predicted a positive throat culture for GABHS in a population of adults and children.26  [Evidence level B, observational study] The findings were tonsillar exudates, anterior cervical lymphadenopathy, absence of cough, and history of fever higher than 38°C (100.4°F). When combined with the patient’s age, these findings allow the physician to place patients in a low-, moderate-, or high-risk group (Table 2).24 Low-risk patients require no further diagnostic testing, high-risk patients should be considered for empiric therapy, and moderate-risk patients should undergo further evaluation with a rapid antigen test or throat culture to make the diagnosis. This general approach is advocated by a recent evidence-based guideline from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention that was written by family physicians, general internists, pediatricians, and other experts.28,29

Laboratory Evaluation

Throat Culture

One method for confirming the diagnosis of GABHS pharyngitis is throat culture. To maximize accuracy, the tonsillar region and posterior pharyngeal wall should be swabbed. The specimen is inoculated onto a 5 percent sheep-blood agar plate, and a bacitracin disk is applied.

TABLE 2

Streptococcal Score Validated in Adults and Children

Symptom Points

Fever (subjective or measured in office)

1

Absence of cough

1

Tender anterior cervical adenopathy

1

Tonsillar swelling or exudates

1

Age

Younger than 15 years

+1

15 to 45 years

0

Older than 45 years

–1


scoring: 0 or –1 points: streptococcal infection ruled out (2 percent); 1 to 3 points: order rapid test and treat accordingly; 4 to 5 points: probable streptococcal infection (52 percent), consider empiric antibiotics.

Information from reference 24.

TABLE 2   Streptococcal Score Validated in Adults and Children

View Table

TABLE 2

Streptococcal Score Validated in Adults and Children

Symptom Points

Fever (subjective or measured in office)

1

Absence of cough

1

Tender anterior cervical adenopathy

1

Tonsillar swelling or exudates

1

Age

Younger than 15 years

+1

15 to 45 years

0

Older than 45 years

–1


scoring: 0 or –1 points: streptococcal infection ruled out (2 percent); 1 to 3 points: order rapid test and treat accordingly; 4 to 5 points: probable streptococcal infection (52 percent), consider empiric antibiotics.

Information from reference 24.

Throat cultures have a reported sensitivity of 97 percent for GABHS and a specificity of 99 percent.24 It takes approximately 24 hours for the culture results to become available.13,23,26

Rapid Antigen Detection Tests

Properly performed, a rapid antigen detection test is almost as sensitive as throat culture.17,26,27 Rapid streptococcal antigen tests are easy to perform, and results are available within minutes. Because of improvements in the sensitivity of these tests, negative results no longer have to be confirmed by throat culture.30 [Evidence level B, nonrandomized trial]

Rapid streptococcal antigen testing is indicated when patients are at moderate risk for GABHS infection based on the clinical score or when the physician is not comfortable with using empiric therapy in a high-risk patient or with further testing in a low-risk patient31 (Figure 1). Patients with a positive test result should be treated with appropriate antibiotics, and those with a negative result should receive supportive treatment and follow-up care. If symptoms do not improve, a throat culture should be considered.31

OTHER INFECTIOUS CAUSES

The presence of at least 10 percent atypical lymphocytes supports the diagnosis (92 percent specificity) of infectious mononucleosis. In a patient with typical symptoms, no further testing is needed.32

When the clinical scenario suggests the presence of infectious mononucleosis, the diagnosis may be obtained by the presence of a positive heterophil antibody test (Monospot test) for Epstein-Barr virus. This test misses about one third of cases in the first week of illness but is more than 80 percent sensitive in the second week. If the diagnosis remains uncertain, the physician should consider a test for IgM antibody to the viral capsid antigen.

Gonococcal pharyngitis is diagnosed by a positive culture (Thayer-Martin medium) for Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Vaginal, cervical, penile, and rectal cultures also should be obtained when gonococcal pharyngitis is suspected.27,33

Suggested Approach to the Evaluation of Patients with Sore Throat

FIGURE 1.

Algorithm for evaluating patients with sore throat. (ENT=ear, nose, and throat)

View Large

Suggested Approach to the Evaluation of Patients with Sore Throat


FIGURE 1.

Algorithm for evaluating patients with sore throat. (ENT=ear, nose, and throat)

Suggested Approach to the Evaluation of Patients with Sore Throat


FIGURE 1.

Algorithm for evaluating patients with sore throat. (ENT=ear, nose, and throat)

Laryngoscopy is recommended when sore throat is chronic and recurrent, cultures and heterophil antibody tests are negative, and the diagnosis remains uncertain. Additional evaluation is required to investigate for the presence of a foreign body, neoplastic lesions, and other unusual causes of sore throat.

The Authors

MIRIAM T. VINCENT, M.D., M.S., is professor and chair of the Department of Family Practice at State University of New York (SUNY)–Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn. She is currently a doctoral thesis candidate in anatomy and cell biology.

NADHIA CELESTIN, M.D., is clinical assistant professor in the Department of Family Practice at SUNY–Downstate Medical Center. She completed her residency training and a faculty development fellowship in family medicine at SUNY–Downstate.

ANEELA N. HUSSAIN, M.D., is assistant professor in the Department of Family Practice at SUNY–Downstate Medical Center. Dr. Hussain completed her residency in family practice as chief resident at SUNY–Downstate.

Address correspondence to Miriam T. Vincent, M.D., M.S., Department of Family Practice, SUNY–Downstate, 450 Clarkson Ave., Box 67, Brooklyn, NY 11203–2098 (e-mail: mvincent@down-state.edu). Reprints are not available from the authors.

The authors indicate that they do not have any conflicts of interests. Sources of funding: none reported.

REFERENCES

1. Ebell MH, Smith MA, Barry HC, Ives K, Carey M. The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have strep throat?. JAMA. 2000;284:2912–8.

2. Perkins A. An approach to diagnosing the acute sore throat. Am Fam Physician. 1997;55:131–8,141–2.

3. Cherry DK, Woodwell DA. National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2000 summary. Adv Data. 2002;328:1–32.

4. Gerber MA. Diagnosis of group A streptococcal pharyngitis. Pediatr Ann. 1998;27:269–73.

5. Bisno AL, Gerber MA, Gwaltney JM Jr, Kaplan EL, Schwartz RH. Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of group A streptococcal pharyngitis. Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;35:113–25.

6. Singer K. The 15-minute visit (acute pharyngitis). Patient Care. 2001;35:20–3.

7. Kirkpatrick GL. The common cold. Prim Care. 1996;23:657–75.

8. Rotbart H. Enteroviruses. In: Katz SL, Gershon AA, Hotez PJ, Krugman S, eds. Krugman’s Infectious diseases of children. 10th ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 1998;81–97.

9. Goldstein MN. Office evaluation and management of the sore throat. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1992;25:837–42.

10. Ruppert SD. Differential diagnosis of common causes of pediatric pharyngitis. Nurse Pract. 1996;21:38–42,44,47–8.

11. Middleton DB. An approach to pediatric upper respiratory infections. Am Fam Physician. 1991;44(5 suppl):33S–40S,46S–47S.

12. Middleton DB. Pharyngitis. Prim Care. 1996;23:719–39.

13. McWhinney IR. A textbook of family medicine. 2d ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.

14. Katz BZ, Miller G. Epstein-Barr virus. In: Katz SL, Gershon AA, Hotez PJ, Krugman S, eds. Krugman’s Infectious diseases of children. 10th ed. St Louis: Mosby, 1998:98–101.

15. Peter J, Ray CG. Infectious mononucleosis. Pediatr Rev. 1998;19:276–9.

16. Zaoutis T, Klein JD. Enterovirus infections. Pediatr Rev. 1998;19:183–91.

17. Crump J, Harrison V, Shope T, Rion R. Pharyngitis. Guidelines for clinical care. Accessed July 17, 2003, at: http://cme.med.umich.edu/pdf/guideline/phrngts.pdf.

18. Bisno AL. Acute pharyngitis. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:205–11.

19. Kaplan EL. Streptococcal infections. In: Katz SL, Gershon AA, Hotez PJ, Krugman S, eds. Krugman’s Infectious diseases of children. 10th ed. St Louis: Mosby, 1998:487–500.

20. Scott PM, Loftus WK, Kew J, Ahuja A, Yue V, van Hasselt CA. Diagnosis of peritonsillar infections: a prospective study of ultrasound, computerized tomography and clinical diagnosis. J Laryngol Otol. 1999;113:229–32.

21. Olivier C. Rheumatic fever—is it still a problem?. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2000;45(suppl):13–21.

22. Zucker JR, Friedman S. Alert ends: update on the possible outbreak of diphtheria in Delaware county, Pa. Accessed July 17, 2003, at: http://www.nycms.org/article_view.php3?view=174&part=1.

23. Pitetti RD, Wald ER. Strep throat: considering the diagnostic options. Patient Care. 1999;33:119–45.

24. McIsaac WJ, Goel V, To T, Low DE. The validity of a sore throat score in family practice. CMAJ. 2000;163:811–5.

25. Vincent MT, Celestin N, Earle B. Upper respiratory infections II: pharyngitis. Accessed July 17, 2003, at: http://www.turner-white.com/pdf/brm_FP_pre4_4.pdf.

26. Pichichero ME. Treatment issues for group A beta hemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis and tonsillitis. Fam Pract Recert. 1992;14(12 suppl):19–26.

27. Lieu TA, Fleisher GR, Schwartz JS. Cost-effectiveness of rapid latex agglutination testing and throat culture for streptococcal pharyngitis. Pediatrics. 1990;85:246–56.

28. Cooper RJ, Hoffman JR, Bartlett JG, Besser RE, Gonzales R, Hickner JM, et al. Principles of appropriate antibiotic use for acute pharyngitis in adults: background. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:509–17.

29. Ebell M. Strep throat. Am Fam Physician. 2003;68:937–8.

30. Mayes T, Pichichero ME. Are follow-up throat cultures necessary when rapid antigen detection tests are negative for group A streptococci?. Clin Pediatr [Phila]. 2001;40:191–5.

31. Attia MW, Zaoutis T, Klein JD, Meier FA. Performance of a predictive model for streptococcal pharyngitis in children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001;155:687–91.

32. Brigden ML, Au S, Thompson S, Brigden S, Doyle P, Tsaparas Y. Infectious mononucleosis in an outpatient population: diagnostic utility of 2 automated hematology analyzers and the sensitivity and specificity of Hoagland’s criteria in heterophile-positive patients. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1999;123:875–81.

33. Carpenter CJ, Lederman MM, Salata RA. Infectious diseases. In: Andreoli TE, Carpenter CJ, Griggs RC, Loscalzo J, eds. Cecil Essentials of medicine. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders, 2001:782–8, 741,755–9.

Members of various family practice departments develop articles for 8“Problem-Oriented Diagnosis.” This article is one in a series coordinated by the Department of Family Practice at the State University of New York–Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn. Guest editor of the series is Miriam T. Vincent, M.D., M.S.


Copyright © 2004 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact afpserv@aafp.org for copyright questions and/or permission requests.

Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions


Article Tools

  • Download PDF
  • Print page
  • Share this page
  • AFP CME Quiz

Information From Industry

More in AFP

More in Pubmed

Navigate this Article