Epstein-Barr Virus Infectious Mononucleosis



FREE PREVIEW Log in or buy this issue to read the full article. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles. Subscribe now.


FREE PREVIEW Subscribe or buy this issue. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles.

Infectious mononucleosis should be suspected in patients 10 to 30 years of age who present with sore throat and significant fatigue, palatal petechiae, posterior cervical or auricular adenopathy, marked adenopathy, or inguinal adenopathy. An atypical lymphocytosis of at least 20 percent or atypical lymphocytosis of at least 10 percent plus lymphocytosis of at least 50 percent strongly supports the diagnosis, as does a positive heterophile antibody test. False-negative results of heterophile antibody tests are relatively common early in the course of infection. Patients with negative results may have another infection, such as toxoplasmosis, streptococcal infection, cytomegalovirus infection, or another viral infection. Symptomatic treatment, the mainstay of care, includes adequate hydration, analgesics, antipyretics, and adequate rest. Bed rest should not be enforced, and the patient’s energy level should guide activity. Corticosteroids, acyclovir, and antihistamines are not recommended for routine treatment of infectious mononucleosis, although corticosteroids may benefit patients with respiratory compromise or severe pharyngeal edema. Patients with infectious mononucleosis should be withdrawn from contact or collision sports for at least four weeks after the onset of symptoms. Fatigue, myalgias, and need for sleep may persist for several months after the acute infection has resolved.

Infectious mononucleosis is a clinical syndrome caused by Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) that is particularly common in adolescents and children. Typical features of infectious mononucleosis include fever, pharyngitis, adenopathy, malaise, and an atypical lymphocytosis. Splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, jaundice, and splenic rupture can occur in patients with infectious mononucleosis, but these complications are rare.1

Strength of Recommendations

Key clinical recommendations Label References

Fatigue, myalgias, and need for sleep may persist for several months after the acute infection has resolved.

B

5

Infectious mononucleosis should be suspected in patients 10 to 30 years of age who present with sore throat and significant fatigue, palatal petechiae, posterior cervical or auricular adenopathy, marked axillary adenopathy, or inguinal adenopathy

B

6

Corticosteroids, acyclovir (Zovirax), and antihistamines are not recommended for routine treatment of infectious mononucleosis.

B

23,26

Atypical lymphocytosis of at least 20 percent or atypical lymphocytosis of at least 10 percent and lymphocytosis of at least 50 percent may signal infectious mononucleosis.

C

10

Corticosteroids may be helpful in patients with respiratory compromise or severe pharyngeal edema.

C

28

Patients with infectious mononucleosis should not participate in contact or collision sports for at least four weeks after the onset of symptoms and until they are asymptomatic.

C

32

Strength of Recommendations

View Table

Strength of Recommendations

Key clinical recommendations Label References

Fatigue, myalgias, and need for sleep may persist for several months after the acute infection has resolved.

B

5

Infectious mononucleosis should be suspected in patients 10 to 30 years of age who present with sore throat and significant fatigue, palatal petechiae, posterior cervical or auricular adenopathy, marked axillary adenopathy, or inguinal adenopathy

B

6

Corticosteroids, acyclovir (Zovirax), and antihistamines are not recommended for routine treatment of infectious mononucleosis.

B

23,26

Atypical lymphocytosis of at least 20 percent or atypical lymphocytosis of at least 10 percent and lymphocytosis of at least 50 percent may signal infectious mononucleosis.

C

10

Corticosteroids may be helpful in patients with respiratory compromise or severe pharyngeal edema.

C

28

Patients with infectious mononucleosis should not participate in contact or collision sports for at least four weeks after the onset of symptoms and until they are asymptomatic.

C

32

Data collected more than 30 years ago on the incidence of infectious mononucleosis show the highest rates in persons 10 to 19 years of age (six to eight cases per 1,000 persons per year).2,3 The incidence in persons younger than 10 years and older than 30 years is less than one case per 1,000 persons per year,2,3 but mild infections in younger children often may be undiagnosed. The infection is most common in populations with many young adults, such as active-duty military personnel and college students, in whom the annual incidence for infectious mononucleosis ranges from 11 to 48 cases per 1,000 persons.4,5

Infectious mononucleosis is relatively uncommon in adults, accounting for less than 2 percent of all adults presenting with sore throat.6 Family physicians should expect to diagnose one to four patients with infectious mononucleosis per year, depending on the number of adolescents in their practice.3,5 The incidence of infectious mononucleosis shows no consistent seasonal peak.2

Etiology and Pathophysiology

EBV is a herpes virus that replicates primarily in β-lymphocytes but also may replicate in the epithelial cells of the pharynx and parotid duct.7 The infection is spread primarily by saliva, and the incubation period is four to eight weeks. In an acute infection, heterophile antibodies that agglutinate sheep erythrocytes are produced. This process forms the basis for the Monospot rapid latex agglutination test. Antibodies to viral capsid antigen (i.e., VCA-IgG and VCA-IgM) are produced slightly earlier than the heterophile antibody and are more specific for EBV infection. The VCA-IgG antibody persists past the stage of acute infection and signals the development of immunity.7

Diagnosis

TYPICAL PRESENTATION

In a series of 500 patients with confirmed infectious mononucleosis, at least 98 percent had sore throat, lymph node enlargement, fever, and tonsillar enlargement.8 Other common physical signs included pharyngeal inflammation (85 percent) and transient palatal petechiae (50 percent).8 This presentation is typical in adolescents. Older adults are less likely to have sore throat and adenopathy but more likely to have hepatomegaly and jaundice.9

DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA FOR INFECTIOUS MONONUCLEOSIS

Hoagland’s criteria8 for the diagnosis of infectious mononucleosis are the most widely cited: at least 50 percent lymphocytes and at least 10 percent atypical lymphocytes in the presence of fever, pharyngitis, and adenopathy, and confirmed by a positive serologic test. While quite specific, these criteria are not highly sensitive and are most useful for research purposes.6,10 Only about one half of patients with symptoms suggestive of infectious mononucleosis and a positive heterophile antibody test meet all of Hoagland’s criteria.

DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS

Patients with streptococcal pharyngitis or one of several viral pharyngitides present with sore throat, fatigue, and adenopathy. Acute cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and toxoplasmosis can share many additional characteristics with infectious mononucleosis, including splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, lymphocytosis, atypical lymphocytosis, and even false-positive results from a heterophile antibody test.11 It may not be possible—or even useful—to distinguish between infectious mononucleosis caused by EBV infection and an infectious mononucleosis–like syndrome caused by toxoplasmosis or CMV, because the management of these syndromes is the same. However, diagnostic testing is warranted in pregnant women because toxoplasmosis and acute human immuno-deficiency virus (HIV) and CMV infections are associated with significant pregnancy complications.

Symptoms of acute HIV infection can resemble those of infectious mononucleosis. If acute HIV infection is suspected, a quantitative polymerase chain reaction test should be performed. The differential diagnosis for suspected infectious mononucleosis is summarized in Table 1.12

TABLE 1

Infectious Mononucleosis: Differential Diagnosis and Distinguishing Features

Diagnosis Key distinguishing features

Acute human immunodeficiency virus infection

Mucocutaneous lesions, rash, diarrhea, weight loss, nausea, and vomiting

Cytomegalovirus infection12

Paired IgG serology shows a fourfold increase in antibody titers and a significant elevation in IgM (at least 30% of IgG value).

Streptococcal pharyngitis

Absence of splenomegaly or hepatomegaly; fatigue is less prominent

Toxoplasmosis

Paired IgG serology shows a fourfold increase in antibody titers and a significant elevation in IgM (at least 30% of IgG value).

Other viral pharyngitis

Patient is less likely to have adenopathy, tonsillar exudates, fever, or absence of cough than patients with streptococcal pharyngitis or infectious mononucleosis.


Some information from reference 12.

TABLE 1   Infectious Mononucleosis: Differential Diagnosis and Distinguishing Features

View Table

TABLE 1

Infectious Mononucleosis: Differential Diagnosis and Distinguishing Features

Diagnosis Key distinguishing features

Acute human immunodeficiency virus infection

Mucocutaneous lesions, rash, diarrhea, weight loss, nausea, and vomiting

Cytomegalovirus infection12

Paired IgG serology shows a fourfold increase in antibody titers and a significant elevation in IgM (at least 30% of IgG value).

Streptococcal pharyngitis

Absence of splenomegaly or hepatomegaly; fatigue is less prominent

Toxoplasmosis

Paired IgG serology shows a fourfold increase in antibody titers and a significant elevation in IgM (at least 30% of IgG value).

Other viral pharyngitis

Patient is less likely to have adenopathy, tonsillar exudates, fever, or absence of cough than patients with streptococcal pharyngitis or infectious mononucleosis.


Some information from reference 12.

KEY DIAGNOSTIC FEATURES

Few well-designed studies have been conducted to determine the value of clinical examination in patients with infectious mononucleosis in the primary care setting. The best study is a series including more than 700 patients 16 years of age and older with sore throat, 15 of whom were found to have infectious mononucleosis on the basis of a positive heterophile antibody test.6  The diagnostic accuracy of different signs and symptoms associated with infectious mononucleosis is summarized in Table 2.6

TABLE 2

Diagnosis of Infectious Mononucleosis: Accuracy of Signs and Symptoms

Sign or symptom Sensitivity* Specificity Positive LR Negative LR Post-test positive (%) Post-test negative (%)

Splenomegaly

7

99

7.0

0.94

44

9

Palatal petechiae

27

95

5.4

0.77

38

8

Posterior cervical adenopathy

40

87

3.1

0.69

25

7

Axillary adenopathy

27

91

3.0

0.80

25

8

Inguinal adenopathy

53

82

2.9

0.57

25

6

Any cervical adenopathy

87

58

2.1

0.22

19

2

Temperature ≥ 37.5°C (99.5°F)

27

84

1.7

0.87

16

9

Headache

60

55

1.3

0.73

13

8

Anterior cervical adenopathy

70

43

1.2

0.70

12

7

Fatigue

93

23

1.2

0.30

12

3


LR = likelihood ratio; post-test positive and negative = probability of disease with positive or negative test, based on a pretest probability of 10 percent.

*—Sensitivity is the percentage of patients with infectious mononucleosis who have each of these findings.

Adapted with permission from Aronson MD, Komaroff AL, Pass TM, Ervin CT, Branch WT. Heterophil antibody in adults with sore throat: frequency and clinical presentation. Ann Intern Med 1982;96:507.

TABLE 2   Diagnosis of Infectious Mononucleosis: Accuracy of Signs and Symptoms

View Table

TABLE 2

Diagnosis of Infectious Mononucleosis: Accuracy of Signs and Symptoms

Sign or symptom Sensitivity* Specificity Positive LR Negative LR Post-test positive (%) Post-test negative (%)

Splenomegaly

7

99

7.0

0.94

44

9

Palatal petechiae

27

95

5.4

0.77

38

8

Posterior cervical adenopathy

40

87

3.1

0.69

25

7

Axillary adenopathy

27

91

3.0

0.80

25

8

Inguinal adenopathy

53

82

2.9

0.57

25

6

Any cervical adenopathy

87

58

2.1

0.22

19

2

Temperature ≥ 37.5°C (99.5°F)

27

84

1.7

0.87

16

9

Headache

60

55

1.3

0.73

13

8

Anterior cervical adenopathy

70

43

1.2

0.70

12

7

Fatigue

93

23

1.2

0.30

12

3


LR = likelihood ratio; post-test positive and negative = probability of disease with positive or negative test, based on a pretest probability of 10 percent.

*—Sensitivity is the percentage of patients with infectious mononucleosis who have each of these findings.

Adapted with permission from Aronson MD, Komaroff AL, Pass TM, Ervin CT, Branch WT. Heterophil antibody in adults with sore throat: frequency and clinical presentation. Ann Intern Med 1982;96:507.

The presence of splenomegaly, posterior cervical adenopathy, axillary adenopathy, and inguinal adenopathy is most useful in considering the possibility of infectious mononucleosis, while the absence of cervical adenopathy and fatigue is most helpful in dismissing the diagnosis. Infectious mononucleosis should be suspected and a diagnostic evaluation obtained in febrile patients who have sore throat plus splenomegaly, palatal petechiae, or posterior, axillary, or inguinal adenopathy.6 A recent study13 confirmed this recommendation, although axillary and inguinal adenopathy were found less often in the study population.

Because the physical examination is quite insensitive for detecting splenomegaly (between 27 and 58 percent, depending on the examiner’s index of suspicion), the absence of splenomegaly should not be used as evidence against the diagnosis of infectious mononucleosis.14

DIAGNOSTIC TESTS

The accuracy of diagnostic tests for infectious mononucleosis is summarized in Table 3.6,10,1517 The syndrome is characterized by an absolute and relative lymphocytosis and an increased proportion of atypical lymphocytes. When a higher cutoff point is used to define an abnormal number of atypical lymphocytes, the sensitivity decreases (i.e., more false-negative diagnoses) and the specificity increases (i.e., fewer false-positive diagnoses).

TABLE 3

Diagnostic Tests for Infectious Mononucleosis

Test Sensitivity (%)* Specificity (%) Positive LR Negative LR Post-test positive (%) Post-test negative (%)

Patients with clinically suspected IM; reference standard is positive heterophile antibody10

 ≥ 10% atypical lymphocytes

75

92

9.4

0.27

51

3

≥ 20% atypical lymphocytes

56

98

28

0.44

76

5

≥ 40% atypical lymphocytes

25

100

50

0.75

100

8

≥ 50% lymphocytes

66

84

4.1

0.40

31

4

≥ 50% lymphocytes and ≥ 10% atypical lymphocytes

61

95

12

0.41

58

4

Patients over age 16 with sore throat; reference standard is positive heterophile antibody6

 ≥ 50% lymphocytes and ≥ 10% atypical lymphocytes

27

100

54

0.73

Patients with suspected IM; reference standard is positive heterophile antibody and an EBV-VCA antibody pattern compatible with recent infections15-17

 Heterophile antibody–latex agglutination*

87 (range, 79 to 95)

91 (range, 82 to 99)

9.7

0.14

52

2

Heterophile antibody–solid-phase immunoassay*

83 (range, 71 to 95)

97 (range, 94 to 99)

28

0.18

75

2

Antibody to VCA or EBNA*

97 (range, 95 to 99)

94 (range, 89 to 99)

16

0.03

64

0.5


NOTE: If the specificity was 100 percent, 99.5 percent was used to calculate the likelihood ratio to avoid dividing by zero.

LR = likelihood ratio; post-test positive and negative = probability of disease with positive or negative test, based on a pretest probability of 10%; IM = infectious mononucleosis; EBV-VCA = Epstein-Barr virus viral capsid antigen; EBNA = Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen.

*—Sensitivity and specificity represent the midpoint of the range from nine to 11 different tests in three studies. The midpoint was within 2 percent of the mean in each case. The sensitivity is the percentage of patients with IM who have a positive test.

Information from references 6,10, and 15 through 17.

TABLE 3   Diagnostic Tests for Infectious Mononucleosis

View Table

TABLE 3

Diagnostic Tests for Infectious Mononucleosis

Test Sensitivity (%)* Specificity (%) Positive LR Negative LR Post-test positive (%) Post-test negative (%)

Patients with clinically suspected IM; reference standard is positive heterophile antibody10

 ≥ 10% atypical lymphocytes

75

92

9.4

0.27

51

3

≥ 20% atypical lymphocytes

56

98

28

0.44

76

5

≥ 40% atypical lymphocytes

25

100

50

0.75

100

8

≥ 50% lymphocytes

66

84

4.1

0.40

31

4

≥ 50% lymphocytes and ≥ 10% atypical lymphocytes

61

95

12

0.41

58

4

Patients over age 16 with sore throat; reference standard is positive heterophile antibody6

 ≥ 50% lymphocytes and ≥ 10% atypical lymphocytes

27

100

54

0.73

Patients with suspected IM; reference standard is positive heterophile antibody and an EBV-VCA antibody pattern compatible with recent infections15-17

 Heterophile antibody–latex agglutination*

87 (range, 79 to 95)

91 (range, 82 to 99)

9.7

0.14

52

2

Heterophile antibody–solid-phase immunoassay*

83 (range, 71 to 95)

97 (range, 94 to 99)

28

0.18

75

2

Antibody to VCA or EBNA*

97 (range, 95 to 99)

94 (range, 89 to 99)

16

0.03

64

0.5


NOTE: If the specificity was 100 percent, 99.5 percent was used to calculate the likelihood ratio to avoid dividing by zero.

LR = likelihood ratio; post-test positive and negative = probability of disease with positive or negative test, based on a pretest probability of 10%; IM = infectious mononucleosis; EBV-VCA = Epstein-Barr virus viral capsid antigen; EBNA = Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen.

*—Sensitivity and specificity represent the midpoint of the range from nine to 11 different tests in three studies. The midpoint was within 2 percent of the mean in each case. The sensitivity is the percentage of patients with IM who have a positive test.

Information from references 6,10, and 15 through 17.

The original serologic test for infectious mononucleosis, the Paul-Bunnell test, detected heterophile antibodies by agglutination of sheep or horse red blood cells.18 Later, guinea pig kidney absorption of serum was added to increase the specificity of the test.19 These tests are now available in convenient latex agglutination or solid-phase immunoassay form. Although they are relatively specific, heterophile antibody tests are somewhat insensitive, particularly in the first weeks of illness. The false-negative rate is as high as 25 percent in the first week, approximately 5 to 10 percent in the second week, and 5 percent in the third week of illness.8 Heterophile antibody tests are less sensitive in patients younger than 12 years, detecting only 25 to 50 percent of infections in this group, compared with 71 to 91 percent in older patients.15

More sensitive tests have been developed that detect VCA-IgG and VCA-IgM. When the results are negative, these tests are better than heterophile antibody tests in ruling out infectious mononucleosis caused by EBV (negative likelihood ratio, 0.03 versus 0.14 to 0.18 for heterophile antibody tests), but when the results are positive, the tests are similar in their ability to rule in disease (positive likelihood ratio, 16 versus 9.7 to 28).16,17 VCA-IgG and VCA-IgM tests are useful in diagnosing patients who have highly suggestive clinical features but negative heterophile antibody test results. Antibody to Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen (EBNA), while typically not detectable until six to eight weeks after the onset of symptoms, can help distinguish between acute and previous infections. If EBNA is positive in a patient with acute symptoms and suspected infectious mononucleosis, previous infection is suggested. Elevated hepatic transaminase levels are relatively common in patients with infectious mononucleosis, occurring in approximately one half of patients.20

RECOMMENDED DIAGNOSTIC STRATEGY

No evidence-based or consensus guidelines have been proposed to guide the evaluation of patients with suspected infectious mononucleosis; the following recommendations are based on a synthesis of the available evidence (Figure 1). Patients between 10 and 30 years of age with sore throat, fever, and significant anterior cervical adenopathy, fatigue, posterior cervical adenopathy, inguinal adenopathy, palatal petechiae, or splenomegaly are at high risk for infectious mononucleosis. A white blood cell count with differential or a heterophile antibody test should be obtained in these patients, as well as a rapid test for streptococcal pharyngitis.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Epstein-Barr Virus IM

Figure 1

Algorithm for the management of suspected infectious mononucleosis. (IM = infectious mononucleosis; GABHS = group A β-hemolytic streptococcus; VCA = viral capsid antigen; EBV = Epstein-Barr virus)

View Large

Diagnosis and Treatment of Epstein-Barr Virus IM


Figure 1

Algorithm for the management of suspected infectious mononucleosis. (IM = infectious mononucleosis; GABHS = group A β-hemolytic streptococcus; VCA = viral capsid antigen; EBV = Epstein-Barr virus)

Diagnosis and Treatment of Epstein-Barr Virus IM


Figure 1

Algorithm for the management of suspected infectious mononucleosis. (IM = infectious mononucleosis; GABHS = group A β-hemolytic streptococcus; VCA = viral capsid antigen; EBV = Epstein-Barr virus)

If the patient has more than 20 percent atypical lymphocytes or more than 50 percent lymphocytes with at least 10 percent atypical lymphocytes, infectious mononucleosis is quite likely, and further confirmation of the diagnosis is not needed. A positive result of a heterophile antibody test also is strong evidence in favor of a diagnosis of infectious mononucleosis. A negative result of an antibody test, particularly during the first week of illness, may indicate that the patient does not have infectious mononucleosis. However, it also could be a false-negative result or could indicate that the patient has an infectious mononucleosis–like syndrome caused by CMV or toxo-plasmosis. The patient should be treated symptomatically, and if the patient does not clinically improve within five to seven days, a second heterophile antibody test should be performed. If an accurate diagnosis is urgently required (for example, in a competitive athlete who wants to return to competition as soon as possible), a VCA-IgM test may be selected. A negative result is strong evidence against the diagnosis of infectious mononucleosis.

Treatment

The mainstay of treatment for infectious mononucleosis is good supportive care, including adequate hydration; nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or acetaminophen for fever and myalgias; and throat lozenges or sprays, or gargling with a 2 percent lidocaine (Xylocaine) solution to relieve pharyngeal discomfort. An older, quasi-experimental study21 found that enforced bed rest slowed recovery. Given the lack of evidence for bed rest in many other conditions, it seems sensible to recommend that patients base their return to usual activities on their energy levels.

A meta-analysis22 of five randomized controlled trials involving 339 patients found that patients who took acyclovir (Zovirax) had less oropharyngeal shedding at the end of therapy, but this treatment provided no significant or consistent clinical benefit and is therefore not recommended. Another trial found no significant benefit from the use of ranitidine (Zantac) in patients with infectious mononucleosis.23

Corticosteroids have been advocated for the treatment of patients with infectious mononucleosis,8 and some early studies24,25 seemed to show a benefit from these agents with regard to normalization of temperature and laboratory values. However, these studies had significant methodologic limitations. A more recent and better-designed study26 found no benefit from a combination of acyclovir and prednisone. In a small, double-blind, randomized trial27 of 40 children with suspected infectious mononucleosis (33 of whom had confirmed infectious mononucleosis), those who were given oral dexamethasone (0.3 mg per kg) had less pain at 12 hours but not at 24, 48, and 72 hours. This finding indicates that repeated doses may be needed. Based on clinical experience and case reports, corticosteroids are recommended in patients with significant pharyngeal edema that causes or threatens respiratory compromise.28

PREVENTION OF COMPLICATIONS AND RECURRENCE

A 1975 report8 of 500 consecutive patients with infectious mononucleosis found that 30 percent of patients had group A β-hemolytic streptococcal (GABHS) pharyngitis, 0.2 percent had splenic rupture, 0.2 percent had peritonsillar abscess, and 0.2 percent had rheumatic fever. Two other studies29,30 reported GABHS pharyngitis rates of only 3 to 4 percent in studies of more than 100 patients. The true rate of concomitant infectious mononucleosis and GABHS pharyngitis probably lies between these extremes and may depend on the time of year. It seems prudent to obtain a rapid strep test in patients with infectious mononucleosis and to treat them with antibiotics only if the strep test result is positive. Amoxicillin and ampicillin should not be used because they may cause a morbilliform rash in patients with infectious mononucleosis.

Patients with infectious mononucleosis are likely to have splenomegaly. Although most patients do not have a palpable spleen on physical examination, a study31 of 29 patients who were hospitalized with infectious mononucleosis (and who therefore may have had more severe disease) found that all patients had splenomegaly on ultrasound examination and that one half of them had hepatomegaly. Only 17 percent of the enlarged spleens and 8 percent of the enlarged livers were palpable on physical examination, a finding that is consistent with other studies.6 Because an enlarged spleen is at risk for rupture, athletes should not compete in contact or collision sports for a minimum of three to four weeks after the onset of symptoms.32

The risk of splenic rupture is estimated at 0.1 percent, based on a retrospective series of 8,116 patients.33 In a review34 of 55 athletes with splenic rupture, almost all ruptures occurred in the first three weeks of illness. Interestingly, in the same series, one half of ruptures were atraumatic. These data suggest that patients should be kept out of athletics for at least three to four weeks and until they are asymptomatic. Some experts suggest a longer duration of restricted activity of five to six weeks35 or even six months,36 although data from natural history studies do not necessarily support these recommendations. Because the physical examination is so insensitive, ultrasound imaging to assess the size of the spleen at three weeks may be a better guide for determining whether a patient should return to athletics.37 The cost to prevent one traumatic rupture probably is well over $1 million when this strategy is used, given that the risk of rupture overall is one in 1,000, the risk of rupture beyond four weeks is considerably less, about one half of ruptures are atraumatic, and the cost of an ultrasound scan is several hundred dollars. Although the strategy may make sense when used selectively (e.g., when an athlete would like to return to competition in less than four weeks), it cannot be endorsed as routine practice.

Several cohort studies have examined the long-term outcomes of infectious mononucleosis. Between 9 and 22 percent of patients reported persistent fatigue or hypersomnia six months after clinical infectious mononucleosis, compared with zero to 6 percent of patients following uncomplicated upper respiratory infection.5 The best study13 of the natural history of infectious mononucleosis followed 150 patients for six months. In this study, sore throat, fever, headache, rash, cough, and nausea largely had resolved one month after the onset of symptoms. Fatigue resolved more slowly (77 percent initially, 28 percent at one month, 21 percent at two months, and 13 percent at six months), as did sleeping too much (45 percent initially, 18 percent at one month, 14 percent at two months, and 9 percent at six months) and sore joints (23 percent initially, 15 percent at one month, 6 percent at two months, and 9 percent at six months).13 This study also followed functional status over the same six-month period and found that patients required about two months to achieve a stable level of recovery. The association between EBV infection and chronic fatigue syndrome remains uncertain, and a positive IgG test for EBV does not imply a causal relationship. In addition, evidence of EBV infection is not part of the definition of chronic fatigue syndrome.28  Physicians should be aware of several other rare complications of infectious mononucleosis (Table 4).1,3841

TABLE 4

Potential Complications of Infectious Mononucleosis

Acute interstitial nephritis

Hemolytic anemia

Myocarditis and cardiac conduction abnormalities

Neurologic abnormalities

Cranial nerve palsies

Encephalitis

Meningitis

Mononeuropathies

Retrobulbar neuritis

Thrombocytopenia

Upper airway obstruction


Information from references 1 and 38through 41.

TABLE 4   Potential Complications of Infectious Mononucleosis

View Table

TABLE 4

Potential Complications of Infectious Mononucleosis

Acute interstitial nephritis

Hemolytic anemia

Myocarditis and cardiac conduction abnormalities

Neurologic abnormalities

Cranial nerve palsies

Encephalitis

Meningitis

Mononeuropathies

Retrobulbar neuritis

Thrombocytopenia

Upper airway obstruction


Information from references 1 and 38through 41.

The Author

MARK H. EBELL, M.D., M.S., is associate professor of family medicine at Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, East Lansing, and practices at Athens (Ga.) Primary Care. Dr. Ebell received his medical degree from the University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, where he also completed a family practice residency. He is the developer of the InfoRetriever software and deputy editor for evidence-based medicine for American Family Physician.

Address correspondence to Mark H. Ebell, M.D., M.S., 330 Snapfinger Dr., Athens, GA 30605 (e-mail: ebell@msu.edu). Reprints are not available from the author.

The author indicates that he does not have any conflict of interest. Source of funding: none reported.

REFERENCES

1. Bailey RE. Diagnosis and treatment of infectious mononucleosis. Am Fam Physician. 1994;49:879–88.

2. Henke CE, Kurland LT, Elveback LR. Infectious mononucleosis in Rochester, Minnesota, 1950 through 1969. Am J Epidemiol. 1973;98:483–90.

3. Fry J. Infectious mononucleosis: some new observations from a 15-year study. J Fam Pract. 1980;10:1087–9.

4. Van Cauwenberge PB, Vander Mijnsbrugge A.. Pharyngitis: a survey of the microbiologic etiology. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1991;1010 suppl:S39–42.

5. Candy B, Chalder T, Cleare AJ, Wessley S, White PD, Hotopf M. Recovery from infectious mononucleosis: a case for more than symptomatic therapy? A systematic review. Br J Gen Pract. 2002;52:844–51.

6. Aronson MD, Komaroff AL, Pass TM, Ervin CT, Branch WT. Heterophil antibody in adults with sore throat: frequency and clinical presentation. Ann Intern Med. 1982;96:505–8.

7. Andersson JP. Clinical aspects of Epstein-Barr virus infection. Scand J Infect Dis Suppl. 1991;80:94–104.

8. Hoagland RJ. Infectious mononucleosis. Prim Care. 1975;2:295–307.

9. Axelrod P, Finestone AJ. Infectious mononucleosis in older adults. Am Fam Physician. 1990;42:1599–606.

10. Brigden ML, Au S, Thompson S, Brigden S, Doyle P, Tsaparas Y. Infectious mononucleosis in an outpatient population: diagnostic utility of 2 automated hematology analyzers and the sensitivity and specificity of Hoagland’s criteria in heterophile-positive patients. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1999;123:875–81.

11. Ho-Yen DO, Martin KW. The relationship between atypical lymphocytosis and serological tests in infectious mononucleosis. J Infect. 1981;3:324–31.

12. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Cytomegalo-virus (CMV) infection. Accessed online August 16, 2004, at: http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/diseases/cmv.htm.

13. Rea TD, Russo JE, Katon W, Ashley RL, Buckwald DS. Prospective study of the natural history of infectious mononucleosis caused by Epstein-Barr virus. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2001;14:234–42.

14. Grover SA, Barkun AN, Sackett DL. The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have splenomegaly? JAMA. 1993;270:2218–21.

15. Linderholm M, Boman J, Juto P, Linde A. Comparative evaluation of nine kits for rapid diagnosis of infectious mononucleosis and Epstein-Barr virus-specific serology. J Clin Microbiol. 1994;32:259–61.

16. Bruu AL, Hjetland R, Holter E, Mortensen L, Natas O, Petterson W, et al. Evaluation of 12 commercial tests for detection of Epstein-Barr virus-specific and heterophile antibodies. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2000;7:451–6.

17. Elgh F, Linderholm M. Evaluation of six commercially available kits using purified heterophile antigen for the rapid diagnosis of infectious mononucleosis compared with Epstein-Barr virus-specific serology. Clin Diagn Virol. 1996;7:17–21.

18. Paul JR, Bunnell WW. Classics in infectious diseases. The presence of heterophile antibodies in infectious mononucleosis by John R. Paul and W. W. Bunnell. American Journal of the Medical Sciences, 1932. Rev Infect Dis. 1982;4:1062–8.

19. Davidsohn I. Serologic diagnosis of infectious mononucleosis. JAMA. 1937;108:289–95.

20. Grotto I, Mimouni D, Huerta M, Mimoumi M, Cohen D, Robin G, et al. Clinical and laboratory presentation of EBV positive infectious mononucleosis in young adults. Epidemiol Infect. 2003;131:683–9.

21. Dalrymple W. Infectious mononucleosis. 2. Relation of bed rest and activity to prognosis. Postgrad Med. 1964;35:345–9.

22. Torre D, Tambini R. Acyclovir for treatment of infectious mononucleosis: a meta-analysis. Scand J Infect Dis. 1999;31:543–7.

23. Vendelbo Johansen L, Lildholdt T, Bende M, Toft A, Brahe Pedersen C, Danielsson GP. Infectious mononucleosis treated by an antihistamine: a comparison of the efficacy of ranitidine (Zantac) vs placebo in the treatment of infectious mononucleosis. Clin Otolaryngol. 1997;22:123–5.

24. Bolden KJ. Corticosteroids in the treatment of infectious mononucleosis. An assessment using a double blind trial. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1972;22:87–95.

25. Prout C, Dalrymple W. A double-blind study of eighty-two cases of infectious mononucleosis treated with corticosteroids. J Am Coll Health Assoc. 1966;15:62–6.

26. Tynell E, Aurelius E, Brandell A, Julander I, Wood M, Yao QY, et al. Acyclovir and prednisolone treatment of acute infectious mononucleosis: a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Infect Dis. 1996;174:324–31.

27. Roy M, Bailey B, Amre DK, Girodias JB, Bussieres JF, Gaudreault P. Dexamethasone for the treatment of sore throat in children with suspected infectious mononucleosis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004;158:250–4.

28. Epstein-Barr virus and infectious mononucleosis. Accessed online August 16, 2004, at: http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/diseases/ebv.htm.

29. Chretien JH, Esswein JG. How frequent is bacterial superinfection of the pharynx in infectious mononucleosis? Observations on incidence, recognition, and management with antibiotics. Clin Pediatr [Phila]. 1976;15:424–7.

30. Merriam SC, Keeling RP. Beta-hemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis: uncommon in infectious mononucleosis. South Med J. 1983;76:575–6.

31. Dommerby H, Stangerup SE, Stangerup M, Hancke S. Hepatosplenomegaly in infectious mononucleosis, assessed by ultrasonic scanning. J Laryngol Otol. 1986;100:573–9.

32. Burroughs KE. Athletes resuming activity after infectious mononucleosis. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:1122–3.

33. Farley DR, Zietlow SP, Bannon MP, Farnell MB. Spontaneous rupture of the spleen due to infectious mononucleosis. Mayo Clin Proc. 1992;67:846–53.

34. Maki DG, Reich RM. Infectious mononucleosis in the athlete. Diagnosis, complications, and management. Am J Sports Med. 1982;10:162–73.

35. Eichner ER. Infectious mononucleosis. Phys Sportsmed. 1996;24:49–54.

36. Rutkow IM. Rupture of the spleen in infectious mononucleosis: a critical review. Arch Surg. 1978;113:718–20.

37. Sevier TL. Infectious disease in athletes. Med Clin North Am. 1994;78:389–412.

38. Verma N, Arunabh S, Brady TM, Charytan C. Acute interstitial nephritis secondary to infectious mononucleosis. Clin Nephrol. 2002;58:151–4.

39. Connelly KP, DeWitt LD. Neurologic complications of infectious mononucleosis. Pediatr Neurol. 1994;10:181–4.

40. Anderson MD, Kennedy CA, Lewis AW, Christensen GR. Retrobulbar neuritis complicating acute Epstein-Barr virus infection. Clin Infect Dis. 1994;18:799–801.

41. MacGowan JR, Mahendra P, Ager S, Marcus RE. Thrombocytopenia and spontaneous rupture of the spleen associated with infectious mononucleosis. Clin Lab Haematol. 1995;17:93–4.



Copyright © 2004 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact afpserv@aafp.org for copyright questions and/or permission requests.

Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions


Article Tools

  • Download PDF
  • Print page
  • Share this page
  • AFP CME Quiz

Information From Industry

More in Pubmed

Navigate this Article