Blunt Trauma in Pregnancy



FREE PREVIEW Log in or buy this issue to read the full article. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles. Subscribe now.


FREE PREVIEW Subscribe or buy this issue. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles.

Am Fam Physician. 2004 Oct 1;70(7):1303-1310.

  Patient Information Handout

Trauma is the most common cause of nonobstetric death among pregnant women in the United States. Motor vehicle crashes, domestic violence, and falls are the most common causes of blunt trauma during pregnancy. All pregnant patients with traumatic injury should be assessed formally in a medical setting because placental abruption can have dire fetal consequences and can present with few or no symptoms. Evaluation and treatment are the same as for nonpregnant patients, except that the uterus should be shifted off the great vessels. After initial stabilization, management includes electronic fetal monitoring, ultrasonography, and laboratory studies. Electronic fetal monitoring currently is the most accurate measure of fetal status after trauma, although the optimal duration of monitoring has not been established. Prevention of trauma through proper seat belt use during pregnancy and recognition of domestic violence during prenatal care is important.

Trauma affects 6 to 7 percent of pregnancies in the United States and is the leading cause of nonobstetric maternal death.14 A reported 0.3 percent of pregnant women require hospital admission because of trauma.4 Motor vehicle crashes, domestic violence, and falls are the most common causes of blunt trauma in pregnancy.1,313

The rate of fetal mortality after maternal blunt trauma is 3.4 to 38.0 percent,2,4,5,1015 mostly from placental abruption, maternal shock, and maternal death11,12,16,17  (Table 1).4,11,14,16,1821 Fetal loss can occur even when the mother has incurred no abdominal injuries.5,12 Regardless of the apparent severity of injury in blunt trauma, all pregnant women should be evaluated in a medical setting.5

TABLE 1

Factors Associated with Increased Fetal Mortality After Trauma*

Maternal hypotension

High maternal Injury Severity Score†

Ejection from a motor vehicle

Maternal pelvic fracture

Automobile versus pedestrian accidents

Maternal history of alcohol use

Young maternal age

Motorcycle crashes

Maternal smoking history

Uterine rupture


*—Listed in order from those most commonly to least commonly found to contribute to fetal death.

†—A standard assessment of the level of traumatic injury, based on codes from the International Classification of Diseases, 9th ed.

Information from references 14,11,14,16, and 18 through 21.

TABLE 1   Factors Associated with Increased Fetal Mortality After Trauma*

View Table

TABLE 1

Factors Associated with Increased Fetal Mortality After Trauma*

Maternal hypotension

High maternal Injury Severity Score†

Ejection from a motor vehicle

Maternal pelvic fracture

Automobile versus pedestrian accidents

Maternal history of alcohol use

Young maternal age

Motorcycle crashes

Maternal smoking history

Uterine rupture


*—Listed in order from those most commonly to least commonly found to contribute to fetal death.

†—A standard assessment of the level of traumatic injury, based on codes from the International Classification of Diseases, 9th ed.

Information from references 14,11,14,16, and 18 through 21.

Management

INITIAL STABILIZATION

A systematic approach to initial stabilization should be used after blunt trauma in pregnant women1 (Figure 1).11,12,22,23 Rapid maternal respiratory support is critical; anoxia occurs more quickly in advanced pregnancy because of the changes that occur in respiratory physiology during pregnancy24  (Table 2).25,26 Evaluation of the fetus should begin only after the mother has been stabilized.

Management of the Pregnant Woman After Trauma

FIGURE 1

Algorithm for the management of the pregnant woman after trauma.

Adapted with permission from University of Michigan. Suggested algorithm for management of trauma during pregnancy. Accessed online May 20, 2004, at: http://www.med.umich.edu/obgyn/resdir/protocols/traumaprotocol.htm, with additional information from references 11,12, and 22.

View Large

Management of the Pregnant Woman After Trauma


FIGURE 1

Algorithm for the management of the pregnant woman after trauma.

Adapted with permission from University of Michigan. Suggested algorithm for management of trauma during pregnancy. Accessed online May 20, 2004, at: http://www.med.umich.edu/obgyn/resdir/protocols/traumaprotocol.htm, with additional information from references 11,12, and 22.

Management of the Pregnant Woman After Trauma


FIGURE 1

Algorithm for the management of the pregnant woman after trauma.

Adapted with permission from University of Michigan. Suggested algorithm for management of trauma during pregnancy. Accessed online May 20, 2004, at: http://www.med.umich.edu/obgyn/resdir/protocols/traumaprotocol.htm, with additional information from references 11,12, and 22.

TABLE 2

Changes in Normal Pregnancy that May Affect Trauma Management*

Affected value or system Change during normal pregnancy

Systolic blood pressure

Decreased by an average of 5 to 15 mm Hg

Diastolic blood pressure

Decreased by 5 to 15 mm Hg

Electrocardiogram

Flat or inverted T waves in leads III, V1, and V2; Q waves in leads III and aVF

Blood volume

Increased by 30 to 50 percent

White blood cell count

May be increased; range: 5,000 to 25,000 per mm3 (5 to 25 × 109 per L; higher in late pregnancy)

Fibrinogen

Increased; range: 264 to 615 mg per dL (2.6 to 6.1 g per L)

D-dimer

Frequently positive

Respiratory rate

Increased by 40 to 50 percent

Oxygen consumption

Increased by 15 to 20 percent at rest

Partial pressure of oxygen

Increased; range: 100 to 108 mm Hg

Partial pressure of carbon dioxide

Decreased; range: 27 to 32 mm Hg

Bicarbonate

Decreased; range: 19 to 25 mEq per L

Base excess

Present; range: 3 to 4 mEq per L

Blood urea nitrogen

Decreased; range: 3 to 3.5 mg per dL (1.1 to 1.2 mmol per L)

Serum creatinine

Decreased; range: 0.6 to 0.7 mg per dL (50 to 60 μmol per L); 1.0 mg per dL [90 μmol per L] may be abnormal

Alkaline phosphatase

Increased because of placental production; range: 60 to 140 IU per L (60 to 140 U per L)

Kidneys

Mild hydronephrosis

Gastrointestinal tract

Decreased gastric emptying, decreased motility, increased risk of aspiration

Musculoskeletal system

Widened symphysis pubis and sacroiliac joints, which may lead to misreading of radiologic studies

Diaphragm

Higher position in pregnancy; consequently, chest tubes would need to be placed one or two interspaces higher.

Peritoneum

Small amounts of intraperitoneal fluid normally present


*—Listed in order from most to least clinically relevant.

Information from references 25 and 26.

TABLE 2   Changes in Normal Pregnancy that May Affect Trauma Management*

View Table

TABLE 2

Changes in Normal Pregnancy that May Affect Trauma Management*

Affected value or system Change during normal pregnancy

Systolic blood pressure

Decreased by an average of 5 to 15 mm Hg

Diastolic blood pressure

Decreased by 5 to 15 mm Hg

Electrocardiogram

Flat or inverted T waves in leads III, V1, and V2; Q waves in leads III and aVF

Blood volume

Increased by 30 to 50 percent

White blood cell count

May be increased; range: 5,000 to 25,000 per mm3 (5 to 25 × 109 per L; higher in late pregnancy)

Fibrinogen

Increased; range: 264 to 615 mg per dL (2.6 to 6.1 g per L)

D-dimer

Frequently positive

Respiratory rate

Increased by 40 to 50 percent

Oxygen consumption

Increased by 15 to 20 percent at rest

Partial pressure of oxygen

Increased; range: 100 to 108 mm Hg

Partial pressure of carbon dioxide

Decreased; range: 27 to 32 mm Hg

Bicarbonate

Decreased; range: 19 to 25 mEq per L

Base excess

Present; range: 3 to 4 mEq per L

Blood urea nitrogen

Decreased; range: 3 to 3.5 mg per dL (1.1 to 1.2 mmol per L)

Serum creatinine

Decreased; range: 0.6 to 0.7 mg per dL (50 to 60 μmol per L); 1.0 mg per dL [90 μmol per L] may be abnormal

Alkaline phosphatase

Increased because of placental production; range: 60 to 140 IU per L (60 to 140 U per L)

Kidneys

Mild hydronephrosis

Gastrointestinal tract

Decreased gastric emptying, decreased motility, increased risk of aspiration

Musculoskeletal system

Widened symphysis pubis and sacroiliac joints, which may lead to misreading of radiologic studies

Diaphragm

Higher position in pregnancy; consequently, chest tubes would need to be placed one or two interspaces higher.

Peritoneum

Small amounts of intraperitoneal fluid normally present


*—Listed in order from most to least clinically relevant.

Information from references 25 and 26.

Supplemental oxygen and intravenous fluids are administered initially, and are continued until hypovolemia, hypoxia, and fetal distress resolve.22 These measures maximize uterine perfusion and oxygenation for the fetus.22 In animal studies, improvement in fetal partial pressure of arterial oxygen is slower with the use of saline or lactated Ringer’s solution than with blood replacement.13 Therefore, blood transfusion should be initiated when significant blood loss has occurred or is suspected. It is important to recognize that significant blood loss can occur in the uterine wall or retroperitoneal space without external bleeding.

After 20 weeks of gestation, the uterus may compress the great vessels when a pregnant woman is supine. This compression can cause a decrease of up to 30 mm Hg in maternal systolic blood pressure, a 30 percent decrease in stroke volume,24 and a consequent decrease in uterine blood flow.22 Manual deflection of the uterus laterally or placement of the patient in the lateral decubitus position avoids uterine compression.22

SECONDARY ASSESSMENT

After initial stabilization, other maternal injuries are evaluated, and fetal heart tones are assessed by Doppler or ultrasonography. If fetal heart tones are absent, resuscitation of the fetus should not be attempted. There were no fetal survivors in a series of 441 pregnant trauma patients with initially absent fetal heart tones.14

When fetal heart tones are present, gestational age is determined by fundal height, history, Leopold’s maneuvers, or ultrasonography.14 Ultrasonography is the most accurate method of determining gestational age. Determination of fetal viability is subject to institutional variation: an estimated gestational age of 24 to 26 weeks and an estimated fetal weight of 500 g are commonly used thresholds of viability. Only viable fetuses are monitored,14 because no obstetric intervention will alter the outcome with a pre-viable fetus.

The findings of the physical examination in the pregnant woman with blunt trauma are not reliable in predicting adverse obstetric outcomes.3,9  Pregnancy induces physiologic changes in women (Table 2).25,26 For example, maternal blood pressure does not accurately reflect uterine perfusion18 or fetal injury,12,1518 because pregnant women can lose up to 30 percent (2 L) of their blood volume before vital signs change.22

Compared with nonpregnant persons who experience trauma, pregnant women have a higher incidence of serious abdominal injury but a lower incidence of chest and head injuries.4 Maternal pelvic fractures, particularly in late pregnancy, are associated with bladder injury, urethral injury, retroperitoneal bleeding, and fetal skull fracture.22 After 12 weeks of gestation, the maternal uterus and bladder are no longer exclusively pelvic organs and are more susceptible to direct injury.27 Skull fracture is the most common direct fetal injury, with a mortality rate of 42 percent.12 Altered mental status or severe head injury after trauma in a pregnant woman is associated with increased adverse fetal outcomes.13

Placental abruptions usually occur from 16 weeks of gestation onward.27 Some signs of placental abruption, including spontaneous rupture of membranes, vaginal bleeding, and uterine tenderness, are infrequent after trauma.4,6,9,28 Although associated with maternal and fetal morbidity,5,20 these signs are only 52 percent sensitive and 48 percent specific for adverse fetal outcomes.3

Electronic Fetal Monitoring

Continuous electronic fetal monitoring after trauma is the current standard of care with a viable fetus.2,11 Monitoring is initiated as soon as possible after maternal stabilization,11,14,22 because most placental abruptions occur shortly after trauma.4

Occasional uterine contractions are the most common finding after trauma in pregnant women.3,4,6,9 These occasional contractions are not associated with adverse fetal outcomes4,11 and resolve within a few hours in 90 percent of cases.9 The occurrence of eight or more uterine contractions per hour for more than four hours, however, is associated with placental abruption.9 [Evidence level B—nonrandomized clinical trial] With placental abruptions after trauma, there is a 67 to 75 percent rate of fetal mortality.4,5 If significant placental abruption occurs, a viable fetus should be delivered immediately. In an analysis29 of case fatality rates among pregnant women who had placental abruption subsequent to trauma, 69 percent of fetal deaths were prevented by cesarean delivery.

Bradycardia or repetitive late decelerations unresponsive to intrauterine resuscitation also require immediate delivery of the fetus if the mother is stable.14

The ideal duration for electronic fetal monitoring is unclear.3,1012 A widely used protocol, as outlined in Figure 1,11,12,22,23 is based on a prospective study9 of 60 patients at more than 20 weeks of gestation. This protocol has a sensitivity of 100 percent for predicting adverse outcomes within four hours. In the prospective study,9 70 percent of patients required more than four hours of fetal monitoring because of continued contractions (four or more per hour), abnormal laboratory values, or vaginal bleeding, but all of the patients discharged at the end of four or 24 hours had similar outcomes compared with noninjured control patients.9 If fetal tachycardia is present or a non-stress test is nonreactive, monitoring usually is continued for 24 hours, but no studies exist to support or refute this practice. Some experts recommend prolonged electronic fetal monitoring in patients with high-risk mechanisms of injury. These high-risk mechanisms include automobile versus pedestrian, and high-speed motor vehicle crashes.11 No evidence supports the use of routine electronic fetal monitoring for more than 24 hours after noncatastrophic trauma.3

Continuous electronic fetal monitoring is more sensitive in detecting placental disruption than ultrasonography, intermittent monitoring, an acid elution test (Kleihauer-Betke test to assess the amount of fetal blood in the maternal serum), or physical examination.11 However, continuous fetal monitoring prevents few perinatal deaths.3 It is most useful for determining reassuring fetal status and appropriate discharge.3 Abnormal tracings (found in 3.1 percent of pregnant women with traumatic injury) are not reliable in predicting adverse fetal outcomes (sensitivity of 62 percent; specificity of 49 percent).3,4,30 In contrast, a normal tracing has a negative predictive value of 100 percent when combined with a normal physical examination.3

Ultrasonography

Ultrasonography misses 50 to 80 percent of placental abruptions9,11,20,31 but rapidly and safely determines fetal heart tone, placental location, gestational age, and amniotic fluid index.25,28 Ultrasound examination is particularly helpful with maternal tachycardia, when the fetal and maternal heart rates may be difficult to distinguish with Doppler.

Based on limited data, most obstetric ultrasonography results that are obtained after trauma are normal.5,6,9,28,32 Few fetuses survive when ultrasonography detects evidence of fetal trauma5,6,9,28,32 (Figure 2). The benefit of a biophysical profile after trauma is unknown.32

FIGURE 2

Ultrasonograph of a fetus with hemorrhage into the amniotic cavity after maternal trauma. This fetus did not survive.

View Large


FIGURE 2

Ultrasonograph of a fetus with hemorrhage into the amniotic cavity after maternal trauma. This fetus did not survive.


FIGURE 2

Ultrasonograph of a fetus with hemorrhage into the amniotic cavity after maternal trauma. This fetus did not survive.

The accuracy of ultrasonography greatly depends on operator experience and maternal body habitus. Maternal pulsation can mimic fetal bradycardia or cause fetal movement, leading to unnecessary emergency deliveries in cases of fetal demise. Ultrasonography commonly is used to reassure the mother after non-catastrophic trauma, but this practice has not been studied.

Laboratory Studies

After trauma occurs in a pregnant woman, the complete blood count, blood type, and Rhesus factor (Rh) status should be determined. Additional blood tests may be indicated in patients with more severe injuries.

In Rh-negative pregnant women, administration of Rho(D) immune globulin (Rho-GAM) is unnecessary after insignificant superficial injury confined to an extremity. After any other trauma, the immune globulin should be administered within 72 hours to all Rh-negative women, including those who are at less than 12 weeks of gestation and those who have minimal injuries.22 One dose of the immune globulin is sufficient in 90 percent of cases of fetal-maternal hemorrhage, because most fetal-maternal hemorrhages are less than 30 mL of blood.22 A Kleihauer-Betke test is unnecessary5,22,28,33 [Reference 22, Evidence level C—expert/consensus opinion; Reference 28, Evidence level C—cross-sectional study] unless a fetal-maternal hemorrhage needs to be quantified for accurate dosing of the immune globulin.3,22

A Kleihauer-Betke test is not predictive of fetal outcome.3,5,9,22,28 Although fetal-maternal hemorrhage occurs in 30.6 percent of pregnant women with trauma compared with 8.2 percent of pregnant women without trauma, and the amount of fetal-maternal hemorrhage is four times as large on average in cases of trauma, these two patient groups have similar outcomes.9

Evidence of disseminated intravascular coagulation requires immediate intervention because it is associated with poor fetal outcomes.2,16 In a retrospective study18 of 76 pregnant patients with blunt trauma, the maternal bicarbonate level at admission was found to be predictive of fetal outcomes. Liberal administration of oxygen and fluids when the bicarbonate level is low improves tissue perfusion and fetal oxygenation.12,18

In urban medical centers, 13 percent of pregnant patients admitted for trauma have detectable levels of alcohol, and 12 percent have positive toxicology screening results.13

Radiography

Patients and physicians commonly are concerned about fetal exposure to radiation, but adverse effects are unlikely at less than 5 to 10 radiation-absorbed doses (rads).17,22,34,35 Less than 1 percent of trauma patients are exposed to more than 3 rads33  (Table 3).6,22,35,36 Poor growth, mental retardation, central nervous system defects, and microcephaly are the most common adverse events associated with extremely large doses of fetal radiation.17,34

TABLE 3

Radiation Exposure for the Unshielded Uterus in Various Imaging Studies

Imaging study Uterine radiation dose (rads)

Plain-film radiography

Abdomen (AP)

0.133 to 0.92

Abdomen (PA)

0.064 to 0.3

Cervical spine

Undetectable

Chest (AP)

0.0003 to 0.0043

Chest (PA)

<0.001

Femur (AP)

0.0016 to 0.012

Hip (AP)

0.01 to 0.21

Pelvis (AP)

0.142 to 2.2 (mean: 0.2)

Full spine (AP)

0.154 to 0.527

Lumbar spine (AP)

0.031 to 4.0

Thoracic spine (AP)

<0.001

Computed tomography

Upper abdomen

3.0 to 3.5

Entire abdomen

2.8 to 4.6 (depends on trimester)

Head

<0.05

Pelvis

1.94 to 5.0 (depends on trimester)

Thorax

0.01 to 0.59


Rads = radiation-absorbed doses; AP = anteroposterior; PA = posteroanterior. Information from references 6,22,35, and 36.

TABLE 3   Radiation Exposure for the Unshielded Uterus in Various Imaging Studies

View Table

TABLE 3

Radiation Exposure for the Unshielded Uterus in Various Imaging Studies

Imaging study Uterine radiation dose (rads)

Plain-film radiography

Abdomen (AP)

0.133 to 0.92

Abdomen (PA)

0.064 to 0.3

Cervical spine

Undetectable

Chest (AP)

0.0003 to 0.0043

Chest (PA)

<0.001

Femur (AP)

0.0016 to 0.012

Hip (AP)

0.01 to 0.21

Pelvis (AP)

0.142 to 2.2 (mean: 0.2)

Full spine (AP)

0.154 to 0.527

Lumbar spine (AP)

0.031 to 4.0

Thoracic spine (AP)

<0.001

Computed tomography

Upper abdomen

3.0 to 3.5

Entire abdomen

2.8 to 4.6 (depends on trimester)

Head

<0.05

Pelvis

1.94 to 5.0 (depends on trimester)

Thorax

0.01 to 0.59


Rads = radiation-absorbed doses; AP = anteroposterior; PA = posteroanterior. Information from references 6,22,35, and 36.

The relative risk (RR) of childhood cancers is greatest when a fetus is exposed to radiation in the first trimester (RR = 3.19) and is especially high when exposure occurs before eight weeks of gestation (RR = 4.60).33 In a study37 of 19,889 children exposed to radiation in utero and 35,753 children without such exposure, radiation exposure was not found to be linked to childhood cancer. In another study38 of 39,166 children with in utero radiation exposure, a lower rate of leukemia was found among the exposed children than in the age-matched general population. When the results of these and four other studies were combined, the overall RR of in utero radiation was not statistically different from that of the general population.33 After 15 weeks of gestation, fetuses are unlikely to be affected by radiation.33,34 Fetal doses from identical procedures vary among pregnant women and are lower in obese women.39

Other Procedures

If needed, open diagnostic peritoneal lavage, in which the peritoneum is visualized directly, is safe and accurate in pregnant women.12,22 Surgery for trauma has not been associated with an increased rate of fetal loss.22

Medications

Medications used in trauma may have fetal effects, although most are pregnancy category B or C. Good resources for adverse effects of medications in pregnancy are available.40,41 Tetanus toxoid should be given as indicated.22

Based on limited data, tocolysis probably should be avoided after trauma.9,32 [Reference 9, Evidence level B—nonrandomized clinical trial; Reference 32, Evidence level B—prospective cohort study] Regular contractions may signify placental abruption. Administration of tocolytics could compromise the fetus by delaying the diagnosis of placental abruption and consequently delaying delivery.

Perimortem Cesarean Section

Perimortem cesarean section rarely is required14 but is performed in the patient with a viable fetus who has been unsuccessfully resuscitated for four minutes.24 Delivery within five minutes carries the best chance of fetal and maternal survival.22,24 Perimortem cesarean section can increase maternal perfusion; a few cases report maternal survival.24

Prevention

Despite advances in trauma management, the fetal and maternal mortality rates after traumatic injury have not declined. Because current management does little to affect mortality, prevention is key to increasing maternal and fetal survival. Motor vehicle crashes and domestic violence are common preventable causes of trauma in pregnancy.

Although motor vehicle crashes are responsible for most severe maternal injuries and fetal losses from trauma,2,6,11,12,18 pregnant women have low rates of seat belt use.4,10,11,28 Proper seat belt use is the most significant modifiable factor in decreasing maternal and fetal injury and mortality after motor vehicle crashes.1,27,42 Seat belt–restrained women who are in motor vehicle crashes have the same fetal mortality rate as women who are not in motor vehicle crashes, but unrestrained women who are in crashes are 2.8 times more likely to lose their fetuses.43

Prenatal care must include three-point seat belt instruction.1,8,22,27 The lap belt should be placed under the gravid abdomen, snugly over the thighs, with the shoulder harness off to the side of the uterus, between the breasts and over the midline of the clavicle.27 Seat belts placed directly over the uterus can cause fetal injury.22 Airbags should not be disabled during pregnancy.22,27

Because many women are unaware of the potential for placental abruption without evidence of maternal injury, pregnant patients should be instructed to seek care immediately after any blunt trauma.

Domestic violence occurs in up to 25 percent of pregnant women,43,44 but physicians detect only 4 to 10 percent of cases.10 It is important for physicians to screen all patients for domestic violence and to be familiar with the community resources for helping patients who experience domestic abuse10  (Table 4).43 Screening of younger patients is particularly important, because they have higher rates of motor vehicle crashes and domestic violence.43,44 Resource materials in waiting rooms and restrooms allow patients to gather information without confrontation.10

TABLE 4

Domestic Violence Prevention Techniques

Partner violence screen

Have you been hit, punched, or otherwise hurt by someone within the past year? If so, by whom?

Do you feel safe in your current relationship?

Is a partner from a previous relationship making you feel unsafe now?

SAFE screen

Stress/safety

What stress do you have in your relationship?

Do you feel safe in your relationship?

Afraid/abused

What happens when you and your partner disagree?

Has your partner ever threatened or abused you or your children?

Friends/family

If you were hurt, would your friends or family know?

Could you tell them?

Would they be able to help you?

Emergency plan

Do you have a safe place to go in an emergency?

Would you like help in locating a shelter?

Would you like to talk with a social worker or counselor to develop an emergency plan?

Hotline number

National Domestic Violence Hotline: 1-800-799-7233 (24-hour nationwide, in English and Spanish)


Adapted with permission from Guth AA, Pachter L. Domestic violence and the trauma surgeon. Am J Surg 2000;179:137.

TABLE 4   Domestic Violence Prevention Techniques

View Table

TABLE 4

Domestic Violence Prevention Techniques

Partner violence screen

Have you been hit, punched, or otherwise hurt by someone within the past year? If so, by whom?

Do you feel safe in your current relationship?

Is a partner from a previous relationship making you feel unsafe now?

SAFE screen

Stress/safety

What stress do you have in your relationship?

Do you feel safe in your relationship?

Afraid/abused

What happens when you and your partner disagree?

Has your partner ever threatened or abused you or your children?

Friends/family

If you were hurt, would your friends or family know?

Could you tell them?

Would they be able to help you?

Emergency plan

Do you have a safe place to go in an emergency?

Would you like help in locating a shelter?

Would you like to talk with a social worker or counselor to develop an emergency plan?

Hotline number

National Domestic Violence Hotline: 1-800-799-7233 (24-hour nationwide, in English and Spanish)


Adapted with permission from Guth AA, Pachter L. Domestic violence and the trauma surgeon. Am J Surg 2000;179:137.

The Author

NANCY BETH GROSSMAN, M.D., currently is in practice at the Open Door Community Health Center, Crescent City, Calif. She received her medical degree from the University of Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles, and completed a family practice residency at the University of California, San Diego. Dr. Grossman also completed an obstetrics fellowship at Brackenridge Hospital, Austin, Tex.

Address correspondence to Nancy Beth Grossman, M.D., 200 A St., Crescent City, CA 95531 (e-mail: NGrossman@opendoorhealth.com). Reprints are not available from the author.

The author indicates that she does not have any conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: none reported.

Figure 2 used with permission from Dolores Pretorius, M.D., San Diego, Calif.

 

REFERENCES

1. Jacob S, Bloebaum L, Shah G, Varner MW. Maternal mortality in Utah. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;91:187–91.

2. Rogers FB, Rozycki GS, Osler TM, Shackford SR, Jalbert J, Kirton O, et al. A multi-institutional study of factors associated with fetal death in injured pregnant patients. Arch Surg. 1999;134:1274–7.

3. Connolly AM, Katz VL, Bash KL, McMahon MJ, Hansen WF. Trauma and pregnancy. Am J Perinatol. 1997;14:331–6.

4. Shah KH, Simons RK, Holbrook T, Fortlage D, Winchell RJ, Hoyt DB. Trauma in pregnancy: maternal and fetal outcomes. J Trauma. 1998;45:83–6.

5. Baerga-Varela Y, Zietlow S, Bannon MP, Harmsen WS, Ilstrup DM. Trauma in pregnancy. Mayo Clin Proc. 2000;75:1243–8.

6. Drost TF, Rosemurgy AS, Sherman HF, Scott LM, Williams JK. Major trauma in pregnant women: maternal/ fetal outcome. J Trauma. 1990;30:574–8.

7. Goodwin H, Holmes JF, Wisner DH. Abdominal ultrasound examination in pregnant blunt trauma patients. J Trauma. 2001;50:689–94.

8. Greenblatt JF, Dannenberg AL, Johnson CJ. Incidence of hospitalized injuries among pregnant women in Maryland, 1979–1990. Am J Prev Med. 1997;13:374–9.

9. Pearlman MD, Tintinalli JE, Lorenz RP. A prospective controlled study of outcome after trauma during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;162:1502–10.

10. Poole GV, Martin JN Jr, Perry KG Jr , Griswold JA, Lambert CJ, Rhodes RS. Trauma in pregnancy: the role of interpersonal violence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;174:1873–8.

11. Curet MJ, Schermer CR, Demarest GB, Bieneik EJ 3d, Curet LB. Predictors of outcome in trauma during pregnancy: identification of patients who can be monitored for less than 6 hours. J Trauma 2000;49:18–25.

12. Esposito TJ, Gens DR, Smith LG, Scorpio R, Buchman T. Trauma during pregnancy. A review of 79 cases. Arch Surg. 1991;126:1073–8.

13. Kissinger DP, Rozycki GS, Morris JA Jr, Knudson MM, Copes WS, Bass SM, et al. Trauma in pregnancy. Predicting pregnancy outcome [published correction appears in Arch Surg 1991;126:1524]. Arch Surg. 1991;126:1079–86.

14. Morris JA Jr, Rosenbower TJ, Jurkovich GJ, Hoyt DB, Harviel JD, Knudson MM, et al. Infant survival after cesarean section for trauma. Ann Surg. 1996;223:481–91.

15. Theodorou DA, Velmahos GC, Souter I, Chan LS, Vassiliu P, Tatevossian R, et al. Fetal death after trauma in pregnancy. Am Surg. 2000;66:809–12.

16. Ali J, Yeo A, Gana TJ, McLellan BA. Predictors of fetal mortality in pregnant trauma patients. J Trauma. 1997;42:782–5.

17. Bochicchio GV, Napolitano LM, Haan J, Champion H, Scalea T. Incidental pregnancy in trauma patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2001;192:566–9.

18. Scorpio RJ, Esposito TJ, Smith LG, Gens DR. Blunt trauma during pregnancy: factors affecting fetal outcome. J Trauma. 1992;32:213–6.

19. Weiss HB, Songer TJ, Fabio A. Fetal deaths related to maternal injury. JAMA. 2001;286:1863–8.

20. Reis PM, Sander CM, Pearlman MD. Abruptio placentae after auto accidents. A case-control study. J Reprod Med. 2000;45:6–10.

21. Marcin JP, Pollack MM. Triage scoring systems, severity of illness measures, and mortality prediction models in pediatric trauma. Crit Care Med. 2002;3011 suppl:S457–67.

22. ACOG educational bulletin.. Obstetric aspects of trauma management. Number 251, September 1998 (replaces Number 151, January 1991, and Number 161, November 1991). Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1999;64:87–94.

23. University of Michigan. Suggested algorithm for management of trauma during pregnancy. Accessed online May 20, 2004, at: http://www.med.umich.edu/obgyn/resdir/protocols/traumaprotocol.htm .

24. Katz VL, Dotters DJ, Droegemueller W. Perimortem cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 1986;68:571–6.

25. Marx JA, Hockberger RS, Walls RM, Adams J, eds. Rosen’s Emergency medicine: concepts and clinical practice. 5th ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 2002:256–7.

26. DeCherney AH, Pernoll ML, eds. Current obstetric & gynecologic diagnosis & treatment. 8th ed. Norwalk, Conn.: Appleton & Lange, 1994:147–8,246–7,429.

27. Pearlman MD, Klinich KD, Schneider LW, Rupp J, Moss S, Ashton-Miller J. A comprehensive program to improve safety for pregnant women and fetuses in motor vehicle crashes: a preliminary report. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182:1554–64.

28. Dahmus MA, Sibai BM. Blunt abdominal trauma: are there any predictive factors for abruptio placentae or maternal-fetal distress? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;169:1054–9.

29. Rasmussen S, Irgens LM, Bergsjo P, Dalaker K. Perinatal mortality and case fatality after placental abruption in Norway 1967–1991. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1996;75:229–34.

30. Biester EM, Tomich PG, Esposito TJ, Weber L. Trauma in pregnancy: normal Revised Trauma Score in relation to other markers of maternofetal status—a preliminary study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;176:1206–12.

31. Aitokallio-Tallberg A, Halmesmaki E. Motor vehicle accident during the second or third trimester of pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1997;76:313–7.

32. Pak LL, Reece EA, Chan L. Is adverse pregnancy outcome predictable after blunt abdominal trauma? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179:1140–4.

33. Doll R, Wakeford R. Risk of childhood cancer from fetal irradiation. Br J Radiol. 1997;70:130–9.

34. Berlin L. Radiation exposure and the pregnant patient. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;167:1377–9.

35. North DL. Radiation doses in pregnant women. J Am Coll Surg. 2002;194:100–1.

36. Damilakis J, Perisinakis K, Voloudaki A, Gourtsoyiannis N. Estimation of fetal radiation dose from computed tomography scanning in late pregnancy: depth-dose data from routine examinations [published correction appears in Invest Radiol 2000;35:706]. Invest Radiol. 2000;35:527–33.

37. Diamond EL, Schmerler H, Lilienfeld AM. The relationship of intra-uterine radiation to subsequent mortality and development of leukemia in children. A prospective study. Am J Epidemiol. 1973;97:283–313.

38. Court Brown WM, Doll R, Hill RB. Incidence of leukaemia after exposure to diagnostic radiation in utero. Br Med J. 1960;5212:1539–45.

39. Osei EK, Faulkner K. Fetal doses from radiological examinations. Br J Radiol. 1999;72:773–80.

40. Briggs GG, Freeman RK, Yaffe SJ, eds. Drugs in pregnancy and lactation. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2002.

41. Reprotox. An information system on environmental hazards to human reproduction and development. Accessed online June 4, 2004, at: http://www.reprotox.org.

42. Hyde LK, Cook LJ, Olson LM, Weiss HB, Dean JM. Effect of motor vehicle crashes on adverse fetal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102:279–86.

43. Guth AA, Pachter L. Domestic violence and the trauma surgeon. Am J Surg. 2000;179:134–40.

44. Hedin LW, Janson PO. Domestic violence during pregnancy. The prevalence of physical injuries, substance use, abortions and miscarriages. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2000;79:625–30.



Copyright © 2004 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact afpserv@aafp.org for copyright questions and/or permission requests.

Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions


Article Tools

  • Download PDF
  • Print page
  • Share this page
  • AFP CME Quiz

Information From Industry

More in Pubmed

Navigate this Article