Letters to the Editor
Suggestions for Performing Aspiration of Breast Cysts
Am Fam Physician. 2004 Oct 15;70(8):1451-1452.
to the editor: I enjoyed the article “Breast Cyst Aspiration,”1 in the November 15, 2003, issue of American Family Physician. As a diagnostic radiologist, I’ve aspirated thousands of breast cysts and would like to offer a few suggestions regarding the management of cysts.
I think the aspiration technique is even simpler than the authors1 indicate. By cleansing the skin that will be punctured by the needle with two or three alcohol wipes, povidone-iodine swabs or sterile drapes are not necessary.
There is fairly good evidence2–4 that injecting an equivalent volume of air into the cyst after aspirating the fluid prevents or markedly reduces the propensity for cyst fluid reaccumulation. Desiccation of the fluid-secreting cells that line the cyst interior has been proposed as the mechanism. The air injection is accomplished by unscrewing the syringe from the needle with the needle in situ, evacuating the aspirated cyst’s fluid from the syringe into a container or test tube, drawing an equivalent volume of air back into the syringe, reattaching the syringe, and injecting the air. This takes 20 seconds and may prevent cyst recurrence. Patients will have a soft mushy mass where the cyst had been, and the air resorbs during the ensuing days. Before ultrasonography was generally available in breast-imaging facilities, we would perform “pneumocystogram” mammography after injecting the air to exclude the possibility of intracystic mass.
In my experience, thick gelatinous cyst fluid is simply “old” fluid with high protein content. Intracystic neoplasms are papillary cancers or papillomas, and do not have this type of intracystic fluid; it is generally new or old blood resulting from spontaneous hemorrhage or local needle trauma to the friable papillary fronds that occurs during the aspiration procedure. I’ve watched numerous colloid-filled cysts completely disappear with aspiration under real-time ultrasound observation. It is okay to simply discard viscous fluid from cysts if it is not bloody. Even in the case of documented intracystic papillary cancer, the sensitivity of cytologic diagnosis from the cyst fluid is quite poor. In general, cyst fluid cytology is seldom helpful, and may even force unnecessary surgical biopsies in cases where the cytology shows “atypia.”
If no fluid is obtained during the first stick, I would urge physicians to stop and maintain firm pressure to minimize bruising, because hematomas can complicate breast imaging by obscuring true masses.
Lastly, the authors1 note that surgical referral is recommended for refilling of cysts or residual mass after aspiration. Actually, breast imaging is the most logical next step. A work-up would include a diagnostic mammogram following placement of a metallic marker over the palpable finding, and an ultrasound examination of the region using current-generation equipment. Only after a thorough imaging evaluation should the need for tissue sampling be addressed. The radiologist usually should decide whether or not tissue diagnosis is needed. If tissue sampling is needed, it could be done with core needle biopsy at the time of the diagnostic mammogram, and all data necessary for management would be obtained during one visit to the radiology department.
1. Lucas JH, Cone DL. Breast cyst aspiration Am Fam Physician. 2003;68:1983–6.
2. Ikeda DM, Helvie MA, Adler DD, Schwindt LA, Chang AE, Rebner M. The role of fine-needle aspiration and pneumocystography in the treatment of impalpable breast cysts. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992;158:1239–41.
3. Tabar L, Pentek Z, Dean PB. The diagnostic and therapeutic value of breast cyst puncture and pneumocystography. Radiology. 1981;141:659–63.
4. Dyreborg U, Blichert-Toft M, Boegh L, Kiaer H. Needle puncture followed by pneumocystography of palpable breast cysts. A controlled clinical trial. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh). 1985;26:277–81.
editor’s note : This letter was sent to the authors of “Breast Cyst Aspiration,” who declined to reply.
Send letters to Kenneth W. Lin, MD, MPH, Associate Deputy Editor for AFP Online, e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org, or 11400 Tomahawk Creek Pkwy., Leawood, KS 66211-2680.
Please include your complete address, e-mail address, and telephone number. Letters should be fewer than 400 words and limited to six references, one table or figure, and three authors.
Letters submitted for publication in AFP must not be submitted to any other publication. Possible conflicts of interest must be disclosed at time of submission. Submission of a letter will be construed as granting the American Academy of Family Physicians permission to publish the letter in any of its publications in any form. The editors may edit letters to meet style and space requirements.
Copyright © 2004 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact email@example.com for copyright questions and/or permission requests.
Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions