Correction



FREE PREVIEW Log in or buy this issue to read the full article. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles. Subscribe now.


FREE PREVIEW Subscribe or buy this issue. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles.

Am Fam Physician. 2004 Oct 15;70(8):1454.

The article “DVT and Pulmonary Embolism: Part 1. Diagnosis” (June 15, 2004, page 2829) contained an error in the Wells clinical prediction rule for pulmonary embolism. On page 2834, in Table 3, the third entry was incorrectly given as “Heart rate less than 100 beats per minute” when it should have stated “Heart rate greater than 100 beats per minute.” The online version of this article has been corrected, and the corrected table is reprinted below.

TABLE 3

Wells Clinical Prediction Rule for PE

Clinical feature Points

Clinical symptoms of DVT

3

Other diagnosis less likely than PE

3

Heart rate greater than 100 beats per minute

1.5

Immobilization or surgery within past 4 weeks

1.5

Previous DVT or PE

1.5

Hemoptysis

1

Malignancy

1

Total points:


PE = pulmonary embolism; DVT = deep venous thrombosis.

Risk score interpretation (probability of DVT): >6 points: high risk (78.4%); 2 to 6 points: moderate risk (27.8%); <2 points: low risk (3.4%)

Adapted with permission from Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, Ginsberg JS, Kearon C, Gent M, et al. Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients’ probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the model utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer. Thromb Haemost 2000;83:418.

TABLE 3   Wells Clinical Prediction Rule for PE

View Table

TABLE 3

Wells Clinical Prediction Rule for PE

Clinical feature Points

Clinical symptoms of DVT

3

Other diagnosis less likely than PE

3

Heart rate greater than 100 beats per minute

1.5

Immobilization or surgery within past 4 weeks

1.5

Previous DVT or PE

1.5

Hemoptysis

1

Malignancy

1

Total points:


PE = pulmonary embolism; DVT = deep venous thrombosis.

Risk score interpretation (probability of DVT): >6 points: high risk (78.4%); 2 to 6 points: moderate risk (27.8%); <2 points: low risk (3.4%)

Adapted with permission from Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, Ginsberg JS, Kearon C, Gent M, et al. Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients’ probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the model utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer. Thromb Haemost 2000;83:418.



Copyright © 2004 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact afpserv@aafp.org for copyright questions and/or permission requests.

Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions


Article Tools

  • Print page
  • Share this page
  • AFP CME Quiz

Information From Industry

Navigate this Article