FPIN’s Clinical Inquiries

Intravenous Fluids for Children with Gastroenteritis

Am Fam Physician. 2005 Jan 1;71(1):121-122.

Clinical Question

In children with acute vomiting and diarrhea (gastroenteritis), does treatment with intravenous fluids improve recovery compared with oral rehydration therapy (ORT)?

Evidence-Based Answer

Most children with gastroenteritis do not require intravenous fluids and will respond favorably to ORT. Intravenous fluids do not shorten the duration of gastroenteritis and are more likely to cause adverse effects than ORT. [Strength of recommendation: B]

Evidence Summary

Dehydration from gastroenteritis is one of the most common reasons for hospitalization of children, and intravenous fluids are often part of the treatment regimen. However, treatment guidelines and the results from multiple studies suggest that ORT usually is appropriate as first-line therapy and that intravenous fluids should be reserved for use in patients with more severe dehydration15  (see accompanying table).3,5

Fluid Replacement in Children with Gastroenteritis

Level of dehydration (percent body-weight loss) ORT Intravenous fluids

Mild (3 to 5)

50 mL per kg over three to four hours

Not recommended*

Moderate (6 to 9)

100 mL per kg over three to four hours

Not recommended*

Severe (10 or higher)

100 to 150 mL per kg over three to four hours†

20 mL per kg bolus over one hour‡

Ongoing body-weight loss

10 mL per kg for each stool or emesis

10 mL per kg for each stool or emesis


ORT = oral rehydration therapy.

*—If able to take ORT.

† —If clinically stable, alert, and taking ORT well.

‡ —Normal saline or lactated Ringer’s solution.

Information from references3 and5.

Fluid Replacement in Children with Gastroenteritis

View Table

Fluid Replacement in Children with Gastroenteritis

Level of dehydration (percent body-weight loss) ORT Intravenous fluids

Mild (3 to 5)

50 mL per kg over three to four hours

Not recommended*

Moderate (6 to 9)

100 mL per kg over three to four hours

Not recommended*

Severe (10 or higher)

100 to 150 mL per kg over three to four hours†

20 mL per kg bolus over one hour‡

Ongoing body-weight loss

10 mL per kg for each stool or emesis

10 mL per kg for each stool or emesis


ORT = oral rehydration therapy.

*—If able to take ORT.

† —If clinically stable, alert, and taking ORT well.

‡ —Normal saline or lactated Ringer’s solution.

Information from references3 and5.

A meta-analysis1 of international studies comparing ORT with intravenous fluids in children with mild to severe dehydration found that ORT shortened the length of hospital stay by up to 29 hours. There were no significant differences in weight gain or duration of intestinal losses between the treatment groups, although the rate of major adverse events was lower in children receiving ORT (relative risk, 0.36; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.04 to 0.89). The number needed to harm was 59 for intravenous fluids, meaning that there was one additional major adverse event for every 59 patients receiving intravenous fluids instead of ORT. In developing countries, treatment with ORT instead of intravenous fluids resulted in a number needed to treat of 37 to have one fewer seizure or death.

The results of a second review2 confirm that ORT shortens the duration of hospitalization in children with mild to severe dehydration and suggest that ORT has superior effects on weight gain and duration of diarrhea compared with intravenous fluids. The results of other reviews3,6 based on similar populations show little difference between ORT and intravenous fluids in weight gain, duration of illness, or length of hospital stay, but maintain the superiority of ORT in reducing the risk for seizure during correction of hypernatremic dehydration. The results of a systematic review4 show that ORT corrects dehydration and acidosis more quickly and safely than intravenous fluids, although the degree of dehydration in the study population was unclear.

Intravenous fluids are overused in many emergency departments because of the false perception that this form of rehydration is a faster therapy and decreases the length of hospital stay. In a case series study7 involving mild to moderate dehydration among children in an urban emergency department, the average time for rehydration with intravenous fluids was 5.4 hours, which exceeds the four-hour period recommended for ORT.5,7

Recommendations from Others

The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends the use of ORT in the treatment of gastroenteritis in children with mild to moderate dehydration (see accompanying table). The use of intravenous fluids should be reserved for use in children with severe dehydration, shock, or inability to tolerate oral fluids.5

Clinical Commentary

It is reassuring that the best treatment for routine gastroenteritis in children is the easiest and least invasive approach. Not only will this delight children, it should make physicians and parents feel more comfortable about delaying hospitalization and managing rehydration initially at home. This message also should encourage confidence in the effectiveness and efficiency of ORT among emergency physicians and guide hospital personnel to admit only children with severe dehydration or children whose social situations would not permit adequate monitoring or aggressive ORT at home.

Address correspondence by e-mail to J. Burton Banks, M.D., banksii@mail.etsu.edu. Reprints are not available from the authors.

The authors indicate that they do not have any conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: none reported.

REFERENCES

1. Fonseca BK, Holdgate A, Craig JC. Enteral vs intravenous rehydration therapy for children with gastroenteritis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004;158:483–90.

2. Gavin N, Merrick N, Davidson B. Efficacy of glucose-based oral rehydration therapy. Pediatrics. 1996;98:45–51.

3. Murphy MS. Guidelines for managing acute gastroenteritis based on a systematic review of published research. Arch Dis Child. 1998;79:279–84.

4. Armon K, Stephenson T, MacFaul R, Eccleston P, Werneke U. An evidence and consensus based guideline for acute diarrhoea management. Arch Dis Child. 2001;85:132–42.

5. American Academy of Pediatrics, Provisional Committee on Quality Improvement, Subcommittee on Acute Gastroenteritis. Practice parameter: the management of acute gastroenteritis in young children. Pediatrics. 1996;97:424–35.

6. Dalby-Payne J, Elliot E. Gastroenteritis in children. Accessed online December 1, 2004, at: http://www.clinicalevidence.com/ceweb/conditions/chd/0314/0314.jsp.

7. Bender BJ, Ozuah PO. Intravenous rehydration for gastroenteritis: how long does it really take?. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2004;20:215–8.

Copyright Family Practice Inquiries Network. Used with permission.

 

Clinical Inquiries provides answers to questions submitted by practicing family physicians to the Family Practice Inquiries Network (FPIN). Members of the network select questions based on their relevance to family medicine. Answers are drawn from an approved set of evidence-based resources and undergo peer review. The strength of recommendations and the level of evidence for individual studies are rated using criteria developed by the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group (www.cebm.net/levels_of_evidence.asp).

This series of Clinical Inquiries is coordinated for American Family Physician by John Epling, M.D., State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, N.Y. The complete database of evidence-based questions and answers is copyrighted by FPIN. If you are interested in submitting questions to be answered or writing answers for this series, go to www.fpin.org or contact CI2Editor@fpin.org.


Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions


Article Tools

  • Print page
  • Share this page
  • AFP CME Quiz

Information From Industry

More in Pubmed

Navigate this Article