Am Fam Physician. 2005 Apr 1;71(7) Online.
to the editor: In the article,1 "Hyperparathyroidism," in the January 15, 2004, issue of American Family Physician, the discussion of surgical options mentions the traditional approach of bilateral neck exploration and the minimally invasive parathyroidectomy (MIP). To contemplate an MIP, preoperative localization studies, usually a Sestamibi scan and ultrasound, are necessary.
Dr. Taniegra reports that MIP can be video-assisted, endoscopic, radioguided, or image-guided. While these are indeed all options, the first three approaches have significant drawbacks. The video-assisted approach requires two incisions and usually is performed under general anesthesia. The endoscopic approach requires three incisions and expert endoscopy skills, inflates most of the central neck, and does not allow the surgeon to make a tactile assessment.2 Finally, a recent study3 recommended against the routine use of a radioguided approach because it is usually unnecessary, and it provided "confusing and inaccurate information" in 48 percent of cases. Image-guidance (combined with an intraoperative parathyroid hormone assay) is both feasible and cost-effective; it eliminates the risk of general anesthesia, requires one small incision, and has been proven to decrease operating time and length of stay.4,5
Preoperative localization allows for appropriate planning of the incision and directs the surgeon to the abnormality. Dissection is localized to the specific locale of the abnormality, minimizing pain and preventing extensive scarring. The remainder of the neck is left undisturbed. Image-guided MIP is the most effective alternative to the traditional bilateral approach when preoperative studies localize the adenoma and can be recommended as the most effective alternative to bilateral exploration.
1. Taniegra ED. Hyperparathyroidism. Am Fam Physician 2004;69:333-9. 2. Sosa JA, Udelsman R. Minimally invasive parathyroidectomy. Surg Oncol
2. Sosa JA, Udelsman R. Minimally invasive parathyroidectomy. Surg Oncol 2003;12:125-34.
3. Inabnet WB 3d, Kim CK, Haber RS, Lopchinsky RA. Radioguidance is not necessary during parathyroidectomy. Arch Surg 2002;137:967-70.
4. Fahy BN, Bold RJ, Beckett L, Schneider PD. Modern parathyroid surgery: a cost-benefit analysis of localizing strategies. Arch Surg 2002;137:917-22.
5. Udelsman R, Donovan PI, Sokoll LJ. One hundred consecutive minimally invasive parathyroid explorations. Ann Surg 2000;232:331-9.
in reply: I basically agree with the discussion of Dr. Lopchinsky and Ms. Love that image-guided minimally invasive parathyroidectomy (MIP) is the most effective alternative to bilateral exploration in the surgical management of primary hyperparathyroidism.
Send letters to Kenneth W. Lin, MD, MPH, Associate Deputy Editor for AFP Online, e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org, or 11400 Tomahawk Creek Pkwy., Leawood, KS 66211-2680.
Please include your complete address, e-mail address, and telephone number. Letters should be fewer than 400 words and limited to six references, one table or figure, and three authors.
Letters submitted for publication in AFP must not be submitted to any other publication. Possible conflicts of interest must be disclosed at time of submission. Submission of a letter will be construed as granting the American Academy of Family Physicians permission to publish the letter in any of its publications in any form. The editors may edit letters to meet style and space requirements.
Copyright © 2005 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact email@example.com for copyright questions and/or permission requests.
Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions