Letters to the Editor
Population-Based Strategy to Reverse the Obesity Epidemic
Am Fam Physician. 2005 Apr 15;71(8) Online.
to the editor: While the interventions listed in the article1 on obesity in children and adolescents by Fowler-Brown and Kahwati address clinical practice in depth, experience with tobacco control has shown that changing individual behavior requires structural and societal supports to achieve the desired results. The most effective solutions to the obesity epidemic will likely involve policies and environments that encourage healthy food and physical activity choices. Regulatory policies; consumer education that addresses marketing, health claims, and nutrition labeling; and school strategies will all be necessary to reverse current trends.
Changes to encourage physical activity can be implemented on a small scale. For instance, secure bike storage and shower facilities can be made available, and the location, safety, and appearance of stairwells can be improved. Community designs that locate neighborhoods convenient to shopping, work sites, libraries, and schools require more substantial long-term planning and political support. Child-oriented features that encourage physical activity include safe, available playgrounds and traffic infrastructure that increases the safety of walking or biking to school.
School vending machines and cafeterias that offer diverse, attractive, and well-priced alternatives to unhealthy foods have been shown to make nutritious choices more competitive.2 Compared with more affluent families, those living in high-poverty areas often have less access to low-cost nutritious food and depend on high-priced, calorie-dense processed foods from convenience stores. Zoning and tax incentives that encourage larger grocery stores to locate in less affluent neighborhoods are as important as nutrition education. Promotions such as the "5-A-Day" program to increase the consumption of fruits and vegetables do not work well if those foods are not available.
Financial pressures force hard choices on under-funded school. School nutrition programs may rely on revenue from snack sales, as do other worthy extracurricular programs. Emphasis on academic basics cuts into nutrition and physical activity curricula.3,4 Fortunately for policy makers, the societal costs of obesity help justify the costs of interventions. Public recognition also is shifting; some of the most financially strapped school districts have banned soda-pouring contracts because of the financial incentives to increase consumption among children and adolescents.
Increased awareness of the extent of obesity and its health consequences is inadequate to resolve the problem, as are education and weight reduction interventions for individuals. A comprehensive, population-based strategy, similar to the anti-tobacco strategies, will be needed. Analogous to the tobacco example, corporate interests have reasons and resources to oppose the regulation of marketing and sales, especially to children. Advocates must be willing to become politically active and adept. The positions of the American Academy of Family Physicians on nutrition and physical activity in schools are worthy guidelines, and family physicians are ideal champions for the necessary changes.5
1. Fowler-Brown A, Kahwati LC. Prevention and treatment of overweight in children and adolescents. Am Fam Physician 2004;69:2591-8.
2. French SA, Story M, Jeffery RW, Snyder P, Eisenberg M, Sidebottom A, et al. Pricing strategy to promote fruit and vegetable purchase in high school cafeterias. J Am Diet Assoc 1997;97:1008-10.
3. School lunch program: efforts needed to improve nutrition and encourage healthy eating. GAO-03-506. Washington, D.C.: General Accounting Office, 2003.
4. School meal programs: competitive foods are available in many schools: actions taken to restrict them differ by state and locality. GAO-04-673. Washington, D.C.: General Accounting Office, 2004.
5. Healthy eating in schools. Accessed online March 3, 2005, at: http://www.AAFP.org/x30322.xml.
Send letters to Kenneth W. Lin, MD, MPH, Associate Deputy Editor for AFP Online, e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org, or 11400 Tomahawk Creek Pkwy., Leawood, KS 66211-2680.
Please include your complete address, e-mail address, and telephone number. Letters should be fewer than 400 words and limited to six references, one table or figure, and three authors.
Letters submitted for publication in AFP must not be submitted to any other publication. Possible conflicts of interest must be disclosed at time of submission. Submission of a letter will be construed as granting the American Academy of Family Physicians permission to publish the letter in any of its publications in any form. The editors may edit letters to meet style and space requirements.
Copyright © 2005 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact email@example.com for copyright questions and/or permission requests.
Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions