Letters to the Editor
Alternative to Liquid Nitrogen for Freezing Skin Lesions
FREE PREVIEW Log in or buy this issue to read the full article. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles. Subscribe now.
FREE PREVIEW Subscribe or buy this issue. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles.
Am Fam Physician. 2005 Aug 15;72(4):573.
to the editor: I enjoyed Dr. Andrews’ article, “Cryosurgery for Common Skin Conditions,”1 in American Family Physician. However, I was disappointed that he only mentioned liquid nitrogen as the refrigerant of choice. For the past five years, I have been using an aerosolized mixture of rapidly evaporating hydrocarbons (Verruca-Freeze, by CryoSurgery Inc., Nashville, Tenn.; another similar product is Histofreezer, by Delasco, Council Bluffs, Iowa), with results similar to those that I have achieved in the past with the use of liquid nitrogen. The technique uses a mixture of three compressed gases (trifluoroethane, pentafluoroethane, and tetrafluoroethane), which are sprayed as a liquid into a limiting cone held over flat lesions, or onto a cotton swab (such as a Q-tip) device for lesions in delicate areas or on curved surfaces such as fingers. The cone is held in place over the lesion for 20 to 30 seconds while the liquid evaporates, producing (according to the manufacturer) local temperatures down to −70°C (−94°F).
The major advantage to the physician in a small or solo practice is that the shelf life of the aerosol is five years; thus, one does not have to pay regularly to replace liquid nitrogen, which boils off whether you use it or not. Also, the aerosol is easily portable. The drawbacks are the initial cost of the 355-mL canister kit at $295, and the replacement canisters at $215. However, you can freeze around 50 to 70 average-size lesions with a can this size, and the cost is quickly recouped after the first few procedures. Also, it may take a little longer to freeze a lesion while you wait for the liquid to evaporate. However, patients and I have been pleased with the results when used for the usual range of cryosurgery–amenable lesions.
1. Andrews MD. Cryosurgery for common skin conditions. Am Fam Physician. 2004;69:2365–72.
Send letters to Kenneth W. Lin, MD, MPH, Associate Deputy Editor for AFP Online, e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org, or 11400 Tomahawk Creek Pkwy., Leawood, KS 66211-2680.
Please include your complete address, e-mail address, and telephone number. Letters should be fewer than 400 words and limited to six references, one table or figure, and three authors.
Letters submitted for publication in AFP must not be submitted to any other publication. Possible conflicts of interest must be disclosed at time of submission. Submission of a letter will be construed as granting the American Academy of Family Physicians permission to publish the letter in any of its publications in any form. The editors may edit letters to meet style and space requirements.
Copyright © 2005 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact email@example.com for copyright questions and/or permission requests.
Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions