Graham Center One-Pager
Osteopathic Physicians and the Family Medicine Workforce
Am Fam Physician. 2005 Aug 15;72(4):583.
Historically, osteopathic physicians have made an important contribution to the primary care workforce. More than one half of osteopathic physicians are primary care physicians, and most of these are family physicians. However, the proportion of osteopathic students choosing family medicine, like that of their allopathic peers, is declining, and currently is only one in five.
Traditionally, osteopathic students have been more likely than allopathic students to choose primary care specialties, and as such, they have been important contributors to the primary care physician workforce. In 2004, about 629,000 (67 percent) of the 936,000 physicians in the United States and its territories reported patient care as their major professional activity, and just 226,000 (36 percent) of these were in the primary care specialties of family medicine/general practice, internal medicine, and general pediatrics.1 Fourteen percent of direct patient care physicians were family physicians or general practitioners. Osteopathic physicians composed 5 percent of physicians involved in patient care, although 55 percent of these were in primary care specialties, and 41 percent of osteopathic physicians in patient care were family physicians or general practitioners (Figure 1).2
The shift away from primary care and family medicine, particularly apparent in allopathic students, also is taking place in osteopathic schools. Slightly more than one half (52 percent) of osteopathic medical students are choosing residency training outside of primary care. Only 21 percent of osteopathic medical residents are in family medicine training programs, down from 37 percent in 1996 and 31 percent in 2002 (Figure 2).2 This trend mirrors choices by allopathic graduates, of whom 9 percent are currently in family medicine residency programs.
The reduced selection of primary care and family medicine by osteopathic students may be a normal fluctuation, but it is worth investigating to understand whether it is reversible or a sustained downturn. It would be particularly troubling if, as in allopathic schools, the shift is reflective of a change in valuation of and commitment to primary care by osteopathic medicine that affects student selection and mentoring arrangements.
1. Green LA, Dodoo MS, Ruddy G, Fryer GE, Phillips RL, McCann JL, et al. The physician workforce of the United States: a family medicine perspective. Washington, D.C.: Robert Graham Center, 2004.
2. AMA Masterfile. Analysis by the Robert Graham Center, 2004.
note: The information and opinions contained in research from the Graham Center do not necessarily reflect the views or the policy of the AAFP.
Adapted from the Graham Center One-Pager #34. Ruddy G, Phillips RL, Klein LS, McCann JL, Dodoo MS, Green LA, et al. Osteopathic physicians and the family medicine workforce. August 2005. Available online at: http://www.graham-center.org/onepager34.xml. From the Robert Graham Center: Policy Studies in Family Medicine and Primary Care, 1350 Connecticut Ave., NW, Suite 201, Washington, DC 20036 (telephone: 202–331–3360; fax: 202–331–3374; e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org).
Copyright © 2005 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact email@example.com for copyright questions and/or permission requests.
Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions