Common Overuse Tendon Problems: A Review and Recommendations for Treatment



FREE PREVIEW Log in or buy this issue to read the full article. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles. Subscribe now.


FREE PREVIEW Subscribe or buy this issue. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles.

Am Fam Physician. 2005 Sep 1;72(5):811-818.

There is a common misconception that symptomatic tendon injuries are inflammatory; because of this, these injuries often are mislabeled as “tendonitis.” Acute inflammatory tendinopathies exist, but most patients seen in primary care will have chronic symptoms suggesting a degenerative condition that should be labeled as “tendinosus” or “tendinopathy.” Accurate diagnosis requires physicians to recognize the historical features, anatomy, and useful physical examination maneuvers for these common tendon problems. The natural history is gradually increasing load-related localized pain coinciding with increased activity. The most common overuse tendinopathies involve the rotator cuff, medial and lateral elbow epicondyles, patellar tendon, and Achilles tendon. Examination should include thorough inspection to assess for swelling, asymmetry, and erythema of involved tendons; range-of-motion testing; palpation for tenderness; and examination maneuvers that simulate tendon loading and reproduce pain. Plain radiography, ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging can be helpful if the diagnosis remains unclear. Most patients with overuse tendinopathies (about 80 percent) fully recover within three to six months, and outpatient treatment should consist of relative rest of the affected area, icing, and eccentric strengthening exercises. Although topical and systemic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are effective for acute pain relief, these cannot be recommended in favor of other analgesics. Injected corticosteroids also can relieve pain, but these drugs should be used with caution. Ultrasonography, shock wave therapy, orthotics, massage, and technique modification are treatment options, but few data exist to support their use at this time. Surgery is an effective treatment that should be reserved for patients who have failed conservative therapy.

Tendon injury may be secondary to acute trauma (e.g., rupture, laceration) or repetitive loading (e.g., overuse injury). The latter is the focus of this article and is the most common type of tendon problem seen by family physicians. Overuse injuries, including tendinopathies, account for nearly 7 percent of all injury-related physician office visits in the United States.1 Hundreds of thousands of employees are affected by overuse tendinopathies each year, causing significant loss of work time.2 Understanding the pathophysiology, diagnostic criteria, and treatment of tendinopathies can help reduce pain, hasten return to function, and reduce the economic impact of lost productivity in the workforce.

SORT: KEY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Clinical recommendation Evidence rating References

Relative rest and reduced activity prevent further damage and promote healing and pain relief. There are no clear recommendations for the duration of rest and avoidance of activity.

C

*

Cryotherapy provides acute relief of tendinopathy pain and its use is widely accepted. Repeated applications of melting ice water through a wet towel for 10-minute periods are most effective.

B

14

Eccentric strengthening is an effective treatment of tendinopathy and may reverse degenerative changes.

B

1517

NSAIDs are recommended for short-term pain relief but have no effect on long-term outcomes. Topical NSAIDs are effective and may have fewer systemic side effects. It is unclear whether NSAIDs are better than other analgesics.

B

1820

Locally injected corticosteroids may be more effective than oral NSAIDs in acute-phase pain relief but do not alter long-term outcomes.

B

2123

No conclusive recommendations can be made for the use of orthotics and braces in patellar tendinopathy or elbow tendinopathy. Clinical experience and patient preference should guide therapy.

B

24,25

Therapeutic ultrasonography, corticosteroid iontophoresis, and phonophoresis are of uncertain benefit for tendinopathy.

B

27,30

Extracorporeal shock wave therapy appears to be a safe, noninvasive, effective but expensive means of pain relief for a number of chronic tendinopathies.

B

28,29

Surgery is an effective option in carefully selected patients who have failed three to six months of conservative therapy.

B

31,32


NSAIDs = nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

*—Generally accepted practice.

A = consistent, good-quality, patient-oriented evidence; B = inconsistent or limited-quality, patient-oriented evidence; C = consensus, disease-oriented evidence, usual practice, expert opinion, or case series. For information about the SORT evidence rating system, see page 736 or http://www.aafp.org/afpsort.xml.

SORT: KEY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PRACTICE

View Table

SORT: KEY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Clinical recommendation Evidence rating References

Relative rest and reduced activity prevent further damage and promote healing and pain relief. There are no clear recommendations for the duration of rest and avoidance of activity.

C

*

Cryotherapy provides acute relief of tendinopathy pain and its use is widely accepted. Repeated applications of melting ice water through a wet towel for 10-minute periods are most effective.

B

14

Eccentric strengthening is an effective treatment of tendinopathy and may reverse degenerative changes.

B

1517

NSAIDs are recommended for short-term pain relief but have no effect on long-term outcomes. Topical NSAIDs are effective and may have fewer systemic side effects. It is unclear whether NSAIDs are better than other analgesics.

B

1820

Locally injected corticosteroids may be more effective than oral NSAIDs in acute-phase pain relief but do not alter long-term outcomes.

B

2123

No conclusive recommendations can be made for the use of orthotics and braces in patellar tendinopathy or elbow tendinopathy. Clinical experience and patient preference should guide therapy.

B

24,25

Therapeutic ultrasonography, corticosteroid iontophoresis, and phonophoresis are of uncertain benefit for tendinopathy.

B

27,30

Extracorporeal shock wave therapy appears to be a safe, noninvasive, effective but expensive means of pain relief for a number of chronic tendinopathies.

B

28,29

Surgery is an effective option in carefully selected patients who have failed three to six months of conservative therapy.

B

31,32


NSAIDs = nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

*—Generally accepted practice.

A = consistent, good-quality, patient-oriented evidence; B = inconsistent or limited-quality, patient-oriented evidence; C = consensus, disease-oriented evidence, usual practice, expert opinion, or case series. For information about the SORT evidence rating system, see page 736 or http://www.aafp.org/afpsort.xml.

Pathophysiology

Tendon is composed of densely arranged collagen fibers, elastin, proteoglycans, and lipids. It is sheathed by the epitenon, which contains the tendon’s neurovascular supply. Muscular force is transmitted to the skeleton at the point where the tendon inserts into bone. This osteotendinous junction is the most common site of overuse tendon injury, but problems can occur throughout.

Tendons are relatively hypovascular proximal to the tendon insertion.3 This hypovascularity may predispose the tendon to hypoxic tendon degeneration and has been implicated in the etiology of tendinopathies.

Tendinopathy classification remains problematic and encompasses a variety of histopathologic entities. One classification scheme is as follows: (1) acute tendonitis alone, (2) chronic tendinosus with acute tendonitis, and (3) chronic tendinosus alone4  (Table 15). Although true inflammatory tendinopathies exist, most patients have prolonged symptoms before presentation to a family physician, by which time acute inflammation probably has subsided and been supplanted by degeneration of the normally highly arranged collagen fiber structure.

TABLE 1

Comparison of Overuse Tendinosus and Overuse Tendonitis

Comparison factors Tendinosus Tendonitis

Prevalence

Common

Uncommon

Time for full recovery (initial)

Two to three months

Two to three days

Time for full recovery (chronic)

Three to six months

Four to six weeks

Likelihood of full recovery

About 80 percent

99 percent

Focus of conservative therapy

Encourage collagen synthesis, maturation, and strength

Anti-inflammatory therapy and drugs

Role of surgery

Excise abnormal tissue

Not known

Prognosis of surgery

70 to 85 percent

95 percent

Surgical recovery

Four to six months

Three to four weeks


Adapted with permission from Khan K, Cook J. The painful nonruptured tendon: clinical aspects. Clin Sports Med 2003;22:715.

TABLE 1   Comparison of Overuse Tendinosus and Overuse Tendonitis

View Table

TABLE 1

Comparison of Overuse Tendinosus and Overuse Tendonitis

Comparison factors Tendinosus Tendonitis

Prevalence

Common

Uncommon

Time for full recovery (initial)

Two to three months

Two to three days

Time for full recovery (chronic)

Three to six months

Four to six weeks

Likelihood of full recovery

About 80 percent

99 percent

Focus of conservative therapy

Encourage collagen synthesis, maturation, and strength

Anti-inflammatory therapy and drugs

Role of surgery

Excise abnormal tissue

Not known

Prognosis of surgery

70 to 85 percent

95 percent

Surgical recovery

Four to six months

Three to four weeks


Adapted with permission from Khan K, Cook J. The painful nonruptured tendon: clinical aspects. Clin Sports Med 2003;22:715.

Histologic descriptions of tendinopathies have demonstrated disordered collagen arrangement together with increased proteoglycan ground substance and neovascularization (Figures 1 and 2).4,6 It is unclear if these chronic degenerative changes are preceded consistently by an acute inflammatory response; therefore, the designation of tendon pain as “tendonitis” may be a misnomer. The terms “tendinopathy” and “tendinosus” are more appropriate and should be used to describe these clinical entities in the absence of biopsy-proven histopathologic evidence of acute inflammation, particularly in patients who have had symptoms for more than a few weeks.

Figure 1.

Histology of a normal tendon.

View Large


Figure 1.

Histology of a normal tendon.


Figure 1.

Histology of a normal tendon.

Figure 2.

Histology of a damaged tendon. Note the collagen disorientation and fiber separation.

View Large


Figure 2.

Histology of a damaged tendon. Note the collagen disorientation and fiber separation.


Figure 2.

Histology of a damaged tendon. Note the collagen disorientation and fiber separation.

General Diagnostic Approach

HISTORY

The usual presentation of a tendinopathy is insidious onset of load-related localized pain coinciding with increased activity. Most, but not all, patients with tendinopathy will report engaging in a new activity or increasing the intensity of a current activity before the onset of their symptoms. In the early stages, pain is present during activity but may subside after a warm-up period. Pain gradually increases in intensity and duration and may be present at rest in the later stages of tendinopathy. Patients describe their pain as “sharp” or “stabbing” during aggravating activities, but often they describe a “dull” ache immediately after activity and at rest.

PHYSICAL EXAMINATION

Examination includes inspection for muscle atrophy, asymmetry, swelling, erythema, and joint effusions. Atrophy often is present with chronic conditions and is an important clue to the duration of the tendinopathy. Swelling, erythema, and asymmetry are commonly noted when examining pathologic tendons. Joint effusions are uncommon with tendinopathy and suggest the possibility of intra-articular pathology. Range-of-motion testing often is limited on the symptomatic side.

Palpation tends to elicit well-localized tenderness that is similar in quality and location to the pain experienced during activity. Palpation is limited occasionally by the anatomic location of the tendon (e.g., supraspinatus and rotator cuff tendinopathy). The diagnosis of tendinosus is supported by physical maneuvers that simulate tendon loading and predictably reproduce the patient’s pain. The presence of multiple symptomatic tendons should alert the physician to consider evaluation for rheumatic disease or rheumatologic referral.

IMAGING

Plain-film radiography usually is unable to demonstrate the soft-tissue changes of tendinopathy but may reveal bony abnormalities, such as loose bodies or osteoarthritis, that can cause symptoms. Further imaging studies should be reserved for when the diagnosis remains unclear after a thorough history and physical examination, in the case of recalcitrant pain despite adequate conservative management, or for preoperative evaluation. Ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are options that can show characteristic changes of tendinosus (Table 2).715 Tendon morphology seen on ultrasonography and MRI does not necessarily correlate with clinical symptoms.7

TABLE 2
Summary of Diagnostic Imaging for Common Tendinopathies

The rightsholder did not grant rights to reproduce this item in electronic media. For the missing item, see the original print version of this publication.

General Approach to Conservative Treatment

It may take up to six months for symptoms of tendinopathy to improve, but most patients eventually respond to conservative treatment. The goal of treatment is to reduce pain and return function. Unfortunately, few methodologically adequate randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have investigated the variety of treatments recommended for patients with tendinosus. Relative rest of the affected area, stretching, ice, and analgesics are all appropriate in the acute phase of tendinopathy pain.

RELATIVE REST

Patients should be encouraged to reduce activity to decrease repetitive loading of the damaged tendon. Relative rest prevents ongoing damage, reduces pain, and may promote tendon healing. There are no clear recommendations for the duration of rest, and different regimens have not been studied in RCTs. Most physicians allow patients to continue activities that do not worsen pain. Complete immobilization should be avoided to prevent muscular atrophy and deconditioning. Tensile loading of the tendon stimulates collagen production and guides normal alignment of newly formed collagen fibers.

ICE

Cryotherapy is effective for short-term pain relief. Icing may slow the release of blood and proteins from the surrounding vasculature by reducing tissue metabolism. Ice may be effective for reducing swelling and pain in cases of acute inflammatory tendinopathies by blunting the inflammatory response. Although specifics about cryotherapy are not well studied, the authors of a recent systematic review16 of cryotherapy for soft-tissue injuries concluded that applications of ice through a wet towel for 10-minute periods are most effective.

STRENGTHENING AND STRETCHING

Once pain has subsided, strengthening and stretching exercises should be considered. Eccentric strength training (Figures 3a and 3b) is particularly effective in treating tendinopathies and helps promote the formation of new collagen.17,18 Eccentric contraction involves the lengthening of muscle fibers as the muscle contracts, preferentially loading the tendon. Eccentric exercise has proved beneficial in Achilles tendinosus17,18 and patellar tendinosus,19 and may be helpful in other tendinopathies. Stretching exercises generally are thought to be helpful and are widely accepted.

Figure 3.

Eccentric exercise (lengthening contraction) for Achilles tendinopathy. (A) A toe raise is performed with both legs. (B) Once the feet are plantar flexed, the uninvolved leg is lifted and the body is slowly lowered into dorsiflexion.

View Large


Figure 3.

Eccentric exercise (lengthening contraction) for Achilles tendinopathy. (A) A toe raise is performed with both legs. (B) Once the feet are plantar flexed, the uninvolved leg is lifted and the body is slowly lowered into dorsiflexion.


Figure 3.

Eccentric exercise (lengthening contraction) for Achilles tendinopathy. (A) A toe raise is performed with both legs. (B) Once the feet are plantar flexed, the uninvolved leg is lifted and the body is slowly lowered into dorsiflexion.

ANALGESICS

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) effectively relieve tendinopathy pain and may offer additional benefit in acute inflammatory tendonitis because of their anti-inflammatory properties. Topical NSAIDs also reduce tendon pain and eliminate the increased risk of gastrointestinal hemorrhage associated with systemic NSAIDs.20 However, because the majority of chronic tendinopathies are not inflammatory, few data exist to support the use of NSAIDs over analgesics without anti-inflammatory effects.21 In one systematic review,22 investigators found insufficient evidence to recommend or discourage the use of oral NSAIDs in the short-term treatment of tendinopathies.

CORTICOSTEROIDS

Locally injected corticosteroids are a topic of debate, and more research in this area is needed. The optimal drugs, dosages, techniques, intervals, and post-injection care remain unknown. For unclear reasons, injected corticosteroids may be more effective than oral NSAIDs for relief in the acute phase of tendon pain, but they do not tend to alter long-term outcomes.23,24 Unfortunately, no evidence-based guidelines support the use of local corticosteroid injections in tendinopathy, and there may be deleterious effects on the tendon when they are injected into the tendon substance.

The effects of peritendinous corticosteroid injections are unknown, but they should be used with some caution. Because the role of inflammation in tendinopathies is unclear, corticosteroids may serve only to inhibit healing and reduce the tensile strength of the tissue, predisposing to spontaneous rupture.25

ORTHOTICS AND BRACES

Orthotics and braces (e.g., tennis elbow bands, shoe orthotics) are used to reinforce, unload, and protect tendons during activity and are valuable adjuncts to the above therapies. Although few data support definitive conclusions regarding their effectiveness,26,27 orthotics and braces are safe, widely used, and often helpful in correcting biomechanical problems, such as excessive foot pronation or pes planus deformity.

OTHER MODALITIES

Tendinopathies can be treated with ultrasonography, extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), iontophoresis and phonophoresis, and technique modification. Therapeutic ultrasonography produces high frequency vibrations that generate heat as they penetrate superficial tissues. Ultrasonography may decrease pain and increase the rate of collagen synthesis, but evidence for a consistent benefit in tendinopathies is weak.28,29

ESWT uses acoustic shock waves to impart structural and neurochemical alterations that may reduce pain and promote tendon healing. ESWT appears to be safe and effective, but further research is needed to clarify the mechanisms of action and optimal treatment strategies.30,31

Iontophoresis and phonophoresis use electric and ultrasonographic impulses to deliver topical NSAIDs and corticosteroids to symptomatic subcutaneous tissues. Both are widely used and anecdotally effective, but well-designed RCTs are lacking to permit reliable recommendations.29,32

Technique modification for athletes and manual laborers aims to minimize the repetitive stresses placed on tendons to eliminate pain and promote healing.

SURGERY

Although the mechanism of surgical healing promotion is not entirely understood, surgery is an effective treatment option in carefully selected patients.33,34 If pain persists despite a well-managed conservative treatment trial, referral to an orthopedic surgeon for surgical evaluation may be warranted. Surgical techniques vary by tendinopathy location but typically include excision of abnormal tendon tissue and performance of longitudinal tenotomies to release areas of scarring and fibrosis. Consideration for surgical referral typically occurs after three to six months of failed conservative treatment.

Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy

Rotator cuff tendinopathy affects one in 50 adults35 and is particularly common in athletes who throw repetitively and in laborers who have to work with their arms overhead. The cuff is composed of the subscapularis anteriorly, the supraspinatus superiorly, and the teres minor and infraspinatus posteriorly. Improper functioning and muscle weakness permit the humeral head to migrate superiorly, resulting in supraspinatus tendon impingement. The supraspinatus complex occupies a narrow space, with light contact between the supraspinatus and the coracoacromial arch during normal abduction. Repeated impingement of the coracoacromial arch onto the supraspinatus tendon has been implicated as the likely mechanism of tendon injury. Hypovascularity in the region proximal to the insertion of the supraspinatus tendon also may have implications in rotator cuff tendinopathy.36

Supraspinatus tendon impingement is most apparent with the humerus simultaneously abducted and internally rotated. The Hawkins’ test (Figure 4) elicits pain with forcible internal rotation with the patient’s arm passively flexed forward at 90 degrees. It is sensitive (92 percent) but not specific (25 percent) for impingement. The Neer’s test (Figure 5) elicits pain with full forward flexion between 70 and 120 degrees. It too is sensitive (88 percent), but not specific (33 percent).37,38  See Table 2715 for a summary of diagnostic imaging for rotator cuff tendinopathy.

Figure 4.

The Hawkins’ test for subacromial impingement or rotator cuff tendinosus. The arm is forward, elevated to 90 degrees, then forcibly internally rotated.

View Large


Figure 4.

The Hawkins’ test for subacromial impingement or rotator cuff tendinosus. The arm is forward, elevated to 90 degrees, then forcibly internally rotated.


Figure 4.

The Hawkins’ test for subacromial impingement or rotator cuff tendinosus. The arm is forward, elevated to 90 degrees, then forcibly internally rotated.

Figure 5.

The Neer’s test for impingement of the rotator cuff tendons under the coracoacromial arch. The arm is fully pronated and placed in forced flexion.

View Large


Figure 5.

The Neer’s test for impingement of the rotator cuff tendons under the coracoacromial arch. The arm is fully pronated and placed in forced flexion.


Figure 5.

The Neer’s test for impingement of the rotator cuff tendons under the coracoacromial arch. The arm is fully pronated and placed in forced flexion.

Elbow Tendinopathy

Lateral epicondylosis is seven to 10 times more common than medial epicondylosis; it involves the dominant arm 75 percent of the time.39 Elbow tendinopathies affect men and women equally and are most common after 40 years of age. Activities that require repetitive wrist extension contribute to the development of lateral epicondylosis. The condition commonly occurs in persons who play racquet sports (“tennis elbow”) and often is a problem in occupations requiring repetitive wrist flexion and extension. Medial epicondylosis is associated with repetitive wrist flexion, which is common among athletes who throw repetitively, golfers (“golfer’s elbow”), and manual laborers.

Patients with lateral epicondylosis often report insidious lateral elbow pain that is exacerbated by wrist extension activities. Palpation produces point tenderness over or just distal to the lateral epicondyle where the extensor tendons insert. Pain may be reproducible with resisted wrist extension. In the case of medial epicondylosis, patients will have medial elbow pain exacerbated with wrist flexion and pronation. Palpation produces tenderness over the medial epicondyle near the insertion of the wrist flexor tendons. Pain is reproducible with resisted wrist flexion and pronation. Table 319,2426,30,40 provides a summary of the evidence for treatments of elbow tendinopathy.

TABLE 3

Treatment Recommendations for Specific Tendinopathies

Elbow tendinopathy

Corticosteroid injections for lateral epicondylopathy are more effective than NSAIDs in the acute phase of epicondylosis but do not change long-term outcomes of pain.

Studies of extracorporeal shock wave therapy have demonstrated mixed benefit for lateral elbow pain.

Orthotics commonly are used, although no definitive conclusions concerning their effectiveness can be drawn from existing clinical trials.

Patellar tendinopathy

Eccentric exercise is recommended to reduce symptoms, increase strength, and promote tendon healing.

Deep transverse friction massage is recommended to reduce pain.

Corticosteroid iontophoresis is effective for treatment of patellar tendinosus pain and function.


NSAIDs = nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Information from references 19,24 through 26,30, and 40.

TABLE 3   Treatment Recommendations for Specific Tendinopathies

View Table

TABLE 3

Treatment Recommendations for Specific Tendinopathies

Elbow tendinopathy

Corticosteroid injections for lateral epicondylopathy are more effective than NSAIDs in the acute phase of epicondylosis but do not change long-term outcomes of pain.

Studies of extracorporeal shock wave therapy have demonstrated mixed benefit for lateral elbow pain.

Orthotics commonly are used, although no definitive conclusions concerning their effectiveness can be drawn from existing clinical trials.

Patellar tendinopathy

Eccentric exercise is recommended to reduce symptoms, increase strength, and promote tendon healing.

Deep transverse friction massage is recommended to reduce pain.

Corticosteroid iontophoresis is effective for treatment of patellar tendinosus pain and function.


NSAIDs = nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Information from references 19,24 through 26,30, and 40.

Patellar Tendinopathy

Patellar tendinopathy causes activity-related anterior knee pain and occurs in athletes and nonathletes alike. Repetitive loading of the patellar tendon places jumping athletes at greatest risk. Pain that is exacerbated by navigating stairs and prolonged sitting is common. Physical examination may elicit pain at the inferior pole of the patella with the leg fully extended using resisted leg extension. A decline squat test (Figure 6) places increased load on the patellar tendon and often reproduces a patient’s pain. See Table 2715  for a summary of diagnostic imaging for patellar tendinopathy and Table 319,2426,30,40 for a summary of the evidence for treatment of patellar tendinopathy.

Figure 6

Decline squat test for patellar tendinopathy. This test places greater load on the patellar tendon than does a squat performed on level ground.

View Large


Figure 6

Decline squat test for patellar tendinopathy. This test places greater load on the patellar tendon than does a squat performed on level ground.


Figure 6

Decline squat test for patellar tendinopathy. This test places greater load on the patellar tendon than does a squat performed on level ground.

Achilles Tendinopathy

Achilles tendinopathy is common among adult runners, with a higher incidence as age increases. The etiology and pathogenesis of Achilles tendinosus tend to be multifactorial (e.g., improper technique, anatomic misalignment, weakness, uneven training surfaces, improperly fitted footwear). Most patients have posterior heel pain proximal to the tendon insertion. Physical examination often reveals thickening and tender, palpable nodules. Special attention should be paid to anatomic deformities such as forefoot and heel varus and excessive pes planus or foot pronation, which often are associated with this problem. Imaging rationale is similar to that of previously discussed tendinopathies.

Treatment should be conservative. Eccentric strength training is a particularly popular and effective option.17,18,41 Stretching and deep friction massage of the gastrocnemius-soleus complex generally are considered helpful for Achilles tendinopathy. Anatomic misalignment can be treated with shoe orthotics to correct overpronation or pes planus problems. Many patients will benefit from heel lift orthotics to unload the tendon for pain relief.

The Authors

JOHN J. WILSON, M.D., is a resident physician in the University of Wisconsin-Madison family medicine residency program. Dr. Wilson received his medical degree from the University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison.

THOMAS M. BEST, M.D., PH.D., is professor and Pomerene chair in family medicine at Ohio State University, Columbus, where he also is director of sports medicine and the primary care sports medicine fellowship. Previously Dr. Best was associate professor of family medicine and orthopedics and rehabilitation at the University of Wisconsin Medical School. He received his medical degree from the University of Western Ontario Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, London, Ontario, and served a family practice residency in Chapel Hill, N.C.

Address correspondence to John J. Wilson, M.D., University of Wisconsin Health Verona Clinic, 100 N. Nine Mound Rd., Verona, WI 53593 (e-mail: john.wilson@fammed.wisc.edu). Reprints are not available from the authors.

Author disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

REFERENCES

1. Woodwell DA, Cherry DK. National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2002 summary. Adv Data. 2004;346:1–44.

2. U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Accessed online August 8, 2005, at: http://www.bls.gov.

3. Carr AJ, Norris SH. The blood supply of the calcaneal tendon. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1989;71:100–1.

4. Puddu G, Ippolito E, Postacchini F. A classification of Achilles tendon disease. Am J Sports Med. 1976;4:145–50.

5. Khan K, Cook J. The painful nonruptured tendon: clinical aspects. Clin Sports Med. 2003;22:711–25.

6. Khan KM, Cook JL, Bonar F, Harcourt P, Astrom M. Histopathology of common tendinopathies. Update and implications for clinical management. Sports Med. 1999;27:393–408.

7. Gold RH, Seeger LL, Yao L. Imaging shoulder impingement. Skeletal Radiol. 1993;22:555–61.

8. Paavolainen P, Ahovuo J. Ultrasonography and arthrography in the diagnosis of tears of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76:335–40.

9. Drakeford MK, Quinn MJ, Simpson SL, Pettine KA. A comparative study of ultrasonography and arthrography in the evaluation of the rotator cuff. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;253:118–22.

10. Beltran J. The use of magnetic resonance imaging about the shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1992;1:321–32.

11. Fritschy D, de Gautard R. Jumper’s knee and ultrasonography. Am J Sports Med. 1988;16:637–40.

12. Khan KM, Bonar F, Desmond PM, Cook JL, Young DA, Visentini PJ, et al. Patellar tendinosis (jumper’s knee): findings at histopathologic examination, US, and MR imaging. Victorian Institute of Sport Tendon Study Group. Radiology. 1996;200:821–7.

13. Davies SG, Baudouin CJ, King JB, Perry JD. Ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in patellar tendinitis. Clin Radiol. 1991;43:52–6.

14. Miller TT. Imaging of elbow disorders. Orthop Clin North Am. 1999;30:21–36.

15. Neuhold A, Stiskal M, Kainberger F, Schwaighofer B. Degenerative Achilles tendon disease: assessment by magnetic resonance and ultrasonography. Eur J Radiol. 1992;14:213–20.

16. Bleakley C, McDonough S, MacAuley D. The use of ice in the treatment of acute soft-tissue injury: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32:251–61.

17. Alfredson H, Pietila T, Jonsson P, Lorentzon R. Heavy-load eccentric calf muscle training for the treatment of chronic Achilles tendinosis. Am J Sports Med. 1998;26:360–6.

18. Ohberg L, Lorentzon R, Alfredson H. Eccentric training in patients with chronic Achilles tendinosis: normalised tendon structure and decreased thickness at follow up. Br J Sports Med. 2004;38:8–11.

19. Cannell LJ, Taunton JE, Clement DB, Smith C, Khan KM. A randomised clinical trial of the efficacy of drop squats or leg extension/leg curl exercises to treat clinically diagnosed jumper’s knee in athletes: pilot study. Br J Sports Med. 2001;35:60–4.

20. Moore RA, Tramer MR, Carroll D, Wiffen PJ, McQuay HJ. Quantitative systematic review of topically applied non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [published correction appears in BMJ 1998;316:1059]. BMJ. 1998;316:333–8.

21. Almekinders LC, Temple JD. Etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of tendonitis: an analysis of the literature. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;30:1183–90.

22. Green S, Buchbinder R, Barnsley L, Hall S, White M, Smidt N, et al. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for treating lateral elbow pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;(4):CD003686.

23. Stahl S, Kaufman T. The efficacy of an injection of steroids for medial epicondylitis. A prospective study of sixty elbows. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:1648–52.

24. Assendelft WJ, Hay EM, Adshead R, Bouter LM. Corticosteroid injections for lateral epicondylitis: a systematic overview. Br J Gen Pract. 1996;46:209–16.

25. Kapetanos G. The effect of the local corticosteroids on the healing and biomechanical properties of the partially injured tendon. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982;163:170–9.

26. Struijs PA, Smidt N, Arola H, Dijk CN, Buchbinder R, Assendelft WJ. Orthotic devices for the treatment of tennis elbow. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;(1):CD001821.

27. D’hondt NE, Struijs PA, Kerkhoffs GM, Verheul C, Lysens R, Aufdemkampe G, et al. Orthotic devices for treating patellofemoral pain syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;(2):CD002267.

28. Jackson BA, Schwane JA, Starcher BC. Effect of ultrasound therapy on the repair of Achilles tendon injuries in rats. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1991;23:171–6.

29. Klaiman MD, Shrader JA, Danoff JV, Hicks JE, Pesce WJ, Ferland J. Phonophoresis versus ultrasound in the treatment of common musculoskeletal conditions. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;30:1349–55.

30. Buchbinder R, Green S, White M, Barnsley L, Smidt N, Assendelft WJ. Shock wave therapy for lateral elbow pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;(1):CD003524.

31. Chung B, Wiley JP. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy: a review. Sports Med. 2002;32:851–65.

32. Penderghest C, Kimura I, Gulick D. Double-blind clinical efficacy study of pulsed phonophoresis on perceived pain associated with symptomatic tendinitis. J Sport Rehab. 1998;7:9–19.

33. Tallon C, Coleman BD, Khan KM, Maffulli N. Outcome of surgery for chronic Achilles tendinopathy. A critical review. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29:315–20.

34. Coleman BD, Khan KM, Maffulli N, Cook JL, Wark JD. Studies of surgical outcome after patellar tendinopathy: clinical significance of methodological deficiencies and guidelines for future studies. Victorian Institute of Sport Tendon Study Group. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2000;10:2–11.

35. van der Windt DA, Koes BW, de Jong BA, Bouter LM. Shoulder disorders in general practice: incidence, patient characteristics, and management. Ann Rheum Dis. 1995;54:959–64.

36. Lohr JF, Uhthoff HK. The microvascular pattern of the supraspinatus tendon. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;254:35–8.

37. Calis M, Akgun K, Birtane M, Karacan I, Calis H, Tuzun F. Diagnostic values of clinical diagnostic tests in subacromial impingement syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis. 2000;59:44–7.

38. Wright MH, Jobe CM, O’hara RC, Osborn JM, Alexander G. Cross sectional anatomy of impingement syndrome. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1994;73(suppl 3):73.

39. Leach RE, Miller JK. Lateral and medial epicondylitis of the elbow. Clin Sports Med. 1987;6:259–72.

40. Jensen K, Di Fabio RP. Evaluation of eccentric exercise in treatment of patellar tendinitis. Phys Ther. 1989;69:211–6.

41. Cook JL, Khan KM. What is the most appropriate treatment for patellar tendinopathy? Br J Sports Med. 2001;35:291–4.



Copyright © 2005 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact afpserv@aafp.org for copyright questions and/or permission requests.

Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions


Article Tools

  • Download PDF
  • Print page
  • Share this page
  • AFP CME Quiz

Information From Industry

More in Pubmed

Navigate this Article