Tips from Other Journals
Who Should Be Tested for Hepatitis C Virus Infection?
FREE PREVIEW Log in or buy this issue to read the full article. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles. Subscribe now.
FREE PREVIEW Subscribe or buy this issue. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles.
Am Fam Physician. 2005 Sep 1;72(5):925-926.
The diagnosis and management of hepatitis C virus (HCV) disease has been well characterized, and specific groups have been identified as being at increased risk for infection. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends that testing for hepatitis C be offered to persons in this increased risk group. Routine screening of the general population has not been recommended. In 2004, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recognized the health burden caused by HCV and advances in management but determined that there was insufficient evidence to recommend for or against routine screening for HCV infection in high-risk asymptomatic persons. Testing is recommended for persons with signs or symptoms of liver disease. Persons at high risk of infection include those who have ever injected illegal drugs; who received clotting factors made before 1987; who received blood or organs before July 1992; who ever received long-term hemodialysis; with unexplained abnormal alanine transaminase levels; and health care, emergency medical, and public safety workers with needlestick or mucosal exposures to HCV-positive women.
Alter and associates note that although there is no population-based evidence that treatment of HCV disease decreases morbidity or mortality from liver cirrhosis or primary liver cancer, the protracted course of this disease may mean that the benefits of treatment will only be noticeable after 20 to 30 years of follow-up evaluation. Depending on the viral genotype, current treatments result in sustained viral elimination in 40 to 85 percent of infected persons. This, with normalization of liver enzyme tests and improved liver histology, makes a strong case for identifying and treating asymptomatic infected persons. Other interventions include counseling, cessation of alcohol intake, and immunization against other forms of viral hepatitis. Access to health care services may slow down disease progression and reduce mortality. Waiting for symptoms may delay diagnosis and treatment until a time when therapy will not significantly impact survival.
The potential harms of testing asymptomatic high-risk persons include false-positive results, knowledge of HCV status, complications of invasive evaluation testing such as liver biopsy, and side effects of treatment. These potential harms can be minimized by confirmatory blood testing and reserving liver biopsies for situations in which the results will influence treatment recommendations. Limiting treatment to those most likely to benefit will improve the benefit-to-risk ratio of current treatment options. Appropriate counseling can help reduce personal upset and anxiety about the diagnosis.
The authors conclude that it is important to identify persons with chronic HCV infection early in the disease course. It seems inappropriate to delay testing until signs or symptoms are present because it is not certain that early intervention decreases HCV-related chronic disease. Testing should be offered to all persons at high risk for infection with appropriate counseling, medical evaluation, and treatment.
Alter MJ, et al. Testing for hepatitis C virus infection should be routine for persons at increased risk for infection. Ann Intern Med. November 2, 2004;141:715–7.
editor’s note: In an editorial in the same issue, Calonge and Randhawa1 clarify the role and process of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) in assessing evidence and developing recommendations. The USPSTF recommendations are developed to help physicians understand the evidence for and against preventive interventions for apparently healthy persons. The review of evidence supports the virologic value of treatment and the accuracy of screening tests but does not demonstrate any decrease in actual morbidity or mortality with early identification, counseling, alcohol cessation, or treatment. The result is a finding of insufficient evidence to recommend for or against routine screening for HCV infection in high-risk persons; this is a grade I recommendation. The USPSTF gives a grade of A, B, C, or D when there is adequate evidence to determine the magnitude of the benefit of a specific preventive service. A grade I means that there is inadequate evidence to determine a net benefit. Therefore, a recommendation about HCV screening for high-risk asymptomatic persons cannot be made at this time because of a lack of evidence.—r.s.
1. Calonge N, Randhawa G. The meaning of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force grade I recommendation: screening for hepatitis C virus infection. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:718–9.
Copyright © 2005 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact email@example.com for copyright questions and/or permission requests.
Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions