Cochrane for Clinicians
Putting Evidence into Practice
Glucocorticoids for Treatment of Croup
The Cochrane Abstract below is a summary of a review from the Cochrane Library. It is accompanied by an interpretation that will help clinicians put evidence into practice. Michael Schooff, M.D., presents a clinical scenario and question based on the Cochrane Abstract, along with the evidence-based answer and a full critique of the abstract.
Clinical Scenario
A two-year-old child presents with a barking cough, stridor, and tachypnea.
Clinical Question
Are glucocorticoids effective in treating children with croup?
Evidence-Based Answer
Compared with placebo, treatment with glucocorticoids results in reduced symptoms, less need for treatment with racemic epinephrine, fewer readmissions to emergency departments, and shorter hospital stays.
|
|||||
Practice Pointers
Croup is an acute viral inflammation of the upper and lower respiratory tracts, characterized by inspiratory stridor, barking cough, subglottic swelling, and respiratory distress. Each year, croup occurs in up to 6 percent of children six months to six years of age. Croup is self-limited, usually lasting four to seven days, but about one in 20 children with croup who present to emergency departments requires hospitalization.2
Standard therapy for croup includes cool-mist humidification, hydration, supplemental oxygen, and general comfort measures. Nebulized racemic epinephrine improves symptoms and reduces respiratory fatigue, but these results are transient. Hospitalization is indicated in children with increasing or persistent respiratory distress, fatigue, cyanosis, or dehydration. In severe cases, patients may require intubation and mechanical ventilation. Stridor, cyanosis, sternal retraction, tachypnea, and tachycardia increase the risk for intubation.3
Most of the articles evaluated in this review used the Westley croup scoring system4 to measure symptoms. This system assigns points for stridor, retractions, air entry, cyanosis, and level of consciousness. The use of glucocorticoids reduced symptom scores at six and 12 hours compared with placebo. In patients who received glucocorticoids, 69 percent improved at six hours, and 84 percent improved at 12 hours, compared with 46 percent and 61 percent, respectively, in patients who received placebo (number needed to treat [NNT], six to seven for both time intervals). Administration of glucocorticoids also led to fewer admissions or readmissions (NNT, 11), shorter emergency department and inpatient lengths of stay, and less need for racemic epinephrine.
There is insufficient research comparing the various glucocorticoids, or establishing the most effective glucocorticoid dosage and the most effective route of administration. Preliminary evidence suggests that oral and intramuscular dexamethasone may have equivalent efficacies, and that either may be more effective than nebulized dexamethasone or budesonide.5-7
This clinical content conforms to AAFP
criteria for evidence-based continuing medical education (EB CME). EB CME is
clinical content presented with practice recommendations supported by evidence
that has been systematically reviewed by an AAFP-approved source. The practice
recommendations in this activity are available online at
http://www.cochrane.org/cochrane/revabstr/AB001955.htm.
The Author
MICHAEL SCHOOFF, M.D., is associate director of the Clarkson Family Medicine Residency Program in Omaha. He received his medical degree from the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, F. Edward Hébert School of Medicine, Bethesda, Md., and completed a family practice residency at Womack Army Medical Center, Fort Bragg, N.C.
Address correspondence to Michael Schooff, M.D., Clarkson Family Medicine, 4200 Douglas St., Omaha, NE 68131 (e-mail: mschooff@nebraskamed.org). Reprints are not available from the author.
REFERENCES
1. Russell K, Wiebe N, Saenz A, Ausejo SM, Johnson D, Hartling L, et al. Glucocorticoids for croup. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004;(3):CD001955.
2. Knutson D, Aring A. Viral croup. Am Fam Physician 2004;69:535-40.
3. Jacobs S, Shortland G, Warner J, Dearden A, Gataure PS, Tarpey J. Validation of a croup score and its use in triaging children with croup. Anaesthesia 1994;49:903-6.
4. Westley CR, Cotton EK, Brooks JG. Nebulized racemic epinephrine by IPPB for the treatment of croup: a double-blind study. Am J Dis Child 1978;132:484-7.
5. Rittichier KK, Ledwith CA. Outpatient treatment of moderate croup with dexamethasone: intramuscular versus oral dosing. Pediatrics 2000;106:1344-8.
6. Luria JW, Gonzalez-del-Rey JA, DiGiulio GA, McAneney CM, Olson JJ, Ruddy RM. Effectiveness of oral or nebulized dexamethasone for children with mild croup. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2001;155:1340-5.
7. Johnson DW, Jacobson S, Edney PC, Hadfield P, Mundy ME, Schuh S. A comparison of nebulized budesonide, intramuscular dexamethasone, and placebo for moderately severe croup. N Engl J Med 1998;339:498-503.
Cochrane Briefs
Antidepressants and Smoking Cessation
Clinical Question
Which antidepressants help patients stop smoking?
Evidence-Based Answer
Bupropion and nortriptyline increase the likelihood of smoking cessation, but selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) do not.
Practice Pointers
The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force1 and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services2 recommend that physicians screen all adults for tobacco use and recommend intervention for those who report using tobacco products. There is good evidence that brief behavioral counseling and pharmacotherapy increase rates of abstinence. More intensive counseling has a dose-response relationship, with more minutes of contact producing better results. Nicotine replacement and bupropion have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for use in smoking cessation.
Hughes and colleagues reviewed the literature to see if other antidepressants also improve rates of smoking cessation. All trials had at least six months of follow-up. Although nortriptyline and bupropion had the most studies meeting the inclusion criteria, there were also trials on sertraline, venlafaxine, and fluoxetine. Patients taking bupropion (19.3 versus 10.2 percent; pooled odds ratio [OR], 2.0; 95 percent confidence interval [CI], 1.7 to 2.3) or nortriptyline (18.5 versus 7.6 percent; pooled OR, 2.8; 95 percent CI, 1.8 to 4.3) had long-term abstinence rates higher than in those taking placebo. One small trial comparing bupropion with nortriptyline did not show a statistically significant difference. In five studies of SSRIs (largely fluoxetine) with 1,521 patients, there was no significant difference between treated patients and control patients in rates of long-term abstinence. This systematic review did not address the question of whether combining pharmaceutical and counseling interventions produces higher quit rates. However, patients who report using tobacco should receive at least a brief counseling intervention and an offer of medication.
Hughes JR, et al. Antidepressants for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004;(3):CD000031.
REFERENCE
1. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Counseling to prevent tobacco use and tobacco-caused disease: recommendation statement. Rockville, Md.: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2003.
2. Treating tobacco use and dependence. Washington, D.C.: U.S Dept of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, 2000.
Hormonal Contraceptives and Weight Gain
Clinical Question
Do combination hormonal contraceptives cause weight gain?
Evidence-Based Answer
There is no causal relationship between combination contraceptives and weight gain.
Practice Pointers
Many women and physicians believe that weight gain is associated with combination hormonal contraceptives. The weight gain could be the result of water retention, increased muscle mass, or increased fat deposition. To test this perception, Gallo and colleagues performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. They included studies of at least three menstrual cycles' duration that compared combination contraceptives with placebo or other drugs, dosages, regimens, or study lengths. They found three placebo-controlled trials, none of which found a significant difference in weight gain between groups. The largest of these studies, with 473 patients, found a difference of less than 1 lb after six months. There was also no difference between groups in discontinuation of the contraceptives because of weight gain. Furthermore, most of the studies comparing two contraceptive regimens did not show differences in weight gain.
When patients are reluctant to take combination contraceptives because they fear weight gain, physicians can tell them that it is true that women gain weight with the pill and the patch. However, they also gain weight when they don't use these products. Physicians can direct them to the excellent resources on healthy lifestyles that have been developed by the National Institutes of Health.1 The "Aim for a Healthy Weight program has an interactive Web site on diet and exercise for patients (http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/public/heart/obesity/lose_wt/).
CLARISSA KRIPKE, M.D.
Gallo MF, et al. Combination contraceptives: effects on weight. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2004;(3):CD003987.
REFERENCES
1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults: the evidence report. Bethesda, Md.: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. NIH publication no. 98-4083.
|
Copyright © 2005 by the American
Academy of Family Physicians. |
MEDLINE:
• Citation
More in AFP:
• Cochrane for Clinicians: Putting Evidence into Practice (99)
• Croup (4)
• Glucocorticoids (12)










These summaries have been derived from Cochrane reviews published in
the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Library. Their
content has, as far as possible, been checked with the authors of the original
reviews, but the summaries should not be regarded as an official product of the
Cochrane Collaboration; minor editing changes have been made to the text (