Advertisement
American Family Physician

Online Letters to the Editor

Alternative to the Traditional Bilateral Neck Exploration

TO THE EDITOR: In the article,1 “Hyperparathyroidism,” in the January 15, 2004, issue of American Family Physician, the discussion of surgical options mentions the traditional approach of bilateral neck exploration and the minimally invasive parathyroidectomy (MIP). To contemplate an MIP, preoperative localization studies, usually a Sestamibi scan and ultrasound, are necessary.

Dr. Taniegra reports that MIP can be video-assisted, endoscopic, radioguided, or image-guided. While these are indeed all options, the first three approaches have significant drawbacks. The video-assisted approach requires two incisions and usually is performed under general anesthesia. The endoscopic approach requires three incisions and expert endoscopy skills, inflates most of the central neck, and does not allow the surgeon to make a tactile assessment.2 Finally, a recent study3 recommended against the routine use of a radioguided approach because it is usually unnecessary, and it provided “confusing and inaccurate information” in 48 percent of cases. Image-guidance (combined with an intraoperative parathyroid hormone assay) is both feasible and cost-effective; it eliminates the risk of general anesthesia, requires one small incision, and has been proven to decrease operating time and length of stay.4,5

Preoperative localization allows for appropriate planning of the incision and directs the surgeon to the abnormality. Dissection is localized to the specific locale of the abnormality, minimizing pain and preventing extensive scarring. The remainder of the neck is left undisturbed. Image-guided MIP is the most effective alternative to the traditional bilateral approach when preoperative studies localize the adenoma and can be recommended as the most effective alternative to bilateral exploration.

REFERENCES

1. Taniegra ED. Hyperparathyroidism. Am Fam Physician 2004;69:333-9.

2. Sosa JA, Udelsman R. Minimally invasive parathyroidectomy. Surg Oncol 2003;12:125-34.

3. Inabnet WB 3d, Kim CK, Haber RS, Lopchinsky RA. Radioguidance is not necessary during parathyroidectomy. Arch Surg 2002;137:967-70.

4. Fahy BN, Bold RJ, Beckett L, Schneider PD. Modern parathyroid surgery: a cost-benefit analysis of localizing strategies. Arch Surg 2002;137:917-22.

5. Udelsman R, Donovan PI, Sokoll LJ. One hundred consecutive minimally invasive parathyroid explorations. Ann Surg 2000;232:331-9.

In reply: I basically agree with the discussion of Dr. Lopchinsky and Ms. Love that image-guided minimally invasive parathyroidectomy (MIP) is the most effective alternative to bilateral exploration in the surgical management of primary hyperparathyroidism.

Hemolytic Anemia Manifesting As Improved A1C Values

to the editor: I read with interest the article1 on hemolytic anemia by Dr. Dhaliwal and colleagues. To further highlight the clinical relevance of drug-induced hemolytic anemia, we present an interesting case of hemolysis leading to a diagnostic enigma.

A 59-year-old woman was evaluated for diabetes mellitus and hypertension in our outpatient clinic. She required regular insulin therapy for glucose control and was receiving ramipril, methyldopa, and nifedipine for hypertension and diabetic nephropathy. Over the past two years, her glycosylated hemoglobin (A1C) values ranged from 6.4 to 8.3 percent (normal range: 5.1 to 6.4 percent) with a stable insulin regimen. Nonetheless, a dramatic improvement trend of glycemic control over the preceding year was reflected by her recent A1C values. Despite A1C values as low as 3.9 percent, she denied having hypoglycemic symptoms and reported self-monitored blood glucose measurements of 108 to 144 mg per dL (6 to 8 mmol per L) while fasting and a postprandial value of less than 162 mg per dL (9 mmol per L).

The history of methyldopa therapy in this particular patient made hemolytic anemia a distinct probability, which may have accounted for her “exceedingly good” glycemic control. An elevated reticulocyte count (19 percent) and characteristic features of anemia, polychromasia, and spherocytosis were evident. She had taken alpha-methyldopa (250 mg twice daily) for 18 months before the current evaluation. The dosage was increased to 1 g per day over the previous 10 months. Autoimmune hemolysis was supported further by the positive direct Coombs’ test, demonstrating the agglutination of the patient’s red blood cells with anti-IgG antisera but not with complement component (anti-C3 sera).

After discontinuation of methyldopa therapy, the patient’s hemoglobin level increased from 9.1 to 13.3 g per dL (91 to 133 g per L; normal range: 11.5 to 14.3 g per dL [115 to 143 g per L]) over the course of eight weeks, accompanied by decrement of reticulocyte count (from 19 to 4.5 percent) and normalization of plasma haptoglobin concentration (less than 20 to 35 mg per dL [0.20 to 0.35 g per L]; normal range: 33 to 171 mg per dL [0.33 to 1.71 g per dL]).

Methyldopa-induced autoimmune hemolytic anemia is a recognized cause of warm-antibody immune hemolysis.1-3 Formation of red-cell autoantibodies has been observed in up to 10 to 20 percent of patients receiving methyldopa therapy.4,5 Presumably, alpha-methyldopa alters antigens on red blood cells and makes the proteins of the cell membrane Rhesus complex immunogenic, leading to the formation of red-cell antibodies. Occasionally, severe hemolysis ensues in the presence of sufficient antibody production,3 as was the case with our patient. The prompt reversibility after withdrawal of methyldopa therapy resembles the same phenomenon seen in other autoantibody anemia induced by infectious mechanisms. Once the antigenic epitope is no longer produced, the hemolysis process ceases over a period of four weeks to four months (equivalent to one red-cell life span).6

Interestingly, the “satisfactory” glycemic control index in our patient warned of a shortened red-cell life span, rather than providing a reassuring sign to her physician.

REFERENCES

1. Dhaliwal G, Cornett PA, Tierney LM Jr. Hemolytic anemia. Am Fam Physician 2004;69:2599-606.

2. Murphy WG, Kelton JG. Methyldopa-induced autoantibodies against red blood cells. Blood Rev 1988;2:36-42.

3. Pruss A, Salama A, Ahrens N, Hansen A, Kiesewetter H, Koscielny J, Dorner T. Immune hemolysis–serological and clinical aspects. Clin Exp Med 2003;3:55-64.

4. LoBuglio AF, Jandl JH. The nature of the alpha-methyldopa red-cell antibody. N Engl J Med 1967;276:658-65.

5. Carstairs KC, Breckenridge A, Dollery CT, Worlledge SM. Incidence of a positive direct coombs test in patients on alpha-methyldopa. Lancet 1966;2:133-5.

6. Murad F. Immunohemolytic anemia during therapy with methyldopa. JAMA 1968;203:149-51.




Advertisement