Advertisement

Diagnosis and Management of Diastolic Dysfunction and Heart Failure

Diastolic heart failure occurs when signs and symptoms of heart failure are present but left ventricular systolic function is preserved (i.e., ejection fraction greater than 45 percent). The incidence of diastolic heart failure increases with age; therefore, 50 percent of older patients with heart failure may have isolated diastolic dysfunction. With early diagnosis and proper management the prognosis of diastolic dysfunction is more favorable than that of systolic dysfunction. Distinguishing diastolic from systolic heart failure is essential because the optimal therapy for one may aggravate the other. Although diastolic heart failure is clinically and radiographically indistinguishable from systolic heart failure, normal ejection fraction and abnormal diastolic function in the presence of symptoms and signs of heart failure confirm diastolic heart failure. The pharmacologic therapies of choice for diastolic heart failure are angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, diuretics, and beta blockers. (Am Fam Physician 2006;73:841–6. Copyright © 2006 American Academy of Family Physicians.)

Three million Americans have congestive heart failure (CHF), and 500,000 new cases are diagnosed each year. The condition is the most common discharge diagnosis for patients older than 65 years1 and is the most expensive disease for Medicare.2 Systolic and diastolic dysfunction can cause CHF.3 All patients with systolic dysfunction have concomitant diastolic dysfunction; therefore, a patient cannot have pure systolic heart failure.4 In contrast, certain cardiovascular diseases such as hypertension may lead to diastolic dysfunction without concomitant systolic dysfunction.5 Although diastolic heart failure accounts for approximately 40 to 60 percent of patients with CHF, these patients have a better prognosis than those with systolic heart failure.6

Definition and Diagnostic Criteria

Diastolic heart failure is defined as a condition caused by increased resistance to the filling of one or both ventricles; this leads to symptoms of congestion from the inappropriate upward shift of the diastolic pressure-volume relation.7Although this definition describes the principal pathophysiologic mechanism of diastolic heart failure, it is not clinically applicable. A more practical definition for use in clinical practice is: a condition that includes classic CHF findings and abnormal diastolic and normal systolic function at rest.8,9A study group7  proposed that physicians combine clinical and echocardiographic information to categorize patients with diastolic heart failure according to the degree of diagnostic certainty (Table 110).

Prevalence and Etiology

On average, 40 percent of patients with heart failure have preserved systolic function.1113 The incidence of diastolic heart failure increases with age, and it is more common in older women.14,15  Hypertension and cardiac ischemia are the most common causes of diastolic heart failure (Table 2). Common precipitating factors include volume overload; tachycardia; exercise; hypertension; ischemia; systemic stressors (e.g., anemia, fever, infection, thyrotoxicosis); arrhythmia (e.g., atrial fibrillation, atrioventricular nodal block); increased salt intake; and use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Pathophysiology

Diastole is the process by which the heart returns to its relaxed state. During this period, the cardiac muscle is perfused. Conventionally, diastole can be divided into four phases: isovolumetric relaxation, caused by closure of the aortic valve to the mitral valve opening; early rapid ventricular filling located after the mitral valve opening; diastasis, a period of low flow during mid-diastole; and late rapid filling during atrial contraction.16 Broadly defined, isolated diastolic dysfunction is the impairment of isovolumetric ventricular relaxation and decreased compliance of the left ventricle. With diastolic dysfunction, the heart is able to meet the body’s metabolic needs, whether at rest or during exercise, but at a higher filling pressure. Transmission of higher end-diastolic pressure to the pulmonary circulation may cause pulmonary congestion, which leads to dyspnea and subsequent right-sided heart failure. With mild dysfunction, late filling increases until the ventricular end-diastolic volume returns to normal. In severe cases, the ventricle becomes so stiff that the atrial muscle fails and end-diastolic volume cannot be normalized with elevated filling pressure. This process reduces stroke volume and cardiac output, causing effort intolerance. Figure 117 summarizes the pathophysiology of diastolic heart failure.

TABLE 1
Diagnostic Criteria for Diastolic Heart Failure
Definitive diastolic heart failure Probable diastolic heart failure* Possible diastolic heart failure

Definitive evidence of congestive heart failure†

Same as definitive

Same as definitive

and

and

and

Objective evidence of normal left ventricular systolic function in proximity of event‡

Same as definitive

Left ventricular ejection fraction of 50 percent or more not measured within 72 hours of event

and

and

and

Objective evidence of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction§

No conclusive information on left ventricular diastolic function

Same as probable


*—Patients who have definitive evidence of congestive heart failure and objective evidence of normal left ventricular systolic function in proximity of event are accepted as having probable diastolic heart failure provided that mitral valve disease, cor pulmonale, primary volume overload, and noncardiac causes are excluded.

†—Clinical symptoms and signs, supporting chest radiography, typical clinical response to diuretics with or without elevated left ventricular filling pressure, or low cardiac index.

‡—Left ventricular ejection fraction of 50 percent or more within 72 hours of event.

§—Abnormal left ventricular relaxation or filling or distensibility indices on catheterization.

Adapted with permission from van Kraaij DJ, van Pol PE, Ruiters AW, de Swart JB, Lips DJ, Lencer N, et al. Diagnosing diastolic heart failure. Eur J Heart Failure 2002;4:427.

Diagnosis

Heart failure can present as fatigue, dyspnea on exertion, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea, orthopnea, jugular venous distention, rales, tachycardia, third or fourth heart sounds, hepatomegaly, and edema. Cardiomegaly and pulmonary venous congestion commonly are found on chest radiography. However, these findings are non-specific and often occur in noncardiac conditions such as pulmonary disease, anemia, hypothyroidism, and obesity. Furthermore, it is difficult to distinguish diastolic from systolic heart failure based on physical findings alone.18

TABLE 2
Causes of Diastolic Dysfunction and Heart Failure

Common causes*

Cardiac ischemia

Hypertension

Aging

Obesity

Aortic stenosis

Uncommon causes

Myocardial disorders

Myocardial diseases

Infiltrative disease (e.g., amyloidosis, sarcoidosis, fatty infiltration)

Noninfiltrative diseases (e.g., idiopathic and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy)

Endomyocardial diseases

Hypereosinophilic syndrome

Storage diseases

Glycogen storage disease

Hemochromatosis

Pericardial disorders

Constrictive pericarditis

Effusive-constrictive pericarditis

Pericardial effusion


*—Common causes are listed in order of prevalence.

The serum brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) test can accurately differentiate heart failure from noncardiac conditions in a patient with dyspnea, but it cannot distinguish diastolic from systolic heart failure. Table 319 summarizes the accuracy of BNP levels for diagnosing heart failure. Physicians also should consider that patients’ New York Heart Association severity class affects BNP levels.

In addition to providing fundamental information on chamber size, wall thickness and motion, systolic function, the valves, and the pericardium, two-dimensional echocardiography with Doppler is used to evaluate the characteristics of diastolic transmitral and pulmonary venous flow pattern.20 On echocardiography, the peak velocity of blood flow across the mitral valve during early diastolic filling corresponds to the E wave. Similarly, atrial contraction corresponds to the A wave. From these findings, the E/A ratio is calculated. Under normal conditions, E is greater than A and the E/A ratio is approximately 1.5.21

In early diastolic dysfunction, relaxation is impaired and, with vigorous atrial contraction, the E/A ratio decreases to less than 1.0. As the disease progresses, left ventricular compliance is reduced, which increases left atrial pressure and, in turn, increases early left ventricular filling despite impaired relaxation. This paradoxical normalization of the E/A ratio is called pseudonormalization. In patients with severe diastolic dysfunction, left ventricular filling occurs primarily in early diastole, creating an E/A ratio greater than 2.0. The E- and A-wave velocities are affected by blood volume, mitral valve anatomy, mitral valve function, and atrial fibrillation, making standard echocardiography less reliable. In these cases, tissue Doppler imaging is useful for measuring mitral annular motion (a measure of transmitral flow that is independent of the aforementioned factors).

Cardiac catheterization remains the preferred method for diagnosing diastolic dysfunction. However, in day-to-day clinical practice, two-dimensional echocardiography with Doppler is the best noninvasive tool to confirm the diagnosis. Rarely, radionuclide angiography is used for patients in whom echocardiography is technically difficult.

Management

Primary prevention of diastolic heart failure includes smoking cessation and aggressive control of hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and coronary artery disease. Lifestyle modifications such as weight loss, smoking cessation, dietary changes, limiting alcohol intake, and exercise are equally effective in preventing diastolic and systolic heart failure. Diastolic dysfunction may be present for several years before it is clinically evident (Figure 117). Early diagnosis and treatment is important in preventing irreversible structural alterations and systolic dysfunction. However, no single drug has pure lusitropic properties (i.e., selective enhancement of myocardial relaxation without inhibiting left ventricular contractility or function). Therefore, medical therapies for diastolic dysfunction and diastolic heart failure often are empirical and not as well defined as therapies for systolic heart failure. On the surface, it appears that the pharmacologic treatments of diastolic and systolic heart failure do not differ dramatically; however, the treatment of diastolic heart failure is limited by the lack of large and conclusive randomized control trials.22 Furthermore, the optimal treatment for systolic heart failure may exacerbate diastolic heart failure. Most clinical trials to date have focused exclusively on patients with systolic heart failure; only recently have trials addressed the treatment of diastolic heart failure.



Although conclusive data on specific therapies for diastolic heart failure are lacking, the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association joint guidelines22  recommend that physicians address blood pressure control, heart rate control, central blood volume reduction, and alleviation of myocardial ischemia when treating patients with diastolic heart failure. These guidelines target underlying causes and are likely to improve left ventricular function and optimize hemodynamics. Table 4 lists treatment goals for diastolic heart failure.

IMPROVING LEFT VENTRICULAR FUNCTION

When treating a patient with diastolic dysfunction, it is important to control the heart rate and prevent tachycardia to maximize the diastolic filling period. Beta blockers are particularly useful for this purpose; however, they do not directly affect myocardial relaxation. In addition to slowing heart rate, beta blockers have proven benefits in reducing blood pressure and myocardial ischemia, promoting regression of left ventricular hypertrophy, and antagonizing the excessive adrenergic stimulation during heart failure. Beta blockers have been independently associated with improved survival in patients with diastolic heart failure.23These medications should be used to treat diastolic heart failure, especially if hypertension, coronary artery disease, or arrhythmia is present.

OPTIMIZING HEMODYNAMICS

Optimizing hemodynamics primarily is achieved by reducing cardiac preload and afterload. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) directly affect myocardial relaxation and compliance by inhibiting production of or blocking angiotensin II receptors, thereby reducing interstitial collagen deposition and fibrosis.24,25 The indirect benefits of optimizing hemodynamics include improving left ventricular filling and reducing blood pressure. More importantly, there is improvement in exercise capacity and quality of life.26 One retrospective study27 showed that improved survival was associated with ACE inhibitor therapy in patients with diastolic heart failure. One arm of the CHARM (Candesartan in Heart Failure Assessment of Reduction in Morbidity and Mortality) trial,28 which studied the effect of candesartan (Atacand) in patients with normal ejection fraction for 36.6 months, did not show a significant mortality benefit. However, it reduced the incidence of hospitalization for CHF exacerbation.

Diuretics are effective in managing optimal intravascular volume, and they minimize dyspnea and prevent acute heart failure in patients with diastolic dysfunction. Although diuretics control blood pressure, reverse left ventricular hypertrophy, and reduce left ventricular stiffness, some patients with diastolic heart failure are sensitive to the preload reduction and may develop hypotension or severe prerenal azotemia. Intravenous diuretics should only be used to relieve acute symptoms.

The hormone aldosterone promotes fibrosis in the heart and contributes to diastolic stiffness. The aldosterone antagonist spironolactone (Aldactone) has been studied in a large clinical trial of systolic heart failure,29 which showed a reduction in mortality related to heart failure. However, the specific effects of spironolactone on diastolic dysfunction are unclear.

TABLE 3
Accuracy of BNP Levels for Diagnosing Heart Failure
Congestive heart failure vs. noncongestive heart failure Systolic heart failure vs. nonsystolic heart failure
BNP level (pg per mL) Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) LR+ LR– Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) LR+ LR–

100

90

73

4.5

0.12

95

14

1.1

0.36

200

81

85

5.4

0.22

89

27

1.2

0.41

300

73

89

6.6

0.3

83

39

1.4

0.44

400

63

91

7

0.41

74

50

1.48

0.52


BNP = brain natriuretic peptide; LR+ = positive likelihood ratio; LR– = negative likelihood ratio.

Adapted with permission from Maisel AS, McCord J, Nowak RM, Hollander JE, Wu AH, Duc P, et al. Bedside B-Type natriuretic peptide in the emergency diagnosis of heart failure with reduced or preserved ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:2015.

Calcium channel blockers have been shown to improve diastolic function directly by decreasing cytoplasmic calcium concentration and causing myocardial relaxation or indirectly by reducing blood pressure, reducing or preventing myocardial ischemia, promoting regression of left ventricular hypertrophy, and by slowing the heart rate. However, nondihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (e.g., diltiazem [Cardizem]) and verapamil (Calan), should not be used in patients with bradycardia, conduction defects, or severe heart failure caused by left ventricular systolic dysfunction.30 Instead, nondihydropyridines, such as diltiazem and verapamil, should be used for rate control and angina when beta blockers are contraindicated or ineffective. [corrected] Finally, large randomized controlled trials have not proved that calcium channel blockers reduce mortality in patients with isolated diastolic dysfunction.

Vasodilators (e.g., nitrates, hydralazine [Apresoline]) may be useful because of their preload-reducing and anti-ischemic effects, particularly when ACE inhibitors cannot be used. The Vasodilator Heart Failure Trial,31 however, did not show significant survival benefit in patients with diastolic heart failure. Vasodilators should be used cautiously because decreasing preload may worsen cardiac output. Unlike other medications used for diastolic heart failure, vasodilators have no effect on left ventricular regression.

The exact role of digoxin for treating patients with diastolic heart failure remains unclear. Digoxin can be deleterious in older patients with left ventricular hypertrophy and hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy; therefore, digoxin is only appropriate for patients with diastolic heart failure and atrial fibrillation.32

TABLE 4
Goals for Treating Diastolic Heart Failure

Treat precipitating factors and underlying disease.

Prevent and treat hypertension and ischemic heart disease.

Surgically remove diseased pericardium.

Improve left ventricular relaxation.

ACE inhibitors Calcium channel blockers

Regress left ventricular hypertrophy (decrease wall thickness and remove excess collagen).

ACE inhibitors and ARBs Aldosterone antagonists Beta blockers Calcium channel blockers

Maintain atrioventricular synchrony by managing tachycardia (tachyarrhythmia).

Beta blockers (preferred) Calcium channel blockers (second-line agents) Digoxin (controversial) Atrioventricular node ablation (rare cases)

Optimize circulating volume (hemodynamics).

ACE inhibitors Aldosterone antagonists (theoretical benefit) Salt and water restriction Diuresis, dialysis, or plasmapheresis

Improve survival.

Beta blocker ACE inhibitors

Prevent relapse by intensifying outpatient follow-up.

Control blood pressure. Dietary counseling (sodium) Monitoring volume status (daily weights and diuretic adjustment) Institute exercise program.


ACE = angiotensin-converting enzyme; ARB = angiotensin receptor blocker.


The Authors

CHHABI SATPATHY, M.D., is professor in the Department of Cardiology at Utkal University’s Sriram Chandra Bhanja (SCB) Medical College, Cuttack, Orissa, India. She received her medical degree from and completed an internal medicine residency at Utkal University’s SCB Medical College.

TRINATH K. MISHRA, M.D., is professor in the Department of Cardiology at Utkal University’s SCB Medical College, where he received his medical degree and completed an internal medicine residency.

RUBY SATPATHY, M.D., is a resident in the Department of Internal Medicine at Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha, Neb. She received her medical degree from Utkal University’s SCB Medical College.

HEMANT K. SATPATHY, M.D., is professor of family medicine in the Department of Family Practice at Creighton University Medical Center. He received his medical degree from Utkal University’s SCB Medical College. Dr. Satpathy completed a residency in obstetrics and gynecology at Vir Surendra Sai Medical College, Burla, India. He completed a family practice residency at Creighton University Medical Center, including one year as chief resident.

EUGENE BARONE, M.D., is professor and predoctoral director in the Department of Family Practice at Creighton University Medical Center where he received his medical degree and completed a family medicine residency.

Address correspondence to Hemant K. Satpathy, M.D., 6224 S. 100th St., Omaha, NE 68127 (e-mail: kuntala@hotmail.com). Reprints are not available from the authors.

Author disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

REFERENCES

1. Tecce  MA, Pennington  JA, Segal  BL, Jessup  ML.  Heart failure: clinical implications of systolic and diastolic dysfunction.  Geriatrics.  1999;54:24–8,31–3.

2. Massie  BM, Shah  NB.  Evolving trends in the epidemiologic factors of heart failure: rationale for preventive strategies and comprehensive disease management.  Am Heart J.  1997;133:703–12.

3. Litwin  SE, Grossman  W.  Diastolic dysfunction as a cause of heart failure.  J Am Coll Cardiol.  1993;22(4 suppl A):49A–55A.

4. Brutsaert  DL, Sys  SU.  Diastolic dysfunction in heart failure.  J Card Fail.  1997;3:225–42.

5. Vasan  RS, Larson  MG, Benjamin  EJ, Evans  JC, Reiss  CK, Levy  D.  Congestive heart failure in subjects with normal versus reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: prevalence and mortality in a population-based cohort.  J Am Coll Cardiol.  1999;33:1948–55.

6. Senni  M, Redfield  MM.  Heart failure with preserved systolic function. A different natural history?.  J Am Coll Cardiol.  2001;38:1277–82.

7. Brutsaert  DL, Sys  SU, Gillebert  TC.  Diastolic failure: pathophysiology and therapeutic implications [published correction appears in J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;22:1272].  J Am Coll Cardiol.  1993;22:318–25.

8. Vasan  RS, Levy  D.  Defining diastolic heart failure: a call for standardized diagnostic criteria.  Circulation.  2000;101:2118–21.

9. Grossman  W.  Defining diastolic dysfunction.  Circulation.  2000;101:2020–1.

10. van Kraaij  DJ, van Pol  PE, Ruiters  AW, de Swart  JB, Lips  DJ, Lencer  N, et al.  Diagnosing diastolic heart failure.  Eur J Heart Fail.  2002;4:419–30.

11. Vasan  RS, Benjamin  EJ, Levy  D.  Prevalence, clinical features and prognosis of diastolic heart failure: an epidemiologic perspective.  J Am Coll Cardiol.  1995;26:1565–74.

12. Kitzman  DW, Gardin  JM, Arnold  A, Gottdiener  JS, Lyles  M, Smith  VE, et al., for the CHS Research Group. .  Heart failure with preserved systolic LV function in the elderly: clinical and echocardiographic correlates from the Cardiovascular Health Study.  Circulation.  1996;94(suppl 1):1–433.

13. Senni  M, Tribouilloy  CM, Rodeheffer  RJ, Jacobsen  SJ, Evans  JM, Bailey  KR, et al.  Congestive heart failure in the community: a study of all incident cases in Olmsted County, Minnesota, in 1991.  Circulation.  1998;98:2282–9.

14. McCullough  PA, Philbin  EF, Spertus  JA, Kaatz  S, Sandberg  KR, Weaver  WD.  Confirmation of a heart failure epidemic: findings from the Resource Utilization Among Congestive Heart Failure (REACH) study.  J Am Coll Cardiol.  2002;39:60–9.

15. Ahmed  A, Nanda  NC, Weaver  MT, Allman  RM, DeLong  JF.  Clinical correlates of isolated left ventricular diastolic dysfunction among hospitalized older heart failure patients.  Am J Geriatr Cardiol.  2003;12:82–9.

16. Kovacs  SJ, Meisner  JS, Yellin  EL.  Modeling of diastole [published correction appears in Cardiol Clin 2000;18:following table of contents].  Cardiol Clin.  2000;18:459–87.

17. Mandinov  L, Eberli  FR, Seiler  C, Hess  OM.  Diastolic heart failure.  Cardiovasc Res.  2000;45:822.

18. Philbin  EF, Hunsberger  S, Garg  R, Lader  E, Thadani  U, McSherry  F, et al., and the Digitalis Investigation Group..  Usefulness of clinical information to distinguish patients with normal from those with low ejection fractions in heart failure.  Am J Cardiol.  2002;89:1218–21.

19. Maisel  AS, McCord  J, Nowak  RM, Hollander  JE, Wu  AH, Duc  P, et al.  Bedside B-type natriuretic peptide in the emergency diagnosis of heart failure with reduced or preserved ejection fraction. Results from the Breathing Not Properly Multinational Study.  J Am Coll Cardiol.  2003;41:2010–7.

20. Naqvi  TZ.  Diastolic function assessment incorporating new techniques in Doppler echocardiography.  Rev Cardiovasc Med.  2003;4:81–99.

21. Appleton  CP, Hatle  LK, Popp  RL.  Relation of transmitral flow velocity patterns to left ventricular diastolic function: new insights from a combined hemodynamic and Doppler echocardiographic study.  J Am Coll Cardiol.  1988;12:426–40.

22. Hunt  SA, Baker  DW, Chin  MH, Cinquegrani  MP, Feldman  AM, Francis  GS, et al.  ACC/AHA guidelines for the evaluation and management of chronic heart failure in the adult: executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.  J Am Coll Cardiol.  2001;38:2101–13.

23. Chen  HH, Lainchbury  JB, Senni  M, Redfield  MM.  Factors influencing survival in patients with diastolic heart failure in Olmsted County, Minn.  Circulation.  2000;102:II412.

24. Angomachalelis  N, Hourzamanis  AI, Sideri  S, Serasli  E, Vamvalis  C.  Improvement of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in hypertensive patients 1 month after ACE inhibition therapy: evaluation by ultrasonic automated boundary detection.  Heart Vessels.  1996;11:303–9.

25. Mitsunami  K, Inoue  S, Maeda  K, Endoh  S, Takahashi  M, Okada  M, et al.  Three-month effects of candesartan cilexetil, an angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonist, on left ventricular mass and hemodynamics in patients with essential hypertension.  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther.  1998;12:469–74.

26. Warner  JG  Jr, Metzger  DC, Kitzman  DW, Wesley  DJ, Little  WC.  Losartan improves exercise tolerance in patients with diastolic dysfunction and a hypertensive response to exercise.  J Am Coll Cardiol.  1999;33:1567–72.

27. Philbin  EF, Rocco  TA  Jr, Lindenmuth  NW, Ulrich  K, Jenkins  PL.  Systolic versus diastolic heart failure in community practice: clinical features, outcomes, and the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors.  Am J Med.  2000;109:605–13.

28. Yusuf  S, Pfeffer  MA, Swedberg  K, Granger  CB, Held  P, McMurray  JJ, et al.  Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and preserved left-ventricular ejection fraction: the CHARM-Preserved Trial.  Lancet.  2003;362:777–81.

29. Pitt  B, Zannad  F, Remme  WJ, Cody  R, Castaigne  A, Perez  A, et al., for the Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study Investigators..  The effect of spironolactone on morbidity and mortality in patients with severe heart failure.  N Engl J Med.  1999;341:709–17.

30. Gutierrez  C, Blanchard  DG.  Diastolic heart failure: challenges of diagnosis and treatment.  Am Fam Physician.  2004;69:2609–16.

31. Cohn  JN, Johnson  G, for the Veterans Administration Cooperative Study Group.  Heart failure with normal ejection fraction. The V-HeFT Study.  Circulation.  1990;81(2 suppl):III48–53.

32. Digitalis Investigation Group.  The effect of digoxin on mortality and morbidity in patients with heart failure.  N Engl J Med.  1997;336:525–33.

Advertisement