Graham Center One-Pager

Family Physicians Help Meet the Emergency Care Needs of Rural America



FREE PREVIEW Log in or buy this issue to read the full article. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles. Subscribe now.


FREE PREVIEW Subscribe or buy this issue. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles.

Am Fam Physician. 2006 Apr 1;73(7):1163.

Ensuring access to emergency care in rural areas remains a challenge. High costs and low patient volumes make 100 percent staffing of rural emergency departments (EDs) by emergency medicine residency-trained physicians (EPs) unlikely. As rurality increases, so does the dependence on family physicians to provide quality emergent care.

Emergency medical services should be organized to meet the needs of the patient population in the most effective manner. Today, with increased specialization in medicine, many different clinicians provide ED care.1,2 The American Academy of Family Physicians reports that 54 percent of its members provide some form of ED care, and 2.5 percent work full-time in ED care.3

Rural hospitals, because of their smaller and less predictable patient volumes, are less likely to staff an ED with EPs.2 However, the American College of Emergency Physicians’ (ACEP’s) policy states that EPs should be the preferred providers of care in every ED.4

Nationwide analysis from the Area Resource File shows the consistent presence of family physicians, and the decline in EPs, per capita with increasing rurality (see accompanying table).5,6 The percentage of counties with an ED but no EPs increases with rurality. Available data do not account for care provided by physicians across counties.

2001 U.S. County-Level Data on ED Workforce by RUCC

RUCC* Number of counties Number per 10,000 persons of: Percentage of counties with an ED but no EPs
FPs EPs ED visits

1

413

2.02

0.63

3,254

9

2

325

2.63

0.65

3,215

12

3

351

2.73

0.63

3,930

12

4

218

2.44

0.50

4,754

12

5

105

3.06

0.55

5,033

17

6

609

2.68

0.29

3,974

43

7

450

3.25

0.33

4,382

50

8

235

1.78

0.23

2,208

28

9

435

2.36

0.15

2,028

40


ED = emergency department; RUCC = rural-urban continuum code; FP = family physician; EP = emergency medicine residency–trained physician.

*—1 indicates most urban and 9 indicates most rural.6

Information from references 5 and 6.

2001 U.S. County-Level Data on ED Workforce by RUCC

View Table

2001 U.S. County-Level Data on ED Workforce by RUCC

RUCC* Number of counties Number per 10,000 persons of: Percentage of counties with an ED but no EPs
FPs EPs ED visits

1

413

2.02

0.63

3,254

9

2

325

2.63

0.65

3,215

12

3

351

2.73

0.63

3,930

12

4

218

2.44

0.50

4,754

12

5

105

3.06

0.55

5,033

17

6

609

2.68

0.29

3,974

43

7

450

3.25

0.33

4,382

50

8

235

1.78

0.23

2,208

28

9

435

2.36

0.15

2,028

40


ED = emergency department; RUCC = rural-urban continuum code; FP = family physician; EP = emergency medicine residency–trained physician.

*—1 indicates most urban and 9 indicates most rural.6

Information from references 5 and 6.

To succeed, ACEP’s position requiring emergency medicine board certification for credentialing in EDs would require an increase in the number of EPs, a means of inducing their practice in rural areas, and the subsidizing of rural EDs to pay for them. More viable options include designing a system of care that meets emergency care needs with a range of clinicians including family physicians, and supporting combined professional efforts to ensure access to high-quality emergent care for rural populations.

note: The information and opinions contained in research from the Graham Center do not necessarily reflect the views or the policy of the AAFP.

Adapted from the Graham Center One-Pager #44. Peterson LE, Bazemore A, Dodoo MS, Phillips RL. Family physicians help meet the emergency care needs of rural America. April 2006. Available online at http://www.graham-center.org. From the Robert Graham Center: Policy Studies in Family Medicine and Primary Care, 1350 Connecticut Ave., NW, Suite 201, Washington, DC 20036 (telephone: 202–331–3360; fax: 202–331–3374;e-mail: policy@aafp.org).

 

REFERENCES

1. Moorhead JC, Gallery ME, Hirshkorn C, Barnaby DP, Barsan WG, Conrad LC, et al. A study of the workforce in emergency medicine: 1999. Ann Emerg Med. 2002;40:3–15.

2. Williamson HA, Rosenblatt RA, Hart LG. Physician staffing of small rural hospital emergency departments: rapid change and escalating cost. J Rural Health. 1992;8:171–7.

3. Practice profile survey. Leawood, Kan.: American Academy of Family Physicians, 2004.

4. Physician credentialing and delineation of clinical privileges in emergency medicine. Policy 400171. Irving, Tex.: American College of Emergency Physicians, 2004.

5. Bureau of Health Professions. Area Resource File 2003.

6. Measuring rurality: rural-urban continuum codes. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, 2004. Accessed online February 13, 2006, at:http://www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/rurality/RuralUrbCon/.


Copyright © 2006 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact afpserv@aafp.org for copyright questions and/or permission requests.

Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions


Article Tools

  • Print page
  • Share this page
  • AFP CME Quiz

Information From Industry

More in Pubmed

Navigate this Article