Radiography After Cervical Spine Injury
Am Fam Physician. 2006 May 15;73(10):1787-1788.
When is radiography indicated for patients with blunt trauma to the cervical spine (C-spine)?
Neck pain caused by blunt trauma from a motor vehicle collision, fall, or other injury is a common occurrence. Many patients who decline ambulance transport after an injury will present to their primary care physician rather than the emergency department. Two clinical rules have been developed and validated to help physicians determine which patients with blunt trauma to the C-spine need radiography to rule out fracture.1–3 The goal is to safely reduce unnecessary radiography without missing clinically significant injuries. Although the clinical rules were validated in the acute emergency department setting, with appropriate training they would be applicable in the outpatient primary care setting as well. A third clinical rule to predict C-spine fractures in patients 65 years or older was developed using a retrospective chart review4; however, it is not included in this article because it was not prospectively validated.
The National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS) low-risk criteria for C-spine radiography in patients with blunt trauma (Table 11) were developed and validated over a 10-year period.1 The largest of these prospective validation studies included 34,069 patients presenting to 21 U.S. health centers with blunt trauma who underwent C-spine radiography.3 Patients who did not have C-spine radiography or who had the test for reasons other than trauma were excluded. The study included a broad range of patients, the age range was one to 101 years, and intoxicated patients were included. The NEXUS criteria correctly identified 810 out of 818 patients (99.0 percent) with C-spine injury and 576 out of 578 patients (99.7 percent) with clinically significant injury. Of the latter two missed injuries, one was described in one report (but not in others) as an “extension teardrop” fracture; the patient refused treatment and was asymptomatic at six weeks. The patient with the second missed injury did not have neck pain but had a fracture at the right lamina of C-6 that eventually required laminectomy and fusion. The patient recovered well.
TABLE 1 NEXUS Low-Risk Criteria for Determining if Radiography Is Indicated After C-spine Injury*
NEXUS Low-Risk Criteria for Determining if Radiography Is Indicated After C-spine Injury*
Radiography is not recommended if a patient meets all of the following criteria:
Absence of tenderness at the posterior midline of the C-spine
Absence of a focal neurologic deficit
Normal level of alertness
No evidence of intoxication
Absence of clinically apparent pain that might distract the patient from the pain of a C-spine injury
NEXUS = National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study; C-spine = cervical spine.
*—For patients one year of age or older (including those who are intoxicated) presenting with blunt trauma to the neck for whom the physician is considering C-spine radiography.
Information from reference 1.
The Canadian C-Spine Rule2 (Figure 15) was prospectively validated in 8,283 Canadian patients; it also was compared to the NEXUS criteria in a large clinical trial.5 This study showed that, compared with the NEXUS criteria, the Canadian C-Spine Rule was more sensitive (99.4 versus 90.7 percent) and more specific (45 versus 37 percent) in its intended population. Although these findings seem to suggest that the Canadian C-Spine Rule is more accurate, there were several possible biases against the NEXUS criteria. The comparison study5 was conducted in the same hospitals and with the same physicians as the original Canadian C-Spine Rule study.2 The comparison study also used different wording for the NEXUS criteria than that used in its original study.1 In addition, about 10 percent of participants in the comparison study were not evaluated using the Canadian C-Spine Rule because physicians were afraid to move the necks of these patients. Finally, the comparison study population was very different from that in the original NEXUS population, which included children and intoxicated patients. The NEXUS criteria are simple to use and have been effective in the intended population; therefore, the NEXUS criteria are still a valuable clinical tool.
Applying the Evidence
A 48-year-old man was bicycling in the country when his front wheel became embedded in loose gravel. He flipped over the handle-bars and landed on his head. The impact was partially absorbed by his arms, and he was wearing a helmet. He now complains of neck and head pain and has tenderness at the posterior midline of the C-spine. He is alert, is not intoxicated, and has no other significant injuries.
Answer: Using the NEXUS criteria, you determine that radiography is recommended because the patient has posterior midline tenderness. Using the Canadian C-Spine Rule, you determine that a bicycle collision or an impact involving an axial load to the head constitutes a dangerous mechanism; therefore, radiography is indicated for this patient.
1. Hoffman JR, Schriger DL, Mower W, Luo JS, Zucker M. Low-risk criteria for cervical-spine radiography in blunt trauma: a prospective study. Ann Emerg Med. 1992;21:1454–60.
2. Stiell IG, Wells GA, Vandemheen KL, Clement CM, Lesiuk H, De Maio VJ, et al. The Canadian C-Spine Rule for radiography in alert and stable trauma patients. JAMA. 2001;286:1841–8.
3. Hoffman JR, Mower WR, Wolfson AB, Todd KH, Zucker MI, for the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study Group. Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma [published correction appears in N Engl J Med 2001;344:464]. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:94–9.
4. Bub LD, Blackmore CC, Mann FA, Lomoschitz FM. Cervical spine fractures in patients 65 years and older: a clinical prediction rule for blunt trauma. Radiology. 2005;234:143–9.
5. Stiell IG, Clement CM, McKnight RD, Brison R, Schull MJ, Rowe BH, et al. The Canadian C-Spine Rule versus the NEXUS low-risk criteria in patients with trauma. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:2510–8.
This guide is one in a series that offers evidence-based tools to assist family physicians in improving their decision making at the point of care.
Copyright © 2006 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact firstname.lastname@example.org for copyright questions and/or permission requests.
Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions