Letters to the Editor - American Family Physician

August 15, 2006 Table of Contents

Letters to the Editor

Diagnostic Criteria for Patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Am Fam Physician.�2006�Aug�15;74(4):557.

to the editor: Drs. Hadley and Gaarder provide a helpful discussion of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) in their article1 in the December 15, 2005, issue of American Family Physician. I would like to add further clarification to two points regarding the diagnosis of IBS. First, although the Rome II diagnostic criteria listed in the article1 are commonly used in discussions of IBS, they have been found to be insensitive for the diagnosis of IBS in clinical practice2 and unreliable for capturing disease fluctuation over time.3 The Manning and Rome I criteria for diagnosis of IBS (see accompanying table) have been subjected to more study and validation.4,5 The presence of three of the six Manning criteria is 63 to 90 percent sensitive and 70 to 93 percent specific for diagnosing IBS if no “red flag” symptoms (weight loss, hematochezia, anemia, fever, or onset of symptoms after 50 years of age) are present.4

Diagnostic Criteria for IBS

Manning criteria
IBS is diagnosed if three of the following are present:
	Abdominal pain
	Pain relief with defecation
	Increased stool frequency with pain
	Looser stools with pain
	Mucus in stools
	Feeling of incomplete evacuation
Rome I criteria
IBS is diagnosed if the following are present:
	At least three months of continuous or recurrent abdominal pain that is relieved with defecation and/or is associated with a change in stool consistency
		Plus, at least two of the following on at least 25 percent of days:
		Altered stool frequency
		Altered stool form or passage
		Passage of mucus
		Bloating or feeling of abdominal distension

IBS = irritable bowel syndrome.

Information from reference 4.

Second, it should be emphasized that IBS is not a “diagnosis of exclusion” that can be applied only after other testing has been exhausted. Rather, IBS can be positively diagnosed and further testing avoided for patients who meet diagnostic criteria (such as Manning or Rome I) and have no red f lag symptoms. This approach is supported by a meta-analysis6 of six studies that found that endoscopy, ultrasonography, and barium studies only detected organic disease in approximately 1 percent of patients who otherwise met IBS diagnostic criteria, and blood counts and chemistries were unhelpful in further clarifying the diagnosis. Proper use of diagnostic criteria for IBS can facilitate more timely diagnosis, avoid needless testing that is unlikely to reveal organic pathology, and facilitate more prompt initiation of a therapeutic relationship and institution of treatment.

WILLIAM E. CAYLEY, JR., M.D. M.DIV.

Eau Claire Family Medicine Residency

University of Wisconsin

Dept. of Family Medicine

207 W. Lincoln

Augusta, WI 54722

REFERENCES

1. Hadley �SK, Gaarder �SM. �Treatment of irritable bowel syndrome. �Am Fam Physician. �2005;72:2501–6.

2. Lea �R, Hopkins �V, Hastleton �J, Houghton �LA, Whorwell �PJ. �Diagnostic criteria for irritable bowel syndrome: utility and applicability in clinical practice. �Digestion. �2004;70:210–3.

3. Williams �RE, Black �CL, Kim �HY, Andrews �EB, Mangel �AW, Buda �JJ, et al. �Stability of irritable bowel syndrome using a Rome II-based classification. �Aliment Pharmacol Ther. �2006;23:197–205.

4. Fass �R, Longstreth �GF, Pimentel �M, Fullerton �S, Russak �SM, Chiou �CF, et al. �Evidence- and consensus-based practice guidelines for the diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome. �Arch Intern Med. �2001;161:2081–8.

5. Longstreth �GF. �Definition and classification of irritable bowel syndrome: current consensus and controversies. �Gastroenterol Clin North Am. �2005;34:173–87.

6. Cash �BD, Schoenfeld �P, Chey �WD. �The utility of diagnostic tests in irritable bowel syndrome patients: a systematic review. �Am J Gastroenterol. �2002;97:2812–9.

editor’s note: This letter was sent to the authors of “Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome,” who declined to reply.

�

Send letters to Kenneth W. Lin, MD, Associate Deputy Editor for AFP Online, e-mail: afplet@aafp.org, or 11400 Tomahawk Creek Pkwy., Leawood, KS 66211-2680.

Please include your complete address, e-mail address, telephone number, and fax number. Letters should be fewer than 500 words and limited to six references, one table or figure, and three authors.

Letters submitted for publication in AFP must not be submitted to any other publication. Possible conflicts of interest must be disclosed at time of submission. Submission of a letter will be construed as granting the American Academy of Family Physicians permission to publish the letter in any of its publications in any form. The editors may edit letters to meet style and space requirements.

Copyright � 2006 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact afpserv@aafp.org for copyright questions and/or permission requests.