Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome: An Emerging Health Risk
Am Fam Physician. 2006 Sep 15;74(6):991-996.
Patient information: See related handout on hemolytic uremic syndrome, written by the author of this article.
Hemolytic uremic syndrome is caused primarily by Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli O157:H7. The most common cause of acute renal failure in children, hemolytic uremic syndrome also can occur in adults. Characteristic features of the syndrome are microangiopathic anemia, thrombotic thrombocytopenia, and renal failure. Although the presentation of this syndrome is diverse, the classic prodromal illness is bloody diarrhea following ingestion of hamburger meat contaminated with E. coli O157:H7, the most common mode of infection in the United States. Children with hemolytic uremic syndrome generally present with gastro-enteritis complaints (e.g., abdominal pain or tenderness, nausea or vomiting, fever, anemia); affected adults may be asymptomatic. Complications from hemolytic uremic syndrome can include intussusception, chronic renal failure, and seizures in severe cases. Because an incubation period of approximately one week occurs between the start of diarrhea and the onset of hemolytic uremic syndrome, physicians should maintain a high index of suspicion; early laboratory testing is important to diagnose and manage this syndrome. Obtaining a complete blood count and stool culture and performing Shiga toxin testing are the first of a series of tests that may help diagnose hemolytic uremic syndrome.
Hemolytic uremic syndrome is the most common cause of acute renal failure in children, and the incidence of this syndrome in children is increasing worldwide.1 First identified in 1955, hemolytic uremic syndrome affects children and adults.2 Attempts to link it to only underdeveloped countries are unsupported because outbreaks occurred in parts of Europe beginning in 1992, the United Kingdom in 1994,3 the United States in 1996,4,5 and Japan in 1996.1,6,7
SORT: KEY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PRACTICE
SORT: KEY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PRACTICE
|Clinical recommendation||Evidence rating||References|
All stools should be cultured for STEC when the index of suspicion is high for Escherichia coli O157:H7.
Do not treat with antibiotics or antidiarrheals while the patient is in the diarrheal stage.
Because hemolytic uremic syndrome is a reportable disease, local public health officials should be notified.
STEC = Shiga toxin–producing E. coli.
A = consistent, good-quality patient-oriented evidence; B = inconsistent or limited-quality patient-oriented evidence; C = consensus, disease-oriented evidence, usual practice, expert opinion, or case series. For information about the SORT evidence rating system, see page 906 or http://www.aafp.org/afpsort.xml.
Hemolytic uremic syndrome can be classified into two types, depending on the presence of a diarrheal prodrome. Diarrhea-positive hemolytic uremic syndrome is associated strongly with Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli (STEC). Diarrhea-negative hemolytic uremic syndrome is seen in adults and occurs sporadically.8 Diarrhea-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome is more common in children. It can be endemic, linked to a common source of infection, and result in bloody diarrhea. Precipitating factors can include familial predisposition (e.g., factor H deficiency),2 infections (e.g., E. coli, Streptococcus pneumoniae), pregnancy, or medications such as cyclosporine (Sandimmune)9 (Table 110). E. coli O157:H7 is responsible for most of the diarrhea-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome in children in North America, but other strains that are more difficult to detect also have been implicated.4–7
TABLE 1 Types and Causes of Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome
Types and Causes of Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome
Infection induced (typical)
Bacteria (e.g., Escherichia coli O157:H7, Streptococcus pneumoniae) or virus
Genetic, drug induced, idiopathic (atypical)
Exposure to toxins (e.g., cyclosporine [Sandimmune], tacrolimus [Prograf], radiation)
Human immunodeficiency virus
Systemic conditions (e.g., lupus, cancer, glomerulonephritis, pregnancy)
Information from reference 10.
The pathophysiology of hemolytic uremic syndrome is not well understood. Proinflammatory (elevated interleukin-8 and tumor necrosis factor Α)1 and prothrombotic changes in the coagulation pathway, along with damage to the endothelial cells, result in end-organ damage.11 Results of the latest studies show damage to mesangial cells, renal tubular epithelial cells, monocytes, and monocytes-derived cell lines in addition to the endothelial cell.1
Most strains of E. coli are harmless; however, enterohemorrhagic E. coli can release Shiga toxins that attach to and damage the endothelial lining of the intestine, resulting in hemorrhagic and ulcerative lesions.2 Subsequently, the Shiga toxins gain access to the circulatory system. By attaching to the Gb3 receptors, protein synthesis is inhibited, resulting in cell injury and death; this causes microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and deposits of microthrombi.1 These ischemic changes manifest as damage to various organs, especially the kidneys.2
E. coli O157:H7 is believed to cause more than 80 percent of the STEC infections that lead to hemolytic uremic syndrome.12 This microorganism is not a normal part of the human intestinal flora13 but is present in the intestines of 1 percent of healthy beef cattle; the meat can become contaminated during the slaughter and processing of the animal. E. coli also has been found to contaminate other food products (Table 2). The most common form of transmission to children in the United States is ingestion of undercooked ground beef containing E. coli bacteria.E. coli bacteria also may be transmitted by contact with persons who inadequately wash their hands, resulting in fecal and oral contamination and transmission.14
TABLE 2 Reported Sources of Shiga Toxin–Producing Escherichia coli
Reported Sources of Shiga Toxin–Producing Escherichia coli
Apple juice/cider, unpasteurized*
Deer meat, undercooked
Goat’s milk, unpasteurized
Ground beef, undercooked*
Meat, cold cooked sliced meat
Sausages, particularly beef, undercooked
Nonchlorinated municipal water supply
Petting farm animals
Unhygienic person-to-person contact
*—Most commonly reported sources.
Hemolytic uremic syndrome primarily occurs in children one to 10 years of age,1,15 with an average annual incidence of one to three cases per 100,000 children9 and a survival rate of nearly 95 percent. Some studies indicate that rural populations are more at risk than urban populations,14,16 and the incidence is higher in warmer months, peaking from June to September.13 Occurrences may be sporadic or present as an outbreak. A study conducted in the United Kingdom, in which confections intentionally were artificially contaminated with E. coli O157:H7, showed that the Shiga toxin–producing strains could survive for as long as one year, depending on storage conditions.17
Three to 15 percent of persons who have STEC with diarrhea can develop hemolytic uremic syndrome.18 Young children and older persons with altered immune response,19 as well as persons who have been in contact with infected farm animals, are particularly vulnerable. In addition to age, risk factors associated with hemolytic uremic syndrome include bloody diarrhea, fever, and elevated white blood cell count and C-reactive protein levels.6 The use of antibiotics or antimotility/antidiarrheal and antimicrobial agents in the early stages of diarrhea has been shown to increase the risk of hemolytic uremic syndrome because the gut is exposed to a greater number of toxins for a longer period as intestinal motility slows.13,20
The classic triad of features for hemolytic uremic syndrome consists of microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and acute renal failure.21–23 Children infected with E. coli O157:H7 are symptomatic; infected adults may be asymptomatic. The incubation period for E. coli O157:H7 is usually three to four days; however, the incubation also can range from just one day to eight days.13 Typical hemolytic uremic syndrome usually develops after a prodrome of diarrhea. Clinical features identifying patients at high risk for hemolytic uremic syndrome are vague and may mimic common gastroenteritis, including bloody diarrhea occurring from three days to more than two weeks before hemolytic uremic syndrome is diagnosed.2 Additional symptoms include nonbloody diarrhea, abdominal cramping, and nausea or vomiting. Fever may be low grade or even absent. Ten percent of cases are associated with rectal prolapse with colitis.2
Hemolytic uremic syndrome cannot be diagnosed without evidence of hemolytic anemia. Hematologic findings include destruction and fragmentation of erythrocytes that result in microangiopathic hemolytic anemia. This develops in all patients within a day or so of contamination and may result in respiratory and cardiovascular compromise. Mean hemoglobin concentration of 6 g per dL (60 g per L) is common and requires red blood cell transfusion.2 Ninety-two percent of patients with hemolytic uremic syndrome develop thrombocytopenia, which results from entrapment of platelets in the organs.2 Clotting times are normal, and petechiae and purpura are uncommon features of hemolytic uremic syndrome.22 Platelet transfusion is not recommended because it could exacerbate the thrombotic process; however, risks and benefits should be considered when platelet transfusion is indicated (e.g., invasive vascular procedure, active bleed).2
Acute renal failure results when micro-thrombi are deposited in kidney parenchyma. This manifests in the form of hypertension associated with oliguria and anuria, which are early signs of acute renal failure.
The central nervous system is another organ system that could become involved. Thirty-three percent of patients with hemolytic uremic syndrome experience neurologic complaints such as irritability, seizures, and altered mental status.2
The differential diagnosis of hemolytic uremic syndrome includes viral or bacterial gastroenteritis, septicemia with disseminated intravascular coagulation, and thrombotic thrombocytopenia (Table 3). Diarrhea or abdominal cramps and absence of fever can be mistaken for inflammatory bowel disease, ischemic colitis, or intussusception. Additionally, abdominal pain and tenderness could mimic appendicitis or an acute abdomen.
TABLE 3 Differential Diagnosis of Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome
Differential Diagnosis of Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome
|Condition||Signs/symptoms differentiating from hemolytic uremic syndrome|
Abdominal pain worsening with time, guarding and rigidity present
Mild abdominal pain, abdominal tenderness, nonpainful defecation
Absence of anemia or thrombocytopenia, pain in right lower quadrant
Afebrile, elevated white blood cell count in stool sample
Disseminated intravascular coagulation
Low fibrinogen level, prolonged prothrombin time, prolonged partial thromboplastin time
Inflammatory bowel disease
Diarrhea or constipation, abdominal pain, nausea, weight loss, high-grade fever
Currant-jelly stool, episodic cramping, abdominal pain
Absence of antiplatelet antibodies, presence of antiphospholipid antibodies
Presence of neurologic abnormalities
Laboratory testing can be used to secure a diagnosis of hemolytic uremic syndrome (Table 4). Findings of hemolysis and thrombocytopenia on a complete blood count are required to establish the diagnosis. Many patients will no longer be shedding STEC by the time the clinical features of hemolytic uremic syndrome begin, but obtaining stool cultures is important because verifying the presence of STEC in patients with this syndrome has significant public health implications. Hemolytic uremic syndrome is a reportable disease; therefore, local public health officials should be notified.23
TABLE 4 Common Laboratory Abnormalities in Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome
Common Laboratory Abnormalities in Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome
Anemia: hemoglobin count of 5 to 9 g per dL (50 to 90 g per L)
Elevated C-reactive protein level
Hematuria on urinalysis
Hemolysis on peripheral smear: burr cells, helmet cells
Increased L-lactate dehydrogenase level
Negative Coombs’ test
Proteinuria on urinalysis
Reticulocyte count moderately elevated
Stool culture positive for Shiga toxin–roducing Escherichia coli O157:H7
Thrombocytopenia: platelet count less than 50,000 per mm3
Typical hemolytic uremic syndrome is a self-limiting disease with spontaneous recovery, although close monitoring and treatment of symptoms are essential. Because hemolytic uremic syndrome has a wide spectrum of presentations, supportive therapy (e.g., good nutrition, close monitoring of fluid and electrolyte status) is crucial for a good outcome. Recent studies indicate that the amount of parenteral hydration given to a patient before the development of hemolytic uremic syndrome, especially the amount of sodium, is crucial in preventing anuria and, ultimately, dialysis.11
Strict fluid balance monitoring is important in detecting early renal failure. If failure develops, it should be handled aggressively24 by starting renal replacement therapy (e.g., peritoneal dialysis, hemodialysis).15 Hypertension is treated traditionally with antihypertensives and diet.
Antibiotics and antimotility agents are not recommended as treatments for hemolytic uremic syndrome during the diarrheal stage of the disease. Studies of antibiotic usage in children with E. coli O157:H7 infections show an increased risk of complications from hemolytic uremic syndrome.25,26 One study reported that using antibiotics to treat children testing positive forE. coli O157:H7 increased their risk of developing hemolytic uremic syndrome.26 Additionally, some children who were diagnosed with Shigella dysenteriae type 1 and treated with ampicillin developed hemolytic uremic syndrome.25
Serial monitoring of the hematocrit and platelet count is important. Currently, platelet transfusion is controversial because it can worsen the thrombotic process.27 However, transfusion of red blood cells may be needed to aggressively correct anemia, which can deteriorate the patient’s condition and further complicate the picture by causing respiratory and cardiovascular compromise.
Modalities such as plasmapheresis, anti-thrombotic agents, steroids, and Shiga toxin–binding agents have proved ineffective and remain controversial.
Complications of hemolytic uremic syndrome can involve the renal, gastrointestinal, or neurologic systems (Table 5). The most severe renal complication is chronic renal failure. Approximately 12 percent of patients who contract hemolytic uremic syndrome either develop end-stage renal disease or die.28 Additional complications include hypertension, proteinuria, and renal impairment. However, extra-renal complications such as pancreatitis (which may lead to diabetes), cerebral involvement, cardiomyopathy, and gastrointestinal involvement also may occur.
TABLE 5 Common Complications Associated with Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome
Common Complications Associated with Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome
Altered mental status
Focal neurologic signs
Chronic renal failure
Approximately 10 percent of patients with hemolytic uremic syndrome develop central nervous system problems and subsequent coma, hemiparesis, or stroke.27,28 In one review of 49 hemolytic uremic syndrome studies, investigators found that of 3,476 patients with diarrhea-positive hemolytic uremic syndrome, 313 (9 percent) died, 104 (3 percent) developed end-stage renal disease, and 869 (25 percent) exhibited renal sequelae.28 Neurologic involvement correlates highly with a fatal outcome.29
Infection-induced hemolytic uremic syndrome presents with a diarrheal prodrome and has a good prognosis. The average length of hospital stay in children is 11 days, with a range of one to 388 days.12 Genetic, drug-induced, or idiopathic hemolytic uremic syndrome is heterogeneous, is not preceded by diarrhea, and has a poor prognosis, with incomplete recovery in most cases. Currently, the mortality rate for all patients with hemolytic uremic syndrome is less than 10 percent.30
1. Andreoli SP. The pathophysiology of the hemolytic uremic syndrome. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 1999;8:459–64.
2. Walker WA. Pediatric Gastrointestinal Disease: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, Management. 4th ed. Hamilton, Ont.: BC Decker, 2004.
3. Green DA, Murphy WG, Uttley WS. Haemolytic uraemic syndrome: prognostic factors. Clin Lab Haematol. 2000;22:11–4.
4. Cody SH, Glynn MK, Farrar JA, Cairns KL, Griffin PM, Kobayashi J, et al. An outbreak ofEscherichia coli O157: H7 infection from unpasteurized commercial apple juice. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:202–9.
5. Hilborn ED, Mshar PA, Fiorentino TR, Dembek ZF, Barrett TJ, Howard RT, et al. An outbreak of Escherichia coli O157:H7 infections and haemolytic uraemic syndrome associated with consumption of unpasteurized apple cider. Epidemiol Infect. 2000;124:31–6.
6. Kawamura N, Yamazaki T, Tamai H. Risk factors for the development of Escherichia coli O157:H7 associated with hemolytic uremic syndrome. Pediatr Int. 1999;41:218–22.
7. Fukushima H, Hashizume T, Morita Y, Tanaka J, Azuma K, Mizumoto Y, et al. Clinical experiences in Sakai City Hospital during the massive outbreak of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157 infections in Sakai City, 1996. Pediatr Int. 1999;41:213–7.
8. Zipfel PF, Neuman HP, Jozsi M. Genetic screening in haemolytic uraemic syndrome. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2003;12:653–7.
9. Index of suspicion.. Pediatr Rev. 2002;23:433–8.
10. Liu J, Hutzler M, Li C, Pechet L. Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) and hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS): the new thinking. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2001;11:261–72.
11. Thorpe CM. Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;38:1298–303.
12. Banatvala N, Griffin PM, Greene KD, Barrett TJ, Bibb WF, Green JH, et al. The United States national prospective hemolytic uremic syndrome study: microbiologic, serologic, clinical, and epidemiologic findings. J Infect Dis. 2001;183:1063–70.
13. Boyce TG, Swerdlow DL, Griffin PM. Escherichia coli O157:H7 and the hemolytic-uremic syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:364–8.
14. Crump JA, Sulka AC, Langer AJ, Schaben C, Crielly AS, Gage R, et al. An outbreak of Escherichia coli O157:H7 infections among visitors to a dairy farm. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:555–60.
15. Andreoli SP. Acute renal failure. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2002;14:183–8.
16. Haack JP, Jelacic S, Besser TE, Weinberger E, Kirk DJ, McKee GL, et al. Escherichia coli O157 exposure in Wyoming and Seattle: serologic evidence of rural risk. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9:1226–31.
17. Baylis CL, MacPhee S, Robinson AJ, Griffiths R, Lilley K, Betts RP. Survival ofEscherichia coli O157:H7, O111: H- and O26:H11 in artificially contaminated chocolate and confectionery products. Int J Food Microbiol. 2004;96:35–48.
18. Chang HG, Tserenpuntsag B, Kacica M, Smith PF, Morse DL. Hemolytic uremic syndrome incidence in New York. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10:928–31.
19. Westerholt S, Peiper AK, Griebel M, Volk HD, Hartung T, Oberhoffer R. Characterization of the cytokine immune response in children who have experienced an episode of typical hemolytic uremic syndrome. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2003;10:1090–5.
20. Slutsker L, Ries AA, Maloney K, Wells JG, Greene KD, Griffin PM. A nationwide case-control study of Escherichia coli O157:H7 infection in the United States. J Infect Dis. 1998;177:962–6.
21. American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Infectious Diseases. Red Book: 2003 report of the committee on infectious diseases. 26th ed. Elk Grove Village, Ill.: American Academy of Pediatrics, 2003.
22. Neild GH. Haemolyticuraemic syndrome in practice [Published correction appears in Lancet 1994;343:552]. Lancet. 1994;343:398–401.
23. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Summary of notifiable diseases, United States, 1996. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1997;45:1–87.
24. D’Souza IE, Phadke KD, Subba Rao SD. Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. Indian Pediatr. 2002;39:162–7.
25. Bin Saeed AA, El Bushra HE, Al-Hamdan NA. Does treatment of bloody diarrhea due to Shigella dysenteriae type 1 with ampicillin precipitate hemolytic uremic syndrome?. Emerg Infect Dis. 1995;1:134–7.
26. Wong CS, Jelacic S, Habeeb RL, Watkins SL, Tarr PI. The risk of the hemolytic-uremic syndrome after treatment of Escherichia coli O157:H7 infections. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1930–6.
27. Tarr PI, Gordon CA, Chandler WL. Shiga-toxin-producing Escherichia coli and haemolytic uraemic syndrome. Lancet. 2005;365:1073–86.
28. Garg AX, Suri RS, Barrowman N, Rehman F, Matsell D, Rosas-Arellano MP, et al. Long-term renal prognosis of diarrhea-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. JAMA. 2003;290:1360–70.
29. Gerber A, Karch H, Allerberger F, Verweyen HM, Zimmerhackl LB. Clinical course and the role of shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli infection in the hemolytic-uremic syndrome in pediatric patients, 1997–2000, in Germany and Austria: a prospective study. J Infect Dis. 2002;186:493–500.
30. Siegler RL, Pavia AT, Christofferson RD, Milligan MK. A 20-year population-based study of postdiarrheal hemolytic uremic syndrome in Utah. Pediatrics. 1994;94:35–40.
Copyright © 2006 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact email@example.com for copyright questions and/or permission requests.
Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions