Tips from Other Journals

Advantages of Providing a Year's Supply of Oral Contraception



FREE PREVIEW Log in or buy this issue to read the full article. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles. Subscribe now.


FREE PREVIEW Subscribe or buy this issue. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles.

Am Fam Physician. 2007 Mar 15;75(6):907-908.

Background: Almost 12 million U.S. women use oral contraceptive (OC) pills as their primary method of birth control, but up to 8 percent are estimated to experience a contraceptive failure in their first year. Breaks in continuity of supply of OCs (“running out of pills” for any reason) was one of the top three reasons for contraceptive failure in a small study; however, this topic has not been extensively studied. Most women are provided with a 30-day supply, requiring monthly refilling of OC prescriptions. In addition, many health plans restrict medications to a 30-day supply on a single prescription. Foster and colleagues studied the implications of providing one year's supply (13 cycles) at a contraceptive consultation.

The Study: The authors studied data from a program that provides reproductive health services to more than 1.5 million low-income California residents per year. The program provided OCs to 82,319 women in January 2003. For these women, the researchers monitored use of services such as physician office visits, testing for sexually transmitted infections, pregnancy tests, and Papanicolaou (Pap) screening throughout 2003. Financial and demographic information was also gathered on participants. Most women (63 percent) were prescribed three cycles of OCs at the initial study contraceptive visit, but 16 percent were prescribed one cycle and 7 percent received prescriptions for 13 cycles. Teenagers were twice as likely as women in their 30s and 40s to receive 13 cycles (8 compared with 4 and 3 percent, respectively). The rates of prescribing 13 cycles also varied significantly by race, with 4 percent for black women, 8 percent for Hispanic women, and 12 percent for white women. New patients were twice as likely to be prescribed 13 cycles as established patients (12 compared with 6 percent).

Results: Women who received prescriptions for 13 cycles were significantly more likely to still be receiving OCs 15 months after the initial prescription. At the 15-month follow-up, 43 percent of women who received prescriptions for 13 cycles had obtained sufficient pills for at least one year of continuous use compared with 22 percent of women given prescriptions for three months and 20 percent of those initially prescribed one month's supply. The rates of pill wastage were higher in women prescribed 13 cycles than in those prescribed three cycles (6.5 percent of cycles dispensed wasted compared with 2.0 percent), but the women initially prescribed 13 cycles completed an average of 14.5 cycles during the study compared with 9.0 cycles completed by women initially prescribed three months' supply. Despite having significantly fewer physician visits, a significantly higher percentage of women prescribed 13 cycles had Pap smears and chlamydia tests during the study. The program calculated an average saving of about $99 per patient for women prescribed 13 cycles compared with those prescribed three cycles (see accompanying table).

Use of Family PACT Services in 2003, by Initial Dispensing Quantity

3 cycles (P) 13 cycles (P)

Percentage receiving a Papanicolaou test

57

74

Percentage younger than 26 years receiving a chlamydia test (n = 44,717)

56

69

Percentage receiving a pregnancy test

46

25

Average number of pregnancy tests*†

2.2 (Reference)

1.4 (< .001)

Average number of total encounters†

5.9 (Reference)

2.2 (< .001)

Average number of clinician encounters†

3.1 (Reference)

2.1 (< .001)

Average number of pharmacy encounters†

2.8 (Reference)

0.1 (< .001)

Average program reimbursement ($)†

478 (Reference)

379 (< .001)


PACT = Planning, Access, Care, and Treatment.

note:Study population was 82,319 women who received pills through Family PACT program in January 2003.

*Among those with at least one pregnancy test.

Differences tested using analysis of variance with reference group three cycles dispensed.

Adapted with permission from Foster DG, Parvataneni R, de Bocanegra HT, Lewis C, Bradsberry M, and Darney P. Number of oral contraceptive pill packages dispensed, method continuation, and costs. Obstet Gynecol November 2006;108:1112.

Use of Family PACT Services in 2003, by Initial Dispensing Quantity

View Table

Use of Family PACT Services in 2003, by Initial Dispensing Quantity

3 cycles (P) 13 cycles (P)

Percentage receiving a Papanicolaou test

57

74

Percentage younger than 26 years receiving a chlamydia test (n = 44,717)

56

69

Percentage receiving a pregnancy test

46

25

Average number of pregnancy tests*†

2.2 (Reference)

1.4 (< .001)

Average number of total encounters†

5.9 (Reference)

2.2 (< .001)

Average number of clinician encounters†

3.1 (Reference)

2.1 (< .001)

Average number of pharmacy encounters†

2.8 (Reference)

0.1 (< .001)

Average program reimbursement ($)†

478 (Reference)

379 (< .001)


PACT = Planning, Access, Care, and Treatment.

note:Study population was 82,319 women who received pills through Family PACT program in January 2003.

*Among those with at least one pregnancy test.

Differences tested using analysis of variance with reference group three cycles dispensed.

Adapted with permission from Foster DG, Parvataneni R, de Bocanegra HT, Lewis C, Bradsberry M, and Darney P. Number of oral contraceptive pill packages dispensed, method continuation, and costs. Obstet Gynecol November 2006;108:1112.

Conclusion: The authors conclude that prescribing a one-year supply of OCs contributes to more continuous use and lower costs than limiting prescriptions to a three-month or a one-month supply.

Source

Foster DG, et al. Number of oral contraceptive pill packages dispensed, method continuation, and costs. Obstet Gynecol. November 2006;108:1107–14.


Copyright © 2007 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact afpserv@aafp.org for copyright questions and/or permission requests.

Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions


Article Tools

  • Print page
  • Share this page
  • AFP CME Quiz

Information From Industry

Navigate this Article