FPIN's Clinical Inquiries

Angiotensin Blockade in Patients with Diabetic Nephropathy



FREE PREVIEW Log in or buy this issue to read the full article. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles. Subscribe now.


FREE PREVIEW Subscribe or buy this issue. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles.

Am Fam Physician. 2007 Aug 1;76(3):423-424.

Clinical Question

What type of angiotensin blockade is preferred in patients with diabetic nephropathy?

Evidence-Based Answer

When used to delay the progression of early nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are not superior to angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. (Strength of Recommendation: C, multiple randomized controlled trials [RCTs]).

Evidence Summary

A multicenter, double-blind trial called the Diabetics Exposed to Telmisartan and Enalapril (DETAIL) study randomized 250 patients with type 2 diabetes and early nephropathy to receive telmisartan (Micardis; 120 persons) or enalapril (Vasotec; 130 persons). The study followed the patients for five years. The primary outcome, which was change in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) from the baseline value to the last available value during the study period, was not significantly different between the two groups. The mean GFR declined by 17.5 mL per min per 1.73 m2 in the telmisartan group compared with 15.0 mL per min per 1.73 m2 in the enalapril group (treatment difference: −2.6 mL per min per 1.73 m2 ; 95% confidence interval [CI], −7.1 to 2.0 mL per min per 1.73 m2).1

An earlier multicenter, double-blind, one-year trial comparing the effects of losartan (Cozaar) and enalapril on kidney function randomized 103 patients with type 2 diabetes and early nephropathy to receive losartan (52 persons) or enalapril (51 persons). The primary outcome was change of urine albumin excretion (UAE) from baseline to week 52. Although UAE decreased in both groups, the reduction was not significantly different between the two groups.2

Most recently, a study on stabilization and regression of albuminuria in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes randomized 42 patients with normal renal function or early nephropathy to valsartan (Diovan; 22 persons) or enalapril (20 persons) for one year. The primary outcome was the change of UAE from baseline to week 52. The absolute difference in decrease of UAE between the two treatment groups was 1 percent, which was not statistically or clinically significant. The sample size required for clinical relevance was calculated at 20 patients in each group.3

These are the only trials that have directly compared an angiotensin-II receptor blocker with an ACE inhibitor in persons with type 2 diabetes and early nephropathy. In all three studies, the patients had an age range of 30 to 80 years, mild to moderate hypertension, and were allowed to be on additional antihypertensive agents with the exception of ACE inhibitors, ARBs, and dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers. All three studies had sufficient numbers of persons to achieve a power of at least 80 percent.

Adverse events in the ACE inhibitor and ARB groups were similar; however, one study found that the ACE inhibitor group was associated with a significantly higher incidence of cough (number needed to harm = 7,P = .006). In the DETAIL study, telmisartan and enalapril were associated with similar incidence of end-stage renal disease, myocardial infarction, stroke, congestive heart failure, and all-cause mortality1 ; these events were not studied in the other two trials.2,3 In other RCTs and systematic reviews, the survival benefit (mainly from cardiovascular events) is better substantiated in ACE inhibitors than ARBs.48

Recommendations from Others

The American Diabetes Association recommends using ACE inhibitors or ARBs for the treatment of early nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, regardless of the presence of hypertension, to delay the progression of microalbuminuria.9

Clinical Commentary

From an effectiveness standpoint, ARBs have not been shown to be superior to ACE inhibitors for prevention of diabetic nephropathy. Because of the availability of generic versions, ACE inhibitors have a lower cost and, therefore, should be favored for this indication. In addition to managing diabetes, other compelling indications for ACE inhibitors include managing chronic kidney disease and congestive heart failure.

The side effect profile for ACE inhibitors is similar to that of ARBs. However, for reasons that are not entirely clear, some patients will develop a cough when taking an ACE inhibitor. In general, ARBs should be reserved for use when ACE inhibitors cannot be tolerated because of cough.

Address correspondence by e-mail to Julio Jimenez, MD, juljimen@hotmail.com. Reprints are not available from the authors.

Author disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Copyright Family Physicians Inquiries Network. Used with permission.

 

REFERENCES

1. Barnett AH, Bain SC, Bouter P, Karlbeg B, Madsbad S, Jervell J, et al., for the Diabetics Exposed to Telmisartan and Enalapril Study Group. Angiotensin-receptor blockade versus converting-enzyme inhibition in type 2 diabetes and nephropathy [Published correction appears in N Engl J Med 2005;352:1731]. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1952–61.

2. Lacourcière Y, Belanger A, Godin C, Halle JP, Ross S, Wright N, et al. Long-term comparison of losartan and enalapril on kidney function in hypertensive type 2 diabetics with early nephropathy. Kidney Int. 2000;58:762–9.

3. Ko GT, Tsang CC, Chan HC. Stabilization and regression of albuminuria in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes: a one-year randomized study of valsartan versus enalapril. Adv Ther. 2005;22:155–62.

4. Effects of ramipril on cardiovascular and microvascular outcomes in people with diabetes mellitus: results of the HOPE study and MICRO-HOPE substudy. Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators [Published correction appears in Lancet 2000;356:860]. Lancet 2000;355:253–9.

5. Strippoli GF, Craig MC, Schena FP, Craig JC. Role of blood pressure targets and specific antihypertensive agents used to prevent diabetic nephropathy and delay its progression. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17(4 suppl 2)S153–5.

6. Strippoli GF, Craig M, Deeks JJ, Schena FP, Craig JC. Effects of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor antagonists on mortality and renal outcomes in diabetic nephropathy: systematic review. BMJ. 2004;329:828–39.

7. Brenner BM, Cooper ME, de Zeeuw D, Keane WF, Mitch WE, Parving HH, et al., for the RENAAL Study Investigators. Effects of losartan on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:861–9.

8. Forman BH, Chambliss ML. Clinical inquiries. Are ARBs or ACE inhibitors preferred for nephropathy in diabetes?. J Fam Pract. 2004;53:241–2.

9. Molitch ME, DeFronzo RA, Franz MJ, Keane WF, Mogensen CE, Parving HH, et al., for the American Diabetes Association. Nephropathy in diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(suppl 1)S79–83.

Clinical Inquiries provides answers to questions submitted by practicing family physicians to the Family Physicians Inquiries Network (FPIN). Members of the network select questions based on their relevance to family medicine. Answers are drawn from an approved set of evidence-based resources and undergo peer review. The strength of recommendations and the level of evidence for individual studies are rated using criteria developed by the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group ( http://www.cebm.net/levels_of_evidence.asp).

The complete database of evidence-based questions and answers is copyrighted by FPIN. If interested in submitting questions or writing answers for this series, go to http://www.fpin.org or e-mail: questions@fpin.org.


Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions


Article Tools

  • Print page
  • Share this page
  • AFP CME Quiz

Information From Industry

More in Pubmed

Navigate this Article