Letters to the Editor
Preconception Care Should Be Vital Issue for Both Sexes
FREE PREVIEW Log in or buy this issue to read the full article. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles. Subscribe now.
FREE PREVIEW Subscribe or buy this issue. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles.
Am Fam Physician. 2009 Feb 1;79(3):online.
I would like to make two additional points on this topic. First, Dr. Lu addressed the importance of women of reproductive age avoiding teratogenic agents because of their potential effects on the fetus. However, many women currently work under potentially hazardous conditions but are afraid to voice their complaints. Primary care physicians must advocate for them. Some medical offices with radiography equipment are not checking Geiger counters or making staff aware of radiation exposure.1 We must screen our patients for these workplace hazards and violations, and also help them to reduce the risks by contacting the Occupational Safety and Health Administration and other authorities.
Second, I disagree with the author's assertion that the components of preconception care for men are not as well defined. This appears to be based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's definition of preconception care as “a set of interventions that aim to identify and modify biomedical, behavioral, and social risks to a woman's health or pregnancy outcome through prevention and management.”2 It would be a mistake to believe that these risk factors affect only women. The man should be viewed as half of the equation. Men contribute financial resources and psychosocial support, and should be educated about the negative effects of sexually transmitted diseases on the health of his spouse and the fetus.3 It is also important for men to understand the potential impact of stress and anxiety on pregnancy outcomes.4,5 Finally, getting potential fathers involved in preconception care may encourage them to take more responsibility for the health and well–being of their partners and children.
1. McDiarmid MA, Gehle K. Preconception brief: occupational/environmental exposures. Matern Child Health J. 2006;10(5 suppl):S123–S128.
2. Johnson K, Posner SF, Biermann J, et al., for the CDC/ATSDR Preconception Care Work Group and Select Panel on Preconception Care. Recommendations to improve preconception health and health care—United States. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2006;55(RR-6):1–23.
3. Giacomini G, Bianchi G, Moretti D. Detection of sexually transmitted diseases by urethral cytology, the ignored male counterpart of cervical cytology. Acta Cytol. 1989;33(1):11–15.
4. Rice F, Jones I, Thapar A. The impact of gestational stress and prenatal growth on emotional problems in offspring: a review. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2007;115(3):171–183.
5. Talge NM, Neal C, Glover V. Antenatal maternal stress and long-term effects on child neurodevelopment: how and why? J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2007;48(3–4):245–261.
in reply: I appreciate Dr. Harding-Marin's response, which calls attention to two important issues in preconception care. First, I agree wholeheartedly that “we must screen our patients for these workplace hazards and violations, and also help them to reduce the risks.” However, we must first educate ourselves. Many physicians are not aware of worker rights under the Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Act.1 Workers have the right to a safe workplace free from recognized reproductive hazards. Under the OSH Act's Hazard Communication Standard, employees have the right to know what they are being exposed to by requesting a Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS). An employer who does not provide MSDSs when asked or retaliates against an employee for requesting an MSDS is breaking the law. Physicians need to review the MSDSs with their patients, or refer them to their local Teratogen Information Service for counseling.2 I agree with Dr. Harding-Marin that physicians have a moral responsibility to report workplace hazards and violations by contacting the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and other authorities.
Second, I also concur that preconception care should be a vital issue for both sexes. Men contribute about one half of the baby's genetic materials. Their sperm DNA can get damaged in many ways,3 including exposures to tobacco, alcohol, drugs (e.g., anabolic steroids), caffeine, poor diet, radiation and chemotherapy, and testicular hyperthermia. Medical conditions such as diabetes mellitus, varicoceles, and epididymitis, if left untreated, can also reduce sperm count and quality. A growing number of xenobiotics, including 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane, nonylphenol, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), dioxins, phthalates and acrylamide, have been shown to cause oxidative stress and DNA damage to the sperm. Such damage can result in infertility and subfertility, spontaneous abortions, birth defects, or even childhood cancers. Men also contribute financial resources and psychosocial support, and their preparation for fatherhood should begin with preconception care.
Unfortunately, the content of preconception care for men is still much less defined than that for women. This is why my colleagues and I wrote a concept paper on clinical content of preconception care for men for the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.4 We identified 10 major components for risk screening, health promotion, and clinical and psychosocial interventions: (1) reproductive life plan and history; (2) medical history, including current medication use; (3) infections, inflammation, and immunizations; (4) family history and genetic risks; (5) behavioral and psychosocial risks; (6) mental health and stress resilience; (7) healthy weight and nutrition; (8) avoidance of harmful exposures; (9) partner and parenting support; and (10) physical assessment including laboratory testing. It was not our intention to propose a complete and final model, but rather to start a much needed dialogue on the content of preconception care for men. Given family physicians' unique relationships with the whole family, your voices need to be heard in this dialogue. Let the dialogue begin.
1. U.S. Department of Labor. Occupational Safety & Health Administration. Reproductive hazards. http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/reproductivehazards/index.html. Accessed July 30, 2008.
2. Organization of Teratology Information Specialists. Find a teratogen information service. http://otispregnancy.org/otis_find_a_tis.asp. Accessed July 30, 2008.
3. Aitken RJ, Koopman P, Lewis SE. Seeds of concern. Nature. 2004;432(7013):48–52.
4. Frey KA, Navarro SM, Kotelchuck M, Lu MC. The clinical content of preconception care: preconception care for men. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008[In press].
Send letters to Kenneth W. Lin, MD, MPH, Associate Deputy Editor for AFP Online, e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org, or 11400 Tomahawk Creek Pkwy., Leawood, KS 66211-2680.
Please include your complete address, e-mail address, and telephone number. Letters should be fewer than 400 words and limited to six references, one table or figure, and three authors.
Letters submitted for publication in AFP must not be submitted to any other publication. Possible conflicts of interest must be disclosed at time of submission. Submission of a letter will be construed as granting the American Academy of Family Physicians permission to publish the letter in any of its publications in any form. The editors may edit letters to meet style and space requirements.
Copyright © 2009 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact email@example.com for copyright questions and/or permission requests.
Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions