Helping Patients Who Drink Too Much: An Evidence-Based Guide for Primary Care Physicians



FREE PREVIEW Log in or buy this issue to read the full article. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles. Subscribe now.


FREE PREVIEW Subscribe or buy this issue. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles.

Am Fam Physician. 2009 Jul 1;80(1):44-50.

  Patient information: See related handout on alcohol abuse.

  Related Editorial

Excessive alcohol consumption is a leading cause of preventable morbidity and mortality, but few heavy drinkers receive treatment. Primary care physicians are in a position to address heavy drinking and alcohol use disorders with patients, and can do so quickly and effectively. The National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism has published a guide for physicians that offers an evidence-based approach to screening, assessing, and treating alcohol use disorders in general health care settings. Screening can be performed by asking patients how many heavy drinking days they have per week. Assessing patients' willingness to change their drinking behaviors can guide treatment. Treatment recommendations should be presented in a clear, nonjudgmental way. Patients who are not alcohol-dependent may opt to reduce drinking to lower risk levels. Patients with alcohol dependence should receive pharmacotherapy and brief behavioral support, as well as disease management for chronic relapsing dependence. All patients with alcohol dependence should be encouraged to participate in community support groups.

Nearly one third of U.S. adults drink enough to cause or place them at risk of adverse consequences.1 In 2000, excessive alcohol use led to 85,000 premature deaths in the United States.2 This was the third leading cause of death from modifiable factors after tobacco use, and poor diet and physical inactivity.

Almost one third of U.S. adults meet the criteria for an alcohol use disorder at some point in their life.3 The chances of developing an alcohol use disorder of abuse or dependence, or a physical illness such as liver disease, increase the more a person drinks per day and the more days he or she drinks per week.4 The National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) recommends that men younger than 65 years drink no more than four drinks per day and no more than 14 drinks per week. The recommended limits for women of any age and for men 65 years and older are no more than three drinks per day and no more than seven drinks per week. “Heavy drinking” refers to amounts in excess of daily limits.

Persons who engage in heavy drinking have a greater risk of injuries, physical disorders, and psychiatric disorders. However, only about 13 percent of persons with alcohol dependence receive specialized addiction treatment, and only 24 percent seek any kind of help.5 Only the most severely dependent drinkers attend alcohol rehabilitation programs.6 For those who do, there is a 10-year gap between the onset of the disorder (21 years of age, on average) and first treatment.3

Primary care physicians are often the only medical professionals that an at-risk drinker will encounter, placing them in a prime position to help prevent premature morbidity and mortality from alcohol use. Physicians seldom identify or adequately address patients' drinking. A study of care quality in primary care practices found that patients with alcohol dependence received only 11 percent of the recommended care.7

In 2005, after recognizing this discrepancy in care, the NIAAA revised its physician's guide, “Helping Patients Who Drink Too Much.”8 This free publication, which was updated in 2007, is available from the NIAAA Web site at http://www.niaaa.nih.gov/guide. The guide provides evidence-based recommendations presented in an easy-to-use format for busy physicians. It addresses screening for alcohol use disorders, assessing at-risk patients, and managing the care of heavy drinkers in primary care and general mental health settings. It also includes “A Pocket Guide for Alcohol Screening and Brief Intervention.” Additionally, the NIAAA has developed training programs with continuing education credit, including an animated slide show and an interactive, online program with video case scenarios. All programs are available on the NIAAA Web site.

SORT: KEY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Clinical recommendation Evidence rating References Comments

Physicians should screen adult patients for at-risk drinking.

B

13

USPSTF B recommendation based on multiple RCTs

Physicians should provide brief counseling for at-risk drinkers.

B

13

USPSTF B recommendation based on multiple RCTs and meta-analyses

Pharmacotherapy with medical management is recommended for treatment of alcohol dependence.

A

10, 1619

Consistent findings from multiple RCTs10,18,19 and meta-analyses16,17

Patients with alcohol dependence should be referred for specialized alcohol counseling.

A

20

Consistent findings from multiple RCTs

Patients with chronic alcohol dependence and serious medical complications should receive ongoing care management.

B

2527

Findings from one RCT,26 a quasi-experimental study,27 and an observational study25


RCT = randomized controlled trial; USPSTF = U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

A = consistent, good-quality patient-oriented evidence; B = inconsistent or limited-quality patient-oriented evidence; C = consensus, disease-oriented evidence, usual practice, expert opinion, or case series. For information about the SORT evidence rating system, go to http://www.aafp.org/afpsort.xml.

SORT: KEY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PRACTICE

View Table

SORT: KEY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Clinical recommendation Evidence rating References Comments

Physicians should screen adult patients for at-risk drinking.

B

13

USPSTF B recommendation based on multiple RCTs

Physicians should provide brief counseling for at-risk drinkers.

B

13

USPSTF B recommendation based on multiple RCTs and meta-analyses

Pharmacotherapy with medical management is recommended for treatment of alcohol dependence.

A

10, 1619

Consistent findings from multiple RCTs10,18,19 and meta-analyses16,17

Patients with alcohol dependence should be referred for specialized alcohol counseling.

A

20

Consistent findings from multiple RCTs

Patients with chronic alcohol dependence and serious medical complications should receive ongoing care management.

B

2527

Findings from one RCT,26 a quasi-experimental study,27 and an observational study25


RCT = randomized controlled trial; USPSTF = U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

A = consistent, good-quality patient-oriented evidence; B = inconsistent or limited-quality patient-oriented evidence; C = consensus, disease-oriented evidence, usual practice, expert opinion, or case series. For information about the SORT evidence rating system, go to http://www.aafp.org/afpsort.xml.

Many primary care physicians are familiar with counseling at-risk drinkers, but choose to refer patients with alcohol use disorders to specialized rehabilitation programs. However, patients with alcohol dependence often refuse a referral because their health insurance does not cover it or because the treatment program is too far away. Even if patients accept a referral and complete a rehabilitation program, about one third will not respond to treatment.9 The NIAAA guide offers detailed assistance for physicians to effectively treat these patients. It includes a user-friendly program that combines medication with a disease-management approach that was shown in recent research to be as effective as specialized alcohol counseling.10

This article provides a brief overview of the NIAAA guide. Ultimately, primary care physicians must play a larger role in identifying alcohol use disorders and making treatment accessible to those who need it.

Clinical Approach

Alcohol use occurs along a continuum, as shown in Table 18 and Figure 1. Appropriate treatment should be applied based on the severity of the patient's drinking. The NIAAA guide focuses on two groups: at-risk drinkers (i.e., those who exceed recommended maximum daily levels of drinking but do not have drinking-related symptoms), and drinkers with an alcohol use disorder (i.e., those who meet diagnostic criteria for alcohol abuse or dependence). A summary of the clinical approach to screening, assessment, and treatment of at-risk drinking and alcohol use disorders is shown in Figure 2.8

Table 1.

Characteristics of Drinking Behaviors by Drinking Category

Drinking category Percentage of U.S. adults in 2001–2002 Drinking pattern Number of DSM-IV-TR criteria met Degree of disability Treatment

Abstinent or low-risk drinking

70

Less than the NIAAA limits*

None

None

Health promotion

At-risk drinking

21

Above the NIAAA daily limits 12 or more times per year

Zero to two dependence criteria

None

Brief counseling

Harmful drinking

5

Monthly to daily drinking above the NIAAA limits

Zero to two dependence criteria; zero to one abuse criteria

Limited

Brief counseling, addiction-focused behavior therapy

Dependent drinking

3

Six to 10 drinks per day; every day or nearly every day

Three to five dependence criteria; zero to one abuse criteria

Mild to moderate

Behavioral and pharmacologic treatment

Chronic dependent drinking

1

10 or more drinks per day; every day or nearly every day

Six to seven dependence criteria; two to four abuse criteria

Moderate to severe

Behavioral and pharmacologic treatment, long-term care management


DSM-IV-TR = Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed., text revision; NIAAA = National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.

*— The NIAAA recommends that men younger than 65 years drink no more than four drinks per day and no more than 14 drinks per week, and that women of any age and men 65 years and older drink no more than three drinks per day and no more than seven drinks per week. One drink is about 14 g of absolute ethanol, which is about 12 oz of beer (5 percent ethanol), 5 oz of wine (12 percent ethanol), or 1.5 oz of 80-proof liquor.

Information from reference 8.

Table 1.   Characteristics of Drinking Behaviors by Drinking Category

View Table

Table 1.

Characteristics of Drinking Behaviors by Drinking Category

Drinking category Percentage of U.S. adults in 2001–2002 Drinking pattern Number of DSM-IV-TR criteria met Degree of disability Treatment

Abstinent or low-risk drinking

70

Less than the NIAAA limits*

None

None

Health promotion

At-risk drinking

21

Above the NIAAA daily limits 12 or more times per year

Zero to two dependence criteria

None

Brief counseling

Harmful drinking

5

Monthly to daily drinking above the NIAAA limits

Zero to two dependence criteria; zero to one abuse criteria

Limited

Brief counseling, addiction-focused behavior therapy

Dependent drinking

3

Six to 10 drinks per day; every day or nearly every day

Three to five dependence criteria; zero to one abuse criteria

Mild to moderate

Behavioral and pharmacologic treatment

Chronic dependent drinking

1

10 or more drinks per day; every day or nearly every day

Six to seven dependence criteria; two to four abuse criteria

Moderate to severe

Behavioral and pharmacologic treatment, long-term care management


DSM-IV-TR = Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed., text revision; NIAAA = National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.

*— The NIAAA recommends that men younger than 65 years drink no more than four drinks per day and no more than 14 drinks per week, and that women of any age and men 65 years and older drink no more than three drinks per day and no more than seven drinks per week. One drink is about 14 g of absolute ethanol, which is about 12 oz of beer (5 percent ethanol), 5 oz of wine (12 percent ethanol), or 1.5 oz of 80-proof liquor.

Information from reference 8.

Figure 1.

Spectrum of drinking and alcohol use disorders with recommended treatment.

View Large


Figure 1.

Spectrum of drinking and alcohol use disorders with recommended treatment.


Figure 1.

Spectrum of drinking and alcohol use disorders with recommended treatment.

Clinical Approach to At-Risk Drinking and Alcohol Use Disorders

Figure 2.

Algorithm for screening, assessing, and treating at-risk drinking and alcohol use disorders. (DSM-IV-TR = Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed., text revision.)

Information from reference 8.

View Large

Clinical Approach to At-Risk Drinking and Alcohol Use Disorders


Figure 2.

Algorithm for screening, assessing, and treating at-risk drinking and alcohol use disorders. (DSM-IV-TR = Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed., text revision.)

Information from reference 8.

Clinical Approach to At-Risk Drinking and Alcohol Use Disorders


Figure 2.

Algorithm for screening, assessing, and treating at-risk drinking and alcohol use disorders. (DSM-IV-TR = Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed., text revision.)

Information from reference 8.

SCREENING

The simplest way to screen a patient for alcohol use disorders or at-risk drinking is to ask how often he or she has exceeded the daily maximum drinking limits in the previous year. This single-question screen has been shown to be as sensitive and specific as other screening methods.11 Addressing the quantity and frequency of drinking can teach the patient about appropriate alcohol limits. Incorporating questions about alcohol consumption into a conversation about other health habits, such as smoking, can decrease patients' defensiveness about drinking.

If your practice is set up for patients to complete a written questionnaire, the 10-item Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT)12 is recommended. It is helpful to accompany the AUDIT with a copy of the NIAAA chart “What's a Standard Drink?” that shows standard sizes of different alcoholic beverages. (Both items are available at http://www.niaaa.nih.gov/guide.) The standard drink chart will help patients accurately answer questions about quantity and frequency of their drinking. The NIAAA sets the standard drink size at about 14 g of absolute ethanol. This equals about 12 oz of beer (5 percent ethanol), 5 oz of wine (12 percent ethanol), or 1.5 oz of 80-proof liquor.8

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends screening adult patients for at-risk drinking13; however, it may be difficult to screen at every patient encounter. There are specific circumstances when screening is particularly important: patients who are likely to drink heavily, such as smokers, adolescents, and young adults; patients who will be taking prescription medication; women who may become pregnant; patients with symptoms that may result from heavy drinking; patients in the emergency department; and patients presenting for routine preventive examinations.

ASSESSMENT

The diagnosis of alcohol use disorders is made using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed., text revision (DSM-IV-TR). The DSM-IV-TR makes a clear distinction between alcohol abuse and dependence (Table 2).14 A diagnosis of alcohol abuse requires meeting one of four abuse criteria without meeting any criteria for alcohol dependence. A diagnosis of alcohol dependence requires meeting three of seven dependence criteria. However, recent research indicates that symptoms of the two categories intermix. For example, it appears that some symptoms of alcohol dependence may occur in milder cases, and some symptoms of alcohol abuse only occur in severe alcohol dependence.15

Table 2.

Diagnostic Criteria for Alcohol Abuse and Dependence

Abuse: Patient must meet one or more criteria without meeting criteria for dependence

Determine whether, in the past 12 months, the patient's drinking has repeatedly caused or contributed to the following:

Risk of bodily harm (drinking and driving, operating machinery, swimming)

Relationship trouble (family or friends)

Role failure (interference with home, work, or school obligations)

Run-ins with the law (arrests or other legal problems)

Dependence: Patient must meet three or more criteria

Determine whether, in the past 12 months, the patient has experienced the following:

Not able to stick to drinking limits (repeatedly exceeded them)

Not able to cut down or stop drinking (repeated failed attempts)

Spent a significant amount of time drinking (or anticipating or recovering from drinking)

Continued drinking despite problems (recurrent physical or psychological problems)

Spent less time on other matters (activities that had been important or pleasurable)

Shown an increase in tolerance (needed to drink more to produce the same effect)

Shown signs of withdrawal (tremors, sweating, or insomnia when trying to quit or cut down)


note: The threshold criterion for any alcohol use disorder is a dysfunctional pattern of substance use causing clinically significant impairment or distress.

Information from reference 14.

Table 2.   Diagnostic Criteria for Alcohol Abuse and Dependence

View Table

Table 2.

Diagnostic Criteria for Alcohol Abuse and Dependence

Abuse: Patient must meet one or more criteria without meeting criteria for dependence

Determine whether, in the past 12 months, the patient's drinking has repeatedly caused or contributed to the following:

Risk of bodily harm (drinking and driving, operating machinery, swimming)

Relationship trouble (family or friends)

Role failure (interference with home, work, or school obligations)

Run-ins with the law (arrests or other legal problems)

Dependence: Patient must meet three or more criteria

Determine whether, in the past 12 months, the patient has experienced the following:

Not able to stick to drinking limits (repeatedly exceeded them)

Not able to cut down or stop drinking (repeated failed attempts)

Spent a significant amount of time drinking (or anticipating or recovering from drinking)

Continued drinking despite problems (recurrent physical or psychological problems)

Spent less time on other matters (activities that had been important or pleasurable)

Shown an increase in tolerance (needed to drink more to produce the same effect)

Shown signs of withdrawal (tremors, sweating, or insomnia when trying to quit or cut down)


note: The threshold criterion for any alcohol use disorder is a dysfunctional pattern of substance use causing clinically significant impairment or distress.

Information from reference 14.

The degree of disability caused by alcohol dependence is associated with the total number of dependence criteria met,3 which may include abuse criteria. Because abuse and dependence symptoms intermingle, most physicians will likely differentiate at-risk drinking from alcohol use disorders based on whether the patient has experienced repeated adverse consequences or is distressed by the inability to control his or her drinking. This differential diagnosis constitutes an important decision because of the difference in treatment strategies for at-risk drinking and for alcohol use disorders. Distinguishing between alcohol abuse and dependence is less important for treatment.

TREATMENT

At-risk drinking and alcohol use disorders are managed differently, but there are similarities in the approaches. It is important for the physician to clearly communicate conclusions and recommendations while keeping a nonjudgmental attitude. Reporting observable facts or endorsed symptoms, and explaining the relationship between drinking and other medical concerns is appropriate.

After stating the initial assessment and recommendations, the physician should briefly assess the patient's motivation for treatment by asking, “Are you willing to consider changing your drinking habits at this time?” Patients may express some willingness to consider change, but may also appear ambivalent or uncertain. Exploring the uncertainty and mixed feelings with patients is helpful, as is discussing the pros and cons of changing drinking behaviors. It should become clear during this discussion whether the patient is ready to commit to treatment.

Managing At-Risk Drinking. At-risk drinkers who are willing to change their drinking habits respond well to motivational counseling.13 The physician and patient should agree on a goal, such as abstaining from alcohol or staying within set limits. The NIAAA Web site (http://www.niaaa.nih.gov/guide) offers patient education handouts on standard drink sizes and drinking limits, strategies for cutting down or abstaining from drinking, and calendars to keep track of drinking. Setting regular follow-up appointments will reinforce the behavior changes and help prevent reversion to previous drinking patterns.

Patients who are unwilling to commit to a specific goal may still benefit from education materials about recommended limits and strategies for cutting down alcohol intake. Physicians should express interest in helping these patients reduce their drinking when they are ready. Changing health behavior is not easy, and repeated attention from the physician over time is often needed.

Managing Alcohol Use Disorders. For patients with moderate to severe alcohol use disorders (i.e., those meeting five or more DSM-IV-TR criteria for alcohol abuse or dependence), it is best to recommend abstinence from alcohol. At-risk drinkers and those with mild alcohol use disorders are often able to reduce their drinking successfully; however, as the severity of the alcohol use disorder increases, the number of persons who can continue to drink at reduced amounts without relapse drops markedly.5

The physician should assess any withdrawal symptoms associated with cessation of drinking and treat accordingly. For alcohol-dependent patients who endorse a goal of abstinence, pharmacotherapy should be considered. Several medications have been shown to reduce the risk of relapse in early recovery, including oral naltrexone (Revia), long-acting injectable naltrexone (Vivitrol), acamprosate (Campral), and topiramate (Topamax).1618 Naltrexone and acamprosate have been tested primarily in patients who are abstinent at the initiation of treatment, whereas topiramate has demonstrated effectiveness in patients who are still drinking at the time of trial entry.18 Patients who do not respond to one medication should be offered a trial of another. There is no research suggesting a particular order in which to prescribe medications for alcohol dependence, nor are there patient characteristics that reliably predict response to a certain medication. Also, there is no demonstrated benefit to combining medications, although not all medication combinations have been tested.10,19 Brief behavioral support, similar to disease management for other disorders, should be provided in conjunction with medication.

Some physicians may choose to refer patients with alcohol dependence to an addiction specialist or treatment program. Considerable research supports the effectiveness of specialized treatment.20 Because many treatment programs do not offer medication, physicians should consider prescribing medication in patients attending community support groups or specialty rehabilitation treatment. Although most medication trials range from 12 to 16 weeks, it is reasonable to continue medication treatment for six to 12 months because of the high risk of relapse. All patients should be encouraged to participate in community support groups such as Alcoholics Anonymous. Many patients are able to combine pharmacotherapy and support group participation successfully.10

TRACKING PROGRESS

The physician should systematically obtain information about the patient's quantity and frequency of drinking at each follow-up visit. Useful metrics include how many days the patient drank per month (including total days and heavy drinking days), how many drinks per typical drinking day, and the maximum number of drinks in one day. This allows the patient and the physician to monitor progress. For patients with initially elevated levels of serum gamma-glutamyl transferase or carbohydrate-deficient transferrin, monitoring these levels can be useful adjuncts to the patient's self-reported progress. Tracking these outcomes notifies the physician when the patient's progress has fallen short of the goal.

Managing Chronic Alcohol Dependence

Most persons recovering from severe alcohol dependence define a good outcome as permanent abstinence from drinking alcohol.21 However, clinical reality is more complex, and successful clinical management requires a more nuanced approach. About one third of persons meeting dependence criteria at some point in their life have a relatively brief course of heavy drinking during late adolescence and early adulthood.6 Most of these persons fully recover as they mature into adults, and 40 percent eventually become stable low-risk drinkers.5,22 Almost none of these persons receives treatment,6 and physicians are most likely to encounter them only if they present with acute trauma.

Another 40 percent of persons meeting these criteria develop dependence mid-life, and are more likely to have a family history of alcohol dependence, and anxiety or depression.6 This group also has relatively mild alcohol dependence (i.e., meeting three to four dependence criteria). Most continue to function reasonably well and eventually remit after a few years. This group is likely to present to a primary care physician and have excellent prognosis for full recovery, including nonabstinent recovery (i.e., engaging only in low-risk drinking and not meeting any criteria for an alcohol use disorder).5,22

Only about one third of persons who meet dependence criteria at some point have early-onset, severe alcohol dependence (i.e., meeting five to seven dependence criteria), which is characterized by a strong family history of alcohol dependence, antisocial behavior, significant disability, and a chronic or recurrent course.6 This is the group most prominent in public discourse. Most patients in treatment programs and members of Alcoholics Anonymous fall into this group.5,23 Although many persons with recurrent dependence eventually make a full recovery, most will have at least occasional relapses, and some will never achieve full recovery.

To determine whether a patient with chronic alcohol dependence is responding to treatment, it is helpful to distinguish between the goal of treatment and the outcome. The goal of all treatment is full, permanent recovery, defined as either abstinence or low-risk drinking without any alcohol-related problems. However, as with other medical treatments, the actual outcome often falls short of the ideal. It is important to realize that even if the goal is not reached, the outcome may still be acceptable. Outcomes may be roughly divided into recovery, response, and nonresponse, with response indicating a significant improvement without full recovery. For example, the patient's number of heavy drinking days per month may decrease significantly, or the length of abstinent periods may increase while the severity and length of relapses decrease. This approach resembles that used for other chronic or recurrent disorders, such as diabetes, asthma, or depression. It is also a highly intuitive approach.

However, as with any chronic disease, distinguishing between response and nonresponse requires the use of quantitative outcome measurements, such as glycosylated hemoglobin, forced expiratory volume in one second, or the nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire score.24 For alcohol dependence, the easiest measures to use are number of heavy drinking days per month and number of drinks per typical week.

Final Comments

Repeated or long-term continuous treatment may be necessary for chronic or recurrent alcohol dependence. Care management is effective for patients with alcohol dependence who have serious alcohol-related medical disorders, such as liver disease.2527 If patients are encouraged to stop drinking during preventive care visits, many will decrease the frequency and quantity of drinking, and eventually achieve stable abstinence. Changing health behavior is difficult, characterized by periods of improvement and reversion to previous behavior. Patients often initiate change attempts repeatedly before achieving a healthy stability. Even when full recovery is not achieved, care management can reduce complications and lengthen meaningful life. The primary care physician can make a difference across the entire spectrum of care for heavy drinking and alcohol use disorders.

The Authors

MARK L. WILLENBRING, MD, is director of the Division of Treatment and Recovery Research at the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA), National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services in Bethesda, Md. He is also a practicing psychiatrist in the Washington, DC, area and serves as clinical professor of psychiatry at the George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC.

SUENA H. MASSEY, MD, is an assistant professor of psychiatry at the George Washington University School of Medicine.

MAUREEN B. GARDNER is a writer and editor for the NIAAA, and coauthor of the NIAAA's “Helping Patients Who Drink Too Much: A Clinician's Guide.”

Address correspondence to Mark L. Willenbring, MD, NIAAA/NIH, 5635 Fishers Ln., Room 2047, Bethesda, MD 20892 (e-mail: mlw@niaaa.nih.gov). Reprints are not available from the authors.

Author disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

REFERENCES

1. Dawson DA, Li TK, Grant BF. A prospective study of risk drinking: at risk for what? Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008;95(1–2):62–72.

2. Mokdad AH, Marks JS, Stroup DF, Gerberding JL. Actual causes of death in the United States, 2000 [published corrections appear in JAMA. 2005;293(3):293–294,298]. JAMA. 2004;291(10):1238–1245.

3. Hasin DS, Stinson FS, Ogburn E, Grant BF. Prevalence, correlates, disability, and comorbidity of DSM-IV alcohol abuse and dependence in the United States: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007;64(7):830–842.

4. Dawson DA, Grant BF, Li TK. Quantifying the risks associated with exceeding recommended drinking limits. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2005;29(5):902–908.

5. Dawson DA, Grant BF, Stinson FS, Chou PS, Huang B, Ruan WJ. Recovery from DSM-IV alcohol dependence: United States, 2001–2002. Addiction. 2005;100(3):281–292.

6. Moss HB, Chen CM, Yi HY. Subtypes of alcohol dependence in a nationally representative sample. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007;91(2–3):149–158.

7. McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, et al. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(26):2635–2645.

8. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Institue on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. Helping patients who drink too much: a clinician's guide. Bethesda, Md: National Institue on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism 2007NIH publication no. 07–3769. http://pubs.niaaa.nih.gov/publications/Practitioner/CliniciansGuide2005/guide.pdf. Accessed February 27, 2009.

9. Cisler RA, Kowalchuk RK, Saunders SM, Zweben A, Trinh HQ. Applying clinical significance methodology to alcoholism treatment trials: determining recovery outcome status with individual- and population-based measures. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2005;29(11):1991–2000.

10. Anton RF, O'Malley SS, Ciraulo DA, et al. Combined pharmacotherapies and behavioral interventions for alcohol dependence: the COMBINE study: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2006;295(17):2003–2017.

11. Smith PC, Schmidt SM, Allensworth-Davies D, Saitz R. Primary care validation of a single-question alcohol screening test J Gen Intern Med. 2009. http://www.springerlink.com/content/86621t3106216032/fulltext.html. Published February 27, 2009. Accessed May 5, 2009.

12. Babor TF, Higgins-Biddle JC, Saunders JB, Monteiro MG. AUDIT: The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test, Guidelines for Use in Primary Care. 2nd edGeneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization 2001

13. Whitlock EP, Polen MR, Green CA, Orleans T, Klein J. Behavioral counseling interventions in primary care to reduce risky/harmful alcohol use by adults: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140(7):557–568.

14. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed text revision.Washington, DC.American Psychiatric Association 2000213–214.

15. Saha TD, Chou SP, Grant BF. Toward an alcohol use disorder continuum using item response theory: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Psychol Med. 2006;36(7):931–941.

16. Mann K, Lehert P, Morgan MY. The efficacy of acamprosate in the maintenance of abstinence in alcohol-dependent individuals: results of a meta-analysis. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2004;28(1):51–63.

17. Srisurapanont M, Jarusuraisin N. Naltrexone for the treatment of alcoholism: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Neuropsy-chopharmacol. 2005;8(2):267–280.

18. Johnson BA, Rosenthal N, Capece JA, et al., for the Topiramate for Alcoholism Advisory Board and the Topiramate for Alcoholism Study Group. Topiramate for treating alcohol dependence: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2007;298(14):1641–1651.

19. Petrakis I, Ralevski E, Nich C, et al., for the VA VISN I MIRECC Study Group. Naltrexone and disulfiram in patients with alcohol dependence and current depression. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2007;27(2):160–165.

20. Miller WR, Walters ST, Bennett ME. How effective is alcoholism treatment in the United States? J Stud Alcohol. 2001;62(2):211–220.

21. Laudet AB. What does recovery mean to you? Lessons from the recovery experience for research and practice. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2007;33(3):243–256.

22. Dawson DA, Grant BF, Stinson FS, Chou PS. Maturing out of alcohol dependence: the impact of transitional life events. J Stud Alcohol. 2006;67(2):195–203.

23. Fein G, Landman B. Treated and treatment-naive alcoholics come from different populations [published correction appears in Alcohol. 2005;36(2):137–138]. Alcohol. 2005;35(1):19–26.

24. Dietrich AJ, Oxman TE, Burns MR, Winchell CW, Chin T. Application of a depression management office system in community practice: a demonstration. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2003;16(2):107–114.

25. Lieber CS, Weiss DG, Groszmann R, Paronetto F, Schenker S. I. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study of polyenylphosphatidylcholine in alcoholic liver disease: effects on drinking behavior by nurse/physician teams. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2003;27(11):1757–1764.

26. Willenbring ML, Olson DH. A randomized trial of integrated out-patient treatment for medically ill alcoholic men. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159(16):1946–1952.

27. Willenbring ML, Olson DH, Bielinski J. Integrated outpatients treatment for medically ill alcoholic men: results from a quasi-experimental study. J Stud Alcohol. 1995;56(3):337–343.



Copyright © 2009 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact afpserv@aafp.org for copyright questions and/or permission requests.

Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions


Article Tools

  • Download PDF
  • Print page
  • Share this page
  • AFP CME Quiz

Information From Industry

More in Pubmed

Navigate this Article