Tips from Other Journals

TIV More Effective Than LAIV at Preventing Influenza A in Adults



FREE PREVIEW Log in or buy this issue to read the full article. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles. Subscribe now.


FREE PREVIEW Subscribe or buy this issue. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles.

Am Fam Physician. 2009 Nov 1;80(9):991.

Background: Live, attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) has been reported to be more effective in children than the trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (TIV); however, comparative effectiveness in adults is unknown. Monto and colleagues previously studied the protective effect of the two vaccine types for the 2004–2005 and 2005–2006 influenza seasons. Although the data suggested that TIV was more effective in adults, a conclusive answer was hampered by relatively low influenza rates in these years. In contrast, influenza-related morbidity was higher in the 2007–2008 influenza season, which allowed for additional analysis by the authors in this study.

The Study: The authors conducted a randomized, double-blind trial of healthy adults 18 to 49 years of age. Patients were excluded for having health conditions for which TIV was specifically recommended and for whom either vaccine was contraindicated. Participants were randomized to receive one of four interventions: an intramuscular injection of TIV (Fluzone, Sanofi Pasteur) or placebo, or an intranasal spray of LAIV (Flumist, Medimmune) or placebo. The primary end point was symptomatic illness that was confirmed as influenza A or B by a cell culture or a real-time polymerase chain reaction assay.

Results: The study followed 1,952 participants, in whom no serious vaccine-related sequelae were reported. Overall, 119 participants (6.1 percent) had laboratory-confirmed symptomatic influenza, with 108 (90.8 percent) having influenza A and 11 (9.2 percent) having influenza B. Absolute effectiveness in preventing influenza A was 72 percent for TIV, compared with 29 percent for LAIV; TIV was 60 percent more effective. Too few cases were identified to compare vaccine effectiveness in preventing influenza B.

Conclusion: TIV and LAIV protect healthy adults against laboratory-confirmed symptomatic influenza A, although the inactivated vaccine is markedly more effective in this population. The authors mention that prior evidence has suggested that LAIV is more effective in children, particularly in those younger than six years, and that we may be entering a new era of influenza control in which different types of vaccines may be appropriate for different age groups.

Source

Monto AS, et al. Comparative efficacy of inactivated and live attenuated influenza vaccines. N Engl J Med. September 24, 2009;361(13):1260–1267.



Copyright © 2009 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact afpserv@aafp.org for copyright questions and/or permission requests.

Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions


Article Tools

  • Print page
  • Share this page
  • AFP CME Quiz

Information From Industry

Navigate this Article