Am Fam Physician. 2010 Jan 1;81(1):15.
Original Article: Ethical Considerations of Patients with Pacemakers (Curbside Consultation)
Issue Date: August 1, 2008
Available at: http://www.aafp.org/afp/2008/0801/p398.html
to the editor: I read the Curbside Consultation, “Ethical Considerations of Patients with Pacemakers,” with amusement and consternation. The authors of the commentary section highlight the dilemma associated with technology intended to extend a person's life and enhance the quality of their life. They present a case of a terminally ill patient who had clearly conveyed his wishes that any therapy prolonging the dying process be withdrawn. In this scenario, the ethical dilemma, though not immediately answerable, is at least discernible given one's religious and philosophical perspectives. What concerns me about the article is the authors' recommendation about how to determine if a pacemaker is life prolonging. They state, “In [this] case, the pacemaker was placed for complete heart block and was prolonging the dying process.” The authors suggest that the easiest way to determine if a pacemaker is prolonging the dying process is to interrogate the device. If the rhythm is completely dependent on the pacemaker, it is considered to be life prolonging, and, thus, turning it off is justifiable.
This assertion made me chuckle and cringe. Being the recipient of a pacemaker two years ago, I am completely dependent on the device. During a recent routine pacemaker interrogation, a young technician turned the pacemaker off to determine my underlying rhythm. There was none. I am glad that he had the good sense to turn it back on rather than to assume that it was prolonging my dying process. We are all in the process of dying. Knowing how and when we are going to die is a more complicated question than a pacemaker can answer.
Author disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Send letters to email@example.com, or 11400 Tomahawk Creek Pkwy., Leawood, KS 66211-2680. Include your complete address, e-mail address, and telephone number. Letters should be fewer than 400 words and limited to six references, one table or figure, and three authors.
Letters submitted for publication in AFP must not be submitted to any other publication. Possible conflicts of interest must be disclosed at time of submission. Submission of a letter will be construed as granting the AAFP permission to publish the letter in any of its publications in any form. The editors may edit letters to meet style and space requirements.
This series is coordinated by Kenny Lin, MD, MPH, Associate Deputy Editor for AFP Online.
Copyright © 2010 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact firstname.lastname@example.org for copyright questions and/or permission requests.
Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions