Tips from Other Journals

Antiviral Medications for Pregnant Women Exposed to Influenza



FREE PREVIEW Log in or buy this issue to read the full article. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles. Subscribe now.


FREE PREVIEW Subscribe or buy this issue. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles.

Am Fam Physician. 2010 Feb 1;81(3):333-337.

Background: Pregnant women have increased rates of hospitalization, morbidity, and mortality from seasonal influenza. Poor outcomes in pregnant women have also been reported from previous influenza pandemics, and in the initial data from the current novel influenza A (H1N1) pandemic. Nevertheless, many barriers exist to vaccine protection of pregnant women. Vaccines may not be available or may offer incomplete protection, and pregnant women may refuse or not have access to immunization. Antiviral medications may provide useful postexposure prophylaxis. Lee and colleagues developed a computer simulation model to predict the potential economic effect of antiviral medications for influenza postexposure prophylaxis in pregnant women.

The Study: The authors used epidemiologic data to construct a decision analysis model representing the decision to administer antiviral medication to a pregnant woman who may have been exposed to influenza through a close contact. The model incorporated the degree of exposure risk, antiviral drug effectiveness and cost, and the probability of potential outcomes such as hospitalization, preterm delivery, and mortality. Costs were estimated for the duration of the pregnancy. The antivirals considered were oseltamivir (Tamiflu), zanamivir (Relenza), amantadine (Symmetrel), and rimantadine (Flumadine). Each simulation was based on 1,000 healthy pregnant women with an average age of 27 years.

Results: For seasonal influenza, the routine use of antiviral medications in pregnant women was not cost-effective. Assuming usual attack and virulence rates, more women had adverse effects than experienced benefit. Conversely, antivirals were cost-effective in a range of H1N1 scenarios. The degree of benefit was strongly influenced by the attack rate, probability of preterm birth in infected women, outcomes for preterm neonates, and probability of influenza-related hospitalization. The outcomes were not influenced substantially by maternal age, but did change notably with gestational age. Before 20 weeks of gestation, the model favored not using prophylaxis, even with high attack rates (up to 30 percent). After 20 weeks of gestation, antiviral use was beneficial in all cases when the attack rate was 20 percent or higher. The model suggested that medications remained cost-effective until viral resistance caused effectiveness to drop to less than 30 percent.

Conclusion: The authors conclude that, among pregnant women, routine postexposure prophylaxis with antivirals is not recommended for seasonal influenza, but is beneficial in pandemic situations.

ANNE D. WALLING, MD

Source

Lee BY, et al. Antiviral medications for pregnant women for pandemic and seasonal influenza: an economic computer model. Obstet Gynecol. November 2009;114(5):971–980.



Copyright © 2010 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact afpserv@aafp.org for copyright questions and/or permission requests.

Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions


Article Tools

  • Print page
  • Share this page
  • AFP CME Quiz

Information From Industry

Navigate this Article