Practice Guidelines

ACEP Releases Guidelines on Evaluation of Suspected Acute Appendicitis



FREE PREVIEW Log in or buy this issue to read the full article. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles. Subscribe now.


FREE PREVIEW Subscribe or buy this issue. AAFP members and paid subscribers get free access to all articles.

Am Fam Physician. 2010 Apr 15;81(8):1043-1044.

Guideline source: American College of Emergency Physicians

Literature search described? Yes

Evidence rating system used? Yes

Published source: Annals of Emergency Medicine, January 2010

Available at: http://www.annemergmed.com/issues/contents?issue_key=S0196-0644(09)X0014-4

Abdominal pain is a common presenting symptom, accounting for nearly 7 percent of emergency department visits in 2005. Although the diagnosis of acute appendicitis is often straightforward, some patients may have early or atypical signs and symptoms that make the diagnosis more challenging. Despite the increasing use of computed tomography (CT) in patients with suspected appendicitis, such widespread use may not be necessary. Clinical indicators, such as laboratory findings and patient signs and symptoms, can help determine which patients with abdominal pain require abdominal CT.

The American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) has developed evidence-based recommendations to help physicians judge which clinical findings are most useful for guiding decision making in patients with suspected acute appendicitis. The guidelines also address the use of contrast dye in imaging and the choice of imaging modality in children.

Clinical Findings

Not every patient with suspected acute appendicitis requires abdominal imaging. Clinical findings should be used to risk stratify patients to guide decisions about further testing, including the need for CT. Right lower quadrant abdominal pain is the most helpful clinical sign; pain migration and progression are less helpful. Laboratory testing should include both a white blood cell count and a C-reactive protein level. Neither test consistently confirms or excludes the diagnosis of acute appendicitis when used alone.

The Alvarado score combines clinical and laboratory findings to assign a score from 0 to 10 (Table 1). Theoretically, higher Alvarado scores are associated with a higher likelihood of appendicitis. However, it is unclear whether the score can reliably predict the need for CT, and imaging is recommended even in patients with low scores.

Table 1.

Alvarado Scoring for Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis

Finding Value*

Clinical signs

Oral temperature > 37.3°C (99.1°F)

1

Rebound pain

1

Right lower quadrant abdominal tenderness

2

Symptoms

Anorexia or acetone in urine

1

Nausea and vomiting

1

Pain migration

1

Laboratory findings

Leukocytosis (> 10,000 cells per mm3 [10 ×109 per L])

2

Shift to left (> 75% neutrophils)

1


*— Total score of 1 to 4 = appendicitis unlikely; 5 or 6 = appendicitis possible; 7 or 8 = appendicitis probable; 9 or 10 = appendicitis very probable.

Adapted with permission from Alvarado A. A practical score for the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Ann Emerg Med. 1986;15(5):561.

Table 1.   Alvarado Scoring for Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis

View Table

Table 1.

Alvarado Scoring for Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis

Finding Value*

Clinical signs

Oral temperature > 37.3°C (99.1°F)

1

Rebound pain

1

Right lower quadrant abdominal tenderness

2

Symptoms

Anorexia or acetone in urine

1

Nausea and vomiting

1

Pain migration

1

Laboratory findings

Leukocytosis (> 10,000 cells per mm3 [10 ×109 per L])

2

Shift to left (> 75% neutrophils)

1


*— Total score of 1 to 4 = appendicitis unlikely; 5 or 6 = appendicitis possible; 7 or 8 = appendicitis probable; 9 or 10 = appendicitis very probable.

Adapted with permission from Alvarado A. A practical score for the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Ann Emerg Med. 1986;15(5):561.

The diagnosis of acute appendicitis is challenging in children, especially in infants and toddlers. Missed or delayed diagnosis can result in perforation, which can cause longer hospital stays, bowel obstruction, and sepsis. Five findings that are consistently associated with appendicitis have been identified in children: nausea, focal right lower quadrant abdominal pain, difficulty walking, rebound tenderness, and an absolute neutrophil count of greater than 6,750 cells per mm3 (6.75 × 109 per L).

Contrast Dye

Once the decision is made to use imaging to help diagnose acute appendicitis, physicians must determine whether to use contrast dye. Intravenous contrast dye highlights inflammation in the wall of the appendix and in the tissue around the appendix; enteric contrast dye helps differentiate the appendix from the surrounding structures. However, oral contrast dye requires time to administer and to transit the bowel, and patients with abdominal pain and vomiting may not tolerate it. Although rectal contrast dye requires less time, patients may find it uncomfortable or unacceptable. Intravenous contrast dye may lead to a severe allergic reaction or renal failure.

In most studies of abdominal and pelvic CT for the evaluation of acute appendicitis in adults, CT performed reasonably well, regardless of whether contrast dye was used. The addition of enteric and intravenous contrast dye improves diagnostic accuracy, but only by a small degree, and the use of oral contrast dye confers no diagnostic benefit.

Diagnostic Imaging in Children

Abdominal and pelvic CT can be used in children to confirm or rule out acute appendicitis. However, CT is expensive and exposes the patient to ionizing radiation. For these reasons, physicians should consider using ultrasonography as the initial imaging modality. Ultrasonography is fast, safe, well tolerated, and does not expose the patient to radiation. It can confirm the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children, but it cannot definitively rule out the condition. If the diagnosis remains uncertain after ultrasonography, CT can be performed.

Coverage of guidelines from other organizations does not imply endorsement by AFP or the AAFP.


Copyright © 2010 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact afpserv@aafp.org for copyright questions and/or permission requests.

Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions


Article Tools

  • Print page
  • Share this page
  • AFP CME Quiz

Information From Industry

Navigate this Article