Tips from Other Journals

SPECT V/Q Scintigraphy Is an Option for Diagnosing Pulmonary Embolism


FREE PREVIEW. AAFP members and paid subscribers: Log in to get free access. All others: Purchase online access.

FREE PREVIEW. Purchase online access to read the full version of this article.

Am Fam Physician. 2010 Sep 1;82(5):531-532.

Background: Computed tomography (CT) pulmonary angiography is up to 90 percent sensitive and 95 percent specific for diagnosing pulmonary embolism, and has largely replaced traditional ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scintigraphy for this purpose. However, up to 24 percent of patients with acute pulmonary embolism have relative contraindications to CT pulmonary angiography. For instance, CT pulmonary angiography's high radiation dose (10 to 50 mGy) to breast tissue of premenopausal and pregnant women can exceed the levels shown to increase cancer risk, and the associated intravenous contrast media can cause complications from contrast allergy or renal impairment. Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) V/Q scintigraphy has the potential to use much less radiation (e.g., 0.28 mGy), and maintains a similar level of accuracy as CT pulmonary angiography in detecting pulmonary embolism. Miles and colleagues compared SPECT V/Q scintigraphy with CT pulmonary angiography to determine the best method for diagnosing pulmonary embolism.

The Study: The authors conducted a prospective observational study of patients 50 years and older with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism. Participants were scheduled to have CT pulmonary angiography and both traditional and SPECT V/Q scintigraphy within 24 hours of presentation. Deidentified scans were reviewed by two radiologists (CT pulmonary angiography) or nuclear medicine subspecialists (traditional and SPECT V/Q scans, presented separately). Exclusion criteria included renal insufficiency and inability to complete CT pulmonary angiography and V/Q scanning within 24 hours.

Results: A total of 83 patients received both CT pulmonary angiography and V/Q scanning, but four of these CT pulmonary angiography scans were nondiagnostic. In the remaining 79 patients, CT pulmonary angiography and SPECT V/Q scans were similar regarding the presence or absence of pulmonary embolism 95 percent of the time. None of the four patients who had discordant CT pulmonary angiography and SPECT V/Q results were clinically diagnosed with pulmonary embolism, and they remained in good health three months later. When compared with the reference diagnosis using clinical data and CT pulmonary angiography results, SPECT V/Q scintigraphy had a sensitivity of 83 percent and a specificity of 98 percent in diagnosing pulmonary embolism, with positive and negative predictive values of 95 and 94 percent, respectively.

Conclusion: The authors conclude that SPECT V/Q scintigraphy is a viable alternative to CT pulmonary angiography for diagnosing pulmonary embolism, and uses substantially less radiation. They recommend SPECT V/Q scintigraphy for patients in whom CT pulmonary angiography is contraindicated, such as those with allergy, renal impairment, diabetes mellitus, or critical illness, and in women who have proliferating breast tissue.


Miles S, et al. A comparison of single-photon emission CT lung scintigraphy and CT pulmonary angiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Chest. December 2009;136(6):1546–1553.


Copyright © 2010 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contact for copyright questions and/or permission requests.

Want to use this article elsewhere? Get Permissions

Information From Industry

More in AFP

Email Alerts

Don't miss a single issue. Sign up for the free AFP email table of contents.

Sign Up Now

Navigate this Article